Anatomic Comparison of Recipient Nerves for Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Neurotization: A Randomized Control Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Although neurotization has the potential to improve sensory outcomes after autologous breast reconstruction, this technique remains controversial. There is debate regarding the clinical outcomes and the recipient nerve of choice. This histoanatomical study aims to quantitatively compare the sensory components of the recipient nerves involved in neurotization of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. METHODS: Subjects undergoing bilateral autologous breast reconstruction were enrolled. Transected nerve specimens underwent immunohistochemical staining with antibodies against neurofilament 1 and choline acetyltransferase for total and motor neurons within the axons, respectively. Photomicrographs were captured, and axons were analyzed using ImageJ. Sensory axons were calculated as equal to the difference between the total and cholinergic axonal counts. RESULTS: Thirty-eight nerves from 19 subjects were included. The overall mean sensory axon count was 1246.3 (±1171.9) in the lateral cutaneous branch (LCB) of the fourth intercostal nerve and 1123.8 (±1213.0) in the anterior cutaneous branch (ACB) of the third intercostal nerve.The fourth LCB presented with an additional 10.9% sensory axonal count (P > 0.05). On average, sensory fibers constituted 36.7% and 31.7% of all fibers in the third ACBs and fourth LCBs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides anatomic and histological evidence that the fourth LCB and third ACB contain comparable mean numbers of sensory axons. Both constitute adequate recipient nerves for coaptation in deep inferior epigastric perforator reinnervation to achieve optimal sensory return after breast reconstruction. The fourth LCB should be preferable when the third ACB remains intact to preserve any native breast flap sensation.

The Evolving Landscape of Leptomeningeal Cancer from Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) is a fatal but uncommon complication occurring in 5-15% of patients with stage IV cancer. Current treatment options are ineffective at managing leptomeningeal spread, with a median overall survival (mOS) of 2-6 months. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify past and future therapies for LMC from solid tumors. Forty-three clinical trials (CTs) published between 1982-2022 were identified. Of these, 35 (81.4%) were non-randomized CTs and 8 (18.6%) were randomized CTs. The majority consisted of phase I (16.3%) and phase II CTs (65.1%). Trials enrolled patients with LMC from various primary histology (n = 23, 57.5%), with one CT evaluating LCM from melanoma (2.4%). A total of 21 trials evaluated a single modality treatment. Among CTs, 23.7% closed due to low accrual. Intraventricular (ITV)/intrathecal (IT) drug delivery was the most common route of administration (n = 22, 51.2%) vs. systemic drug delivery (n = 13, 30.3%). Two clinical trials evaluated the use of craniospinal irradiation for LMC with favorable results. LMC continues to carry a dismal prognosis, and over the years, increments in survival have remained stagnant. A paradigm shift towards targeted systemic therapy with continued standardization of efficacy endpoints will help to shed light on promising treatments.

Smell Outcomes in Olfactory Groove Meningioma Resection Through Unilateral versus Bilateral Transcranial Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Olfactory disturbance is a common complication that occurs following the surgical resection of olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs). There is little evidence on the best transcranial approach that minimizes rates of postoperative olfactory disturbance. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare smell outcomes after OGM resection in unilateral versus bilateral transcranial approaches. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis was conducted using PUBMED, SCOPUS, and EMBASE in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The primary endpoint was incidence of new olfactory disturbance defined as anosmia or hyposmia, or both. Patients were classified as undergoing either a unilateral or bilateral approach. Data on presence of new postoperative olfactory deficits were used to generate standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis, comprising 342 patients. A total of 216 patients underwent unilateral approaches while 126 underwent resection via bilateral approach. In the unilateral approach cohort, 17.1% experienced new postoperative olfactory disturbance following resection, compared with 19.2% of patients in the bilateral approach cohort. Forest plot did not reveal any significant difference in the incidence of new olfactory disturbance following either unilateral or bilateral approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that there is no significant difference between the investigated transcranial approaches and postoperative olfactory disturbances. Accordingly, our study suggests that further investigation with introduced experimental control could provide more insight into the capabilities and drawbacks of each route in relation to olfactory outcomes.