Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT4 Assay using fine-needle aspiration biopsy samples in a resource-constrained setting: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

BACKGROUND: Use of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) specimens on Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT4 Assay (STRAT4; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), a CE-marked in-vitro diagnostic medical device, could potentially increase access to breast cancer biomarker testing in resource-constrained settings. We aimed to assess the performance of a research use-only version of STRAT4 using FNAB specimens in Tanzania. METHODS: In this prospective diagnostic accuracy study, patients aged 18 years or older with palpable breast masses presenting to the FNAB Clinic at Muhimbili National Hospital (Dar es Salaam, Tanzania) were recruited consecutively. Patients who were pregnant, lactating, or had a previous diagnosis of breast cancer were excluded. STRAT4 testing was performed on off-label FNAB samples using four protocols: the 1 × protocol (using the standard lysate method) on FNAB smears (1 × FNAB), quick lysis and Maui protocols (both on FNAB smears), and the 1 × protocol on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cell block material (1 × cell block). For 1 × FNAB and 1 × cell block, tissue was processed using FFPE lysis reagent, incubated at 80°C with proteinase K, and followed by addition of 95% or higher ethanol. Quick lysis was processed using FFPE lysis reagent and 95% or higher ethanol, whereas Maui was processed using a proprietary research-use only lysis reagent. The primary outcomes were overall concordance, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of STRAT4 as compared with immunohistochemistry or immunohistochemistry plus fluorescence in-situ hybridisation performed on cell blocks using clinically validated protocols in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-accredited laboratory at the University of California, San Francisco (San Francisco, CA, USA). FINDINGS: Between Nov 29, 2017, and Dec 17, 2020, 208 patients were enrolled. Of 208 cases, 51 (25%) were excluded from analysis because of insufficient tissue in the cell block or absent cell blocks, leaving 157 participants (all female) for analysis. For oestrogen receptor, 1 × FNAB had the best performance, with an overall concordance of 95% (95% CI 90-100), sensitivity of 94% (85-100), specificity of 97% (90-100), and AUC of 0·96 (0·81-1·00). For progesterone receptor, 1 × cell block had the best overall performance (overall concordance 89% [95% CI 84-95], sensitivity 91% [82-99], and specificity 89% [81-97], with an AUC of 0·93 [0·89-0·99]) and 1 × FNAB performed the best among the smear protocols, with a concordance of 84% (95% CI 74-93), sensitivity of 63% (43-82), specificity of 97% (92-100), and AUC of 0·91 (0·72-0·97). For HER2, Maui had the highest agreement, with an overall concordance of 93% (95% CI 89-98), sensitivity of 96% (88-100), specificity of 92% (87-98), and AUC of 0·95 (0·98-1·00). For Ki67, Maui had the best performance of smear protocols, with a concordance of 73% (95% CI 64-82), sensitivity of 70% (58-81), specificity of 81% (66-96), and AUC of 0·80 (0·54-0·82). INTERPRETATION: Processing FNAB samples with STRAT4 is feasible in Tanzania, and performance for the oestrogen receptor is robust. Further optimisation of STRAT4 for FNAB has the potential to improve timely access to breast cancer diagnostics in resource-constrained settings. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health; UCSF Global Cancer Program, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; UCSF Department of Pathology; and Cepheid.

Rapid Onsite Evaluation for Specimen Adequacy and Triage of Breast Masses in a Low-Resource Setting.

CONTEXT.­: Rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) is critical in determining sample adequacy and triaging cytology samples. Although fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the primary method of initial tissue sampling in Tanzania, ROSE is not practiced. OBJECTIVE.­: To investigate the performance of ROSE in determining cellular adequacy and providing preliminary diagnoses in breast FNAB in a low-resource setting. DESIGN.­: Patients with breast masses were recruited prospectively from the FNAB clinic at Muhimbili National Hospital. Each FNAB was evaluated by ROSE for overall specimen adequacy, cellularity, and preliminary diagnosis. The preliminary interpretation was compared to the final cytologic diagnosis and histologic diagnosis, when available. RESULTS.­: Fifty FNAB cases were evaluated, and all were adequate for diagnosis on ROSE and final interpretation. Overall percentage of agreement (OPA) between preliminary and final cytologic diagnosis was 84%, positive percentage of agreement (PPA) was 33%, and negative percentage of agreement (NPA) was 100% (κ = 0.4, P < .001). Twenty-one cases had correlating surgical resections. OPA between preliminary cytologic and histologic diagnoses was 67%, PPA was 22%, and NPA was 100% (κ = 0.2, P = .09). OPA between final cytologic and histologic diagnoses was 95%, PPA was 89%, and NPA was 100% (κ = 0.9, P = <.001). CONCLUSIONS.­: False-positive rates of ROSE diagnoses for breast FNAB are low. While preliminary cytologic diagnoses had a high false-negative rate, final cytologic diagnoses had overall high concordance with histologic diagnoses. Therefore, the role of ROSE for preliminary diagnosis should be considered carefully in low-resource settings, and it may need to be paired with additional interventions to improve pathologic diagnosis.

Feasibility of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy and Rapid On-Site Evaluation for Immediate Triage in Breast Cancer Screening in Tanzania.

PURPOSE: Clinical breast examination (CBE) is one of the most common methods used for early detection of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries. CBE alone is limited by lack of specificity and may result in unnecessary diagnostic procedures. We evaluated the feasibility of integrating CBE, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), and rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) in triaging palpable breast masses for specialized cancer care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An intensive breast cancer screening event was conducted at a national trade fair by a multidisciplinary team of care providers targeting a healthy population in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. All adults age ≥ 18 years were invited to participate. CBE was performed by oncologists and/or pathologists. FNAB was performed by a pathologist on palpable masses that were then categorized as benign, indeterminate, or suspicious for malignancy or definitively malignant based on ROSE. RESULTS: A total of 208 individuals (207 females, one male; median age, 36 years; range, 18-68 years) were screened. Most (90.8%, 189 of 208) had normal findings, whereas 7.2% (15 of 208), 1% (2 of 208), and 1% (2 of 208) had a palpable mass, breast pain, and nipple discharge, respectively. Two participants had lesions too small for palpation-guided biopsy and clinically consistent with fibroadenomas; the participants were counseled, and observation was recommended. FNAB was performed on 13 breast masses, with 9 of 13 (69%) categorized as benign and 4 of 13 (31%) suspicious for malignancy. Final cytopathologic review of referred patients confirmed one case to be breast adenocarcinoma, one was suggestive of fibroadenoma, and two showed inflammations. CONCLUSION: Integration of CBE with ROSE and FNAB was feasible in a breast cancer screening program in Tanzania. In settings with constrained resources for cancer care, this may be an effective method for triaging patients with breast masses.