High rate of de novo esophagitis 5 years after sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective multicenter study in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Major concerns years after the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) include weight regain, development of hiatal hernia (HH) and gastroesophageal reflux disease, with esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus (BE). Both problems could be related, and the incidence of asymptomatic patients is troubling. OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence of reflux symptoms, esophagitis, BE, HH, and asymptomatic pathology and their relationship with weight regain in patients 5 years after undergoing SG at different bariatric centers in Spain. SETTING: Public and private hospitals with bariatric surgery units. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study involving 13 Spanish hospitals with a cumulative experience of 4,500 patients having undergone the SG procedure and patients who had been subjected to the procedure at least 5 years previously along with preoperative gastroscopy. The clinical history, preoperative gastroscopy, and technical details of the SG were recorded. A specific clinical questionnaire was given that recorded the intake volume, perception of satiety, and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) symptoms. Gastroscopy, pH-metry, and manometry studies were carried out, and the data were analyzed statistically. The study has been authorized by the official Spanish ethics committee CEI/CEIm Hospital Universitario Gran Canaria Dr Negrín (code 2019-216-1). RESULTS: One hundred and five patients who underwent SG and who had with at least 5 years of follow-up were included. All procedures were performed laparoscopically. The mean age of patients was 51.1 years, and 70.5% were women. The mean characteristics of the SG procedure were a 37.2F probe, at 4.6 cm from the pylorus, and a crura closure was performed in 5 cases. There were no major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade >3) or deaths. The average preoperative body mass index was 46.3 kg/m2, the minimum reached was 20.6 kg/m2, whereas the average after 5 years was of 34.5 kg/m2. GER, HH, and esophagitis symptoms went from 17.1%, 28.6%, and 5.7%, respectively, before the SG to 76%, 30.5%, and 31.4%, respectively, 5 years after the procedure. Symptoms persisted over the years in 37.1% of cases and presented de novo in 52.8% of cases. Fifty-three percent of manometries (n = 27, total 51) and 64% of pH-metries (n = 32, total 53; DeMeester average score was 65) were pathologic 5 years after the procedure. Concerning gastroscopies, 5 years after the procedure, HH was found in 33 patients (30.5% of total) and esophagitis in 32 patients (31.4% of total). Eighty patients (76%) had GER symptoms, and 25 patients (24%) were asymptomatic. Only 1 patient (.9%) developed BE. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has confirmed a high rate of both persistent and de novo esophagitis and hiatal hernia, many of which were asymptomatic, 5 years after SG had been performed. Weight regain and a striking increase in gastric capacity are risk factors indicative of esophagitis, even when patients are asymptomatic. We consider a control gastroscopy and the preventive use of proton pump inhibitors necessary in these cases regardless of symptoms. We recommend that a control gastroscopy should be performed in all cases regardless of symptoms 5 years after SG. Further studies are needed to validate these recommendations.

The persistent breach between evidence and practice in the prevention of surgical site infection. Qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the dissemination of guidelines for surgical site infection (SSI) prevention, a gap between the theoretical measures and their compliance persists. Accurate estimates of the implementation of preventative measures is crucial before planning dissemination strategies. METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed to members of 11 Associations of operative nurses and surgeons. Questions aimed to determine their awareness of evidence, personal beliefs and actual use of the main preventative measures. RESULTS: Of 1105 responders, 50.5% receive no feed-back of their SSI rate. Responders show a moderate rate of awareness of the recommendations about not removing hair, hair clipping, skin antisepsis with alcoholic solutions, and normothermia. Antibiotic prophylaxis is given for more than 24 h by 18.8% of respondents. Screening for S. aureus is performed by 27.6%. Hair removal by shaving is used by 16.6% of responders. The most common antiseptic solutions are alcoholic chlorhexidine (57.2%) and aqueous povidone (23.3%). 62.8% of surgeons allow the solution to air dry before applying surgical drapes. Adhesive drapes in the surgical field are used routinely in 33.4% of cases. Perioperative normothermia, glucose control and hyperoxia are used in 84.3%, 65.9% and 23.3% of cases. Antimicrobial sutures and negative pressure therapy are used by 20.2% and 43.5% of teams, respectively. Prior to closing the incision, 83.9% replace surgical instruments always or selectively. Wound irrigation before closing is used in 78.1% of cases, mostly with saline. Check-lists, standardized orders, surveillance, feed-back and educational programs were rated most highly by respondents as a means to improve compliance with preventative guidelines, but few of these strategies were in place at their institutions. CONCLUSION: Gaps in the translation of evidence into practice remain in the prevention of SSI among different surgical specialities. Several areas for improvement have been identified, as some core prevention measures are not in common use.

Retraso diagnóstico durante la pandemia por COVID-19: absceso hepático secundario a colecistitis aguda litiásica / Diagnostic Delay During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Liver Abscess Secondary to Acute Lithiasic Cholecystitis

No disponible