Evaluation of factors affecting total nucleated cells in umbilical cord blood collected for the Calabria cord blood bank.

BACKGROUND: Total nucleated cell (TNC) count is the most important biological feature to consider in assessing the quality of umbilical cord blood (UCB) for haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation. Certain obstetric factors have been reported to increase TNC count in UCB units collected for transplantation. The aim of our study was to analyze how various maternal, neonatal and obstetric factors affected TNC count in the UCBs we collected for our cord blood bank in southern Italy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 634 medical records of UCBs collected by Calabria Cord Blood Bank (CCBB), between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2016. We analyzed various maternal, neonatal and obstetric variables factors and related this factor with the characteristic of TNC. RESULTS: We found that the average number of TNCs was significantly greater in vaginal delivery than in caesarean delivery. We also found that TNCs were higher in the 40th week of pregnancy and when Apgar 1' scores were ≤ 9. The effect of a newborn's gender was less evident on TNC count. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of factors predictive of a higher TNC count would help cord blood banks more efficiently identify donors likely to yield high-quality UCBs for transplantation.

Efficacy of cord blood platelet gel application for enhancing diabetic foot ulcer healing after lower limb revascularization.

The efficacy of umbilical cord blood platelet gel (CBPG) application on healing foot ulcers was analyzed in 10 diabetic patients treated for critical lower limb ischemia by surgical or endovascular arterial revascularization. During a 9-month period, 20 diabetic patients affected by critical lower limb ischemia with tissue loss were enrolled in this nonblinded, consecutive series, randomized clinical trial. After clinical evaluation, patients underwent endovascular or surgical revascularization of the affected limb, followed by minor amputations or surgical debridement of ischemic lesions. Patients were then randomly divided into two groups: 10 patients in Group A treated with standard wound care and 10 patients in Group B treated with topic application of CBPG. The CBPG protocol consisted of platelet gel application twice a week for 4 weeks and then once a week for an additional 4 weeks. Healing was assessed by direct ulcer dimension tracing onto clear plastic sheet and subsequent computerized planimetry. The mean pretreatment and post-treatment ulcer areas at 30 days for Group A were 15.1 cm2 and 8.1 cm2, respectively, and for Group B were 15.7 cm2 and 3.25 cm2, respectively; resulting in a mean ulcer area reduction of 46% for Group A and 79% for Group B patients (P < .01). These observations suggest CBPG application can promote more rapid wound healing than standard care, and indicate the need for a randomized, multicenter trial to confirm clinical efficacy.

Tolerability and efficacy of busulfan and fludarabine as allogeneic pretransplant conditioning therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: comparison with busulfan and cyclophosphamide regimen.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of the association of busulfan with cyclophosphamide (BuCy2) versus busulfan and fludarabine (BuFlu) as a conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (allo-HPCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 65 consecutive patients who received an allo-HPCT from Human Leucocyte Antigen-matched sibling donors were analyzed. The conditioning was BuCy2 in 48 patients and BuFlu in 17 patients. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 cohorts in hematological engraftment, incidence of extrahematological toxicities, and acute graft versus host disease (GVHD). The incidence of chronic GVHD was 34% in the BuCy2 group versus 57% in the BuFlu group (P = .03). Transplant-related mortality was 17% (8 patients) in the BuCy2 group versus 0 in the BuFlu arm. Disease-related mortality was similar in the whole study population; in high-risk AML patients it was 11% in the BuCy2 group and 19% in the BuFlu group (P = .015). The probability of disease-free and event-free survival at 2 years was, respectively, 70% and 60% in the BuCy2 group and 59% and 58% in the BuFlu group (P = .06 and P = not significant [ns]). The probability of overall survival at 2 years was 71% in the BuCy2 group and 63% in the BuFlu group (P = ns), and in the high-risk group it was 83% and 67% in the BuCy2 and BuFlu group, respectively (P = ns). CONCLUSION: BuFlu is well tolerated and is less toxic than BuCy2 and our results did not suggest that in high-risk AML, BuCy2 should be the favorite regimen in terms of efficacy.

The impact of early CD4+ lymphocyte recovery on the outcome of patients who undergo allogeneic bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Different factors influence the clinical outcome of allogeneic transplants, the foremost being good immune recovery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different factors, such as stem cell source, type of donor, conditioning regimen and acute graft-versus-host disease, on early lymphocyte recovery after transplantation. We then analyzed the impact of early CD4+ cell count on overall survival, transplant-related mortality and disease-related mortality. RESULTS: Univariate analysis with Spearman's rho showed a significant correlation between early CD4+ cell recovery and overall survival, transplant-related mortality, stem cell source and type of donor. In multivariate analysis CD4+ cell count was significantly associated with (i) stem cell source, being higher in patients whose haematopoietic progenitor cells were obtained by apheresis than in those whose source of grafted cells was bone marrow, and (ii) type of donor, being higher in patients transplanted from sibling donors than in those whose graft was from an alternative donor. The ROC curve of CD4+ cell count indicated that a cut-off of 115 CD4+ cells/mL could differentiate groups with different outcomes. At 2 years follow-up, patients achieving this CD4+ cell count had significantly lower cumulative transplant-related mortality compared to patients who did not have this count (10%±4% versus 40%±8%, p=0.0026). At the 5-year follow-up, the overall survival rates were 77.5%±0.6% and 36%±7% (p=0.000) in patients with a CD4+ cell count ≥115/mL and in patients with CD4+ cell count ≤ 115/mL, respectively. CONCLUSION: Early CD4+ cell recovery after allogeneic transplantation has a relevant impact on overall survival and transplant-related mortality and is influenced by two factors: stem cell source and type of donor.