Polatuzumab vedotin, venetoclax, and an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

The Phase 2 portion of this study evaluated safety and efficacy of polatuzumab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg and venetoclax 800 mg, plus fixed-dose obinutuzumab 1000 mg or rituximab 375 mg/m2 in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), respectively. Patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)/stable disease (FL) or CR/PR (DLBCL) at end of induction (EOI; six 21-day cycles) received post-induction therapy with venetoclax and obinutuzumab or rituximab, respectively. Primary endpoint was CR rate at EOI. Safety-evaluable populations included 74 patients (FL cohort; median age 64 years; progression of disease within 24 months on first-line treatment, 25.7%; FL International Prognostic Index 3-5, 54.1%; ≥2 previous therapies, 74.3%) and 57 patients (DLBCL cohort; median age 65 years; International Prognostic Index 3-5, 54.4%; ≥2 previous therapies, 77.2%). The most common non-hematologic adverse events (mostly Grades 1-2) in the FL and DLBCL cohorts were diarrhea (55.4% and 47.4%, respectively) and nausea (47.3% and 36.8%); neutropenia was the most common Grades 3-4 toxicity (39.2% and 52.6%). Efficacy-evaluable populations included patients treated at the recommended Phase 2 dose (FL, n = 49; DLBCL, n = 48). CR rates at EOI were 59.2% (FL) and 31.3% (DLBCL); median progression-free survival was 22.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5-not evaluable) and 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.6-8.1), respectively. Polatuzumab vedotin plus venetoclax and obinutuzumab/rituximab had acceptable safety in patients with R/R FL or DLBCL, with promising response rates in R/R FL, including high-risk patients.

The physical exam's role in determining dose-limiting toxicity prior to immunochemotherapy administration in lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced new challenges to healthcare access and delivery. It is critical to identify areas for innovation within oncologic clinical practice to maintain high quality care. We evaluated the potential utility of telemedicine initiatives for patients with lymphoma undergoing immunochemotherapy. We conducted a retrospective review of adult lymphoma patients receiving R-CHOP + /- R, R-ICE, R-GEMOX, and R-DHAP at our institution in the last three years (2017-2019) and identified cycles for which dose modifications were required. METHODS: We reviewed 1290 total treatment cycles in 301 unique patients, 1102 cycles (85.4%) were R-CHOP + /- R, 105 (8.1%) were R-ICE, 71 (5.5%) were R-GEMOX, and 12 (0.9%) were R-DHAP. We identified that 144 cycles (11.2%) were subject to dosing adjustments. We retrospectively reviewed laboratory results, patient history, and/or physical exam findings that informed dose modifications. RESULTS: Of the 144 dose adjustments, 11% of cycles contained dose increases due to a well-tolerated previous dose noted in the clinical assessment. The remaining 128 modified cycles were dose reductions. Notably, only 7/128 dose reductions were based on physical exam findings alone, due solely to a change in patient body weight. As patients are routinely weighed immediately prior to chemotherapy administration, effectively no dose modifications (0/144) were exclusively based on abnormal physical exam finding during a pre-infusion assessment. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that pre-infusion assessments may be amenable to virtual visits for lymphoma patients undergoing immunochemotherapy.

Parsaclisib, a potent and highly selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies.

This phase 1/2 study assessed parsaclisib (INCB050465), a next-generation, potent, and highly selective phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ (PI3Kδ) inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies, alone or in combination with a Janus kinase 1 inhibitor (itacitinib) or chemotherapy (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide). Seventy-two patients received parsaclisib monotherapy (5-45 mg once daily). Expansion doses were 20 and 30 mg once daily; intermittent dosing at 20 mg (once daily for 9 weeks, then once weekly) was explored. No dose-limiting toxicities were identified, and maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Most common nonhematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhea/colitis (36%), nausea (36%), fatigue (31%), and rash (31%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 19% of patients. Serious TEAEs (>2 patients) were diarrhea/colitis (n = 9), pyrexia (n = 4), hypotension (n = 3), and sepsis (n = 3). Aspartate and alanine transaminase elevations occurring before treatment discontinuation were grade 1, except 1 grade 3 event each, secondary to sepsis. Two patients experienced 3 fatal parsaclisib-unrelated TEAEs (respiratory failure; respiratory failure and sepsis). In non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), objective response rates to monotherapy were 71% in follicular lymphoma, 78% in marginal zone lymphoma, 67% in mantle cell lymphoma, and 30% in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; 93% of responses occurred at first assessment (∼9 weeks). Parsaclisib has demonstrated antitumor activity in relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL with the potential for improved long-term patient outcomes. Phase 2 studies in relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL subtypes are ongoing. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02018861.

Phase 1 study of the PI3Kδ inhibitor INCB040093 ± JAK1 inhibitor itacitinib in relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma.

Because both phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ (PI3Kδ) and Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathways contribute to tumor cell proliferation and survival in B-cell malignancies, their simultaneous inhibition may provide synergistic treatment efficacy. This phase 1 dose-escalation/expansion study assessed the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of INCB040093, a selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, as monotherapy or combined with itacitinib (formerly INCB039110), a selective JAK1 inhibitor, in adult patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphomas. Final results are reported. Overall, 114 patients were treated (monotherapy, n = 49; combination therapy, n = 72 [7 patients crossed over from monotherapy to combination]). INCB040093 100 mg twice daily (monotherapy) and INCB040093 100 mg twice daily + itacitinib 300 mg once daily (combination) were the recommended phase 2 doses. One dose-limiting toxicity (gastrointestinal bleed secondary to gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL] regression) occurred with monotherapy. The most common serious adverse events with monotherapy were pneumonia (n = 5) and pyrexia (n = 4), and with combination Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (n = 5), pneumonia (unrelated to P jiroveci; n = 5), and pyrexia (n = 4). Grade 3 or higher transaminase elevations were less common with combination. INCB040093 was active across the B-cell lymphomas; 63% of patients (5/8) with follicular lymphoma responded to monotherapy. Adding itacitinib provided promising activity in select subtypes, with responses of 67% (14/21) in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (vs 29% [5/17] with monotherapy) and 31% (4/13) in nongerminal center B-cell-like DLBCL. INCB040093 with/without itacitinib was tolerated and active in this study, and is a promising treatment strategy for patients with select R/R B-cell lymphomas. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01905813.

Multicentre retrospective study of intravascular large B-cell lymphoma treated at academic institutions within the United States.

Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) is a rare entity, with a generally aggressive course that may vary based on geographic presentation. While a United States (US) registry study showed relatively good outcomes with IVLBCL, clinicopathological and treatment data were unavailable. We performed a detailed retrospective review of cases identified at 8 US medical centres, to improve understanding of IVLBCL and inform management. We compiled data retrieved via an Institutional Review Board-approved review of IVLBCL cases identified from 1999 to 2015 at nine academic institutions across the US. We characterized the cohort's clinical status at time of diagnosis, presenting diagnostic and clinical features of the disease, treatment modalities used and overall prognostic data. Our cohort consisted of 54 patients with varying degrees of clinical features. Adjusting for age, better performance status at presentation was associated with increased survival time for the patients diagnosed in vivo (hazard ratio: 2·12, 95% confidence interval 1·28, 3·53). Based on the data we have collected, it would appear that the time interval to diagnosis is a significant contributor to outcomes of patients with IVLBCL.

Follicular Lymphoma: Recent and Emerging Therapies, Treatment Strategies, and Remaining Unmet Needs.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a heterogeneous disease with varying prognosis owing to differences in clinical, laboratory, and disease parameters. Although generally considered incurable, prognosis for early- and advanced-stage disease has improved because of therapeutic advances, several of which have resulted from elucidation of the biologic and molecular basis of the disease. The choice of treatment for FL is highly dependent on patient and disease characteristics. Several tools are available for risk stratification, although limitations in their routine clinical use exist. For limited disease, treatment options include radiotherapy, rituximab monotherapy or combination regimens, and surveillance. Treatment of advanced disease is often determined by tumor burden, with surveillance or rituximab considered for low tumor burden and chemoimmunotherapy for high tumor burden disease. Treatment for relapsed or refractory disease is influenced by initial first-line therapy and the duration and quality of the response. Presently, there is no consensus for treatment of patients with early or multiply relapsed disease; however, numerous agents, combination regimens, and transplant options have demonstrated efficacy. Although the number of therapies available to treat FL has increased together with an improved understanding of the underlying biologic basis of disease, the best approach to select the most appropriate treatment strategy for an individual patient at a particular time continues to be elucidated. This review considers prognostication and the evolving treatment landscape of FL, including recent and emergent therapies as well as remaining unmet needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In follicular lymphoma, a personalized approach to management based on disease biology, patient characteristics, and other factors continues to emerge. However, application of current management requires an understanding of the available therapeutic options for first-line treatment and knowledge of current development in therapies for previously untreated and for relapsed or refractory disease. Thus, this work reviews for clinicians the contemporary data in follicular lymphoma, from advances in characterizing disease biology to current treatments and emerging novel therapies.

Survival following salvage therapy for primary refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL).

Optimal salvage therapy for primary refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) and the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (SCT) remain poorly defined. We conducted a retrospective review of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in a single-center cohort of 93 patients with primary refractory PTCL, defined as progression during first-line therapy or relapse within 6 months of its completion. Clinical outcomes were poor in this population, with median event-free survival (EFS) of 3.5 months, median overall survival (OS) of 9.1 months, and 34% 3-year survival. Outcomes were comparable in patients who progressed through first-line therapy and patients who achieved CR/PR and subsequently relapsed within 6 months. A majority exhibited high-risk features and had intermediate to high risk IPI, which correlated with inferior outcomes. There was no difference in outcomes between patients who received single-agent salvage regimens and patients who underwent traditional, multi-agent salvage regimens. Thus, participation in well-designed clinical trials should be encouraged in this population. Additionally, there may be a trend toward improved EFS and OS in patients who underwent autologous or allogeneic SCT compared to patients who achieved CR or PR but were not transplanted.

Taking a BiTE out of Lymphoma: Bispecific Antibodies in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) refers to a heterogenous group of diseases, all of which have a wide range of treatment strategies and patient outcomes. There have been multiple novel, immune-based therapies approved in NHL in the last decade, including bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor therapy (CAR-T). With a host of new therapies, an important next step will be determining how these therapies should be sequenced in contemporary management strategies. This review seeks to offer a framework for the ways in which BsABs can be incorporated into the current management paradigm for NHL, with special attention paid to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

Acalabrutinib plus venetoclax and rituximab in treatment-naive mantle cell lymphoma: 2-year safety and efficacy analysis.

This phase 1b study (NCT02717624) evaluated the safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and rituximab (AVR) in treatment-naive mantle cell lymphoma (TN MCL). Patients received acalabrutinib from cycle 1 until progressive disease or undue toxicity, rituximab for 6 cycles with maintenance every other cycle through cycle 24 or until progressive disease, and venetoclax, beginning at cycle 2, for 24 cycles. Twenty-one patients were enrolled, 95.2% completed induction (6 AVR cycles), and 47.6% continued maintenance with acalabrutinib. Thirteen (61.9%) patients had grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs), most commonly neutropenia (33.3%). Seven (33.3%) patients had COVID-19 infection (6 [28.6%] serious AEs; 5 [23.8%] deaths, all among unvaccinated patients). There were no grade ≥ 3 events of atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, major hemorrhages, or tumor lysis syndrome. Overall response rate (ORR) by Lugano criteria was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.9, 100.0) with 71.4% complete response (CR). With median follow-up of 27.8 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. PFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 90.5% (95% CI: 67.0, 97.5) and 63.2% (34.7, 82.0), respectively; both were 95% after censoring COVID-19 deaths. OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 95.2% (95% CI: 70.7, 99.3) and 75.2% (50.3, 88.9), respectively; both were 100% after censoring COVID-19 deaths. Overall, 87.5% of patients with available minimal residual disease (MRD) data achieved MRD negativity (10-6; next-generation sequencing) during treatment. AVR represents a chemotherapy-free regimen for TN MCL and resulted in high ORR and high rates of MRD negativity.

A phase 2 study of the PI3Kδ inhibitor parsaclisib in relapsed and refractory marginal zone lymphoma (CITADEL-204).

ABSTRACT: Parsaclisib, a potent and highly selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, has shown clinical benefit in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphomas. The phase 2 CITADEL-204 study (NCT03144674, EudraCT 2017-000970-12) assessed efficacy and safety of parsaclisib in Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor-experienced (cohort 1) or BTK inhibitor-naive (cohort 2) patients with R/R marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed R/R MZL, treated with ≥1 prior systemic therapy (including ≥1 anti-CD20 antibody) received parsaclisib 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks then 20 mg once weekly (weekly dosing group [WG]) or parsaclisib 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks then 2.5 mg once daily (daily dosing group [DG]); DG was selected for further assessment. Primary end point of the study was objective response rate (ORR). Owing to slower than expected recruitment, cohort 1 was closed with 10 patients (WG, n = 4; DG, n = 6) enrolled. Based on a planned interim analysis in cohort 2, the futility boundary was not crossed, and enrollment continued to study completion. At data cutoff (15 January 2021), 100 patients were enrolled and treated in cohort 2 (WG, n = 28; DG, n = 72). In the DG, the ORR was 58.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.1-69.8), with a complete response rate of 4.2% (95% CI, 0.9-11.7); the lower bound of the ORR 95% CI exceeded the protocol-defined threshold of 40%. The median duration of response was 12.2 months (95% CI, 8.1-17.5) and progression-free survival was 16.5 months (95% CI, 11.5-20.6); median overall survival was not reached. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) among all patients were diarrhea (47.0%), cough (23.0%), and rash (18.0%); the most common grade ≥3 TEAEs included diarrhea (12.0%), neutropenia, and pneumonia (9.0% each). TEAEs led to dose interruptions, reductions, and discontinuations in 56.0%, 16.0%, and 29.0% of all patients, respectively. Durable responses and an overall manageable safety profile were demonstrated in patients with R/R MZL treated with parsaclisib monotherapy.

Mosunetuzumab in combination with CHOP in previously untreated DLBCL: safety and efficacy results from a phase 2 study.

Up to 40% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are refractory to or relapse after first-line therapy, highlighting the need for better treatments. Mosunetuzumab is a CD20 × CD3 bispecific antibody that engages and redirects T cells to eliminate malignant B cells. In this phase 2, open-label study (NCT03677141), 40 patients (52.5% with international prognostic index ≥3) with previously untreated DLBCL initiated 6 cycles of IV mosunetuzumab with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) chemotherapy. Mosunetuzumab was administered in cycle 1 as step-up doses to mitigate cytokine release syndrome [CRS], and a dose of 30 mg was given on day 1 of cycles 2-6. Efficacy end points included objective and complete response rates, as determined by the investigator, via positron emission tomography-computed tomography, using Lugano 2014 criteria (87.5% and 85.0%, respectively). At a median follow-up of 32.0 months, the estimated 2-year progression-free survival and event-free survival rates were 65.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.5-81.4) and 60.4% (95% CI, 44.7-76.1), respectively. CRS occurred in 60.0% of patients; all events were grade 1 (45.0%) or grade 2 (15.0%) and occurred primarily in cycle 1. Mosunetuzumab-related grade ≥3 neurologic adverse events (AEs) potentially consistent with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 1 patient (2.5%). Grade 5 AEs were reported in 2 patients. Neutropenia occurred in 70.0% of patients, mostly during cycle 1 and was of short duration. These findings demonstrate promising activity and a manageable safety profile for mosunetuzumab-CHOP and warrant further investigation of mosunetuzumab in first-line combination regimens for DLBCL.

Long-term outcomes of second-line versus later-line zanubrutinib treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: An updated pooled analysis.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported results of a pooled analysis of two zanubrutinib studies in relapsed or refractory (R/R) MCL showing better survival outcomes when zanubrutinib is used in second-line versus later-line. Here, we present an updated pooled analysis with a longer follow-up of 35.2 months. METHODS: Data were pooled from two studies-BGB-3111-AU-003 (NCT02343120) and BGB-3111-206 (NCT03206970) of zanubrutinib in R/R MCL. The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment line of zanubrutinib: the second-line and the later-line group. The inverse propensity score weighting method was used to balance the baseline covariates between the groups. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), PFS, and OS rates, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and safety. RESULTS: Among 112 pooled patients, 41 (36.6%) patients received zanubrutinib as second-line and 71 (63.4%) patients as later-line therapy. After weighting, OS was significantly improved in the second-line versus later-line group (HR, 0.459 [95% CI: 0.215, 0.98]; p = 0.044) with median OS not estimable in both groups. The PFS was similar between the two groups (HR, 0.78 [95% CI: 0.443, 1.373]; p = 0.389) but with numerically longer median PFS in the second-line versus later-line group (27.8 vs. 22.1 months). ORR was numerically higher in the second-line versus later-line (88.6% vs. 85.7%), and DOR was similar between the two groups (25.2 vs. 25.1 months). Zanubrutinib showed a similar safety profile in both groups. CONCLUSION: Zanubrutinib in second-line treatment was associated with significantly improved OS compared with later-line treatment of R/R MCL.

Adding venetoclax to lenalidomide and rituximab is safe and effective in patients with untreated mantle cell lymphoma.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, incurable hematological malignancy with a heterogeneous presentation and clinical course. A wide variety of chemotherapy-based regimens are currently used in patients who are untreated. Over the last several years, several targeted or small-molecule therapies have shown efficacy in the relapsed/refractory setting and have since been explored in the frontline setting. Lenalidomide plus rituximab was explored in a phase 2 study of 38 patients with MCL who were untreated and ineligible to receive transplantation, in which the combination produced durable remissions. We looked to build upon this regimen by adding venetoclax to the combination. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, single-arm study to evaluate this combination. We enrolled 28 unselected patients with untreated disease irrespective of age, fitness, or risk factors. Lenalidomide was dosed at 20 mg daily from days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle. The dose of venetoclax was determined using the time-to-event continual reassessment method. Rituximab was dosed at 375 mg/m2 weekly, starting on cycle 1, day 1 until cycle 2, day 1. No dose-limiting toxicities were noted. All patients were treated with venetoclax at the maximum tolerated dose of 400 mg daily. The most common adverse events were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The overall and complete response rates were 96% and 86%, respectively. In total, 86% of patients achieved minimal residual disease undetectability via next-generation sequencing. The median overall and progression-free survivals were not reached. The combination of lenalidomide, rituximab, and venetoclax is a safe and effective regimen in patients with untreated MCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03523975.

Integrative analysis of clinicopathological features defines novel prognostic models for mantle cell lymphoma in the immunochemotherapy era: a report from The North American Mantle Cell Lymphoma Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) exhibit a wide variation in clinical presentation and outcome. However, the commonly used prognostic models are outdated and inadequate to address the needs of the current multidisciplinary management of this disease. This study aims to investigate the clinical and pathological features of MCL in the immunochemotherapy era and improve the prognostic models for a more accurate prediction of patient outcomes. METHODS: The North American Mantle Cell Lymphoma Project is a multi-institutional collaboration of 23 institutions across North America to evaluate and refine prognosticators for front-line therapy. A total of 586 MCL cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 are included in this study. A comprehensive retrospective analysis was performed on the clinicopathological features, treatment approaches, and outcomes of these cases. The establishment of novel prognostic models was based on in-depth examination of baseline parameters, and subsequent validation in an independent cohort of MCL cases. RESULTS: In front-line strategies, the use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was the most significant parameter affecting outcomes, for both overall survival (OS, p < 0.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS, p < 0.0001). P53 positive expression was the most significant pathological parameter correlating with inferior outcomes (p < 0.0001 for OS and p = 0.0021 for PFS). Based on the baseline risk factor profile, we developed a set of prognostic models incorporating clinical, laboratory, and pathological parameters that are specifically tailored for various applications. These models, when tested in the validation cohort, exhibited strong predictive power for survival and showed a stratification resembling the training cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of patients with MCL has markedly improved over the past two decades, and further enhancement is anticipated with the evolution of clinical management. The innovative prognostic models developed in this study would serve as a valuable tool to guide the selection of more suitable treatment strategies for patients with MCL.

Divergent paths: management of early relapsed follicular lymphoma.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the United States and Western Europe. Overall outcomes for patients with FL have continued to improve over the last several decades-most notably, with the addition of the CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab to the treatment armamentarium. More recently, we have seen advances in the management of patients with relapsed/refractory FL with the approval of several new treatments including lenalidomide, axicabtagene ciloleucel, copanlisib, umbralisib, and tazemetostat. Unfortunately, there remains a group of patients for which treatment outcomes, especially overall survival (OS), are suboptimal. This group has been identified as patients who relapse within 24 months (POD24) of completion of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). Data indicate that patients who relapse within this window have a 5-year OS of around 50%, compared to 80% for those who remain in remission beyond 24 months. POD24 patients have been included and evaluated in the studies of the novel agents mentioned. While not specifically designed to treat this high-risk group, early data suggest that outcomes are not significantly impacted by this designation, unlike CIT. While to date the optimal management of POD24 patients has not been elucidated, the future appears bright with the continued use of the approved agents and several others in clinical development.

Can Next-Generation PI3K Inhibitors Unlock the Full Potential of the Class in Patients With B-Cell Lymphoma?

Although outcomes after first-line therapy for patients with indolent or aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are continually improving, relapse is still common. Current treatment options for patients with relapsed or refractory disease have limited efficacy, and various targeted therapies are under investigation to help improve outcomes in this patient population. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway was identified as being involved in hematologic malignancies, leading to significant research for potential therapeutic agents. This has led to 3 PI3K inhibitors (idelalisib, copanlisib, and duvelisib) being approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma who have received at least 2 prior systemic therapies, with reported response rates of 40% to 59%. With potential class-specific and PI3K isoform-related toxicities that may limit clinical utility, the safety of the approved PI3K inhibitors has been carefully evaluated to weigh the risk/benefit ratio of therapy. Currently, there are no approved PI3K inhibitors for patients with aggressive NHL. A number of newer PI3K inhibitors are in clinical development for the treatment of relapsed or refractory NHL, aiming to improve treatment benefit for patients. We discuss a number of attributes that are important to increase the therapeutic potential of newer PI3K inhibitors. More promising results may come from combination trials with these newer PI3K inhibitors, developed to limit toxicities (including long-term adverse events), and other antitumor agents.

Germline variants discovered in lymphoma patients undergoing tumor profiling: a case series.

Clinical tumor sequencing protocols often depend on obtaining germline DNA from patients to aid in the identification of de novo variants in the tumor, and therefore come with the possibility for the incidental discovery of germline variants. Ninety-one adult patients with lymphoma were consented and enrolled in MIONCOSEQ, an IRB-approved tumor profiling protocol that utilizes an exome sequencing platform. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for germline variants from sequencing results, personal and/or family history of cancer and genetic counseling referral. After review of the 91 lymphoma cases, seven (8%) cases revealed germline variants. Only one of these, CHEK2 p.I157T, has been previously recovered as a germline variant in lymphoma. Two of the seven patients received genetic counseling, two died before genetic counseling could be arranged and three did not follow-up with a genetics provider. None of the patients had a personal or family history that would have otherwise suggested an indication for cancer genetics referral, especially notable as lymphoma is not traditionally associated with inherited cancer syndromes. Importantly, as only two of seven patients had appropriate genetic counseling for their variant, timely genetic counseling should be a critical part of all tumor profiling platforms that use non-tumor DNA.

Evaluating the Role of Novel Oncology Agents: Oncology Stewardship in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Novel treatment strategies have shifted the treatment landscape for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, particularly for those with relapsed/refractory disease. However, uncertainty remains regarding the therapeutic value of these novel agents compared to existing salvage chemotherapy regimens. In addition, the high cost associated with these agents puts both patients and health systems at risk of financial toxicity, further complicating their use. The development of clinical pathways incorporating oncology stewardship principles are necessary in order to maximize value-based care. This comprehensive review assesses the efficacy and safety data available for novel treatment options in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and applies stewardship principles to evaluate their optimal place in therapy, with the aim of optimizing safe, effective, and financially responsible patient care.

Late-onset complications with bendamustine versus CHOP or CVP based chemoimmunotherapy in indolent Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Bendamustine is a preferred first-line chemoimmunotherapy regimen for indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL). Emerging evidence suggests an increased incidence of late-onset complications with bendamustine-based regimens compared with CHOP/CVP; however, this evidence is limited. We retrospectively compared late-onset complications from January 2005 to May 2020 in adults with previously untreated iNHL who received rituximab or obinutuzumab with CHOP, CVP, or bendamustine. Forty-six patients received CHOP/CVP; 119 received bendamustine. No difference in incidence of late-onset infections was observed. Bendamustine led to a higher rate of prolonged and unresolved lymphocytopenia and a greater incidence of late-onset neutropenia. Many patients receiving bendamustine did not have lymphocyte recovery even three years following administration. Ongoing infection prophylaxis with bendamustine-based regimens may offset translation of these laboratory findings to late-onset infectious risk.