Biological wastewater treatment: a comprehensive sustainability analysis using life cycle assessment.

The research conducts a life cycle assessment (LCA) on wastewater treatment (WWT) methods-membrane bioreactor (MBR), soil biotechnology (SBT), and bio-electrochemical constructed wetlands (BCW)-in comparison with the conventional activated sludge process (ASP). Employing SimaPro v9.5 with a cradle-to-gate system boundary, the analysis utilizes the IMPACT 2002 + method, employing per cubic meter of treated wastewater as the functional unit. The analysis shows that SBT exhibits the lowest environmental impacts among the considered WWT methods. The global warming potential was 0.0996 kg CO2 eq. for SBT, 1.33 kg CO2 eq. for MBR, 0.131 kg CO2 eq. for BCW, and 0.544 kg CO2 eq. for ASP. BCW demonstrates a 75.91% decrease, while MBR exhibits a 144.48% increase compared to ASP. Notably, electricity consumption emerges as the primary contributor to environmental impact in MBR and ASP. The resource impact category varies with a 138.15% increase in MBR and an 83.41% decrease in SBT compared to ASP. Additionally, the research indicates that the high human health impact observed in MBR results mainly from increased carcinogens (0.00176 kg C2H3Cl eq.), non-carcinogens (0.01 kg C2H3Cl eq.), and ionizing radiation (3.34 Bq C-14 eq.). The findings underscore the importance of considering treatment efficiency and broader environmental implications in selecting WWT methods. As the world emphasizes sustainability, such LCA studies provide valuable insights for making informed decisions in wastewater management.

Sustainable waste management: a comprehensive life cycle assessment of bioethanol production from agricultural and municipal waste.

Biofuels have emerged as a promising and eco-friendly alternative to conventional fossil fuels. Biofuel sourced from rice straw (RS) and municipal solid waste (MSW), which are abundant residues from agricultural and municipal activities, present a sustainable solution to address waste management challenges. Utilizing life cycle assessment, this study quantifies the environmental advantages by assessing the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, and other environmental impacts linked with employing these waste materials for biofuel production. Employing a cradle-to-gate approach as the system boundary for bioethanol production, with the functional unit set as per liter of bioethanol produced, the analysis reveals that the global warming potential (GWP) for ethanol from MSW is 4.4 kg CO2 eq., whereas for RS, it is 2.1 kg CO2 eq. per functional unit. The total environmental impacts were primarily due to enzymatic hydrolysis and electricity consumption for ethanol production from MSW and RS. Despite advancements, fossil fuel consumption remains a potential energy source for biofuel production. The cumulative energy demand stands at 18.6 MJ for RS and 71.5 MJ for MSW per functional unit, underscoring the potential to significantly reduce overall impacts by transitioning to a more environmentally sustainable energy source. The uncertainty analysis acknowledges the inherent uncertainties associated with data, assumptions, and methodologies, highlighting the crucial need for ongoing research and updates to enhance the accuracy of future assessments. This analysis forms the foundation for well-informed decision-making, providing valuable insights for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and consumers.