Retrograde tibial nail: anatomical implantation and surgical feasibility study.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The treatment of distal tibial fractures requires a stable fixation while minimizing the secondary trauma to the soft tissues by the surgical approach and implant. The experimental Retrograde Tibial Nail is currently investigated as a minimally invasive alternative to plating and antegrade nailing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical feasibility in a cadaver model for all distal tibial fracture types generally considered treatable by nailing. MATERIAL AND METHODS Five different fracture types (AO/OTA 43-A1/A2/A3 and 43-C1/C2) were created on separate cadaveric limbs. In simple fractures (AO/OTA 43-A1/A2/A3) primary nailing was performed. In intraarticular fractures (AO/OTA 43-C1/2) reduction of the articular block and lag screw fixation was performed before nailing. Intraoperative complications, quality of reduction, fluoroscopy duration and operative time were evaluated. RESULTS Retrograde intramedullary nailing is feasible in simple fracture types by closed manual reduction and percutaneous reduction forceps. Retrograde nailing is possible in fractures with simple intraarticular involvement after primary lag screw fixation. The duration of surgery averaged 51.8 minutes (range 40-62 min). No major complications occurred during nailing. CONCLUSIONS The minimally invasive retrograde nail combines a minimally invasive local osteosynthesis with the ability to adequately fix extraarticular and simple intraarticular distal tibial fractures. The results suggests that retrograde tibia nailing is a promising new concept for the treatment of distal tibia fractures. Key words: minimally invasive surgery, tibia, metaphyseal fractures, intramedullary nailing, retrograde nailing.

Fragility fractures of the pelvis: should they be fixed?

Due to the aging population, there is an increasing number of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP). They are the result of low energy trauma. The bone breaks but the ligaments remain intact. Immobilizing pain at the pubic region or at the sacrum is the main symptom. Conventional radiographs reveal pubic rami fractures, but lesions of the dorsal pelvis are hardly visible and easily overlooked. CT of the pelvis with multiplanar reconstructions show the real extension of the lesion. Most patients have a history of osteoporosis or other fragility fractures. The new classification distinguishes between four categories of different and increasing instability. FFP Type I are anterior lesions only, FFP Type II are non-displaced posterior lesions, FFP Type III are displaced unilateral posterior lesions and FFP Type IV are displaced bilateral posterior lesions. Subgroups discriminate between the localization of the dorsal instability. FFP Type I lesions are treated non-operatively. FFP Type II lesions are fixed in a percutaneous procedure when a trial of conservative treatment was not successful. FFP Type III lesions are treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). FFP Type IV lesions are treated with bilateral ORIF or with a bridging osteosynthesis. Iliosacral screw osteosynthesis is widely used, but has an elevated risk of screw loosening due to diminished bine mineral density. Transsacral bar osteosynthesis enable interfragmentary compression and does not have this danger of loosening. Bridging plate osteosynthesis is used as an additional fixation to iliosacral screw osteosynthesis. Lumbopelvic fixation is restricted to highly unstable lumbopelvic dissociations. More studies are needed to find the optimal treatment for each type of instability. Key words: pelvis, fragility fracture, diagnosis, classification, treatment.

[Nailing of metaphyseal fractures]. / Nagelung metaphysärer Frakturen.

Nailing of metaphyseal fractures demands thorough preoperative planning. The trauma surgeon has to take the specific morphology of the fracture, the individual anatomy of the broken bone, and the design and characteristics of the selected implant into consideration. The fracture has to be precisely reduced and the reduction controlled during nail insertion. The reduction technique and reduction aids must be chosen preoperatively. The nail has to be introduced with care and brought to its correct and ideal position. Only after successful proximal and distal interlocking can the nail become the central weight bearing implant, which holds the fracture stable and reduced. In the following contribution, the specific problems of reduction and nail fixation of metaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus, proximal and distal femur, and proximal and distal tibia together with the needed reduction and fixation aids are presented.

Intramedullary nailing after external fixation of the femur and tibia: a review of advantages and limits.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: External fixation is a safe option for stabilisation of extremity lesions in the polytraumatised patient as well as in fractures with severe soft tissue damage. Nevertheless, long-term-complications are to be expected when external fixation is chosen as a definitive treatment. The purpose of this review article is twofold: primarily, to define the rationale of a procedural change from an external fixator to an intramedullary nail; secondarily, to assess the possible advantages and pitfalls of a single- or two-staged procedure. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: External fixation of the femur is recommended in multiply injured patients who are critically ill to avoid an additional inflammatory response caused by the surgical trauma of primary nailing. The conversion towards nailing must be done as soon as the clinical condition of the patient has been stabilised. Stable polytraumatised patients do not benefit from initial stabilisation with an external fixator and should immediately be treated with a definitive osteosynthesis. In tibial fractures, external fixation followed by intramedullary nailing is recommendable in fractures with severe soft tissue injuries. Conversion should be done as soon as the soft tissues allow before pin-tract infections occur and performed in a one-staged procedure.

The role of intramedullary nailing in treatment of open fractures.

The management of open fractures remains one of the greatest challenges to orthopedic trauma surgeons. Damage to the soft tissue envelope together with periosteal stripping are the most important factors making open fractures prone to complications such as nonunion and infection. Urgent and thorough soft tissue debridement, proper surgical fracture stabilization as well as the administration of intravenous and local antibiotics as adjunctive therapy are mandatory to reduce the risk of infection. Intramedullary nail osteosynthesis has become an accepted treatment method of open long bone fractures. Especially at sites of sparse soft tissue coverage like the proximal and distal tibia, early intramedullary stabilization proved advantageous for its superior biomechanical stability, the chance of early soft tissue reconstruction, shorter healing times, and quicker rehabilitation. However, due to a potential risk of deep infection, especially when a reamed technique is applied, nailing of open fractures remains contentious. In this review, we focus on the current evidence of nail osteosynthesis in open fractures and delineate its value with respect to other possible treatment options.