Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
FASEB J ; 34(11): 14960-14976, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32924185

RESUMEN

Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease characterized by the accumulation of macrophages in the vessel wall. Macrophages depend on their polarization to exert either pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory effects. Macrophages of the anti-inflammatory phenotype express high levels of CD163, a scavenger receptor for the hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex. CD163 can also bind to the pro-inflammatory cytokine TWEAK. Using ApoE-deficient or ApoE/CD163 double-deficient mice we aim to investigate the involvement of CD163 in atherosclerosis development and its capacity to neutralize the TWEAK actions. ApoE/CD163 double-deficient mice displayed a more unstable plaque phenotype characterized by an increased lipid and macrophage content, plaque size, and pro-inflammatory cytokine expression. In vitro experiments demonstrated that the absence of CD163 in M2-type macrophages-induced foam cell formation through upregulation of CD36 expression. Moreover, exogenous TWEAK administration increased atherosclerotic lesion size, lipids, and macrophages content in ApoE-/- /CD163-/- compared with ApoE-/- /CD163+/+ mice. Treatment with recombinant CD163 was able to neutralize the proatherogenic effects of TWEAK in ApoE/CD163 double-deficient mice. Recombinant CD163 abolished the pro-inflammatory actions of TWEAK on vascular smooth muscle cells, decreasing NF-kB activation, cytokines and metalloproteinases expression, and macrophages migration. In conclusion, CD163-expressing macrophages serve as a protective mechanism to prevent the deleterious effects of TWEAK on atherosclerotic plaque development and progression.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos CD/fisiología , Antígenos de Diferenciación Mielomonocítica/fisiología , Aterosclerosis/patología , Citocina TWEAK/metabolismo , Células Espumosas/patología , Macrófagos/patología , Placa Aterosclerótica/patología , Receptores de Superficie Celular/fisiología , Animales , Aterosclerosis/etiología , Aterosclerosis/metabolismo , Citocinas/metabolismo , Femenino , Células Espumosas/metabolismo , Macrófagos/metabolismo , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones Noqueados , Ratones Noqueados para ApoE , Placa Aterosclerótica/etiología , Placa Aterosclerótica/metabolismo
2.
Environ Res ; 197: 111062, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33798517

RESUMEN

Bisphenol A (BPA) is one of the most common endocrine disruptors found in the environment and its harmful health effects in humans and wildlife have been extensively reported One of the main aims of this review was to examine the metabolic pathways of BPA and BPA substitutes and the endocrine disrupting properties of their metabolites. According to the available literature, phase I and phase II metabolic reactions play an important role in the detoxification process of bisphenols (BPs), but their metabolism can also lead to the formation of highly reactive metabolites. The second part of this work addresses the associations between exposure to BPA and its analogues with the alterations in miRNAs expression and the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Available scientific evidence shows that BPs can dysregulate the expression of several miRNAs, and in turn, these miRNAs could be considered as epigenetic biomarkers to prevent the development of a variety of BP-mediated diseases. Interestingly, genetic polymorphisms are able to modify the relationship of BPA exposure with the risk of adverse health effects, suggesting that interindividual genetic differences modulate the susceptibility to the effects of environmental contaminants.


Asunto(s)
Disruptores Endocrinos , MicroARNs , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/toxicidad , Disruptores Endocrinos/toxicidad , Humanos , Redes y Vías Metabólicas , MicroARNs/genética , Fenoles , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Sulfonas
3.
Sci Total Environ ; 898: 165530, 2023 Nov 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37453710

RESUMEN

The development and progression of prostate cancer (PCa) depends on complex interactions between genetic, environmental and dietary factors that modulate the carcinogenesis process. Interactions between chemical exposures and genetic polymorphisms in genes encoding xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes (XME), antioxidant enzymes and DNA repair enzymes have been reported as the main drivers of cancer. Thus, a better understanding of the causal risk factors for PCa will provide avenues to identify men at increased risk and will contribute to develop effective detection and prevention methods. We performed a meta-analysis on 17,518 cases and 42,507 controls obtained from 42 studies to determine whether seven SNPs and one CNV pertaining to oxidative stress, xenobiotic detoxification and DNA repair enzymes are associated with the risk of PCa (GPX1 (rs1050450), XRCC1 (rs25487), PON1 (rs662), SOD2 (rs4880), CAT (rs1001179), GSTP1 (rs1695) and CNV GSTM1). A significant increased risk of PCa was found for SOD2 (rs4880) ORGG+GA vs. AA 1.08; 95%CI 1.01-1.15, CAT (rs1001179) ORTT vs. TC+CC 1.39; 95%CI 1.17-1.66, PON1 (rs662) ORCT vs. CC+TT 1.17; 95%CI 1.01-1.35, GSTP1 (rs1695) ORGG vs. GA+AA 1.20; 95%CI 1.05-1.38 and GSTM1 (dual null vs. functional genotype) ORN vs. NN1+NN2 1.34; 95%CI 1.10-1.64. The meta-analysis showed that the CNV GSTM1, and the SNPs GSTP1 (rs1695) and CAT (rs1001179) are strongly associated with a greater risk of PCa and, to a lesser extent, the genetic variants SOD2 (rs4880) and PON1 (rs662). Although several antioxidant enzymes and XME play an important role in the PCa development, other risk factors such as chemical exposures should also be considered to gain insight on PCa risk. The functional in silico analysis showed that the genetic variants studied had no clinical implication regarding malignancy, except for GPX1 (rs1050450) SNP.


Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Xenobióticos , Gutatión-S-Transferasa pi/genética , Genotipo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Proteína 1 de Reparación por Escisión del Grupo de Complementación Cruzada de las Lesiones por Rayos X/genética , Arildialquilfosfatasa/genética
4.
Front Immunol ; 13: 1094644, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36969980

RESUMEN

Background: Approximately 13.8% and 6.1% of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients require hospitalization and sometimes intensive care unit (ICU) admission, respectively. There is no biomarker to predict which of these patients will develop an aggressive stage that we could improve their quality of life and healthcare management. Our main goal is to include new markers for the classification of COVID-19 patients. Methods: Two tubes of peripheral blood were collected from a total of 66 (n = 34 mild and n = 32 severe) samples (mean age 52 years). Cytometry analysis was performed using a 15-parameter panel included in the Maxpar® Human Monocyte/Macrophage Phenotyping Panel Kit. Cytometry by time-of-flight mass spectrometry (CyTOF) panel was performed in combination with genetic analysis using TaqMan® probes for ACE2 (rs2285666), MX1 (rs469390), and TMPRSS2 (rs2070788) variants. GemStone™ and OMIQ software were used for cytometry analysis. Results: The frequency of CD163+/CD206- population of transitional monocytes (T-Mo) was decreased in the mild group compared to that of the severe one, while T-Mo CD163-/CD206- were increased in the mild group compared to that of the severe one. In addition, we also found differences in CD11b expression in CD14dim monocytes in the severe group, with decreased levels in the female group (p = 0.0412). When comparing mild and severe disease, we also found that CD45- [p = 0.014; odds ratio (OR) = 0.286, 95% CI 0.104-0.787] and CD14dim/CD33+ (p = 0.014; OR = 0.286, 95% CI 0.104-0.787) monocytes were the best options as biomarkers to discriminate between these patient groups. CD33 was also indicated as a good biomarker for patient stratification by the analysis of GemStone™ software. Among genetic markers, we found that G carriers of TMPRSS2 (rs2070788) have an increased risk (p = 0.02; OR = 3.37, 95% CI 1.18-9.60) of severe COVID-19 compared to those with A/A genotype. This strength is further increased when combined with CD45-, T-Mo CD163+/CD206-, and C14dim/CD33+. Conclusions: Here, we report the interesting role of TMPRSS2, CD45-, CD163/CD206, and CD33 in COVID-19 aggressiveness. This strength is reinforced for aggressiveness biomarkers when TMPRSS2 and CD45-, TMPRSS2 and CD163/CD206, and TMPRSS2 and CD14dim/CD33+ are combined.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antígenos CD/metabolismo , Receptores de Superficie Celular/metabolismo , Biomarcadores , Serina Endopeptidasas/genética , Lectina 3 Similar a Ig de Unión al Ácido Siálico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA