Ruxolitinib Adherence in Myelofibrosis and Polycythemia Vera: the "RAMP" Italian multicenter prospective study.

Ruxolitinib is beneficial in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) and polycythemia vera (PV). Information on ruxolitinib adherence is scant. The Ruxolitinib Adherence in Myelofibrosis and Polycythemia Vera (RAMP) prospective multicenter study (NCT06078319) included 189 ruxolitinib-treated patients. Patients completed the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) and Distress Thermometer and Problem List (DTPL) at the earliest convenience, after registration in the study, and at later timepoints. At week-0, low adherence (ARMS > 14) and high distress (DT ≥ 4) were declared by 49.7% and 40.2% of patients, respectively. The main reason for low adherence was difficult ruxolitinib supply (49%), intentional (4.3%) and unintentional (46.7%) non-take. In multivariable regression analysis, low adherence was associated to male sex (p = 0.001), high distress (p < 0.001), and treatment duration ≥ 1 year (p = 0.03). Over time, rates of low adherence and high distress remained stable, but unintentional non-take decreased from 47.9% to 26.0% at week-48. MF patients with stable high adherence/low distress were more likely to obtain/maintain the spleen response at week-24. Low adherence to ruxolitinib represents an unmet clinical need that require a multifaceted approach, based on reason behind it (patients characteristics and treatment duration). Its recognition may help distinguishing patients who are truly refractory and those in need of therapy optimization.

Tapering and discontinuation of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in immune thrombocytopenia: Real-world recommendations.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are currently indicated for continuous treatment of chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, there is growing evidence that TPO-RAs can also trigger sustained response in 10-30% of cases after treatment tapering and discontinuation. Therefore, at least for selected responding patients, it might be rational to plan TPO-RA interruption to exploit off-treatment response. Intriguingly, complete or partial responses with TPO-RAs are frequently observed when treatments are initiated early, suggesting that unknown immune-related mechanisms may be involved in this phenomenon. The sustained responses observed after interruption of TPO-RAs may be interpreted as a recovery of immunological tolerance; thus, the re-establishment of immunological equilibrium might be primarily responsible for the observed off-treatment effect. Importantly, these findings may indicate that anticipated TPO-RA usage can lead to improved responses, and that optimized tapering and interruption in selected patients can furthermore improve prognoses. On the base of this rationale, a series of real-life considerations have been generated by a panel of Experts to elucidate possible novel criteria and modalities to identify subgroups of patients who can benefit from tapering and/or discontinuation of TPO-RAs. Towards this aim, the results of a survey of ITP experts are herein reported, reflecting a snapshot of current real-life experience on early discontinuation of TPO-RA-based therapy. The present manuscript also highlights the importance of future translational studies on novel prognostic and predictive biomarkers that can stratify patients and facilitate the clinical choice for second-line treatment of ITP.

Safety and tolerability of infliximab therapy: suggestions and criticisms based on wide clinical experience.

Infliximab, an IgG1 monoclonal chimeric antibody against tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, represents the main biological drug employed for the treatment of several immuno-mediated inflammatory disorders. Infliximab infusion can be complicated by clinically heterogeneous adverse reactions, potentially interfering with the course of treatment. We analysed the adverse events recorded in 49 patients affected by different chronic inflammatory disorders (rheumatoid arthritis, seronegative spondyloarthritis, Behçet's disease, Wegener's granulomatosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, Cogan's disease) who were receiving a total of 709 infliximab infusions, in order to correlate the development of infliximab reactions and their features to some potential risk factors. We displayed a lower frequency of infusion reactions (1.5 percent; 11 out of 709 infusions) than those previously reported. However, patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis and/or patients who underwent re-treatment after a long period, showed a higher prevalence of infliximab-related reactions. In conclusion, in our experience infliximab treatment is rarely complicated by adverse reactions which are, more importantly, almost always mild. Some good clinical practices, such as the low rate of infusion, pre-treatment with anti-histamine and prednisone in all patients, chronic immunosuppressive therapy and avoidance of long intervals between infusions may represent a combined useful strategy to reduce the frequency of infliximab reactions and to increase safety.

Phase 2 study of gandotinib (LY2784544) in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: The Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are associated with increases in janus kinase 2 (JAK2) signaling, often resulting from the JAK2 V617F mutation. LY2784544 (gandotinib) is a potent, selective, small-molecule inhibitor of JAK2 that has potential dose-dependent selectivity for the JAK2 V617F mutation and may inhibit additional JAK2 mutant isoforms in nonclinical testing. METHODS: A multicenter, single-arm, outpatient phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of gandotinib administered to patients (120 mg once daily) with MPNs, including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF). Between May 2012 and March 2015, 138 patients received at least one dose of study drug. FINDINGS: Most frequent Grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events that were considered study-drug related were anemia (11.6%), hyperuricemia (3.2%), fatigue (2.9%), diarrhea (2.2%), and thrombocytopenia (2.2%). Overall response rates (ORRs) in patients with JAK2 V617F-mutated PV, ET, and MF were 95%, 90.5%, and 9.1%, respectively, while patients with ET and MF without the JAK2 V617F mutations had ORRs of 43.7% and 0%, respectively. INTERPRETATIONS: LY2784544 demonstrated efficacy in JAK2 V617F-mutated MPNs, including in patients previously on ruxolitinib therapy, who had an ORR of 3.3%. At the 1-year visit, 44% of patients experienced a ≥50% improvement in the MPN-Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score, and 26% of patients had a 50% reduction in Brief Fatigue Inventory score.

