Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 111
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 13: 393, 2013 Oct 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24099264

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A tariff modulation mechanisms has been introduced in some Italian regions with the aim of reducing inappropriate admissions and improving quality of care. In response to a regional act, hospitals in Lazio adopted a clinical pathway for elderly patients with hip fracture and introduced a compensation system based on the quality of health care, as in a pay-for-performance model. The objective of the present study was to compare the proportion of surgery for hip fracture performed within 48 hours of admission among Lazio hospitals according to different payment systems, before and after the implementation of the regional act. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients aged 65 years and over, residing in the Lazio region and admitted to an acute care hospital for hip fracture before (1 July 2008 - 30 June 2009) and after (1 July 2010 - 30 June 2011) the pay-for-performance act. The proportion of surgeries performed within 48 h of hospital arrival was calculated. An adjusted multivariate regression analysis was applied to assess the effect of hospital payment type on the likelihood of surgery within 48 h of hospital arrival. RESULTS: The share of patients with hip fracture that had surgery within 48 hours was 11.7% before the introduction of the pay-for-performance act and 22.2% after. The proportion of early hip fracture operations increased after the pay-for-performance act, regardless of hospital payment type. The largest increase of surgery within 48 h occurred in private hospitals (adjusted Relative Risk = 2.80, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a compensation system based on health care quality is associated with improved quality of care for elderly patients with hip fracture, especially in hospitals that only use the Diagnosis Related Group system.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Reembolso de Incentivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
2.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 12: 54, 2012 Jun 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22720844

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) rate is a quality of health care indicator frequently used at national and international level. The aim of this study was to assess whether adjustment for Robson's Ten Group Classification System (TGCS), and clinical and socio-demographic variables of the mother and the fetus is necessary for inter-hospital comparisons of CS rates. METHODS: The study population includes 64,423 deliveries in Emilia-Romagna between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2004, classified according to theTGCS. Poisson regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted hospital relative risks of CS compared to a reference category. Analyses were carried out in the overall population and separately according to the Robson groups (groups I, II, III, IV and V-X combined). Adjusted relative risks (RR) of CS were estimated using two risk-adjustment models; the first (M1) including the TGCS group as the only adjustment factor; the second (M2) including in addition demographic and clinical confounders identified using a stepwise selection procedure. Percentage variations between crude and adjusted RRs by hospital were calculated to evaluate the confounding effect of covariates. RESULTS: The percentage variations from crude to adjusted RR proved to be similar in M1 and M2 model. However, stratified analyses by Robson's classification groups showed that residual confounding for clinical and demographic variables was present in groups I (nulliparous, single, cephalic, ≥37 weeks, spontaneous labour) and III (multiparous, excluding previous CS, single, cephalic, ≥37 weeks, spontaneous labour) and IV (multiparous, excluding previous CS, single, cephalic, ≥37 weeks, induced or CS before labour) and to a minor extent in groups II (nulliparous, single, cephalic, ≥37 weeks, induced or CS before labour) and IV (multiparous, excluding previous CS, single, cephalic, ≥37 weeks, induced or CS before labour). CONCLUSIONS: The TGCS classification is useful for inter-hospital comparison of CS section rates, but residual confounding is present in the TGCS strata.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Ajuste de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/estadística & datos numéricos , Trabajo de Parto , Modelos Estadísticos , Trabajo de Parto Prematuro/epidemiología , Paridad , Embarazo , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 12: 25, 2012 Jan 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22283880

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: P.Re.Val.E. is the most comprehensive comparative evaluation program of healthcare outcomes in Lazio, an Italian region, and the first Italian study to make health provider performance data available to the public. The aim of this study is to describe the P.Re.Val.E. and the impact of releasing performance data to the public. METHODS: P.Re.Val.E. included 54 outcome/process indicators encompassing many different clinical areas. Crude and adjusted rates were estimated for the 2006-2009 period. Multivariate regression models and direct standardization procedures were used to control for potential confounding due to individual characteristics. Variable life-adjusted display charts were developed, and 2008-2009 results were compared with those from 2006-2007. RESULTS: Results of 54 outcome indicators were published online at http://www.epidemiologia.lazio.it/prevale10/index.php. Public disclosure of the indicators' results caused mixed reactions but finally promoted discussion and refinement of some indicators. Based on the P.Re.Val.E. experience, the Italian National Agency for Regional Health Services has launched a National Outcome Program aimed at systematically comparing outcomes in hospitals and local health units in Italy. CONCLUSIONS: P.Re.Val.E. highlighted aspects of patient care that merit further investigation and monitoring to improve healthcare services and equity.


Asunto(s)
Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Instituciones de Salud/normas , Hospitales/normas , Humanos , Italia , Opinión Pública
4.
Environ Health ; 10: 22, 2011 Mar 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21435200

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several studies have been conducted on the possible health effects for people living close to incinerators and well-conducted reviews are available. Nevertheless, several uncertainties limit the overall interpretation of the findings. We evaluated the health effects of emissions from two incinerators in a pilot cohort study. METHODS: The study area was defined as the 3.5 km radius around two incinerators located near Forlì (Italy). People who were residents in 1/1/1990, or subsequently became residents up to 31/12/2003, were enrolled in a longitudinal study (31,347 individuals). All the addresses were geocoded. Follow-up continued until 31/12/2003 by linking the mortality register, cancer registry and hospital admissions databases. Atmospheric Dispersion Model System (ADMS) software was used for exposure assessment; modelled concentration maps of heavy metals (annual average) were considered the indicators of exposure to atmospheric pollution from the incinerators, while concentration maps of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) were considered for exposure to other pollution sources. Age and area-based socioeconomic status adjusted rate ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals were estimated with Poisson regression, using the lowest exposure category to heavy metals as reference. RESULTS: The mortality and morbidity experience of the whole cohort did not differ from the regional population. In the internal analysis, no association between pollution exposure from the incinerators and all-cause and cause-specific mortality outcomes was observed in men, with the exception of colon cancer. Exposure to the incinerators was associated with cancer mortality among women, in particular for all cancer sites (RR for the highest exposure level = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.99), stomach, colon, liver and breast cancer. No clear trend was detected for cancer incidence. No association was found for hospitalizations related to major diseases. NO2 levels, as a proxy from other pollution sources (traffic in particular), did not exert an important confounding role. CONCLUSIONS: No increased risk of mortality and morbidity was found in the entire area. The internal analysis of the cohort based on dispersion modeling found excesses of mortality for some cancer types in the highest exposure categories, especially in women. The interpretation of the findings is limited given the pilot nature of the study.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/toxicidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Enfermedades Respiratorias/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/clasificación , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Incineración , Italia/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Metales Pesados/clasificación , Metales Pesados/toxicidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Teóricos , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/clasificación , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/toxicidad , Proyectos Piloto , Distribución de Poisson , Enfermedades Respiratorias/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos
5.
Environ Health ; 10: 53, 2011 Jun 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21635784

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Policies on waste disposal in Europe are heterogeneous and rapidly changing, with potential health implications that are largely unknown. We conducted a health impact assessment of landfilling and incineration in three European countries: Italy, Slovakia and England. METHODS: A total of 49 (Italy), 2 (Slovakia), and 11 (England) incinerators were operating in 2001 while for landfills the figures were 619, 121 and 232, respectively. The study population consisted of residents living within 3 km of an incinerator and 2 km of a landfill. Excess risk estimates from epidemiological studies were used, combined with air pollution dispersion modelling for particulate matter (PM10) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). For incinerators, we estimated attributable cancer incidence and years of life lost (YoLL), while for landfills we estimated attributable cases of congenital anomalies and low birth weight infants. RESULTS: About 1,000,000, 16,000, and 1,200,000 subjects lived close to incinerators in Italy, Slovakia and England, respectively. The additional contribution to NO2 levels within a 3 km radius was 0.23, 0.15, and 0.14 µg/m3, respectively. Lower values were found for PM10. Assuming that the incinerators continue to operate until 2020, we are moderately confident that the annual number of cancer cases due to exposure in 2001-2020 will reach 11, 0, and 7 in 2020 and then decline to 0 in the three countries in 2050. We are moderately confident that by 2050, the attributable impact on the 2001 cohort of residents will be 3,621 (Italy), 37 (Slovakia) and 3,966 (England) YoLL. The total exposed population to landfills was 1,350,000, 329,000, and 1,425,000 subjects, respectively. We are moderately confident that the annual additional cases of congenital anomalies up to 2030 will be approximately 2, 2, and 3 whereas there will be 42, 13, and 59 additional low-birth weight newborns, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current health impacts of landfilling and incineration can be characterized as moderate when compared to other sources of environmental pollution, e.g. traffic or industrial emissions, that have an impact on public health. There are several uncertainties and critical assumptions in the assessment model, but it provides insight into the relative health impact attributable to waste management.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/toxicidad , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Incineración , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Esperanza de Vida , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Eliminación de Residuos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Niño , Preescolar , Recolección de Datos , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Teóricos , Eslovaquia/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
6.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (12): CD003410, 2011 Dec 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22161378

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several types of medications have been used for stabilizing heroin users: Methadone, Buprenorphine and levo-alpha-acetyl-methadol (LAAM.) The present review focuses on the prescription of heroin to heroin-dependent individuals. OBJECTIVES: To compare heroin maintenance to methadone or other substitution treatments for opioid dependence regarding: efficacy and acceptability, retaining patients in treatment, reducing the use of illicit substances, and improving health and social functioning. SEARCH METHODS: A review of the Cochrane Central Register of Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to november 2009), EMBASE (1980 to 2005) and CINAHL until 2005 (on OVID) was conducted. Personal communications with researchers in the field of heroin prescription identified ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of heroin maintenance treatment (alone or combined with methadone) compared with any other pharmacological treatment for heroin-dependent individuals. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Eight studies involving 2007 patients met the inclusion criteria. Five studies compared supervised injected heroin plus flexible dosages of methadone treatment to oral methadone only and showed that heroin helps patients to remain in treatment (valid data from 4 studies, N=1388 Risk Ratio 1.44 (95%CI 1.19-1.75) heterogeneity P=0.03), and to reduce use of illicit drugs. Maintenance with supervised injected heroin has a not statistically significant protective effect on mortality (4 studies, N=1477 Risk Ratio 0.65 (95% CI 0.25-1.69) heterogeneity P=0.89), but it exposes at a greater risk of adverse events related to study medication (3 studies N=373 Risk Ratio 13.50 (95% CI 2.55-71.53) heterogeneity P=0.52). Results on criminal activity and incarceration were not possible to be pooled but where the outcome were measured results of single studies do provide evidence that heroin provision can reduce criminal activity and incarceration/imprisonment. Social functioning improved in all the intervention groups with heroin groups having slightly better results. If all the studies comparing heroin provision in any conditions vs any other treatment are pooled the direction of effect remain in favour of heroin. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence suggests an added value of heroin prescribed alongside flexible doses of methadone for long-term, treatment refractory, opioid users, to reach a decrease in the use of illicit substances, involvement in criminal activity and incarceration, a possible reduction in mortaliity; and an increase in retention in treatment. Due to the higher rate of serious adverse events, heroin prescription should remain a treatment for people who are currently or have in the past failed maintenance treatment, and it should be provided in clinical settings where proper follow-up is ensured.


Asunto(s)
Dependencia de Heroína/rehabilitación , Heroína/uso terapéutico , Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Crimen/prevención & control , Humanos , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Cooperación del Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Adulto Joven
7.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 182(3): 376-84, 2010 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20339147

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Acute effects of ozone on mortality have been extensively documented in clinical and epidemiological research. However, only a few studies have focused on subgroups of the population especially vulnerable to these effects. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the association between exposure to ozone and cause-specific mortality, and to evaluate whether individual sociodemographic characteristics or chronic conditions confer greater susceptibility to the adverse effects of ozone. METHODS: A case-crossover analysis was conducted in 10 Italian cities. Data on mortality were collected for the period 2001 to 2005 (April-September) for 127,860 deceased subjects. Information was retrieved on cause of death, sociodemographic characteristics, chronic conditions from previous hospital admissions, and location of death. Daily ozone concentrations were collected from background fixed monitors. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We estimated a 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-2.1) increase in total mortality for a 10 microg/m(3) increase in ozone (8-h, lag 0-5). The effect lasted several days for total, cardiac and respiratory mortality (lag 0-5), and it was delayed for cerebrovascular deaths (lag 3-5). In the subgroup analysis, the effect was more pronounced in people older than 85 years of age (3.5%; 95% CI, 2.4-4.6) than in 35- to 64-year-old subjects (0.8%; 95% CI, -0.8 to 2.5), in women (2.2%; 95% CI, 1.4-3.1) than in men (0.8%; 95% CI, -0.1 to 1.8), and for out-of-hospital deaths (2.1%; 95% CI, 1.0-3.2), especially among patients with diabetes (5.5%; 95% CI, 1.4-9.8). CONCLUSIONS: A greater vulnerability of elderly people and women was indicated; subjects who died at home and had diabetes emerged as especially affected.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/toxicidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/mortalidad , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Ozono/toxicidad , Trastornos Respiratorios/mortalidad , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Cruzados , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sexuales
8.
Epidemiol Prev ; 35(2 Suppl 1): 1-80, 2011.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21628766

RESUMEN

This introductory guide represents an operative tool to conduct epidemiological studies in the area of comparative outcomes evaluation. It is based on the experience of epidemiological research in this field conducted in Italy within national (BPAC-Esiti del bypass aortocoronarico, Progetto mattoni outcome, Progetto Progressi) or regional (P.Re.Val.E. Programma Regionale di Valutazione degli Esiti, Lazio) health care outcomes projects and the National outcome programme. This guide is aimed to all those interested in conducting or interpreting health care outcomes studies within different levels of the Italian NHS. It gives an introductory description of the operative steps to build outcome indicators and to perform comparative analyses, with the general objective of measuring and promoting improvement in health care. A specific emphasis is given to the use of routinely collected health care databases that have found widespread use for epidemiological purposes. This guide has two parts: part A includes an introduction and comments on critical methodological points, part B shows three example of epidemiological studies (A. Complications after cholecystectomy: comparison between two surgical techniques, B. 30-day mortality after acute myocardial infarction: comparison among hospitals, C. 30-day mortality after acute myocardial infarction: comparison between time periods). The online version of this guide is organised as a hypertext as practical instrument of appraisal.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/normas , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Hospitales/normas , Programas Nacionales de Salud/normas , Colecistectomía/métodos , Colecistectomía/normas , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Promoción de la Salud/normas , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Humanos , Italia , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud
9.
Epidemiology ; 21(3): 414-23, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20386174

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the short-term effects of ultrafine particles. METHODS: We evaluated the effect of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter or=35 years hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, lower respiratory tract infections, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Information was available for factors indicating vulnerability, such as age and previous admissions for COPD. Particulate matter data were collected daily at one central fixed monitor. A case-crossover analysis was performed using a time-stratified approach. We estimated percent increases in risk per 14 microg/m PM10, per 10 microg/m PM2.5, and per 9392 particles/mL. RESULTS: An immediate impact (lag 0) of PM2.5 on hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome (2.3% [95% confidence interval = 0.5% to 4.2%]) and heart failure (2.4% [0.3% to 4.5%]) was found, whereas the effect on lower respiratory tract infections (2.8% [0.5% to 5.2%]) was delayed (lag 2). Particle number concentration showed an association only with admissions for heart failure (lag 0-5; 2.4% [0.2% to 4.7%]) and COPD (lag 0; 1.6% [0.0% to 3.2%]). The effects were generally stronger in the elderly and during winter. There was no clear effect modification with previous COPD. CONCLUSIONS: We found sizeable acute health effects of fine and ultrafine particles. Although differential reliability in exposure assessment, in particular of ultrafine particles, precludes a firm conclusion, the study indicates that particulate matter of different sizes tends to have diverse outcomes, with dissimilar latency between exposure and health response.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Italia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tamaño de la Partícula
10.
BMC Infect Dis ; 10: 97, 2010 Apr 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20403169

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Concerns about the hepatitis C virus (HCV) are due to the high risk of chronic liver disease and poor treatment efficacy. Synthesizing evidence from multiple data sources is becoming widely used to estimate HCV-infection prevalence. This paper aims to estimate the prevalence of HCV infection, and the hepatic and extrahepatic sequelae in at-risk groups, using routinely collected data in the Lazio region, Italy. METHODS: HCV laboratory surveillance and dialysis, hospital discharge, and drug-user registers were used as information sources to identify at-risk groups and to estimate HCV prevalence and sequelae.Full name and birth date were used as linkage keys for the various health registries. Prevalence was estimated as the percentage of cases within the general population and the at-risk groups, with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) from 1997 to 2001. The risk of sequelae was estimated through a follow-up of hospital discharges up to December 31, 2004 and calculated as the prevalence ratio in HCV-positive and HCV-negative people, within each at-risk group, with 95% CI. RESULTS: There were 65,127 HCV-infected people in the study period; the prevalence was 1.24% (95%CI = 1.23%-1.25%) in the whole population, higher in males and older adults. Drug users (35.1%; 95%CI = 34.6-35.7) and dialysis patients (21.1%; 95%CI = 20.2%-22.0%) showed the highest values. Medical procedures with little exposure to blood resulted in higher estimates, ranging between 1.3% and 3.4%, which was not conclusively attributable to the surgical procedures. Cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and encephalopathy were the most frequent hepatic sequelae; cryoglobulinaemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were the most frequent extrahepatic sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Synthesising data from multiple routine sources improved estimates of HCV prevalence and sequelae in dialysis patients and drug users, although prevalence validity should be assessed in survey and sequelae need a well-defined longitudinal approach.


Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Italia/epidemiología , Cirrosis Hepática/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Factores Sexuales , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Adulto Joven
11.
Environ Health ; 9: 41, 2010 Jul 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20663144

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Subjects living close to high traffic roads (HTR) are more likely to suffer from air-pollution related morbidity and mortality. The issue has large public health consequences but few studies have described the main socio-demographic characteristics of people exposed to traffic. OBJECTIVES: To characterise a large cohort of residents in Rome according to different measures of traffic exposure, socioeconomic position (SEP), and baseline health status. METHODS: Residents of Rome in October 2001 were selected. Individual and area-based SEP indices were available. GIS was used to obtain traffic indicators at residential addresses: distance from HTR (> = 10,000 vehicles/day), length of HTR, average daily traffic count, and traffic density within 150 meters of home. Hospitalisations in the 5-year period before enrolment were used to characterise health status. Logistic and linear regression analyses estimated the association between traffic exposure and socio-demographic characteristics. RESULTS: We selected 1,898,898 subjects with complete SEP information and GIS traffic indicators. A total of 320,913 individuals (17%) lived within 50 meters of an HTR, and 14% lived between 50 and 100 meters. These proportions were higher among 75+ year-old subjects. Overall, all traffic indicators were directly associated with SEP, with people living in high or medium SEP areas or with a university degree more likely to be exposed to traffic than people living in low SEP areas or with a low level of education. However, an effect modification by area of residence within the city was seen and the association between traffic and SEP was reversed in the city centre. CONCLUSIONS: A large section of the population is exposed to traffic in Rome. Elderly people and those living in areas of high and medium SEP tend to be more exposed. These findings are related to the historical stratification of the population within the city according to age and socioeconomic status.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Estado de Salud , Emisiones de Vehículos/toxicidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Escolaridad , Empleo , Femenino , Sistemas de Información Geográfica , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Italia , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Salud Pública , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estadística como Asunto , Adulto Joven
12.
Environ Health ; 9: 37, 2010 Jul 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20637065

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed at developing a standardized heat wave definition to estimate and compare the impact on mortality by gender, age and death causes in Europe during summers 1990-2004 and 2003, separately, accounting for heat wave duration and intensity. METHODS: Heat waves were defined considering both maximum apparent temperature and minimum temperature and classified by intensity, duration and timing during summer. The effect was estimated as percent increase in daily mortality during heat wave days compared to non heat wave days in people over 65 years. City specific and pooled estimates by gender, age and cause of death were calculated. RESULTS: The effect of heat waves showed great geographical heterogeneity among cities. Considering all years, except 2003, the increase in mortality during heat wave days ranged from + 7.6% in Munich to + 33.6% in Milan. The increase was up to 3-times greater during episodes of long duration and high intensity. Pooled results showed a greater impact in Mediterranean (+ 21.8% for total mortality) than in North Continental (+ 12.4%) cities. The highest effect was observed for respiratory diseases and among women aged 75-84 years. In 2003 the highest impact was observed in cities where heat wave episode was characterized by unusual meteorological conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Climate change scenarios indicate that extreme events are expected to increase in the future even in regions where heat waves are not frequent. Considering our results prevention programs should specifically target the elderly, women and those suffering from chronic respiratory disorders, thus reducing the impact on mortality.


Asunto(s)
Calor/efectos adversos , Mortalidad , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Desastres/estadística & datos numéricos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo
13.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (8): CD003410, 2010 Aug 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20687073

