RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To describe short-term outcomes and independent predictors of 28-dayx mortality in adult patients with hematologic malignancies and septic shock defined by the new Third International Consensus Definitions (Sepsis-3) criteria. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the medical ICU with septic shock from April 2016 to March 2019. Demographic and clinical features and short-term outcomes were collected. We used descriptive statistics to summarize patient characteristics, logistic regression to identify predictors of 28-day mortality, and Kaplan-Meier plots to assess survival. RESULTS: Among the 459 hematologic patients with septic shock admitted to the ICU, 109 (23.7%) had received hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The median age was 63 years (range, 18-89 years), and 179 (39%) were women. Nonsurvivors had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (P=.007), longer length of stay before ICU admission (P=.01), and greater illness severity at diagnosis and throughout the hospital course (P<.001). The mortality rate at 28 days was 67.8% and increased with increasing sequential organ failure assessment score on admission (odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.20), respiratory failure (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.49-6.51), and maximum lactate level (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.22). Aminoglycosides administration (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.26-0.69), serum albumin (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31-0.86), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.65) were associated with lower 28-day mortality. Life support limitations were present in 81.6% of patients at death. At 90 days, 19.4% of the patients were alive. CONCLUSIONS: Despite efforts to enhance survival, septic shock in patients with hematologic malignancies is still associated with high mortality rates and poor 90-day survival. These results demonstrate the need for an urgent call to action with higher awareness, including the further evaluation of interventions such as earlier ICU admission, aminoglycosides administration, and G-CSF treatment.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Adulto , Femenino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Séptico/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Improving family-centered outcomes is a priority in oncologic critical care. As part of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Collaborative, we implemented patient- and family-centered initiatives in a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team was created to implement the initiatives. We instituted an open visitation policy (OVP) that revamped the use of the two-way communication boards and enhanced the waiting room experience by hosting ICU family-centered events. To assess the initiatives' effects, we carried out pre-intervention (PRE) and post-intervention (POST) family/caregiver and ICU practitioner surveys. RESULTS: A total of 159 (PRE = 79, POST = 80) family members and 147 (PRE = 95, POST = 52) ICU practitioners participated. Regarding the decision-making process, family members felt more included (40.5% vs. 68.8%, p < 0.001) and more supported (29.1% vs. 48.8%, p = 0.011) after the implementation of the initiatives. The caregivers also felt more control over the decision-making process in the POST survey (34.2% vs. 56.3%, p = 0.005). Although 33% of the ICU staff considered OVP was beneficial for the ICU, 41% disagreed and 26% were neutral. Only half of them responded that OVP was beneficial for patients and 63% agreed that OVP was beneficial for families. Half of the practitioners agreed that OVP resulted in additional work for staff. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Our project effectively promoted patient- and family-centered care. The families expressed satisfaction with the communication of information and the decision-making process. However, the ICU staff felt that the initiatives increased their work load. Further research is needed to understand whether making this project universal or introducing additional novel practices would significantly benefit patients admitted to the ICU and their family.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas , Atención Integral de Salud , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Neoplasias , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Relaciones Profesional-Familia , Humanos , Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Familia/psicología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Neoplasias/terapia , Instituciones Oncológicas/organización & administración , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To identify and synthesize available recommendations from scientific societies and experts on pain management at the end-of-life in the ICU. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Biblioteca Virtual en Salud from their inception until March 28, 2019. STUDY SELECTION: We included all clinical practice guidelines, consensus statements, and benchmarks for quality. DATA EXTRACTION: Study selection, methodological quality, and data extraction were performed independently by two investigators. A quality assessment was performed by four investigators using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. The recommendations were then synthesized and categorized. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ten publications were included. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II statement showed low scores in various quality domains, especially in the applicability and rigor of development. Most documents were in agreement on five topics: 1) using a quantitative tool for pain assessment; 2) administering narcotics for pain relief and benzodiazepines for anxiety relief; 3) against prescribing neuromuscular blockers during withdrawal of life support to assess pain; 4) endorsing the use of high doses of opioids and sedatives for pain control, regardless of the risk that they will hasten death; and 5) using quality indicators to improve pain management during end-of-life in the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the lack of high-quality evidence, recommendations for pain management at the end-of-life in the ICU are homogeneous and are justified by ethical principles and agreement among experts. Considering the growing demand for the involvement of palliative care teams in the management of the dying patients in the ICU, there is a need to clearly define their early involvement and to further develop comprehensive evidence-based pain management strategies. Based on the study findings, we propose a management algorithm to improve the overall care of dying critically ill patients.
Asunto(s)
Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Manejo del Dolor , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Cuidado Terminal , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Contraindicaciones de los Medicamentos , Enfermedad Crítica/psicología , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/efectos adversos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dimensión del Dolor , Cuidados Paliativos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Privación de TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess-by literature review and expert consensus-workforce, workload, and burnout considerations among intensivists and advanced practice providers. DESIGN: Data were synthesized from monthly expert consensus and literature review. SETTING: Workforce and Workload section workgroup of the Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine Task Force. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multidisciplinary care teams led by intensivists are an essential component of critical care delivery. Advanced practice providers (nurse practitioners and physician assistants) are progressively being integrated into ICU practice models. The ever-increasing number of patients with complex, life-threatening diseases, concentration of ICU beds in few centralized hospitals, expansion of specialty ICU services, and desire for 24/7 availability have contributed to growing intensivist staffing concerns. Such staffing challenges may negatively impact practitioner wellness, team perception of care quality, time available for teaching, and length of stay when the patient to intensivist ratio is greater than or equal to 15. Enhanced team communication and reduction of practice variation are important factors for improved patient outcomes. A diverse workforce adds value and enrichment to the overall work environment. Formal succession planning for ICU leaders is crucial to the success of critical care organizations. Implementation of a continuous 24/7 ICU coverage care model in high-acuity, high-volume centers should be based on patient-centered outcomes. High levels of burnout syndrome are common among intensivists. Prospective analyses of interventions to decrease burnout within the ICU setting are limited. However, organizational interventions are felt to be more effective than those directed at individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Critical care workforce and staffing models are myriad and based on several factors including local culture and resources, ICU organization, and strategies to reduce burden on the ICU provider workforce. Prospective studies to assess and avoid the burnout syndrome among intensivists and advanced practice providers are needed.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Cuidados Críticos/psicología , Admisión y Programación de Personal/organización & administración , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Recursos Humanos/organización & administración , Carga de TrabajoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE:: To determine resource utilization and outcomes of out-of-hospital transfer patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a cancer referral center. DESIGN:: Single-center cohort. SETTING:: A tertiary oncological center. PATIENTS:: Patients older than 18 years transferred to our ICU from an outside hospital between January 2013 and December 2015. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:: A total of 2127 (90.3%) were emergency department (ED) ICU admissions and 228 (9.7%) out-of-hospital transfers. The ICU length of stay (LOS) was longer in the out-of-hospital transfers when compared to all other ED ICU admissions ( P = .001); however, ICU and hospital mortality were similar between both groups. The majority of patients were transferred for a higher level of care (77.2%); there was no difference in the amount of interventions performed, ICU LOS, and ICU mortality between nonhigher level-of-care and higher level-of-care patients. Factors associated with an ICU LOS ≥10days were a higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, weekend admissions, presence of shock, need for mechanical ventilation, and acute kidney injury on admission or during ICU stay ( P < .008). The ICU mortality of transferred patients was 17.5% and associated risk factors were older age, higher SOFA score on admission, use of mechanical ventilation and vasopressors during ICU stay, and renal failure on admission ( P < .0001). Data related to the transfer such as LOS at the outside facility, time of transfer, delay in transfer, and longer distance traveled were not associated with increased LOS or mortality in our study. CONCLUSION:: Organ failure severity on admission, and not transfer-related factors, continues to be the best predictor of outcomes of critically ill patients with cancer when transferred from other facilities to the ICU. Our data suggest that transferring critically ill patients with cancer to a specialized center does not lead to worse outcomes or increased resource utilization when compared to patients admitted from the ED.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Neoplasias/terapia , Derivación y Consulta , Adulto , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Transferencia de Pacientes , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Outcomes of intensive care for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) patients remain poor. Better selection of critically ill Allo-SCT patients for intensive care may alleviate costs to the patients, families, and the health care system. We aimed to develop a prognostic index tailored for critically ill Allo-SCT patients as traditional instruments are of limited value in this setting. Six hundred fifty-six Allo-SCT patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2001 and 2010 were divided into training and test sets. Of the 3 multivariable regression models built to predict hospital mortality in the training set, the model with the largest area under receiver operating curve (AUC) in the test set was selected as the prognostic index for intensive care after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (PICAT). The parameters included in the regression model with the highest AUC (.81) were time to ICU from hospital admission, lactate dehydrogenase, bilirubin, albumin, reason for ICU admission, prothrombin time-international normalized ratio, conditioning intensity, age, and comorbidity score. AUC for hospital mortality of PICAT (.80) was significantly larger than that of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) (.61) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (.72) in all patients. Hospital mortality and median overall survival of patients with PICAT scores of 0 to 2 (n = 141), >2 to 4 (n = 242), and >4 (n = 182) were 34%, 69%, and 91%; and 7.59, .67, and .30 months, respectively. PICAT has good calibration and accuracy in predicting mortality for Allo-SCT patients requiring intensive care. Its AUC was significantly higher than APACHE II and SOFA scores and is also associated with overall survival.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Área Bajo la Curva , Cuidados Críticos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Trasplante Homólogo/métodos , Trasplante Homólogo/mortalidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary embolism often causes cardiac arrest. When this occurs, thrombolytic therapy is not routinely administered. There are multiple reasons for this, including difficulty with rapidly adequately diagnosing the embolus, the lack of good data supporting the use of thrombolytics during resuscitation, the belief that thrombolytic therapy is ineffective once a patient has already arrested, the difficulty of obtaining thrombolytics at the bedside rapidly enough to administer during a code, and the increased risks of bleeding, particularly with ongoing chest compressions. In this case report, we present a patient who was successfully treated with thrombolytic therapy during pulmonary embolism-induced cardiopulmonary arrest and discuss the role of thrombolytics in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Surgical ICU in a comprehensive cancer center. PATIENT: A 56-year-old man who developed hypotension, dyspnea, hypoxia, and pulseless electrical activity 10 days after resection of a benign colon lesion with a right hemicolectomy and primary end-to-end anastomosis. INTERVENTIONS: After a rapid bedside echocardiogram suggesting pulmonary embolus, thrombolytic therapy was administered during cardiopulmonary resuscitative efforts. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The patient had a return of spontaneous circulation and showed improvement in repeat echocardiographic imaging. He had a prolonged course in the ICU and hospital, but eventually made an essentially complete clinical recovery. CONCLUSION: As bedside echocardiographic technology becomes more rapidly and readily available, the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and use of thrombolytics during cardiopulmonary resuscitation may need to be more routinely considered a potential therapeutic adjunctive measure.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Embolia Pulmonar/complicaciones , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Enfermedad Aguda , Ecocardiografía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate ICU utilization and hospital outcomes of oncological patients admitted to a comprehensive cancer center. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. PATIENTS: Consecutive adults with cancer discharged over a 20-year period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The Cochran-Armitage test for trend was used to evaluate ICU utilization and hospital mortality rates by primary service over time. A negative binomial log linear regression model was fitted to the data to investigate length of stay over time. Among 387,306 adult hospitalized patients, the ICU utilization rate was 12.9%. The overall hospital mortality rate was 3.6%: 16.2% among patients with an ICU stay and 1.8% among non-ICU patients. Among those admitted to the ICU, the mean (SD) admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 6.1 (3.8) for all ICU patients: 7.3 (4.4) for medical ICU patients and 4.9 (2.8) for surgical ICU patients. Hematologic disorders were associated with the highest hospital mortality rate in ICU patients (42.8%); metastatic disease had the highest mortality rate in non-ICU patients (4.2%); sepsis, pneumonia, and other infections had the highest mortality rate for all inpatients (8.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a longitudinal view of ICU utilization rates, hospital and ICU length of stay, and severity-adjusted mortality rates. Although the data arise from a single institution, it encompasses a large number of hospital admissions over two decades and can serve as a point of comparison for future oncological studies at similar institutions. More studies of this nature are needed to determine whether consolidation of cancer care into specialized large-volume facilities may improve outcomes, while simultaneously sustaining appropriate resource utilization and reducing unnecessary healthcare costs.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de ÓrganosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Data assessing outcomes of patients with solid tumors demonstrating septic shock using the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock are scarce. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the independent predictors of 28-day mortality in critically ill adults with solid tumors and septic shock? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cohort of solid tumor patients admitted to the ICU with septic shock. Demographic and clinical characteristics were gathered from the electronic health records. We developed a reduced multivariate logistics regression model to identify independent predictors of 28-day mortality and used Kaplan-Meier plots to assess survival. RESULTS: A total of 271 patients were included. The median age was 62 years (range, 19-94 years); 57.2% were men and 53.5% were White. The most common underlying malignancies were lung (19.2%), breast (7.7%), pancreatic (7.7%), and colorectal (7.4%) cancers. Most patients (84.5%) harbored metastatic disease. Twenty-eight days after ICU admission, 188 patients (69.4%) had died. Nonsurvivors showed a higher rate of advanced cancer, longer hospital stays before ICU admission, and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores at admission and throughout the ICU stay (P < .001 for all). The multivariate analysis identified metastatic disease (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.43-7.03), respiratory failure (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.15-4.74), elevated lactate levels (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.90-5.36), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance scores of 3 or 4 (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.33-5.57) as independent predictors of 28-day mortality. Only 38 patients (14%) were discharged home without medical assistance. INTERPRETATION: The 28-day mortality rate of patients with solid tumors and septic shock was considerably high. Factors associated with worse survival included advanced oncologic disease, poor performance status, high lactate level, and concomitant acute respiratory failure. Early goals-of-care discussions should be considered for frail patients with septic shock and advanced metastatic disease without denying access to the appropriate level of care.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Consenso , Ácido Láctico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , PronósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in critically ill patients with cancer. The RIFLE criteria define three levels of AKI based on the percent increase in serum creatinine (Scr) from baseline: risk (> or = 50%), injury (> or = 100%), and failure (> or = 200% or requiring dialysis). The utility of the RIFLE criteria in critically ill patients with cancer is not known. OBJECTIVE: To examine the incidence, outcomes, and costs associated with AKI in critically ill patients with cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients admitted to a single-center ICU over a 13-month period with a baseline Scr < or = 1.5 mg/dL (n = 2,398). Kaplan-Meier estimates for survival by RIFLE category were calculated. Logistic regression was used to determine the association of AKI on 60-day mortality. A log-linear regression model was used for economic analysis. Costs were assessed by hospital charges from the provider's perspective. RESULTS: For the risk, injury, and failure categories of AKI, incidence rates were 6%, 2.8%, and 3.7%; 60-day survival estimates were 62%, 45%, and 14%; and adjusted odds ratios for 60-day mortality were 2.3, 3, and 14.3, respectively (P < or = 0.001 compared to patients without AKI). Hematologic malignancy and hematopoietic cell transplant were not associated with mortality in the adjusted analysis. Hospital cost increased by 0.16% per 1% increase in creatinine and by 21% for patients requiring dialysis. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective analysis. Single-center study. No adjustment by cost-to-charge ratios. CONCLUSIONS: AKI is associated with higher mortality and costs in critically ill patients with cancer.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/economía , Enfermedad Crítica/economía , Costos de Hospital , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Anciano , Creatinina/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Declining kidney function has been associated with adverse hospital outcome in cancer patients. ICU literature suggests that small changes in serum creatinine are associated with poor outcome. We hypothesized that reductions in renal function previously considered trivial would predict a poor outcome in critically ill patients with malignant disease. We evaluated the effects on hospital mortality and ICU length of stay of small changes in creatinine following admission to the intensive care unit. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing clinical, laboratory and pharmacy data collected from 3,795 patients admitted to the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center's Intensive Care Unit. We conducted univariate and multivariate regression analysis to determine those factors associated with adverse ICU and hospital outcome. RESULTS: Increases in creatinine as small as 10% (0.2 mg/dl) were associated with prolonged ICU stay (5 days vs 6.6 days, p < 0.001) and increased mortality (14.6% vs 25.5%, p < 0.0001). Patients with a 25% rise in creatinine during the first 72 h of ICU admission were twice as likely to die in the hospital (14.3% vs 30.1%, p < 0.001). RIFLE criteria were accurate predictors of outcome, though they missed much of the risk of even smaller increases in creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: Even small rises in serum creatinine following admission to the ICU are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in oncologic patients. The poor outcome in those with rising creatinine could not be explained by severity of illness or other risk factors. These small changes in creatinine may not be trivial, and should be regarded as evidence of a decline in an individual patient's condition.
Asunto(s)
Creatinina/sangre , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Neoplasias/sangre , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/terapia , Pronóstico , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although humans are capable of enduring critically low levels of oxygen, many hypoxaemic patients die despite aggressive therapies. Mimicking the physiological hyperventilation necessary to survive extreme hypoxic conditions could minimize the derangements caused by acute hypoxic-hypoxia. The objective of this study was to measure the haemodynamic-biochemical response to artificially induced hyperventilation in hypoxic rats. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four deeply anaesthetized and mechanically ventilated rats were allocated to 3 groups: control (n = 5, FiO2 = 1); hypoxic spontaneously hyperventilating (n = 10, FiO2 = 0.08); and hypoxic artificially induced hyperventilation (n = 9, targeting PaCO2 = 10 mm Hg, FiO2 = 0.08). We compared the spontaneously and artificially hyperventilating groups. P-values < 0.01 were considered statistically significant. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and serum chemistry were measured for 180 minutes. RESULTS: The control group remained stable throughout the experiment. The hypoxic groups developed profound hypotension after the decrease in FiO2. However, the artificially induced hyperventilated rats recovered their MAP to levels higher than the spontaneously hyperventilating group (117.1 ± 17.2 vs. 68.1 ± 16.0, P = 0.0048). In regard to the biochemical derangements, even though the serum lactate and PaO2 were not different among the hypoxic groups, the artificially hyperventilated group achieved significantly higher SaO2 (94.3 ± 3.6 vs. 58.6 ± 9.6, P = 0.005), pH (7.87 ± 0.04 vs. 7.50 ± 0.13, P = 0.005), and CaO2 (17.7 ± 2.6 vs. 10.2 ± 1.3, P = 0.005) at 180 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Artificially induced hyperventilation led to the correction of arterial oxygen content, severe serum chemistry, and haemodynamic derangements. These findings may represent a novel rescue manoeuvre and serve as a bridge to a permanent form of support, but should be further studied before being translated to the clinical setting.
Asunto(s)
Hiperventilación , Hipoxia , Animales , Análisis de los Gases de la Sangre , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Hipoxia/terapia , Oxígeno , RatasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To review and summarize the most frequent medications and dosages used during withholding and withdrawal of life-prolonging measures in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Virtual Health Library from inception through March 2019. We considered any study evaluating pharmaceutical interventions for pain management during the withholding or withdrawing of life support in adult critically ill patients at the end-of-life. Two independent investigators performed the screening and data extraction. We pooled data on utilization rate of analgesic and sedative drugs and summarized the dosing between the moment prior to withholding or withdrawal of life support and the moment before death. RESULTS: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted in the United States (38%), Canada (31%), and the Netherlands (31%). Eleven studies were single-cohort and twelve had a Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score of less than 7. The mean age of the patients ranged from 59 to 71 years, 59-100% were mechanically ventilated, and 47-100% of the patients underwent life support withdrawal. The most commonly used opioid and sedative were morphine [utilization rate 60% (95% CI 48-71%)] and midazolam [utilization rate 28% (95% CI 23-32%)], respectively. Doses increased during the end-of-life process (pooled mean increase in the dose of morphine: 2.6 mg/h, 95% CI 1.2-4). CONCLUSIONS: Pain control is centered on opioids and adjunctive benzodiazepines, with dosages exceeding those recommended by guidelines. Despite consistency among guidelines, there is significant heterogeneity among practices in end-of-life care.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Manejo del Dolor , Adulto , Anciano , Canadá , Muerte , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países BajosRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Currently, there is no standard therapy for treatment of acute renal colic. With the increased scrutiny and controversy now surrounding opioids, the authors identified a need to investigate an alternative medication for pain control. As such, they sought to determine the efficacy of sub-dissociative (i.e., low) doses (0.3 mg/kg) of ketamine in providing Emergency Department (ED) patients acute pain management for renal colic secondary to nephrolithiasis. METHODS: After institutional review board (IRB) approval, the authors conducted a non-blinded, prospective clinical study. A convenience sample of n = 34 patients from the ED of a Western Michigan-based health system with suspected renal colic received one intravenous dose of ketorolac, 30 mg if over 50 kg body weight or 15 mg if under 50 kg In patients weighing greater than 50 kg, up to two doses of sub-dissociative ketamine were then given to further control pain. Pain was assessed at times 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant pain reduction with administration of sub-dissociative ketamine, with 24 (69.2%) patients reporting an average reduction in pain score > 30% (t = 3.16, p = 0.004). Initial average pain scores for patients receiving sub-dissociative ketamine averaged 7.76 (SD = 2.55) on the 11-point verbal Pain Numeric Rating Scale. After a first dose of ketamine, patients' average pain score was 3.56 (SD = 0.74) at 30 minutes. After two hours, patients' average score was 2.56 (SD = 0.65), indicating that pain control was still effective over time with no statistically significant change in pain scores. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in pain reduction observed between genders (t = -0.192, p = 0.850). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, sub-dissociative ketamine may be considered a reasonable and effective supplemental non-opiate treatment option for suspected renal colic in otherwise healthy 18-70-year-old patients and could provide an effective alternative to traditional therapies. Further studies utilizing this methodology with larger, more generalizable samples are needed to further validate these findings.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: With little to no infrastructure or standardized methodology in place to actively engage patients in advance care planning (ACP), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center set out to identify needed resources, develop an intervention to improve ACP, and evaluate the intervention's effects. METHODS: With the support of executive leadership, a multidisciplinary workgroup enlisted the support of ACP champions, performed a root-cause analysis, developed a detailed ACP process flow by provider role, developed patient and family education resources, and developed faculty and staff training materials. The workgroup also implemented two Plan-Do-Study-Act intervention cycles, which identified difficulty using the ACP note function in our electronic health record (EHR) as a barrier to ACP adoption. By educating patients, families, and providers and improving the EHR's functionality, the workgroup aimed to increase the percentage of ambulatory patients with a diagnosis of advanced or metastatic cancer who had a documented ACP conversation with a provider by their third office visit. Our goal was to improve this percentage from 20% at baseline to 50% after the intervention. Data were obtained from our institution's EHRs. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who had documented ACP conversations increased from 20% at baseline to 34% at the end of fiscal year 2017 and 54% at the end of fiscal year 2018. CONCLUSION: Owing to the dedicated efforts of many individuals across the institution, the postintervention goal was surpassed. Additional efforts to facilitate ACP conversations are ongoing.
Asunto(s)
Planificación Anticipada de Atención , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Comunicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/terapia , Participación del Paciente/psicologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Intensive care triage practices and end-user interpretation of triage guidelines have rarely been assessed. We evaluated agreement between providers on the prioritization of patients for ICU admission using different triage guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-centered randomized study on providers from 18 different countries was conducted using clinical vignettes of oncological patients. The level of agreement between providers was measured using two different guidelines, with one being cancer specific. RESULTS: Amongst 257 providers, 52.5% randomly received the Society of Critical Care Prioritization Model, and 47.5% received a cancer specific flowchart as a guide. In the Prioritization Model arm the average entropy was 1.193, versus 1.153 in the flowchart arm (Pâ¯=â¯.095) indicating similarly poor agreement. The Fleiss' kappa coefficients were estimated to be 0.2136 for the SCCMPM arm and 0.2457 for the flowchart arm, also similarly implying poor agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The low agreement amongst practitioners on the prioritization of cancer patient cases for ICU admission existed using both general triage guidelines and guidelines tailored only to cancer patients. The lack of consensus on intensive care unit triage practices in the oncological population exposes a potential barrier to appropriate resource allocation that needs to be addressed.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Admisión del Paciente/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Triaje/normas , Argentina , Chile , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Árboles de Decisión , Ecuador , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias , Estudios Prospectivos , EspañaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the United States, approximately 750,000 cases of sepsis occur annually, and 28% to 50% of affected people die. Treatment is costly, often involving admission to the intensive care unit and prolonged hospitalization. We evaluated outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and sepsis in Texas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of adults discharged from Texas hospitals during 2011, using ICD-9-CM codes and the Texas Inpatient Data Collection. RESULTS: A total of 2,173,776 adults were discharged from hospitals in Texas, and 5501 (0.25%) had a diagnosis of AML. Among patients with AML, 40% were ≥ 65 years old, and 52% were men. The rate of sepsis for AML patients was 16% compared to 4% for non-AML patients. Among patients with AML, sepsis was associated with pneumonia, acute renal failure, and hematologic dysfunctions in 34%, 32%, and 29% of discharges, respectively. Median length of stay, intensive care unit admission rate, and median hospital charges per stay for patients with AML and sepsis were 13 days (range, 1-133 days), 72%, and $122,333, respectively. Among in-hospital deaths due to sepsis, mortality was 30% in AML patients compared to 21% in non-AML patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with AML had a higher sepsis incidence and higher mortality rates overall, especially in relation to stem-cell transplant recipients and those with other types of cancer. Clinical trials are needed to determine whether early intervention or treatment in specialized centers could improve outcomes and reduce costs of care, particularly in the management of serious complications such as sepsis.
Asunto(s)
Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Leucemia Mieloide/terapia , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales , Humanos , Incidencia , Leucemia Mieloide/epidemiología , Leucemia Mieloide/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población , Sepsis/epidemiología , Sepsis/mortalidad , Texas/epidemiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The objective was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of critically ill cancer patients who received noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) vs invasive mechanical ventilation as first-line therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult intensive care unit (ICU) cancer patients who received either conventional invasive mechanical ventilation or NIPPV as first-line therapy for hypoxemic respiratory failure. RESULTS: Of the 1614 patients included, the NIPPV failure group had the greatest hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, ICU mortality (71.3%), and hospital mortality (79.5%) as compared with the other 2 groups (P < .0001). The variables independently associated with NIPPV failure included younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-0.99; P=.031), non-Caucasian race (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.14-2.26; P=.006), presence of a hematologic malignancy (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.33-2.64; P=.0003), and a higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.17; P < .0001). There was no difference in mortality when comparing early vs late intubation (less than or greater than 24 or 48 hours) for the NIPPV failure group. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation failure is an independent risk factor for ICU mortality, but NIPPV patients who avoided intubation had the best outcomes compared with the other groups. Early vs late intubation did not have a significant impact on outcomes.