Cardiac electronic implantable devices: A call for a new coding system.

Over the last decades, cardiac electronic implantable devices (CEID) have incorporated a myriad of technological capabilities that are not conveniently inferred by using the conventional ICHD and NBG coding systems. We propose a new coding system (i.e., the C-ARL-A coding system) aimed at overcoming this important limitation.

Reduction in new cardiac electronic device implantations in Catalonia during COVID-19.

AIMS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, concern regarding its effect on the management of non-communicable diseases has been raised. However, there are no data on the impact on cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) implantation rates. We aimed to determine the impact of SARS-CoV2 on the monthly incidence rates and type of pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantations in Catalonia before and after the declaration of the state of alarm in Spain on 14 March 2020. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on new CIED implantations for 2017-20 were prospectively collected by nine hospitals in Catalonia. A mixed model with random intercepts corrected for time was used to estimate the change in monthly CIED implantations. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, an absolute decrease of 56.5% was observed (54.7% in PM and 63.7% in ICD) in CIED implantation rates. Total CIED implantations for 2017-19 and January and February 2020 was 250/month (>195 PM and >55 ICD), decreasing to 207 (161 PM and 46 ICD) in March and 131 (108 PM and 23 ICD) in April 2020. In April 2020, there was a significant fall of 185.25 CIED implantations compared to 2018 [95% confidence interval (CI) 129.6-240.9; P < 0.001] and of 188 CIED compared to 2019 (95% CI 132.3-243.7; P < 0.001). No significant differences in the type of PM or ICD were observed, nor in the indication for primary or secondary prevention. CONCLUSIONS: During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, a substantial decrease in CIED implantations was observed in Catalonia. Our findings call for measures to avoid long-term social impact.

Pseudoatrial fibrillation during pacemaker interrogation: what is the mechanism?

BACKGROUND: Normal pacemaker response to magnet and programmer is almost universal and helps to interpret basal rhythm. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this report, we report an undescribed atypical magnet response due to an internal cross-talk with atrial oversensing during a specific part of interrogation, simulating atrial fibrillation.

Inefficient diastolic filling in dual-chamber pacemaker recipients: impact of atrio-ventricular interval shortening (AVI-SHORT study).

BACKGROUND: Adequate synchronization between the passive ("E") and active ("a") left ventricular (LV) diastolic filling contributes to the efficiency of the heartbeat. E/a superposition in dual-chamber pacemaker (PM) recipients is an under-recognized phenomenon that may be corrected by shortening the atrio-ventricular interval (AVI). We aimed at establishing the prevalence of E/a superposition in PM patients and to analyze the clinical, echocardiographic, and biological impact of AVI shortening. METHODS: Seventy patients with dual-chamber PMs (74 ± 8 years old, 12 women) were consecutively enrolled in this study. Patients with baseline E/a superposition were crossed over from default to manually shortened AVI or vice versa in a case-control fashion (intervention group). Patients without baseline E/a superposition (controls) served as a reference for a descriptive comparison with the intervention group. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients had E/a superposition after PM implantation (47%). Controls (n = 37) had higher LV ejection fraction (59 ± 8% vs. 53 ± 10%, p = 0.048) and lower levels of high sensitive troponin T and ST2 (p < 0.05) than intervention group patients. The AVI was shortened at 48 ± 9 ms in order to ensure adequate E/a separation. The walked distance increased from 75 ± 17 to 78 ± 10% (p = 0.049) and the Euro-QoL score from 0.50 ± 0.27 to 0.63 ± 0.19 (p = 0.011) with short AVI. CONCLUSIONS: E/a superposition occurs in approximately half of dual-chamber PM recipients and is associated with reduced LV function and increased myocardial injury biomarkers. AVI shortening produces a modest but significant effect in functional capacity and quality of life.

Atrioventricular Node Ablation to Enhance Resynchronization Therapy Response in a Patient With Complete Atrioventricular Block.

Up to one-third of patients who undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy do not obtain clinical benefit. A systematic approach can identify treatable causes in many nonresponding patients. We present a case of nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy that resolved by ablation of the atrioventricular node in a patient with complete atrioventricular block. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Incidence and predictors of new-onset atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implantation after sutureless aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: In high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a sutureless Perceval prosthesis (SU-AVR) can be performed instead of conventional AVR or transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Little data are available regarding postoperative conduction disorders after SU-AVR. We aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of new-onset complete atrioventricular block (NO-AVB) requiring permanent cardiac stimulation following SU-AVR. METHODS: We studied consecutive patients who underwent SU-AVR between 2013 and 2015. Early patients underwent partial aortic decalcification and subannular valve implantation (standard technique), while later patients underwent complete/symmetrical decalcification and intra-annular valve deployment (modified technique). Predictive baseline and procedural variables and electrocardiographic parameters were identified using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: We included 140 patients (mean age, 78 ± 6.5 years; mean Log EuroSCORE II, 8.9 ± 10%; 28.6% concomitant myocardial revascularization). The most common postoperative conduction disturbances were LBBB (25%), NO-AVB (12.1%) and first-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) (7.9%). The incidence of NO-AVB was 61% lower with the modified versus the standard technique (P= 0.04). NO-AVB predominantly appeared within 24 h post-surgery, occurring >24 h post-surgery in only 2 patients (both with baseline conduction defects). Independent predictors of NO-AVB included baseline left QRS axis deviation (LaQD; P= 0.03), first-degree AVB (P< 0.01) and standard surgical technique (P= 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: NO-AVB is a frequent complication following SU-AVR, and its incidence strongly depends on the surgical technique. Baseline first-degree AVB and LaQD independently predict NO-AVB and should be considered when deciding the duration of postoperative electrocardiographic monitoring.