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several types of medications have been used for stabilizing heroin users: Methadone, Buprenorphine and levo-alpha-acetyl-methadol (LAAM.) The present review focuses on the prescription of heroin to heroin-dependent individuals. OBJECTIVES: To compare heroin maintenance to methadone or other substitution treatments for opioid dependence regarding: efficacy and acceptability, retaining patients in treatment, reducing the use of illicit substances, and improving health and social functioning. SEARCH STRATEGY: A review of the Cochrane Central Register of Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to 2008), EMBASE (1980 to 2005) and CINAHL until 2005 (on OVID) was conducted. Personal communication with researchers in the field of heroin prescription identified other ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of heroin maintenance treatment (alone or combined with methadone) were compared with any other pharmacological treatment for heroin-dependent individuals. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Eight studies involving 2007 patients were included. Results show marginal significance in favour of heroin for remaining in treatment until the end of the study (8 studies, N= 2007, RR=1.23, 95%CI=0.96-1.57; heterogeneity P < 0.01). Adverse events are significantly more frequent in the heroin group. Heroin plus methadone prescription for maintenance treatment in adult chronic opioid users who failed previous methadone treatment attempts decreases the use of other illicit substances (3 Studies, N=1289, RR=0.63, 95%CI=0.49, 0.81, heterogeneity P=0.21), and reduces the risk of being incarcerated (2 studies, N=1103, RR=0.64, 95%CI=0.51-0.79, heterogeneity P=0.31). In addition, we also found a marginally significant protective effect of heroin prescription plus methadone for the use of street heroin (3 studies, N=1512, RR=0.70, 95%CI=0.49-1.00, heterogeneity P < 0.01) and for criminal activity (4 studies, N=1377, RR=0.80, 95%CI=0.61-1.04, heterogeneity P=0.31). There was not enough power to detect statistically significant results for the risk of death (5 studies, N=1817, RR=0.77, 95%CI=0.32-1.87, heterogeneity P=0.79). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence suggests a small added value of heroin prescribed alongside flexible doses of methadone for long-term, treatment-refractory opioid users, considering a decrease in the use of street heroin and other illicit substances, and in the probability of being imprisoned; and an increase in retention in treatment. Due to the higher rate of serious adverse events, heroin prescription should remain a treatment of last resort for people who are currently or have in the past failed maintenance treatment.


Asunto(s)
Dependencia de Heroína/rehabilitación , Heroína/uso terapéutico , Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Crimen/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
14.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 179(5): 383-9, 2009 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19060232

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Episode analyses of heat waves have documented a comparatively higher impact on mortality than on morbidity (hospital admissions) in European cities. The evidence from daily time series studies is scarce and inconsistent. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of high environmental temperatures on hospital admissions during April to September in 12 European cities participating in the Assessment and Prevention of Acute Health Effects of Weather Conditions in Europe (PHEWE) project. METHODS: For each city, time series analysis was used to model the relationship between maximum apparent temperature (lag 0-3 days) and daily hospital admissions for cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory causes by age (all ages, 65-74 age group, and 75+ age group), and the city-specific estimates were pooled for two geographical groupings of cities. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For respiratory admissions, there was a positive association that was heterogeneous between cities. For a 1 degrees C increase in maximum apparent temperature above a threshold, respiratory admissions increased by +4.5% (95% confidence interval, 1.9-7.3) and +3.1% (95% confidence interval, 0.8-5.5) in the 75+ age group in Mediterranean and North-Continental cities, respectively. In contrast, the association between temperature and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular admissions tended to be negative and did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: High temperatures have a specific impact on respiratory admissions, particularly in the elderly population, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Why high temperature increases cardiovascular mortality but not cardiovascular admissions is also unclear. The impact of extreme heat events on respiratory admissions is expected to increase in European cities as a result of global warming and progressive population aging.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/epidemiología , Calor/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Respiratorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/envenenamiento , Niño , Preescolar , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución de Poisson , Salud Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
15.
Eur J Public Health ; 20(4): 397-402, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19946045

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Possible effect modifiers are often considered as confounders when applying pre-defined risk-adjustment models. The aim was to provide evidence of effect modification by gender in comparative evaluations of hospitals on 30-day in-hospital mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: Ninety-two Italian hospitals discharging more than 300 patients with a diagnosis of AMI during 2004 were considered. Patients discharged or transferred within 48 h of hospital admission were excluded. Comorbidities recorded in previous and current admissions were used to define patients' health status and to build the adjustment model, in which an interaction term (gender by hospital) was introduced to test the presence of effect modification. The end point was the 30-day in-hospital mortality after AMI. RESULTS: The study population consists of 38,544 incident events of AMI from 92 Italian hospitals. Eleven hospitals showed a significant effect modification by gender. In one of them, the overall mortality rate was comparable with that of the reference category, but a significant excess risk for women was found [odds ratios (ORs) = 2.3; P < 0.01]. In 10 hospitals, the overall adjusted ORs presented a significant excess mortality compared with the benchmark: three had a significant excess mortality only among females (ranging from 230 to 370%), four only among males (ranging from 110 to 200%), and three among both genders. CONCLUSIONS: An effect modification by gender was found. The results suggest that in comparative hospital performances evaluation, stratification by gender is desirable to investigate possible differences in attitudes and practices of health services in the treatment of men and women.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Factores Sexuales , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Ajuste de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Circulation ; 117(9): 1183-8, 2008 Mar 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18268149

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several countries in the world have not yet prohibited smoking in public places. Few studies have been conducted on the effects of smoking bans on cardiac health. We evaluated changes in the frequency of acute coronary events in Rome, Italy, after the introduction of legislation that banned smoking in all indoor public places in January 2005. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed acute coronary events (out-of-hospital deaths and hospital admissions) between 2000 and 2005 in city residents 35 to 84 years of age. We computed annual standardized rates and estimated rate ratios by comparing the data from prelegislation (2000-2004) and postlegislation (2005) periods. We took into account several time-related potential confounders, including particulate matter (PM10) air pollution, temperature, influenza epidemics, time trends, and total hospitalization rates. The reduction in acute coronary events was statistically significant in 35- to 64-year-olds (11.2%, 95% CI 6.9% to 15.3%) and in 65- to 74-year-olds (7.9%, 95% CI 3.4% to 12.2%) after the smoking ban. No evidence was found of an effect among the very elderly. The reduction tended to be greater in men and among lower socioeconomic groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found a statistically significant reduction in acute coronary events in the adult population after the smoking ban. The size of the effect was consistent with the pollution reduction observed in indoor public places and with the known health effects of passive smoking. The results affirm that public interventions that prohibit smoking can have enormous public health implications.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Coronaria/epidemiología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/legislación & jurisprudencia , Fumar/epidemiología , Fumar/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Coronaria/etiología , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Restaurantes/legislación & jurisprudencia , Fumar/efectos adversos , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/legislación & jurisprudencia , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/prevención & control
17.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 9: 23, 2009 Apr 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19356245

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Data from scientific literature show that about 63% of abstracts presented at biomedical conferences will be published in full. Some studies have indicated that full publication is associated with the direction of results (publication bias). No study has looked into the occurrence of publication bias in the field of addiction. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the significance or direction of results of abstracts presented at the major international scientific conference on addiction is associated with full publication METHODS: The conference proceedings of the US Annual Meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence (CPDD), were handsearched for abstracts of randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials that evaluated interventions for prevention, rehabilitation and treatment of drug addiction in humans (years searched 1993-2002). Data regarding the study designs and outcomes reported were extracted. Subsequent publication in peer reviewed journals was searched in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, as of March 2006. RESULTS: Out of 5919 abstracts presented, 581 met the inclusion criteria; 359 (62%) conference abstracts had been published in a broad variety of peer reviewed journals (average time of publication 2.6 years, SD +/- 1.78). The proportion of published studies was almost the same for randomized controlled trials (62.4%) and controlled clinical trials (59.5%) while studies that reported positive results were significantly more likely to be published (74.5%) than those that did not report statistical results (60.9%.), negative or null results (47.1%) and no results (38.6%), Abstracts reporting positive results had a significantly higher probability of being published in full, while abstracts reporting null or negative results were half as likely to be published compared with positive ones (HR = 0.48; 95%CI 0.30-0.74) CONCLUSION: Clinical trials were the minority of abstracts presented at the CPDD; we found evidence of possible publication bias in the field of addiction, with negative or null results having half the likelihood of being published than positive ones.


Asunto(s)
Bibliometría , Congresos como Asunto , Sesgo de Publicación , Edición/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Indización y Redacción de Resúmenes/estadística & datos numéricos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados como Asunto , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Estados Unidos
18.
Int J Equity Health ; 8: 33, 2009 Sep 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19761604

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The inverse association between socioeconomic position (SEP) and health has been extensively explored in Italy; however few studies have been carried out on the relationship between income inequalities and health status or health services utilisation, particularly at a local level.The objective of this study is to test the association between the demand for hospital care and a small area indicator based on income in four Italian cities, over a four-year period (1997-2000), in the adult population. METHODS: Census Block (median 260 residents) Median per capita Income (CBMI) was computed through record linkage between 1998 national tax and local population registries in the cities of Rome, Turin, Milan and Bologna (total population approximately 5.5 million). CBMI was linked to acute hospital discharges among residents, based on patient's residence.Age-standardized gender-specific hospitalisation rates were computed by CBMI quintiles (first quintile indicating lowest income), overall, and by city and year. Heterogeneity of the association between income level and hospitalisation was analysed through a Poisson model. RESULTS: We found an inverse association between small area income level and hospitalisation rates, which decreased continuously from 153 per 1000 inhabitants in the first quintile to 107 per 1000 inhabitants in the fifth quintile. Income differences in hospitalisation were confirmed in each city and year. However, the magnitude of the association and the absolute level of hospitalisation rates were quite different in each city and tended to slightly decrease over time in all cities considered, except Bologna. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms an inverse association between income level and the use of hospitalization in four Italian cities, using a small area economic indicator, based on population tax data. Further analysis of the association between income and cause-specific hospitalization rates will allow to better understand the capability of the Italian National Health System to compel with socio-economic inequalities in health needs.Furthermore the SEP indicator we propose can represent a contribution to the improvement of tools for monitoring inequalities in health and in health services utilization.

19.
Environ Health ; 8: 60, 2009 Dec 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20030820

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Management of solid waste (mainly landfills and incineration) releases a number of toxic substances, most in small quantities and at extremely low levels. Because of the wide range of pollutants, the different pathways of exposure, long-term low-level exposure, and the potential for synergism among the pollutants, concerns remain about potential health effects but there are many uncertainties involved in the assessment. Our aim was to systematically review the available epidemiological literature on the health effects in the vicinity of landfills and incinerators and among workers at waste processing plants to derive usable excess risk estimates for health impact assessment. METHODS: We examined the published, peer-reviewed literature addressing health effects of waste management between 1983 and 2008. For each paper, we examined the study design and assessed potential biases in the effect estimates. We evaluated the overall evidence and graded the associated uncertainties. RESULTS: In most cases the overall evidence was inadequate to establish a relationship between a specific waste process and health effects; the evidence from occupational studies was not sufficient to make an overall assessment. For community studies, at least for some processes, there was limited evidence of a causal relationship and a few studies were selected for a quantitative evaluation. In particular, for populations living within two kilometres of landfills there was limited evidence of congenital anomalies and low birth weight with excess risk of 2 percent and 6 percent, respectively. The excess risk tended to be higher when sites dealing with toxic wastes were considered. For populations living within three kilometres of old incinerators, there was limited evidence of an increased risk of cancer, with an estimated excess risk of 3.5 percent. The confidence in the evaluation and in the estimated excess risk tended to be higher for specific cancer forms such as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and soft tissue sarcoma than for other cancers. CONCLUSIONS: The studies we have reviewed suffer from many limitations due to poor exposure assessment, ecological level of analysis, and lack of information on relevant confounders. With a moderate level confidence, however, we have derived some effect estimates that could be used for health impact assessment of old landfill and incineration plants. The uncertainties surrounding these numbers should be considered carefully when health effects are estimated. It is clear that future research into the health risks of waste management needs to overcome current limitations.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/etiología , Eliminación de Residuos , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/efectos adversos , Análisis por Conglomerados , Humanos , Incineración , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Características de la Residencia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
20.
Environ Health ; 8: 50, 2009 Nov 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19909505

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few studies have identified specific factors that increase mortality during heat waves. This study investigated socio-demographic characteristics and pre-existing medical conditions as effect modifiers of the risk of dying during heat waves in a cohort of elderly residents in Rome. METHODS: A cohort of 651,195 residents aged 65 yrs or older was followed from 2005 to 2007. During summer, heat wave days were defined according to month-specific thresholds of maximum apparent temperature. The adjusted relative risk of dying during heat waves was estimated using a Poisson regression model including all the considered covariates. Risk differences were also calculated. All analyses were run separately for the 65-74 and 75+ age groups. RESULTS: In the 65-74 age group the risk of dying during heat waves was higher among unmarried subjects and those with a previous hospitalization for chronic pulmonary disease or psychiatric disorders. In the 75+ age group, women, and unmarried subjects were more susceptible to heat. Furthermore, a higher susceptibility to heat among those with previous hospitalization for diabetes, diseases of the central nervous system (CNS), psychiatric disorders and cerebrovascular diseases resulted from risk differences. DISCUSSION: Results showed a higher susceptibility to heat among those older than seventy-five years, females and unmarried. Pre-existing health conditions play a different role among the two considered age groups. Moreover, compared with previous studies the pattern of susceptibility factors have slightly changed over time. For the purposes of public health programmes, susceptibility should be considered as time, space and population specific.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Estrés por Calor/mortalidad , Calor/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Demografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Ciudad de Roma/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA