Informing the delivery of cancer survivorship care in rural primary care practice.

PURPOSE: The cancer survivor population is projected to increase to 22.2 million by 2030, requiring improved collaboration between oncology and primary care practices (PCP). PCPs may feel ill-equipped to provide cancer survivorship care to patients without input from cancer specialists. Compared with nonrural cancer survivors, rural cancer survivors report experiencing worse treatment-related symptoms. The goal of this study was to gain a better understanding of the perspectives of PCP teams towards survivorship care and to develop and test an interdisciplinary training program to improve cancer survivorship care in rural practice. METHODS: This study was conducted in two phases. First, focus groups were conducted with rural PCP teams to gather information regarding beliefs, practices, and barriers related to cancer survivorship care delivery. A thematic analysis was completed using an iterative process of reviewing transcripts. Results from phase 1 were used to inform the development of a pilot intervention tested within seven rural PCPs (phase 2). Pre- and post-intervention knowledge changes were compared, and post-session interviews assessed planned or sustained practice changes. RESULTS: Seven PCPs participated in focus groups (phase 1). Cross-cutting themes identified included (1) organizational barriers affecting the delivery of cancer survivorship care, (2) challenges of role delineation with specialists and patients, (3) difficulty accessing survivorship care and resources, and (4) providers' lack of knowledge of cancer survivorship care. For phase 2, seven practices participated in four case-based educational sessions. Within and between practice changes were identified. CONCLUSION: This project explored cancer survivorship perspectives among PCP teams. Lack of familiarity with evidence-based guidelines and the inability to identify cancer survivors was apparent during discussions and led to the implementation of the phase 2 intervention, iSurvive. As a result, PCPs either changed or planned changes to improve the identification and evidence-based care of cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Address barriers to access cancer survivorship care in rural primary care practices.

Cytotoxic effects of topotecan combined with various anticancer agents in human cancer cell lines.

BACKGROUND: Topotecan (TPT) is a topoisomerase I poison that exhibits antineoplastic activity. Analysis of the cytotoxic effects of combinations of TPT and other anticancer agents has been limited. PURPOSE: We assessed the cytotoxic effects produced by combinations of TPT and other antineoplastic agents in experiments involving multiple human cancer cell lines of diverse histologic origins. METHODS: The cytotoxic effects of various antimetabolites (fluorouracil, methotrexate, or cytarabine), antimicrotubule agents (vincristine or paclitaxel [Taxol]), DNA alkylating agents (melphalan, bis[chloroethyl]nitrosourea [BCNU], or 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide [4HC]), and a DNA-platinating agent (cisplatin), alone and in combination with TPT, were measured in clonogenic (i.e., colony-forming) assays. HCT8 ileocecal adenocarcinoma, A549 non-small-cell lung carcinoma, NCI-H82ras(H) lung cancer, T98G glioblastoma, and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines were used in these assays. The data were analyzed by the median effect method, primarily under the assumption that drug mechanisms of action were mutually nonexclusive (i.e., completely independent of one another). For each level of cytotoxicity (ranging from 5% to 95%), a drug combination index (CI) was calculated. A CI less than 1 indicated synergy (i.e., the effect of the combination was greater than that expected from the additive effects of the component agents), a CI equal to 1 indicated additivity, and a CI greater than 1 indicated antagonism (the effect of the combination was less than that expected from the additive effects of the component agents). RESULTS: When the mechanisms of drug action were assumed to be mutually nonexclusive, virtually all CIs for combinations of TPT and either antimetabolites or antimicrotubule agents revealed cytotoxic effects that were less than additive. The CIs calculated at low-to-intermediate levels of cytotoxicity for combinations of TPT and the DNA alkylating agents melphalan, BCNU, and 4HC also showed drug effects that were less than additive; in most cases, however, nearly additive or even synergistic effects were observed with these same drug combinations at high levels of cytotoxicity (i.e., at > or = 90% inhibition of colony formation). Results obtained with combinations of TPT and cisplatin varied according to the cell line examined. With A549 cells, less than additive effects were seen at low-to-intermediate levels of cytotoxicity, and more than additive effects were seen at high levels of cytotoxicity. With NCI-H82ras(H) cells, synergy was observed over most of the cytotoxicity range. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: TPT cytotoxicity appears to be enhanced more by combination with certain DNA-damaging agents than by combination with antimetabolites or antimicrotubule agents. Interactions between TPT and other drugs can vary depending on the cell type examined. Further investigation is required to determine the basis of the observed effects and to determine whether these in vitro findings are predictive of results obtained in vivo.

