Terrible Triad Injuries around the Elbow: It is Still a Puzzle? Prospective Study.

Introduction: The "terrible triad" injury of the elbow, consisting of fractures of the coronoid process and radial head along with posterolateral elbow dislocation and refractory instability, has historically led to poor functional outcomes. Traditional treatment focused on bony injuries, but it is now recognized that soft-tissue injuries must also be addressed. Surgical management aims to restore bony and soft-tissue stabilizers, including fixation of the coronoid process and radial head, repair of ligament complexes, and reduction of elbow dislocation. Studies emphasize the importance of early reduction and tailored treatment. This study discusses means and methods of treating this complex injury, highlighting the significance of addressing both bony and soft-tissue injuries for better functional outcomes. Materials and Method: This is a prospective study conducted at a single center and involved 27 consecutive patients diagnosed with terrible triad injuries around the elbow. The objective was to evaluate functional outcomes and complications associated with surgical treatment of terrible triad injuries around the elbow. From July 2017 to October 2018, 27 patients with terrible triad injuries around the elbow were operated on and evaluated for a minimum of 1 year in terms of functional results using the mean elbow performance score (MEPS) and VAS score. The surgical protocol included coronoid fixation or repair of the anterior capsule, radial head fixation or arthroplasty, and repair of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) in a sequential manner. The medial collateral ligament was repaired if the elbow remained unstable.On follow-up, mean MEPS scores improved significantly. The final mean range of motion of the operated upper limb was as follows: 28.5° of extension deficit (standard deviation [SD] 9.07, range, 10°-40°), 117.5° of flexion (SD 13.18, range, 90°-130°), 70.9° of supination (SD 10.19, range, 40°-85°), and 65.5° of pronation (SD 9.54, range, 40°-80°) at the end of 1 year. A total of 12 patients had complications. Out of the 12 patients, three had elbow arthritis, two had heterotopic ossification, three had radial nerve neuropraxia, two patients had elbow stiffness, and two patients suffered from ulnar nerve neuropathy. Conclusion: Surgical intervention in terrible triad injuries around the elbow in the form of coronoid fixation, radial head fixation, or arthroplasty and soft-tissue repair around the elbow gives satisfactory results at the end of 1 year. Addressing each and every component of fracture in a sequential and step-wise manner is associated with good functional outcomes at the end of 1 year.

Impact and Outcomes of Regional Anesthesia Techniques in Elderly Patients With Fracture of Proximal Femur: A Retrospective Study.

Background Although subarachnoid block (SAB) is the most popular regional anesthesia (RA) technique for fixation of femur fractures, continuous lumbar epidural (CLE) anesthesia, and lumbosacral plexus blocks (LSPB) are also employed in specific situations. The choice of RA technique depends on either the choice of the anesthesiologist or based on the underlying comorbidities. At our institute, we anesthetize elderly patients who come for fixation of femur fracture with multiple comorbidities using RA techniques as mentioned based on comorbidities and overall general condition.  Methods In a cohort of 184 elderly patients, we analyzed RA techniques employed over a period of five years in elderly patients admitted with fractures of the proximal femur, its hemodynamic implications and thus attempted to find the suitable RA technique with minimal adverse events after ethics committee approval. We also compared the length of stay in the hospital in relation to RA techniques. Results The demographic data was comparable with no significant difference in administering the three RA techniques. SAB, CLE and LSPB was implemented at 33.33%, 35.96%, and 30.7% respectively. Perioperative noradrenaline infusion was a feature in patients who received SAB (p<0/001). The higher number of CLE and LSPB patients had a length of stay of fewer than 48 hours whereas most SAB patients had a length of stay of more than 48 hrs (p<0.001). Conclusion Elderly patients with multiple comorbidities should be offered CLE instead of SAB so as to maintain stable hemodynamics. RA technique in an elderly patient with multiple comorbidities should be standardized so as to provide uneventful surgical anesthesia.

