RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies reported a poor outcome in patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) undergoing cardiac surgery. Complications most frequently described were respiratory failure, renal failure, and thromboembolic events. In their recent experience, the authors observed a very high incidence of bleeding complications. The purpose of the study was to investigate a possible significant correlation between perioperative COVID-19 infection and hemorrhagic complications compared to non-COVID-19 patients. DESIGN: Single-center, observational, retrospective, matched case-control (1:2) study involving patients who underwent open-heart cardiac surgery from February 2020 and March 2021 with positive perioperative diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, matched with patients without COVID-19 infection. SETTING: Cardiac surgery unit and intensive care unit of a university tertiary center in a metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: In the study period, 773 patients underwent cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Among them, 23 consecutive patients had perioperative diagnosis of COVID-19 infection (study group). These patients were compared with 46 corresponding controls (control group) that matched for age, sex, body mass index, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score. INTERVENTIONS: Open-heart cardiac surgery on CPB. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the study group, 2 patients (9%) died in the intensive care unit from severe respiratory failure, shock, and multiple organ failure. In the study group, patients showed a significantly higher incidence of bleeding complications (48% v 2%, p = 0.0001) and cases of surgical reexploration for bleeding (35% v 2%, p = 0.0001), a higher incidence of severe postoperative thrombocytopenia (39% v 6%, p = 0.0007), and a higher need of blood components transfusions (74% v 30%, p = 0.0006). Chest tubes blood loss and surgical hemostasis time were markedly prolonged (p = 0.02 and p = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A worrisome increased risk of early and late bleeding complications in COVID-19 patients was observed, and it should be considered when assessing the operative risk. CPB-related inflammatory reaction could exacerbate the deleterious effect of COVID-19 on the coagulation system and likely deviate it toward a hemorrhagic pattern.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , COVID-19/complicaciones , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Puente Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) requires changes in cannulation strategy and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) management when compared to the conventional approach (CAVR). We aimed at evaluating if these differences could influence perfusion-related quality parameters and impair postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Overall, 339 consecutive patients underwent MIAVR or CAVR between 2014 and 2020 and were analyzed retrospectively. To account for baseline differences, a propensity-matching analysis was performed, obtaining two groups of 97 patients each. RESULTS: MIAVR group had longer CPB time [107 (95-120) vs 95 (86-105) min, p = .003] than CAVR group. Of note, average pump flow rate index [2.4 (2.2-2.5) vs 2.7 (2.4-2.8) l/min/m2, p = .004] was lower in the MIAVR group. Mean arterial pressure was 73 = 9 mmHg vs 62 = 11 mmHg for the MIAVR and CAVR group, respectively (p < .001). Cell-salvaged blood was most commonly used in the MIAVR group (25.8% vs 11.3%, p = .02). Finally, CPB temperature was 32.8°C (32.1-34.8) for MIAVR group vs 34.9°C (33.2-36.1) for the CAVR group (p = .02). Postoperative complications were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, despite differences in CPB parameters in patients undergoing CAVR and MIAVR, the incidences of adverse outcomes were similar. However, compared to CAVR, MIAVR was associated with shorter durations of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay as well as less transfusion of blood products.
Asunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Puente Cardiopulmonar , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a severe disease with high mortality and morbidity. Prosthetic valve endocarditis is a life-threatening complication which can occur in less than 10% of patients with valve prosthesis. A fungal etiology of IE is rare and accounts for only 2-4% of all case of endocarditis, but is associated with a higher mortality and morbidity. Herein is reported the first case of fungal endocarditis of aortic valve prosthesis due to Aspergillus oryzae in a 67-year-old caucasian man who nine years previously underwent mitral and aortic valve replacement with mechanical prostheses, and tricuspid annuloplasty for acute IE due to Enterococcus spp. Seven months previously, the patient also underwent a redo cardiac procedure to replace a mitral valve prosthesis with a new mechanical device due to a leakage. Aspergillus oryzae showed impressive growth with strong and unexpected virulence in both local and systemic settings.
Asunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Aspergilosis/microbiología , Aspergillus oryzae/aislamiento & purificación , Endocarditis/microbiología , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Anciano , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/microbiología , Aspergilosis/diagnóstico , Aspergilosis/cirugía , Aspergillus oryzae/crecimiento & desarrollo , Aspergillus oryzae/patogenicidad , Remoción de Dispositivos , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Endocarditis/diagnóstico , Endocarditis/cirugía , Resultado Fatal , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Reoperación , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , VirulenciaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Obese patients are at risk of complications after cardiac surgery. The aim of this study is to investigate safety and efficacy of a minimally invasive approach via upper sternotomy in this setting. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 203 obese patients who underwent isolated, elective aortic valve replacement between January 2014 and January 2023 - 106 with minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) and 97 with conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR). To account for baseline differences, a propensity-matching analysis was performed obtaining two balanced groups of 91 patients each. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was comparable between groups (1.1% MIAVR vs. 0% CAVR, P=0.99). MIAVR patients had faster extubation than CAVR patients (6 ± 2 vs. 9 ± 2 hours, P<0.01). Continuous positive airway pressure therapy was less common in the MIAVR than in the CAVR group (3.3% vs. 13.2%, P=0.03). Other postoperative complications did not differ significantly. Intensive care unit stay (1.8 ± 1.2 vs. 3.2 ± 1.4 days, P<0.01), but not hospital stay (6.7 ± 2.1 vs. 7.2 ± 1.9 days, P=0.09), was shorter for MIAVR than for CAVR patients. Follow-up survival was comparable (logrank P-value = 0.58). CONCLUSION: MIAVR via upper sternotomy has been shown to be a safe and effective option for obese patients. Respiratory outcome was promising with shorter mechanical ventilation time and reduced need for post-extubation support. The length of stay in the intensive care unit was reduced. These advantages might be important for the obese patient to whom minimally invasive surgery should not be denied.
Asunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Humanos , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Esternotomía/efectos adversos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/cirugía , Tiempo de InternaciónRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Postoperative sore throat (POST) and hoarseness are common complications of tracheal intubation. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of flurbiprofen administered through the subglottic port of tracheal tubes to prevent POST after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary Care Referral University Hospital (Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome). PATIENTS: Included 71 patients undergoing for elective cardiac surgery. Inclusion criteria were (a) age between 50 and 75 years, (b) NYHA class I or II, (c) surgery for myocardial revascularization or valve repair or replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTION: Patients were double blind randomized to receive flurbiprofen or saline in the subglottic port of the endotracheal tube (groups F and P). The solution was injected ten minutes after tracheal tube placement, ten minutes after ICU admission and ten minutes before tracheal tube removal. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was to assess the effect of topical flurbiprofen administered through the subglottic port of the tracheal tube to prevent post-operative sore throat (POST). The secondary outcomes were the presence of hoarseness safety and patient's subjective satisfaction with their recovery. We did not report any exploratory outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: We analyzed 68 patients, 34 patients in each group. In group F, two patients complained of POST and hoarseness (5.9%), while all controls did. The two groups significantly differed in the severity scores (VAS and TPS for sore throat and HOAR for hoarseness) at all time points. In group P, patients reported mild to moderate symptoms that significantly improved or disappeared 36 h after tracheal tube removal. According to the multivariable model, hoarseness affected women less than men, in the control group (p = 0.002). None of the patients in either group reported any adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated administration of flurbiprofen through the subglottic port of tracheal tubes reduced the incidence of sore throat and hoarseness after cardiac surgery without evidence of complications.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Flurbiprofeno , Ronquera , Intubación Intratraqueal , Faringitis , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Flurbiprofeno/administración & dosificación , Flurbiprofeno/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Faringitis/prevención & control , Faringitis/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Ronquera/prevención & control , Ronquera/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Administración TópicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing mitral valve surgery, restrictive suture annuloplasty (De Vega) for less-than-severe functional tricuspid regurgitation has been proven to be safe and effective. The aim of this study is to determine whether the adjunct of the plication of the posterior tricuspid leaflet with the same running suture (bicuspidized De Vega or "De Kay") is equally safe and effective. METHODS: Single center, retrospective study on patients submitted to suture repair of the tricuspid valve during mitral valve surgery, with either conventional or De Kay, between January 2014 and December 2020. Comparison was based on degree of residual tricuspid valve regurgitation and right ventricular assessment at discharge. RESULTS: Over the course of the study period, 255 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery had a dilated (>40 mm or >20 mm/m2) tricuspid valve annulus, with less-than-severe tricuspid regurgitation. Conventional De Vega was employed in 166 patients (65.1%) and De Kay in the remaining 89 (34.9%). At discharge the adjunct of postero-septal commissure plication has similar outcomes to the classic De Vega repair. It seems to preserve right ventricular function. CONCLUSIONS: De Kay repair guarantees the same tricuspidal regurgitation reduction as compared with conventional De Vega early after surgery.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide , Humanos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Válvula Tricúspide/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Tricúspide/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Suturas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Valvular heart disease (VHD) requires optimized outpatient management that is generally considered to be best delivered by a dedicated, multidisciplinary team (Heart Valve Clinic [HVC]). Although HVC is promoted by clinical guidelines and organized in many centers, real world outcome assessments are limited. Thus, we evaluated the performance, clinical and management outcomes during a 6-year experience with an original HVC model. METHODS: By interrogating the local database, 1047 consecutive patients admitted to the HVC from January 2015 to October 2020 were found. Management and mortality were checked for all patients. After 3 years of HVC activity, in order to improve appropriateness and efficiency, access priority criteria were introduced. Thus, the study population was divided in two period subgroups (before and after access criteria introduction) that were compared. RESULTS: A total of 1047 consecutive patients admitted to the HVC constituted the study population; 346 patients (33%) were recommended for invasive treatment. After a mean follow-up of 25.7±3.1 months, 37 patients (3.5%) died. When comparing study periods, statistically significant increase inpatients' complexity and VHD severity was noticed in Period 2, also translating into higher rate of referral to intervention (39.0% vs. 29.4% in Period 1; P=0.001). Finally, despite higher rate of elderly and frail patients, operative mortality was not jeopardized. CONCLUSIONS: The present study reports a comprehensive assessment of the characteristics and outcomes achieved through an original HVC model. Standardization of access criteria supports the HVC improvement.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas , Humanos , Anciano , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/epidemiología , Válvulas Cardíacas , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Derivación y ConsultaRESUMEN
Functional tricuspid valve regurgitation in the contest of mitral valve disease is a highly prevalent disease. We describe a ringless technique that combines restrictive annuloplasty (De Vega) with posterior tricuspid leaflet obliteration (Kay) used for patients with less-than-severe functional tricuspid valve regurgitation undergoing mitral valve surgery. The technique has been in use at our center since 2012, showing promising long-term echocardiographic results, with stable reduction of the annulus size and stable reduction of the degree of regurgitation.
Asunto(s)
Anuloplastia de la Válvula Cardíaca/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/cirugía , Válvula Tricúspide/cirugía , HumanosRESUMEN
Background A multidisciplinary approach might be pivotal for the management of patients with valvular heart disease (VHD), but clinical outcome data are lacking. Methods and Results At our institution, since 2014, internal guidelines recommended heart team consultations for patients with VHD. The clinical/echocardiographic characteristics, treatment recommendations, performed treatment, and early clinical outcomes of consecutive, hospitalized patients with VHD undergoing heart team evaluation were collected. Surgical risk was prospectively assessed by the EuroSCORE II and STS-PROM. The primary end point of the study was early mortality. A total of 1004 patients with VHD with high clinical complexity (mean age, 75 years; mean EuroSCORE II, 9.4%; mean STS-PROM, 5.6%; 48% ischemic heart disease; 29% chronic kidney disease, 9% oncologic/hematologic diseases) were enrolled. The heart team recommended an interventional treatment for 807 (80%) patients and conservative management for 197 (20%) patients. Management crossovers occurred in only 5% of patients. The recommended intervention was cardiac surgery for 230 (23%) patients, percutaneous treatment in 516 (51%) patients, and hybrid treatment in 61 (6%) patients. Early mortality occurred in 24 patients (2.4%) and was independently predicted by aortic stenosis, left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary artery systolic pressure, and conservative management recommendation. In patients referred to treatment, observed early mortality (1.7%) was significantly lower (P<0.001) than expected on the bases of both the STS-PROM (5.2%) and EuroSCORE II (9.7%). Conclusions Within the limitations of its single-center and observational design, the present study suggests that heart team-based management of patients with complex VHD is feasible and allows referral to a wide spectrum of interventions with promising early clinical results.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas , Anciano , Ecocardiografía , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/terapia , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular IzquierdaRESUMEN
Valvular heart diseases (VHD) are common in the elderly population and several therapeutic options are available to treat them. When selecting the management strategy for VHD patients, to evaluate the operatory risk, using special scores like STS score, EuroSCORE II and other more specific ones is pivotal. However, the risk scores do not consider some aspects, such as the clinical needs of the single patients, the management of local resources and the expertise of the center. The Heart Team, combining the experience of various specialists, can optimize the decision-making process through a better evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio of the therapeutic choices. The multidisciplinary discussion of the most complex cases is recommended by the international guidelines for the management of VHD and it is part of the clinical practice of many centers. So far, both trials and large clinical studies supporting such multidisciplinary management are lacking. Despite these important limitations, the Heart Team can be actually regarded as a promising tool to locally promote best practices for the treatment of VHD patients.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Anciano , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/terapia , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
AIM: To summarize our experience on the implementation of a telemedicine service dedicated to adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients during the lockdown for the first wave of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: This is a prospective study enrolling all ACHD patients who answered a questionnaire dedicated telematic cardiovascular examination. RESULTS: A total of 289 patients were enrolled, 133 (47%) were male, 25 (9%) were affected by a genetic syndrome. The median age was 38 (29-51) years, whereas the median time interval between the last visit and the telematic follow-up was 9.5 (7.5-11.5) months. Overall, 35 patients (12%) reported a worsening of fatigue in daily life activity, 17 (6%) experienced chest pain, 42 (15%) had presyncope and 2 (1%) syncope; in addition, 28 patients (10%) presented peripheral edema and 14 (5%) were orthopneic. A total of 116 (40%) patients reported palpitations and 12 had at least one episode of atrial fibrillation and underwent successful electrical (8) or pharmacological (4) cardioversion. One patient was admitted to the emergency department for uncontrolled arterial hypertension, five for chest pain, and one for heart failure. Two patients presented fever but both had negative COVID-19 nasal swab. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of telemedicine dramatically increased and here we report a positive experience in ACHD patients. The postpandemic role of telemedicine will depend on permanent regulatory solutions and this early study might encourage a more systematic telematic approach for ACHD patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiopatías Congénitas , Control de Infecciones , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Femenino , Cardiopatías Congénitas/epidemiología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/fisiopatología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/terapia , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Evaluación de Síntomas/métodos , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
The growing burden of valvular heart disease in Western countries represents a challenge for the daily clinical practice, especially in the light of the ever-increasing number of therapeutic options. The Euro Heart Survey showed that, among elderly subjects with severe, symptomatic valve dysfunction, surgery is denied for 33% of patients with aortic stenosis and for 50% of patients with mitral regurgitation. Current management (from diagnosis to follow-up) is often fragmented in multiple-sometimes unnecessary-steps. Such a "patchy" approach may translate into a suboptimal management, especially in the geriatric population. New healthcare models exist that can coordinate care, reduce fragmentation, limit costs and, ultimately, improve outcomes: the clinical pathways.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Anciano , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Benchmarking , Vías Clínicas , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Válvulas Cardíacas , Humanos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Aortic valve disease is more and more common in western countries. While percutaneous approaches should be preferred in older adults, previous reports have shown good outcomes after surgery. Moreover, advantages of minimally invasive approaches may be valuable for octogenarians. We sought to compare outcomes of conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR) versus minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) in octogenarians. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of 75 consecutive octogenarians who underwent primary, elective, isolated aortic valve surgery through conventional approach (41 patients, group CAVR) or partial upper sternotomy (34 patients, group MIAVR). RESULTS: Mean age was 81.9 ± 0.9 and 82.3 ± 1.1 years in CAVR and MIAVR patients, respectively (P = 0.09). MIAVR patients had lower 24-hour chest drain output (353.4 ± 207.1 vs 501.7 ± 229.9 mL, P < 0.01), shorter mechanical ventilation (9.6 ± 2.4 vs 11.3 ± 2.3 hours, P < 0.01), lower need for blood transfusions (35.3% vs 63.4%, P = 0.02), and shorter hospital stay (6.8 ± 1.6 vs 8.3 ± 4.3 days, P < 0.01). Thirty-day mortality was zero in both groups. Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 89.9%, 80%, and 47%, respectively, in the CAVR group, and 93.2%, 82.4%, and 61.8% in the MIAVR group, with no statistically significant differences (log-rank test, P = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve surgery in older patients provided excellent results, as long as appropriate candidates were selected. MIAVR was associated with shorter mechanical ventilation, reduced blood transfusions, and reduced hospitalization length, without affecting perioperative complications or mid-term survival.
Asunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esternotomía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Any instrumental examination may lead to unexpected diagnosis that in turn can radically change the clinical pathway of a patient.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Clinical benefits of minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery (MIVS) have been reported. Improved postoperative mental status was never analyzed with dedicated psychological tests. In the present study we intend to investigate potential benefits of MIVS for patient psychological well-being, with special attention to the relevance of the patient perception of the chest surgical scar, of the self body image and cosmetic aspects. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2017, 87 eligible patients, age 66.5 ± 14.5 years, operated on for heart valve surgery, underwent either conventional full sternotomy (CS; n = 48) or MIVS by V-shape hemi-sternotomy approach (n = 39). Before selection of the surgical approach, patients had undergone preoperative evaluation of their psychological status using Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y (STAI-Y), and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) psychological tests. Six months postoperatively, patients filled in dedicated questionnaires to assess their psychological status, quality of life, and subjective perception, thus repeating the above-mentioned tests and adding the Body Image Questionnaire (BIQ) and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) v2.0 tests for scar-healing process evaluation. RESULTS: No patient died during the study.The 4 post-test scales of psychological well-being (BDI-II P = 0.04, STAI-Y P = 0.04, 2 indices of EQ-5D P = 0.03, P = 0.01) showed significant differences between the MIVS group and CS group, with MIVS-small incision patients having lower level of depression and anxiety symptoms and better quality of life. Mean score differences of scar perception (BIQ and POSAS v2.0) were significant, with MIVS patients having evaluated the scar quality significantly better than CS patients. CONCLUSIONS: MIVS appears associated with significant esthetical and related psychological benefits, as documented by technical tests. These findings should be considered when selecting the most appropriate technique for heart valve surgery.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Válvulas Cardíacas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Esternotomía/efectos adversosRESUMEN
A surgical procedure may lead to unusual and unexpected clinical scenario. Good medical practice should always keep it in mind. So, a broken sternal steel wire was the rare cause of massive emphysema.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Despite conflicting evidence available, minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) is increasingly used as an alternative to full sternotomy. We sought to compare early outcomes of aortic valve replacement through a full sternotomy (conventional aortic valve replacement [CAVR]) and upper ministernotomy (MIAVR). METHODS: We analyzed 297 patients having undergone primary, elective, isolated MIAVR or CAVR between January 2014 and June 2018. Following propensity score matching, 120 patients remained in each group. RESULTS: MIAVR required longer bypass (93 ± 26 vs 81 ± 24 minutes, P < 0.01) and operative times (214 ± 39 vs 182 ± 37 minutes, P < 0.01). However, aortic cross-clamp times were comparable (57 ± 17 vs 54 ± 14 minutes for MIAVR and CAVR, respectively, P = 0.14). MIAVR had less 24-hour blood loss (253 ± 204 vs 323 ± 296 mL, P = 0.03), less red blood cells transfusions [1.4 packs (1.1 o 1.9) vs 2.1 packs (1.8 to 2.7), P = 0.01], and shorter assisted ventilation time (7.1 ± 3.3 vs 9.7 ± 3.8 hours, P < 0.01) when compared to CAVR. These results led to significantly shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays for MIAVR patients (2.5 ± 1.3 vs 3.4 ± 1.1 days, P < 0.01 and 6.9 ± 4.1 vs 8.2 ± 4.8 days, P = 0.03, respectively). Thirty-day mortality and clinical outcomes did not differ significantly among groups. CONCLUSIONS: MIAVR through upper ministernotomy was shown to be as safe and reliable as CAVR. Patient recovery time was improved by shortening mechanical ventilation and reducing blood loss and transfusions. These results may be significant for high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve surgery.
Asunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Tempo Operativo , Puntaje de Propensión , Esternotomía/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with small aortic annulus (diameter ≤21 mm) is considered a challenging scenario because of technical aspects and the high risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM). The choice of the appropriate prosthesis is crucial, and at the moment, an ideal device has yet to be identified. We compare clinical and hemodynamic results after AVR with three bioprostheses with different design and characteristics. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 76 consecutive patients from two cardiac surgery centers who underwent AVR (Trifecta = 24; Edwards INTUITY Elite valve system = 26, and Perceval = 26) for severe aortic stenosis between 2013 and 2017. Patients selected were older than 75 years and with an annulus diameter ≤21 mm at preoperative echocardiogram. Reinterventions and combined procedures were excluded. Minimally invasive AVR was performed in 44 (57.8%) patients. Telephonic interview was obtained at 2.9 ± 0.5 years and echocardiographic follow-up at 2.2 ± 0.8 years. RESULTS: Clinical outcome was similar in the three groups. At follow-up, Trifecta patients presented significantly higher peak and mean transprosthetic pressure gradients ( P = 0.04 and 0.01). Effective orifice area and left ventricular mass regression were comparable, although an advantage was observed in Perceval patients without reaching the statistical significance. Incidence of moderate ( P = 0.2) and severe PPM ( P = 0.7) was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher postoperative pressure gradients observed with the Trifecta valve, all three prostheses (Trifecta, Edwards INTUITY Elite, and Perceval) have proven to be reliable when implanted in small aortic annuli, with good clinical outcome and favorable left ventricular mass regression.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/tendencias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/patología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/patología , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Valvular heart disease (VHD) is frequently diagnosed in old patients with clinical evidence of heart failure. This elderly population typically presents a high prevalence of frailty and comorbidities, which are associated with increased operative risk for surgical and percutaneous procedures. Recently, the Euro Heart Survey reported a clear gap between treatment guidelines and their application in the "real world". A more realistic approach to the treatment of older VHD patients treatment, mostly if associated with heart failure, is advocated. A multidisciplinary approach, as obtained with the Heart Valve Clinic methodology (intended to put the patient in the "center" of the scene and the specialists "around him"), has been applied in a group of 79 patients, aged >70 years, with symptomatic VHD, divided in 2 groups according to their frailty status (58 robust and 21 frail). No in-hospital mortality and no difference in late mortality and complications were observed. Infections were more frequent (14.3 vs. 1.7 %; P = 0.02) in frail patients. In patients with postoperative complications, serum levels of interleukin 6 (67.6 vs. 49.6; P = 0.01) and of CAF (C-terminal agrin fragment) as sarcopenia marker (67.9 vs. 62.0; P = 0.04) were higher than that in uncomplicated patients. This study was designed to determine the outcomes of the multidimensional geriatric assessment in the management of older patients with heart failure eligible for heart valve surgery. Geriatric assessment and measurement of inflammatory and sarcopenia markers may represent valid tools for a more realistic evaluation of elderly patients with VHD.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Fragilidad , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/análisis , Vías Clínicas , Determinación de la Elegibilidad/métodos , Femenino , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Fragilidad/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/sangre , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples/epidemiología , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples/terapia , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Introduction: Obese patients are at risk of complications after cardiac surgery. The aim of this study is to investigate safety and efficacy of a minimally invasive approach via upper sternotomy in this setting. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 203 obese patients who underwent isolated, elective aortic valve replacement between January 2014 and January 2023 - 106 with minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) and 97 with conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR). To account for baseline differences, a propensity-matching analysis was performed obtaining two balanced groups of 91 patients each. Results: The 30-day mortality rate was comparable between groups (1.1% MIAVR vs. 0% CAVR, P=0.99). MIAVR patients had faster extubation than CAVR patients (6 ± 2 vs. 9 ± 2 hours, P<0.01). Continuous positive airway pressure therapy was less common in the MIAVR than in the CAVR group (3.3% vs. 13.2%, P=0.03). Other postoperative complications did not differ significantly. Intensive care unit stay (1.8 ± 1.2 vs. 3.2 ± 1.4 days, P<0.01), but not hospital stay (6.7 ± 2.1 vs. 7.2 ± 1.9 days, P=0.09), was shorter for MIAVR than for CAVR patients. Follow-up survival was comparable (logrank P-value = 0.58). Conclusion: MIAVR via upper sternotomy has been shown to be a safe and effective option for obese patients. Respiratory outcome was promising with shorter mechanical ventilation time and reduced need for post-extubation support. The length of stay in the intensive care unit was reduced. These advantages might be important for the obese patient to whom minimally invasive surgery should not be denied.