A clinical-molecular prognostic model to predict survival in patients with post polycythemia vera and post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.

Polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are myeloproliferative neoplasms with variable risk of evolution into post-PV and post-ET myelofibrosis, from now on referred to as secondary myelofibrosis (SMF). No specific tools have been defined for risk stratification in SMF. To develop a prognostic model for predicting survival, we studied 685 JAK2, CALR, and MPL annotated patients with SMF. Median survival of the whole cohort was 9.3 years (95% CI: 8-not reached-NR-). Through penalized Cox regressions we identified negative predictors of survival and according to beta risk coefficients we assigned 2 points to hemoglobin level <11 g/dl, to circulating blasts ⩾3%, and to CALR-unmutated genotype, 1 point to platelet count <150 × 109/l and to constitutional symptoms, and 0.15 points to any year of age. Myelofibrosis Secondary to PV and ET-Prognostic Model (MYSEC-PM) allocated SMF patients into four risk categories with different survival (P<0.0001): low (median survival NR; 133 patients), intermediate-1 (9.3 years, 95% CI: 8.1-NR; 245 patients), intermediate-2 (4.4 years, 95% CI: 3.2-7.9; 126 patients), and high risk (2 years, 95% CI: 1.7-3.9; 75 patients). Finally, we found that the MYSEC-PM represents the most appropriate tool for SMF decision-making to be used in clinical and trial settings.

Mutations and long-term outcome of 217 young patients with essential thrombocythemia or early primary myelofibrosis.

We investigated the influence of molecular status on disease characteristics and clinical outcome in young patients (⩽ 40 years) with World Health Organization (WHO)-defined essential thrombocythemia (ET) or early/prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (early-PMF). Overall, 217 patients with ET (number 197) and early-PMF (number 20) were included in the analysis. Median follow-up time was 10.2 years. The cumulative incidence of thrombosis, hemorrhages and disease evolution into myelofibrosis/acute leukemia were 16.6%, 8.6% and 3% at 15 years, respectively. No differences were detectable between ET and early-PMF patients, although the latter cohort showed a trend for worse combined-event free survival (EFS). Mutation frequency were 61% for JAK2V617F, 25% for CALR and 1% for MPLW515K, and were comparable across WHO diagnosis; however, JAK2V617F allele burden was higher in the early-PMF group. Compared with JAK2V617F-positive patients, CALR-mutated patients displayed higher platelet count and lower hemoglobin level. CALR mutations significantly correlated with lower thrombotic risk (9.1% versus 21.7%, P = 0.04), longer survival (100% versus 96%, P = 0.05) and better combined-EFS (86% versus 71%, P = 0.02). However, non-type 1/type 2 CALR mutations ('minor' mutations) and abnormal karyotype were found to correlate with increased risk of disease evolution. At last contact, six patients had died; in five cases, the causes of death were related to the hematological disease and occurred at a median age of 64 years (range: 53-68 years). Twenty-eight patients (13%) were unmutated for JAK2, CALR and MPL: no event was registered in these 'triple-negative' patients.

Thrombotic risk in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia is only mildly increased and explained by personal and treatment-related risk factors.

BACKGROUND: An increased risk of thrombosis has been reported in primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and with the use of thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonists, on the basis of population studies using administrative databases. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if the incidence of venous and arterial thrombosis in patients with primary ITP is higher than a clinically significant cut-off set at of 3% and 6.4%. PATIENTS/METHODS: We undertook a retrospective multicenter investigation in a large cohort of patients requiring at least one treatment for ITP, enrolled from the major tertiary Italian centers treating ITP. A total of 986 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: During a 3888 patient-year follow-up, 43 first thrombotic events occurred: 28 arterial and 15 venous, resulting in a cumulative incidence of 3.2% for arterial (95% CI, 2.0-5.0) and 1.4% (95% CI, 0.8-2.5) for venous thrombosis at 5 years. The annualized rates for 100 patient-years were 1.14 (95% CI, 0.84-1.54), 0.39 (95% CI, 0.23-0.65) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.49-1.04) for total, venous and arterial thrombosis. Splenectomy, performed in 136 patients (13.7%), increased thrombotic risk (HR = 3.5, 95% CI) compared with non-splenectomized patients. Age > 60 years, more than two risk factors for thrombosis at diagnosis and steroid use were independently associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrate that the 5-year cumulative incidence of venous and arterial thrombosis in ITP is well below the predefined thresholds. Venous and arterial thromboembolism are not frequent complications in ITP, except in particular settings, such as in splenectomized and elderly patients.