MyrliMax® and Low Back Pain: A Multicentric, Observational, Post-Marketing Surveillance Study in Indian Patients Suffering from Chronic Low Back Pain of Various Pain Intensity.

Background: Chronic low back pain (LBP) is the most common musculoskeletal condition affecting a person's quality of life. Over the past decades, a lot of work was done in an attempt to reduce the negative impact of LBP, and help patients recover and maintain a better quality of life. Nevertheless, there is still a lot to be done to fully understand the problem of underlying chronic LBP and a wide gap that exist between basic science and applied rehabilitation research on LBP. Objectives: This was an open label, multicentric, observational, post-marketing surveillance study in a real-world setup designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MyrliMax® capsules containing standardised Commiphora myrrha gum resin extract in Indian subjects with chronic LBP varying in intensity. Materials and methods:This study included 204 subjects diagnosed with chronic LBP at the outpatient department of 20 centres under the supervision of a medical doctor. All subjects took MyrliMax® capsules twice daily for 20 days. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score, rescue medicine requirement, therapy satisfaction scores and safety parameters were assessed as per the schedule. Outcomes:Treatment with MyrliMax® capsules significantly (p<0.01) and progressively reduced the VAS score throughout treatment. A significant pain reduction was observed from the second visit. The mean VAS score was 6.58, 4.66, 2.99 and 1.88 on Day 0, Day 7, Day 14 and Day 20, respectively. A similar trend was also observed in subgroups based on gender and severity score. The need of rescue analgesics/NSAIDs was significantly reduced from the second week, indicating a potential of MyrliMax® capsules to increase the pain threshold. All physicians and patients were satisfied with the efficacy of MyrliMax® capsules assessed by physician's satisfaction score and patient's satisfaction score. There were no significant serious adverse events due to treatment during the study, which indicated that the treatment with MyrliMax® was well tolerated by subjects. Conclusion:MyrliMax® capsule is a potentially effective and safe therapy for pain reduction in patients suffering from chronic LBP. MyrliMax® capsules can be used to reduce pain in NSAIDs intolerant subjects suffering from chronic LBP.

Can antibiotic impregnated cement nail achieve both infection control and bony union in infected diaphyseal femoral non-unions?

BACKGROUND: Infected non-union is complex and debilitating disorder affecting orthopaedic surgeon and patient in terms of cost and time. Many methods are described in the literature for treatment of infected non-union. Local high concentration of antibiotic and mechanical stability of antibiotic cement impregnated intramedullary nail (ACIIN) proves cost and time effective. Recently it was suggested that ACIIN can achieve both union and infection control in infected non-unions with bone gap less than 4cm. The aim of our study was to investigate this hypothesis and study the outcome of antibiotic cement impregnated intramedullary nail in term of both infection control and osseous union. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 21 patients with infected diaphyseal femoral non-union. Inclusion criteria were bone gap less than 4cm after debridement and more than 1 year follow-up of the case. ACIIN prepared using K nail was used as primary procedure after adequate debridement. Infection control and osseous union was judged on the basis of clinical, radiological and haematological parameters. All patients were followed up with an average follow-up of 20.23±3.65 months (range 14-28 months). RESULTS: Infection control was achieved in all 21 patients at end of 12 months follow-up, out of which 16 patients had osseous union and infection control without any secondary procedure. Of the remaining 5 patients: two patients had good infection control but had broken ACCIN due to non-compliance to weight bearing protocol. One patient underwent exchange nailing and plate augmentation whilst the other underwent simple exchange nailing, One more patient who had infection control but had persistent non-union had to undergo exchange nailing and augmented plating to achieve union. One other patient required debridement and implant removal and attained union and fifth patient required two additional debridements to control infection after which the fracture united. Apart from above 5 cases there were two further complications of knee stiffness. CONCLUSION: In infected non-union with bone gap less than 4cm, ACIIN can achieve both infection control and osseous union in significant number of cases. All such cases should be primarily operated with aim to achieve this outcome and use of thicker nail and ensuring proper compliance from patients regarding weight bearing will improve the outcomes.

Outcomes of dynamic hip screw augmented with trochanteric wiring for treatment of unstable type A2 intertrochanteric femur fractures.

BACKGROUND: Posteromedial and greater trochanteric fragments are a major cause of telescoping and medialization of the femoral shaft in an unstable intertrochanteric fracture. This leads to significant limb shortening, fracture collapse in varus position and implant failure, which can be prevented by trochanteric wiring in addition to dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation. The purpose of our study is to assess the outcomes of DHS augmented with trochanteric wiring in unstable type A2 intertrochanteric fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and two retrospective cases of unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with DHS between January 2010 and December 2015 with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months were reviewed. Out of 102 cases, 28 were treated with DHS and derotation screw alone (Group A), while in rest 74 cases trochanteric wiring was used as an augmentation to DHS and derotation screw (Group B). Patients were evaluated clinically for range of motion, Harris hip score and Oxford hip score. Radiologically, fracture reduction, change in neck shaft angle and neck length ratio in comparison to opposite hip and union status of greater trochanter were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 72 years (range 23-94 years) with 48 males and 54 females. The mean follow-up period was 20 months (range 12-48 months). The Harris hip score, Oxford hip score, shortening, attainment of weight bearing and change in neck shaft angle was not significantly different between the two groups (all p values >0.05). Incidence of greater trochanter nonunion was greater in group A (17.85%) as compared to group B (6.75%). We found significant association between occurrence of limp with varus change in neck shaft angle, decrease in neck length ratio and greater trochanteric non-union (all p values <0.05). We had 7 complications, one superficial infection, one deep vein thrombosis, 4 screw cut out and one deep infection treated with implant removal. CONCLUSION: DHS augmented with trochanteric wiring in unstable intertrochanteric fractures gives similar result to group without no wiring, although greater trochanter non-union rate was more in the latter group. Limp can be prevented by anatomical or valgus fixation, augmentation of DHS to support posteromedial and greater trochanteric fragments and delayed weight bearing.

Effectiveness of exchange K-nail and augmented plating in aseptic femoral diaphyseal non-union.

BACKGROUND: Femoral diaphyseal non-unions present difficult scenario to manage. There are multiple options but most of them still report varying incidences of failure. We combined the principles of augmented plating and exchange nailing and aim to study the effectiveness of this technique. METHOD: A retrospective study at a tertiary trauma centre was conducted. Seventy patients (60 men, 10 women), average age 40.7±15.27 years (range 18-81 years) with diaphyseal femoral fracture non-unions treated between July 2010 and January 2015 were reviewed. The average interval between first and the last surgery was 18.07±17.65 months (range 4-96 months). Forty six patients had hypertrophic non-union and 24 patients had atrophic non-union. Twenty one patients had undergone a prior surgery for non-union, 13 dynamisation, 4 bone grafting, 1 augmented plating and 3 exchange nailing. Non-unions were treated with implant removal, freshening of bone edges and exchange K-nailing and augmented plating. Autologous bone grafting and raising of osteoperiosteal flaps was done in all cases. Outcome measures were radiographic evidence of fracture union at minimum three out of four cortices, knee range of motion as compared to opposite knee, and study of complications. RESULTS: All patients demonstrated radiographic evidence of fracture union with an average time of 16.77±2.38 weeks (range 12-26 weeks). Mean knee range of motion of unaffected limb was 126±9.76° (range 90-140°) while in operated limb it was 121.1±11.36° (range 80-140°), p>0.01. Patients with hypertrophic non-unions, prior surgery for non-union and supra- or infra-isthmal non-unions had shorter union time. Two patients had superficial infection which was managed by superficial debridement and two patients had pain at proximal nail tip site which was managed by anti-inflammatory medication. None of the patients required additional surgery for implant removal. CONCLUSION: Exchange K nailing with Bone graft and additional plating technique for non-union diaphyseal femur fracture achieved good union rates with minimal complication. In our series none of the patient required revision and the technique probably will further minimise the revision rates compared to current options for non-union femur.