Comparison of outcome in stroke patients admitted during working hours vs. off-hours; a single-center cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to disprove an in-hospital off-hour effect in stroke patients by adjusting for disease severity and poor prognostic findings on imaging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study included 5378 patients from a single center prospective stroke registry of a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands, admitted between January 2003 and June 2015. Patients were categorized by admission time, off-hours (OH) or working hours (WH). The in-hospital mortality, 7-day mortality, unfavorable functional outcome (modified Rankin scale > 2) and discharge to home were analyzed. Results were adjusted for age, sex, stroke severity (NIHSS score) and unfavorable findings on imaging of the brain (midline shift and dense vessel sign). RESULTS: Overall, 2796 patients (52%) were admitted during OH, which had a higher NIHSS score [3 (IQR 2-8) vs. 3 (IQR 2-6): p < 0.01] and had more often a dense vessel sign at admission (7.9% vs. 5.4%: p < 0.01). There was no difference in mortality between the OH-group and WH-group (6.2% vs. 6.0%; p = 0.87). The adjusted hazard ratio of in-hospital mortality during OH was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.70-1.08). Analysis of 7-day mortality showed similar results. Unadjusted, the OH-group had an unfavorable outcome [OR: 1.14 (95% CI: 1.02-1.27)] and could less frequently be discharged to home [OR: 1.16 (95% CI: 1.04-1.29)], which was no longer present after adjustment. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The overall outcome of stroke patients admitted to a large Dutch teaching hospital is not influenced by time of admission. When studying OH effects, adjustment for disease severity and poor prognostic findings on imaging is crucial before drawing conclusions on staffing and material.

Incidence and outcome of acquired demyelinating syndromes in Dutch children: update of a nationwide and prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Acquired demyelinating syndromes (ADS) are immune-mediated demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system in children. A nationwide, multicentre and prospective cohort study was initiated in the Netherlands in 2006, with a reported ADS incidence of 0.66/100,000 per year and MS incidence of 0.15/100,000 per year in the period between 2007 and 2010. In this study, we provide an update on the incidence and the long-term follow-up of ADS in the Netherlands. METHODS: Children < 18 years with a first attack of demyelination were included consecutively from January 2006 to December 2016. Diagnoses were based on the International Paediatric MS study group consensus criteria. Outcome data were collected by neurological and neuropsychological assessments, and telephone call assessments. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2016, 55/165 of the ADS patients were diagnosed with MS (33%). This resulted in an increased ADS and MS incidence of 0.80/100,000 per year and 0.26/100,000 per year, respectively. Since 2006 a total of 243 ADS patients have been included. During follow-up (median 55 months, IQR 28-84), 137 patients were diagnosed with monophasic disease (56%), 89 with MS (37%) and 17 with multiphasic disease other than MS (7%). At least one form of residual deficit including cognitive impairment was observed in 69% of all ADS patients, even in monophasic ADS. An Expanded Disability Status Scale score of ≥ 5.5 was reached in 3/89 MS patients (3%). CONCLUSION: The reported incidence of ADS in Dutch children has increased since 2010. Residual deficits are common in this group, even in monophasic patients. Therefore, long-term follow-up in ADS patients is warranted.