Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Allergy ; 76(10): 3041-3052, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33492738

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pollen food allergy syndrome (PFAS) is a frequently underdiagnosed disease due to diverse triggers, clinical presentations, and test results. This is especially relevant in geographic areas with a broad spectrum of pollen sensitization, such as Southern Europe. OBJECTIVES: To elucidate similarities and differences of PFAS in nine Southern European centers and identify associated characteristics and unique markers of PFAS. METHODS: As part of the @IT.2020 Multicenter Study, 815 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), aged 10-60 years, were recruited in seven countries. They completed questionnaires regarding SAR, comorbidities, family history, and PFAS, and underwent skin prick testing (SPT) and serum IgE testing. RESULTS: Of the 815 patients, 167 (20.5%) reported PFAS reactions. Most commonly, eliciting foods were kiwi (58, 34.7%), peach (43, 25.7%), and melon (26, 15.6%). Reported reactions were mostly local (216/319, 67.7%), occurring within 5 min of contact with elicitors (209/319, 65.5%). Associated characteristics included positive IgE to at least one panallergen (profilin, PR-10, or nsLTP) (p = 0.007), maternal PFAS (OR: 3.716, p = 0.026), and asthma (OR: 1.752, p = 0.073). Between centers, heterogeneity in prevalence (Marseille: 7.5% vs. Rome: 41.4%, p < 0.001) and of clinical characteristics was apparent. Cypress played a limited role, with only 1/22 SPT mono-sensitized patients reporting a food reaction (p < 0.073). CONCLUSIONS: PFAS is a frequent comorbidity in Southern European SAR patients. Significant heterogeneity of clinical characteristics in PFAS patients among the centers was observed and may be related to the different pollen sensitization patterns in each geographic area. IgE to panallergen(s), maternal PFAS, and asthma could be PFAS-associated characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional , Alérgenos , Reacciones Cruzadas , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Humanos , Polen , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/diagnóstico , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/epidemiología , Pruebas Cutáneas
2.
Allergy ; 75(7): 1659-1671, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31833579

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The adequate definition of pollen seasons is essential to facilitate a correct diagnosis, treatment choice, and outcome assessment in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. A position paper by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) proposed season definitions for Northern and Middle Europe. OBJECTIVE: To test the pollen season definitions proposed by EAACI in six Mediterranean cities for seven pollen taxa. METHODS: As part of the @IT.2020 multi-center study, pollen counts for Poaceae, Oleaceae, Fagales, Cupressaceae, Urticaceae (Parietaria spp.), and Compositae (Ambrosia spp., Artemisia spp.) were collected from January 1 to December 31, 2018. Based on these data, pollen seasons were identified according to EAACI criteria. A unified monitoring period for patients in AIT trials was created and assessed for feasibility. RESULTS: The analysis revealed a great heterogeneity between the different locations in terms of pattern and length of the examined pollen seasons. Further, we found a fragmentation of pollen seasons in several segments (max. 8) separated by periods of low pollen counts (intercurrent periods). Potential monitoring periods included often many recording days with low pollen exposure (max. 341 days). CONCLUSION: The Mediterranean climate leads to challenging pollen exposure times. Monitoring periods for AIT trials based on existing definitions may include many intermittent days with low pollen concentrations. Therefore, it is necessary to find an adapted pollen season definition as individual solution for each pollen and geographical area.


Asunto(s)
Polen , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional , Alérgenos , Ciudades , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/diagnóstico , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/epidemiología , Estaciones del Año
4.
Allergy ; 64 Suppl 91: 1-59, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20041860
5.
BMC Dermatol ; 2: 11, 2002 Aug 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12201901

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe allergic reactions during rush-specific immunotherapy (Rush-SIT) may occur in the treatment of hymenoptera sting allergy. The objective of the present study was to examine the characteristics of allergic reactions during Rush-SIT in a cohort of patients with allergy towards hymenoptera venom in the mediterranean population of Albania. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using the clinical reports of 37 patients with venom of bee (apinae), wasp (vespidae, subfamily vespinae) or paperwasp (vespidae, subfamily polistinae) allergy treated with Rush-SIT between 1987 and 1996. After hymenoptera sting allergy diagnosis according to anamnesis and intracutaneous tests the patient were treated with Rush-SIT. The protocol lasted 3 - 4 d with an increase in the concentration from 0.01 microg/ml to 100 microg/ml. Anaphylactic reactions were classified according to the Mueller-classification. RESULTS: The frequency of reactions during Rush-SIT for bee-venom was 4.7% and for wasp-venom was 1.5% (p < 0.01). The mean frequency of reactions of Mueller grade II for the bee-venom Rush-SIT patients during the first 4 d (= 26 injections) was 0.73 and for the wasp-venom Rush-SIT patients 0.15. No patient experienced a third-degree reaction. 94.6% of the patient supported an end dose of 100 microg. CONCLUSIONS: Rush-SIT is a reliable method for the treatment of anaphylactic reactions to hymenoptera venom even in less developed countries. Bee-venom Rush-SIT was found to cause higher numbers allergic reactions than wasp or paperwasp Rush-SIT.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/prevención & control , Venenos de Abeja/administración & dosificación , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/complicaciones , Venenos de Avispas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Albania , Anafilaxia/etiología , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 45(8): 796-806, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20597079

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Bronchial responsiveness is an objectively measurable trait related to asthma. Its prevalence and association with asthma symptoms among children in many countries are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To investigate international variations in bronchial responsiveness (BR) and their associations with asthma symptoms and atopic sensitization. METHODS: Bronchial challenge tests were conducted in 6,826 schoolchildren (aged 8-12 years) in 16 countries using hypertonic (4.5%) saline. FEV(1) was measured at baseline and after inhalation for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 min. BR was analyzed both as a dichotomous (bronchial hyperreactivity, BHR, at least 15% decline in FEV(1)) and as a continuous variable (time-response slope, BR slope, individual decline in FEV(1) per log(min)). RESULTS: Prevalence of wheeze last year ranged from 4.4% in Tirana (Albania) to 21.9% in Hawkes Bay (New Zealand) and of BHR from 2.1% in Tirana to 48% in Mumbai (India). The geometric mean BR slope varied between 3.4%/log(min) in Tirana and 12.8%/log(min) in Mumbai and Rome (Italy). At the individual level, BHR was positively associated with wheeze during the past 12 months both in affluent countries (OR = 3.6; 95% CI: 2.7-5.0) and non-affluent countries (OR = 3.0; 1.6-5.5). This association was more pronounced in atopic children. There was a correlation (rho = 0.64, P = 0.002) between center-specific mean BR slope and wheeze prevalence in atopic, but not in non-atopic children. CONCLUSIONS: BR to saline in children varied considerably between countries. High rates of BR were not confined to affluent countries nor to centers with high prevalences of asthma symptoms. The association between wheeze and BHR at the individual level differed across centers and this heterogeneity can be largely explained by effect modification by atopy. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2010; 45:796-806. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Asma/fisiopatología , Hiperreactividad Bronquial/epidemiología , Albania/epidemiología , Pruebas de Provocación Bronquial , Niño , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Masculino , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Ruidos Respiratorios/diagnóstico , Ciudad de Roma/epidemiología , Solución Salina Hipertónica , Pruebas Cutáneas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA