High vs Low PEEP in Patients With ARDS Exhibiting Intense Inspiratory Effort During Assisted Ventilation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can potentially modulate inspiratory effort (ΔPes), which is the major determinant of self-inflicted lung injury. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does high PEEP reduce ΔPes in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS on assisted ventilation? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with Pao2/Fio2 ≤ 200 mm Hg and ΔPes ≥ 10 cm H2O underwent a randomized sequence of four ventilator settings: PEEP = 5 cm H2O or PEEP = 15 cm H2O + synchronous (pressure support ventilation [PSV]) or asynchronous (pressure-controlled intermittent mandatory ventilation [PC-IMV]) inspiratory assistance. ΔPes and respiratory system, lung, and chest wall mechanics were assessed with esophageal manometry and occlusions. PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment and overinflation, lung dynamic strain, and tidal volume distribution were assessed with electrical impedance tomography. RESULTS: ΔPes was not systematically different at high vs low PEEP (pressure support ventilation: median, 20 cm H2O; interquartile range (IQR), 15-24 cm H2O vs median, 15 cm H2O; IQR, 13-23 cm H2O; P = .24; pressure-controlled intermittent mandatory ventilation: median, 20; IQR, 18-23 vs median, 19; IQR, 17-25; P = .67, respectively). Similarly, respiratory system and transpulmonary driving pressures, tidal volume, lung/chest wall mechanics, and pendelluft extent were not different between study phases. High PEEP resulted in lower or higher ΔPes, respiratory system driving pressure, and transpulmonary driving pressure according to whether this increased or decreased respiratory system compliance (r = -0.85, P < .001; r = -0.75, P < .001; r = -0.80, P < .001, respectively). PEEP-induced changes in respiratory system compliance were driven by its lung component and were dependent on the extent of PEEP-induced alveolar overinflation (r = -0.66, P = .006). High PEEP caused variable recruitment and systematic redistribution of tidal volume toward dorsal lung regions, thereby reducing dynamic strain in ventral areas (pressure support ventilation: median, 0.49; IQR, 0.37-0.83 vs median, 0.96; IQR, 0.62-1.56; P = .003; pressure-controlled intermittent mandatory ventilation: median, 0.65; IQR, 0.42-1.31 vs median, 1.14; IQR, 0.79-1.52; P = .002). All results were consistent during synchronous and asynchronous inspiratory assistance. INTERPRETATION: The impact of high PEEP on ΔPes and lung stress is interindividually variable according to different effects on the respiratory system and lung compliance resulting from alveolar overinflation. High PEEP may help mitigate the risk of self-inflicted lung injury solely if it increases lung/respiratory system compliance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04241874; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Regional lung perfusion using different indicators in electrical impedance tomography.

Management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is classically guided by protecting the injured lung and mitigating damage from mechanical ventilation. Yet the natural history of ARDS is also dictated by disruption in lung perfusion. Unfortunately, diagnosis and treatment are hampered by the lack of bedside perfusion monitoring. Electrical impedance tomography is a portable imaging technique that can estimate regional lung perfusion in experimental settings from the kinetic analysis of a bolus of an indicator with high conductivity. Hypertonic sodium chloride has been the standard indicator. However, hypertonic sodium chloride is often inaccessible in the hospital, limiting practical adoption. We investigated whether regional lung perfusion measured using electrical impedance tomography is comparable between indicators. Using a swine lung injury model, we determined regional lung perfusion (% of total perfusion) in five pigs, comparing 12% sodium chloride to 8.4% sodium bicarbonate across stages of lung injury and experimental conditions (body position, positive end-expiratory pressure). Regional lung perfusion for four lung regions was determined from maximum slope analysis of the indicator-based impedance signal. Estimates of regional lung perfusion between indicators were compared in the lung overall and within four lung regions. Regional lung perfusion estimated with a sodium bicarbonate indicator agreed with a hypertonic sodium chloride indicator overall (mean bias 0%, limits of agreement -8.43%, 8.43%) and within lung quadrants. The difference in regional lung perfusion between indicators did not change across experimental conditions. Sodium bicarbonate may be a comparable indicator to estimate regional lung perfusion using electrical impedance tomography.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Electrical impedance tomography is an emerging tool to measure regional lung perfusion using kinetic analysis of a conductive indicator. Hypertonic sodium chloride is the standard agent used. We measured regional lung perfusion using another indicator, comparing hypertonic sodium chloride to sodium bicarbonate in an experimental swine lung injury model. We found strong agreement between the two indicators. Sodium bicarbonate may be a comparable indicator to measure regional lung perfusion with electrical impedance tomography.