Successful re-treatment with taxol after major hypersensitivity reactions.

PURPOSE: To describe the successful re-treatment of eight patients who had major hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to taxol and to suggest a regimen for re-treating patients who develop major HSRs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The treatment courses of eight patients who developed major HSRs and were rechallenged with taxol were reviewed. Patients in this report represent all patients who are known to have been rechallenged with taxol after major HSRs. RESULTS: The most common approach used to rechallenge patients consisted of premedication with multiple high doses of corticosteroids and H1- and H2-histamine antagonists followed by the initiation of the taxol infusion at a reduced rate. All patients who experienced major HSRs were rechallenged successfully. After the rechallenge, these patients received 32 additional courses of taxol without HSRs. CONCLUSION: Re-treatment with taxol after major HSRs is feasible using multiple high doses of corticosteroids and antihistamine premedications and a reduced taxol infusion rate under close supervision. This approach may represent a valid alternative to the termination of taxol; however, a prospective evaluation is required to determine the true efficacy of this approach.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of high doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of escalating doses of the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in minimally pretreated adults with solid tumors and to study whether G-CSF scheduling variably affects the ability to escalate TPT doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients received 121 courses of TPT as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks at doses that ranged from 2.0 to 4.2 mg/m2/d. G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d subcutaneously (SC) was initiated concurrently with TPT (starting on day 1). Because the concurrent administration of TPT and G-CSF resulted in severe myelosuppression at the lowest TPT dose level, an alternate posttreatment G-CSF schedule in which G-CSF dosing began after TPT (starting on day 6) was subsequently evaluated. Plasma sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacologic behavior of high-dose TPT and to determine whether G-CSF altered the pharmacokinetic profile of TPT. RESULTS: Severe myelosuppression precluded the administration of TPT at the first dose, 2.0 mg/m2/d, with G-CSF on the concurrent schedule. However, dose escalation of TPT with G-CSF on a posttreatment schedule proceeded to 4.2 mg/m2/d. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. One partial response was noted in a patient with colorectal carcinoma refractory to fluoropyrimidines. Pharmacokinetics were linear within the dosing range of 2.0 to 3.5 mg/m2/d, but TPT clearance was lower at the 4.2-mg/m2/d dose level. At 3.5 mg/m2/d, which is the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for subsequent-phase studies of TPT with G-CSF, the area under the concentration-versus-time curves (AUCs) for total TPT and lactone averaged 2.2- and 2.3-fold higher, respectively, than the AUCs achieved at the lowest TPT dose, 2.0 mg/m2/d. The pharmacologic behavior of high-dose TPT was not significantly altered by the scheduling of G-CSF. CONCLUSION: G-CSF administered after 5 daily 30-minute infusions of TPT permits a 2.3-fold dose escalation of TPT above the MTD in solid-tumor patients, whereas concurrent therapy with G-CSF and TPT results in severe myelosuppression.

Sequences of topotecan and cisplatin: phase I, pharmacologic, and in vitro studies to examine sequence dependence.

PURPOSE: A phase I and pharmacologic study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of administering the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in minimally pretreated adults with solid tumors. The study was designed to evaluate the magnitude of the toxicologic and pharmacologic differences between the two sequences of drug administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TPT was administered as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days and CDDP was given either before TPT on day 1 or after TPT on day 5. Each patient was treated with both schedules on an alternating basis every 3 weeks. Sequential dose escalation of TPT or CDDP resulted in three dosage permutation of TPT/CDDP (mg/m2): 0.75/50, 1/50, and 0.75/75. After the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) level was achieved, the feasibility of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was studied. To examine the interaction of TPT and CDDP in vitro, human A549 lung cancer cells were exposed to these agents concurrently and sequentially. RESULTS: Dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia resulted after the doses of TPT or CDDP were increased to greater than 0.75 and 50 mg/m2, respectively, without and with G-CSF. The sequence of CDDP before TPT induced significantly worse neutropenia and thrombocytopenia than the alternate sequence. In vitro studies failed to provide any evidence for the differences in the cytotoxicity of these two sequences. Instead, pharmacokinetic studies suggested that the differences in toxicity were due, in part, to lower TPT clearance and exposure when CDDP preceeds TPT, possibly due to subclinical renal tubular toxicity induced by CDDP. CONCLUSION: The sequence of CDDP before TPT at doses of 50 and 0.75 mg/m2, respectively, is recommended for subsequent clinical trials in tumor types in which both agents have significant single-agent activity. The potential for sequence-dependent cytotoxic, toxicologic, and pharmacologic effects should be evaluated in concurrent clinical and laboratory studies in the course of developing combination chemotherapy regimens that consist of topo I-targeting agents and other antineoplastic agents, particularly DNA-damaging agents.

Interferon-gamma and CXC chemokine induction by interleukin 12 in renal cell carcinoma.

Interleukin 12 (IL-12) is known to play an important role in the development of an antitumor response. Its activity has been shown to be dependent upon the intermediate production of IFN-gamma and the influx into the tumor of CD8 lymphocytes. In a murine model, tumor regression induced by IL-12 treatment correlated with IFN-gamma, IP-10, and Mig expression in the tumor bed and was abrogated by antibodies to both chemokines. Here we examined the effects of rHuIL-12 on IFN-gamma and CXC chemokine gene expression in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in an attempt to determine whether a similar series of molecular events leading to IL-12-mediated tumor regression in mice is also detectable in humans. As in the murine RENCA model, cultured RCC cells themselves could be induced by IFN-gamma to synthesize IP-10 and Mig mRNA. Explanted RCC produced IFN-gamma and IP-10 mRNA in response to IL-12 treatment, which was consistent with the finding that biopsied RCC tumors from IL-12-treated patients also variably expressed augmented levels of those molecules after therapy. Although Mig mRNA was present in the majority of biopsied tumors prior to treatment, both the Mig and IP-10 chemokines as well as IFN-gamma were induced in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of IL-12-treated patients. Skin biopsies of IL-12-treated patients also all synthesized IP-10 mRNA. This study demonstrates that recombinant human IL-12 therapy of patients with RCC has the potential to induce the expression of gene products within the tumor bed that may contribute to the development of a successful antitumor response.

Signal transduction abnormalities in T lymphocytes from patients with advanced renal carcinoma: clinical relevance and effects of cytokine therapy.

Studies have demonstrated abnormalities of the CD3/T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) and pathways of signal transduction in T lymphocytes from animals and patients with advanced malignancy. Diminished expression of TCRzeta and p56(lck) that are associated with the TCR and reduced nuclear localization of RelA containing nuclear factor kappaB (NFkappaB) complexes have been noted. These defects have been described in T cells from patients with malignant melanoma, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), ovarian cancer, and colorectal cancer. Preliminary observations also indicate possible correlation with clinical variables such as stage in selected instances. To further characterize altered expression of TCRzeta, p56(lck), and impaired activation of NFkappaB, T lymphocytes were obtained from 65 patients with RCC, the majority of whom were receiving combination cytokine therapy [interleukin (IL)-2, IFN alpha-containing regimens] and 37 control individuals. In 29 of these patients, levels of TCRzeta and p56(lck) were determined by Western blots of T-cell lysates and semiquantitated using densitometry. Relative levels were then correlated with a series of clinical variables including response to therapy, performance status, survival, disease sites, age, and others. In another group of 28 patients (three individuals from the first group), the frequency of abnormal NFkappaB activation was studied using electrophoretic mobility shift assays after activation of T cells with phorbol myristate acetate/ionomycin or anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody. Changes in these signaling molecules during cytokine treatment were also investigated. TCRzeta and p56(lck) were detected in the peripheral blood T cells in 27 of 29 patients, and overall, reduced levels were noted visually in 12 of 29 (41%) and 13 of 29 (45%) individuals, respectively. When levels were semiquantitated using densitometry, significant decreases of TCRzeta (P = 0.029) and p56(lck) (P = 0.029) but not CD3epsilon (P = 0.131), compared with control levels, were found. In patients treated with IL-2/IFN alpha-based therapy, relative levels of TCRzeta increased significantly (P = 0.002) on day 15 of cycle one compared with the baseline. Correlations of TCRzeta or p56(lck) levels with response or disease variables, except for lower TCRzeta levels (P < 0.001) in the presence of bone metastases, were not found. Abnormal NFkappaB activation after stimulation with phorbol myristate acetate/ionomycin and/or anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody was found in 59% of patients (17 of 28) and was not accounted for by the advanced age of the study cohort. Activation of NFkappaB in peripheral blood T cells was inducible during cytokine therapy in four of six individuals who displayed impaired NFkappaB activity prior to therapy. Moreover, impaired activation of NFkappaB does not appear linked to a reduction of TCRzeta expression, because in five patients, normal TCRzeta levels were present although kappaB binding was not inducible. In the majority of patients with advanced RCC, peripheral blood T cells express TCRzeta and p56(lck), and in a subset, reduced levels of these TCRzeta associated molecules are seen that may increase during cytokine-based therapy. Abnormal activation of NFkappaB is also present in >50% of patients and may also revert to normal during IL-2/IFN alpha-based treatment. This alteration in NFkappaB activation occurred in the presence of normal expression of TCRzeta-associated signaling elements. The clinical significance of these findings remains unclear.

Phase I/II trial of all-trans retinoic acid and tamoxifen in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Because tamoxifen and all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) have additive antitumor effects in preclinical systems, we performed a Phase I/II clinical trial of this combination in patients with advanced breast cancer. Patients with potentially hormone-responsive advanced breast cancer were enrolled. All received 20 mg of tamoxifen by mouth daily. Consecutive cohorts of 3-6 patients were treated on odd-numbered weeks with ATRA at doses of 70, 110, 150, 190, or 230 mg/m2/day. Twenty-six patients were entered in this trial; 25 were evaluable. A dose of 230 mg/m2 ATRA produced unacceptable headache and dermatological toxicity, but doses < or = 190 mg/m2 were tolerable. Two of 7 patients with measurable disease responded. Seven of 18 patients with evaluable, nonmeasurable disease achieved disease stability for more than 6 months. Plasma AUCs on day 1 of successive weeks of treatment were stable over time. A nonsignificant decrease in serum insulin-like growth factor I levels was noted during treatment, but this trend was similar to that observed in three "control" patients treated with tamoxifen alone. When given with daily tamoxifen, the maximum tolerated dose of ATRA that could be given on alternate weeks was 190 mg/m2/day. This schedule of ATRA resulted in repeated periods of exposure to potentially therapeutic concentrations of ATRA. Declines in the serum insulin-like growth factor I concentrations observed in patients treated with tamoxifen and ATRA were similar to those observed in patients treated with tamoxifen alone. Objective responses were observed, some in patients who had previously progressed while receiving tamoxifen, suggesting that further studies would be of interest.

Importance of dose intensity in neuro-oncology clinical trials: summary report of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Consortium.

Therapeutic options for the treatment of malignant brain tumors have been limited, in part, because of the presence of the blood-brain barrier. For this reason, the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Consortium, the focus of which was the "Importance of Dose Intensity in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials," was convened in April 2000, at Government Camp, Mount Hood, Oregon. This meeting, which was supported by the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, brought together clinicians and basic scientists from across the U.S. to discuss the role of dose intensity and enhanced chemotherapy delivery in the treatment of malignant brain tumors and to design multicenter clinical trials. Optimizing chemotherapy delivery to the CNS is crucial, particularly in view of recent progress identifying certain brain tumors as chemosensitive. The discovery that specific constellations of genetic alterations can predict which tumors are chemoresponsive, and can therefore more accurately predict prognosis, has important implications for delivery of intensive, effective chemotherapy regimens with acceptable toxicities. This report summarizes the discussions, future directions, and key questions regarding dose-intensive treatment of primary CNS lymphoma, CNS relapse of systemic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, anaplastic oligodendroglioma, high-grade glioma, and metastatic cancer of the brain. The promising role of cytoenhancers and chemoprotectants as part of dose-intensive regimens for chemosensitive brain tumors and development of improved gene therapies for malignant gliomas are discussed.

Phase I and II trials of subcutaneously administered rIL-2, interferon alfa-2a, and fluorouracil in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: A phase I followed by a phase II trial utilizing rIL-2, IFN alpha, and 5-FU were conducted in patients with unresectable and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: Treatment consisted of: rIL-2 at 5.0 x 10(6) IU/m2 SQ on days 1-5 for 4 weeks, rHUIFN alpha-2a at 5.0 x 10(6) U/m2 SQ on days 1, 3, and 5 for 4 weeks, and 5-FU by IV bolus on days 1-5 during week 1. In the phase I study, patients were treated at varying doses of 5-FU: I-none, II-250 mg/m2, III-300, and IV 375. A phase II trial was then conducted utilizing the same schedule and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for 5-FU. RESULTS: Twenty patients were entered into the phase I trial. Dose-limiting toxicity included grade III nausea and vomiting, and one sudden cardiac death. The MTD for 5-FU was determined to be 300 mg/m2. In the phase II trial, a median of two cycles of therapy was administered to 25 evaluable patients. Toxicity was moderate and consisted primarily of fevers, chills, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and anorexia. Grade IV thrombocytopenia, consistent with ITP, developed in one patient each on the phase I and phase II trial. Seven partial responses were seen among 25 patients treated in the phase II trial for a 28% (CI 12-49%) response rate. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of 5-FU to rIL-2 and rHuIFN alpha-2a appears to increase the toxicity of this therapy. Randomized trials will be required to determine if efficacy is enhanced.

Accelerated induction therapy and resection for poor prognosis stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Induction therapy and resection may improve the survival of patients with poor prognosis stage III non-small cell lung cancer, at the cost of significant treatment prolongation. The purpose of this study was to assess toxicity, response, and survival of an accelerated induction regimen and resection in poor prognosis stage III non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Forty-two surgically staged patients with poor prognosis stage III non-small cell lung cancer received 11 days of induction treatment consisting of 96 hours of continuous chemotherapy infusions of cisplatin (20 mg.m-2.day-2), 5 fluorouracil (1,000 mg.m-2.day-2), and etoposide (75 mg.m-2.day-2) concurrent with accelerated fractionation radiation therapy (1.5 Gy twice a day, to a dose of 27 Gy). Induction was followed in 4 weeks by resection. Postoperatively, a second course of continuous chemotherapy and concurrent accelerated fractionation radiation therapy (postoperative dose 13 to 36 Gy) was given. RESULTS: Despite some degree of induction toxicity in all patients there was only one induction death (2.4%). A clinical partial response was seen in 24 patients (57%). Thirty-six patients (86%) underwent thoracotomy, and resection was possible in 33 (79%). Pathologic downstaging was seen in 17 patients (40%), and 2 patients (5%) had no residual carcinoma at operation. There were 11 postoperative complications (31%) and 4 postoperative deaths (11%). Thirteen patients (31%) are alive and disease-free, 24 (57%) have persistent disease or have recurred (15 distant, 5 locoregional, 4 both), and 9 patients are alive with disease. The median survival is 21 months and the 2-year Kaplan-Meier survival is 43%, with no differences identified between stages IIIA and IIIB patients (p = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that accelerated induction therapy and resection in poor prognosis stage III non-small cell lung cancer (1) is toxic, with a 12% treatment mortality; (2) is effective with a 79% resection rate and 40% pathologic downstaging rate; (3) provides excellent local control; (4) may prolong survival; and (5) is of value in stage IIIB as well as stage IIIA patients.

Phase I trial of capecitabine in combination with interferon alpha in patients with metastatic renal cancer: toxicity and pharmacokinetics.

PURPOSE: The present study was designed to determine the toxicity and maximum tolerated doses of oral intermittent oral capecitabine and subcutaneous (s.c.) rHuIFNalpha2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites were also investigated. METHODS: A total of 27 patients were treated at four dose levels of capecitabine (825 or 1000 mg/m2 twice daily orally, days 1-14, 22-36) and rHuIFNalpha2a (1.5 or 3.0 MU/m2 s.c. three times weekly). Unchanged capecitabine and its metabolites were analyzed in plasma using liquid chroatography/mass spectrometry in ten patients. RESULTS: The toxicity of combined capecitabine and rHuIFNalpha2a was moderate. Patients experienced mild nausea/vomiting (70%) and diarrhea (63%). The hand-foot syndrome was seen in 67% of patients and was generally mild, as was hematologic toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity included diarrhea, mucositis, neutropenia and the hand-foot syndrome. The dose level recommended for further trials included capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily and rHuIFNalpha2a 3.0 MU/m2 three times weekly. One patient had a partial response of a liver lesion (duration > 200 days). Pharmacokinetic parameters of capecitabine and its metabolites (5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine, 5-fluorouracil and alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine) were similar to those reported by other authors. There was rapid conversion to 5'-deoxyuridine. The peak plasma concentrations of capecitabine occurred between 0.5 and 3.0 h. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of capecitabine and rHuIFNalpha2a was well tolerated. The recommended dose levels for phase II trials are: rHuIFNalpha2a 3.0 MU/m2 s.c. three times weekly and oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks. No evidence of an effect of rHuIFNalpha2a on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine or its metabolites was apparent. A phase II trial in untreated patients with metastatic RCC is planned.

A phase II pharmacodynamic study of pyrazoloacridine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To perform a phase II trial of pyrazoloacridine (PZA), a novel DNA intercalator, in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma and no previous therapy. METHODS: PZA was administered at a dose of 750 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 h every 21 days. Pharmacokinetic studies to determine PZA plasma concentrations were performed. RESULTS: No responses were seen in 14 response-evaluable patients. Patients received a median of two cycles of PZA (range 1-6). Toxicity included neutropenia and neurologic side-effects, which were > or = grade III in 73% and 14%, respectively. High plasma concentrations of PZA (Cmax) correlated with low neutrophil counts (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: PZA is inactive at this dose and schedule in colorectal cancer, and produces moderately severe toxicity.

Delayed appearance of carbon granulomas of the scalp after use of carbon fiber pins for refixation of a stereotactic head frame. Case report.

The authors present a case involving the formation of several carbon granulomas in the scalp of a woman 7 years after she underwent craniotomy. Her operation had included the use of carbon fiber pins for refixation of a stereotactic head frame. Carbon granulomas have been noted in multiple organs following surgical or traumatic carbon deposition, but have not been reported in association with neurosurgical carbon fiber pins used for head fixation. The lesions in this case arose a few months after initiation of chemotherapy for the patient's brain tumor. The relationship of carbon and cutaneous granuloma formation to adjuvant therapies and treatment strategies is discussed.

Mature results from a phase II trial of accelerated induction chemoradiotherapy and surgery for poor prognosis stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

Mature results are reported from a phase II trial of accelerated induction chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer whose prognosis is poor. Surgically staged patients with poor prognosis stage III non-small-cell lung cancer were eligible for this study. Four-day continuous intravenous infusions of cisplatin 20 mg/m2/day, 5-fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m2/day, and etoposide 75 mg/m2/day were given concurrently with accelerated fractionation radiation therapy, 1.5 Gy twice a day, to a total dose of 27 Gy. Surgical resection followed in 4 weeks. Identical postoperative chemotherapy and concurrent radiation to a total dose of 40 to 63 Gy was subsequently given. Between February 1991 and June 1994, 42 eligible and evaluable patients, 23 with stage IIIA disease and 19 with stage IIIB disease, were entered in this trial. Treatment was well tolerated. The pathologic response rate was 40%. This response was complete in 5%. With a median follow-up of 54 months, the Kaplan-Meier 4-year survival estimate is 19%: 26% for stage IIIA and 11% for stage IIIB patients. Patients with a pathologic response, resectable disease, or pathologic downstaging to stage 0, I, or II had a better survival. The 4-year estimates of locoregional and distant disease control are 70% and 19%, respectively. It is concluded that although the ultimate role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and surgery in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer must await the results of phase III clinical trials, survival and locoregional control in this study appear improved in comparison with historical experience. There is a subset of patients, able to undergo resection with pathologic downstaging, who have a projected survival equivalent to that of patients with more limited disease. Clinical or pathologic tools to identify these patients before treatment would be highly useful.

From serendipity to design: the evolution of drug development in oncology.

Although screening of natural products remains the major method of discovering new anticancer drugs, newer techniques of rational drug design, computer-aided drug design, and combinatorial synthesis promise to broaden the scope of compounds available for screening. Recent changes in Food and Drug Administration rules allow for accelerated approval of drugs for treating cancer and other life-threatening illnesses, although the three-phase process of clinical trials remains largely unchanged.

Second-generation interferons for cancer: clinical targets.

IFNs were the first new therapeutic products resulting from recombinant DNA technology. IFNs were also the first human proteins effective in cancer treatment. There is however much to be discovered which will lead to new clinical applications. Areas which represent major research challenges for full understanding and application of the IFN system are: (i) the diversity of the IFN family; (ii) the role of induction; (iii) molecular mechanism of action; (iv) cellular modulatory effects; (v) advantages of combinations, and (vi) identification of new therapeutic indications. This review will emphasize the diversity of the IFN family and chemical modifications which will result in second-generation IFNs. Pre-clinical and clinical findings form the basis for new therapeutic directions in chronic myelogenous leukemia, lymphomas, myelomas, melanoma, urologic malignancies, primary brain tumors, and ovarian carcinoma.

Locally advanced prostate cancer.

Standard therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer includes radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, or transperineal interstitial brachytherapy. Patients eligible for standard therapy are those with low risk features as defined by various risk group classifications, which generally include clinical stage T1 or T2a, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) less than 10 ng/mL, and biopsy Gleason sum of 6 or less. Although there has been important evolution in the performance of these techniques, particularly with respect to functional outcomes, these approaches for low-risk disease are relatively mature, and the cure rates with each of these therapies are similar in this patient population; locally advanced disease is more difficult to cure, however. Biochemical disease-free survival rates in men undergoing radical prostatectomy are clearly related to the pathologic stage. Prognostic groups can be defined based on pathologic stage with increasingly worse outcomes based on extracapsular extension (ECE), margin status, and the status of the lymph nodes and seminal vesicles. In patients with low risk features, the positive margin rate is generally low, making the presence or absence of ECE the dominant variable in predicting the likelihood of treatment failure. These observations suggest that more aggressive therapy is needed to cure those who are likely to have ECE or other adverse histologic features. Several nomograms predicting the likelihood of ECE or 5-year biochemical failure rates are now in routine clinical use, and can be used to select men at high risk of failure with single modality therapy for more aggressive treatment strategies. However, the optimal form of aggressive therapy for these patients is unknown.

Phase II trial of neoadjuvant estramustine and etoposide plus radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To report the results of a Phase II trial of neoadjuvant estramustine and etoposide before radical prostatectomy in patients with locally advanced disease. METHODS: Treatment consisted of three cycles of estramustine (10 mg/kg/day) and etoposide (50 mg/m(2)/day) orally on days 1 through 21, repeated every 28 days, followed by radical prostatectomy. The eligibility criteria included locally advanced prostate cancer (clinical Stage T2b/c or T3, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level of 15 ng/mL or greater, or Gleason score of 8 or higher) without evidence of metastatic disease. The median PSA level was 14 ng/mL (range 5.3 to 50), the median Gleason score was 7 (range 6 to 9), and 44% had Stage T2b/c or T3 disease. The primary endpoint was feasibility of neoadjuvant therapy and radical prostatectomy, including drug and surgery-related toxicities. Secondary endpoints included the pre-prostatectomy PSA level, local response, pathologic outcomes, and time to PSA failure. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were entered and completed all three cycles of therapy, and 16 (89%) underwent radical prostatectomy. A local response occurred in 15 (94%) of 16 patients with palpable tumors, and the serum PSA reached undetectable levels after therapy and before radical prostatectomy in 9 patients (50%). Five patients (28%) experienced grade 3 toxicity (two with deep venous thrombosis, two with neutropenia, and one with diarrhea) and one (6%) experienced grade 4 toxicity (pulmonary embolus) before surgery. The median operative time was 125 minutes, the mean blood loss was 665 mL, and the mean length of stay was 2.5 nights. Five minor surgical complications occurred in 4 patients. The pathologic analysis demonstrated residual carcinoma with squamous metaplasia and androgen deprivation effect in all patients. Five patients (31%) had organ-confined disease and 9 patients (56%) had specimen-confined disease. All patients achieved an undetectable PSA level postoperatively and at a median follow-up of 14 months (range 5 to 20) and without additional therapy, all 14 patients with negative lymph nodes were disease free. CONCLUSIONS: This trial confirms the feasibility of radical prostatectomy with acceptable surgical morbidity after neoadjuvant therapy with estramustine and etoposide in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. However, this regimen is associated with estramustine-induced thromboembolic toxicity. The results of the pathologic analysis suggest a higher than expected rate of organ-confined and specimen-confined disease, but little histologic evidence of antitumor effect beyond that associated with androgen deprivation. Additional study of this paradigm with other drug regimens is warranted.