RESUMEN
Falls are a major health care concern in individuals with Alzheimer disease (AD) and their caregivers. Vestibular impairment is a known risk factor for falls, and individuals with AD have been shown to have an increased prevalence of vestibular loss compared with age-matched controls. Vestibular physical therapy (VPT) is effective in improving balance and reducing fall risk in cognitively-intact persons with vestibular impairment. However, the effectiveness of VPT in improving balance and reducing falls in individuals with AD who have vestibular loss has never been explored. SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS:: In this article, we apply prevailing ideas about rehabilitation and motor learning in individuals with cognitive impairment (IwCI) to VPT. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE:: We propose a modification of current evidence-based VPT protocols for IwCI using the strength-based theoretical framework that emphasizes the motor learning abilities of IwCI. In addition, we highlight the importance of establishing an excellent rapport with IwCI, and present key strategies for optimizing the therapeutic relationship. In ongoing work, we are assessing the efficacy of this modified VPT protocol in IwCI to improve balance and reduce falls.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Disfunción Cognitiva/complicaciones , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Enfermedades Vestibulares/rehabilitación , Disfunción Cognitiva/fisiopatología , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades Vestibulares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Vestibulares/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND: The aging of the population assures increased prevalence of Individuals Living with Dementia (ILwD) and there will be an increased representation of this cohort requiring physical rehabilitation. If physical therapists (PTs) manage these patients as they do their age-matched, cognitively-intact peers, they will likely be unsuccessful. ILwD have unique needs related to interpersonal and pragmatic components of rehabilitation. Therapeutic nihilism (doubting the benefit of therapy) is well-documented in PTs, either because of existing biases about dementia or previous challenges in working with ILwD. Physical rehabilitation eligibility and placement decisions are often made by PTs without special training in dementia, based upon brief exposure to patients in environments not well-designed for their best functioning. This can lead to underestimation of rehabilitation potential and denial of future PT services. PTs who work with ILwD desire more practical knowledge and targeted skills. Those with more education and training have a more positive attitude and outlook related to ILwD. PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to introduce a framework for rehabilitation with ILwD equipped with pragmatic ideas to facilitate therapeutic success. The four primary components of the model are: (1) Establish a personal RELATIONSHIP, (2) Use intentional verbal and nonverbal COMMUNICATION, (3) Understand and optimize MOTOR LEARNING capabilities, and (4) Create a safe, purposeful ENVIRONMENT. Specific strategies to help PTs optimize each component are provided with supporting evidence. The model is intended to be dynamic, encouraging PTs to capitalize on the most accessible strategies within their control for a given patient and setting. IMPLICATIONS: This framework provides a practical resource for working with ILwD with immediate implications for facilitating therapeutic success. The model is displayed in a schematic that reminds the reader of ideas at a glance within the context of each of the components. If an appreciation for this content was among core competencies required among PTs working with ILwD, perhaps there would be significantly fewer patients written off as "uncooperative" or "unable to participate" in PT.
RESUMEN
Older adults with dementia experience more frequent and injurious falls than their cognitively-intact peers; however, there are no evidence-based fall-prevention programs (EBFPP) for this population. The Otago Exercise Program (OEP) is an EBFPP for older adults that has not been well-studied in people with dementia. We sought to explore the feasibility of group delivery of OEP in an adult day health center (ADHC) for people with dementia. We collected demographic data, Functional Assessment Staging Tool (FAST), and Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) scores for seven participants with dementia. Pre- and post-test data included: Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG), 30-Second Chair-Stand (30s-CST), Four-Stage-Balance-Test (4-SBT), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). We implemented a supervised group OEP, 3x/week × 8 weeks. Most participants required 1:1 supervision for optimal challenge and participation. Five participants completed the program. All had moderately severe to severe dementia based upon FAST; MMSE scores ranged from mild to severe cognitive impairment. Four of five participants crossed the threshold from higher to lower fall risk in at least one outcome (TUG, 30s-CST, 4-SBT, or BBS), and four of five participants improved by >Minimal Detectible Change (MDC90) score in at least one outcome. The group delivery format of OEP required significant staff oversight for optimal participation, making the program unsustainable.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Individuals with Alzheimer disease (AD) have a higher risk of falls than their cognitively intact peers. This pilot study was designed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a small-group balance exercise program for individuals with AD in a day center environment. METHODS: Seven participants met the inclusion criteria: diagnosis of AD or probable AD, medical stability, and ability to walk (with or without assistive device). We used an exploratory pre- and post-test study design. Participants engaged in a functional balance exercise program in two 45-minute sessions each week for eight weeks. Balance activities were functional and concrete, and the intervention was organized into constant, blocked, massed practice. Outcome measures included Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and gait speed (GS; self-selected and fast assessed by an instrumented walkway). Data were analyzed by comparing individual change scores with previously identified minimal detectable change scores at the 90% confidence level (MDC90). RESULTS: Pre- and post-test data were acquired for five participants (two participants withdrew). The BBS improved in all five participants, and improved > or = 6.4 points (the MDC90 for the BBS in three participants. Four participants improved their performance on the TUG, and three participants improved > or = 4.09 seconds (the MDC90 for the TUG). Self-selected GS increased > or = 9.44 cm/sec (the MDC90 for gait speed) in three participants. Two participants demonstrated post-test self-selected GS comparable with their pretest fast GS. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that a small-group functional balance intervention for individuals with AD is feasible and effective. Although participants had no explicit memory of the program, four of five improved in at least two outcome measures. Larger scale functional balance intervention studies with individuals with AD are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/rehabilitación , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Individuals with Alzheimer disease (IwAD) experience more frequent and more injurious falls than their cognitively intact peers. Evidence of balance and gait dysfunction is observed earlier in the course of Alzheimer disease (AD) than once believed. Balance training has been demonstrated to be effective in improving balance and decreasing falls in cognitively intact older adults but is not well studied in IwAD. This study was designed to analyze the effects of a group balance training program on balance and falls in IwAD. The program was developed specifically for IwAD, with explicit guidelines for communication/interaction and deliberate structure of training sessions catered to the motor learning needs of IwAD. DESIGN: This prospective, quasi-experimental, pretest-posttest design study describes the effects of a balance training program for a cohort of IwAD. METHODS: Thirty IwAD were recruited from 3 adult day health centers; 22 completed at least 1 posttest session. Participants were tested with Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), Self-Selected Gait Speed (SSGS), Fast Gait Speed (FGS), and Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) immediately before and after the 3-month intervention and again 3 months later. Group training was held at the adult day health centers for 45 minutes, twice per week. Sessions were characterized by massed, constant, and blocked practice of functional, relevant activities with considerable repetition. Ratio of participant to staff member never exceeded 3:1. Physical therapist staff members assured that participants were up on their feet the majority of each session and were individually challenged as much as possible. RESULTS: Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for BBS was significant (F = 15.04; df = 1.67/28.40; P = .000) with post hoc tests, revealing improvement between pretest and immediate posttest (P = .000) and decline in performance between immediate and 3-month posttest (P = .012). Repeated-measures ANOVA posttest for MMSE was significant (F = 5.12; df = 1.73/22.53; P = .018) with post hoc tests, showing no change in MMSE between pretest and immediate posttest but decline in MMSE when comparing immediate posttest with 3-month posttest (P = .038) and pretest with 3-month posttest (P = .019). Repeated-measures ANOVA for TUG, FGS, and SSGS were not significant. Immediate effects of the intervention as assessed by the a priori paired t tests (comparing pre- and immediate posttest data) revealed significant improvement in BBS (t = -7.010; df = 20; P = .000), TUG (t = 3.103; df = 20; P = .006), and FGS (t = -2.115; df = 19; P = .048), but not in SSGS (t = -1.456; df = 20; P = .161). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The 3-month group balance training intervention designed specifically for IwAD was effective in improving balance and mobility, as evidenced by improved BBS and TUG performances. Cognition did not decline during the course of the intervention but did decline following the intervention, suggesting a possible protective effect. Given the promising findings, a larger-scale controlled study is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/rehabilitación , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Marcha/fisiología , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis de Varianza , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Humanos , Pruebas de Inteligencia , Masculino , Movimiento , Estudios Prospectivos , Muestreo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Brazo , Parálisis Cerebral/rehabilitación , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Paresia/congénito , Paresia/rehabilitación , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Brazo/fisiología , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administración & dosificación , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Técnicas de Ejercicio con Movimientos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Fármacos Neuromusculares/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Aparatos Ortopédicos , Paresia/fisiopatología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With the increasing incidence of Alzheimer disease (AD), determining the validity and reliability of outcome measures for people with this disease is necessary. OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to assess test-retest reliability of data for the Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG), the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and gait speed and to calculate minimal detectable change (MDC) scores for each outcome measure. Performance differences between groups with mild to moderate AD and moderately severe to severe AD (as determined by the Functional Assessment Staging [FAST] scale) were studied. DESIGN: This was a prospective, nonexperimental, descriptive methodological study. METHODS: Background data collected for 51 people with AD included: use of an assistive device, Mini-Mental Status Examination scores, and FAST scale scores. Each participant engaged in 2 test sessions, separated by a 30- to 60-minute rest period, which included 2 TUG trials, 1 6MWT trial, and 2 gait speed trials using a computerized gait assessment system. A specific cuing protocol was followed to achieve optimal performance during test sessions. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability values for the TUG, the 6MWT, and gait speed were high for all participants together and for the mild to moderate AD and moderately severe to severe AD groups separately (intraclass correlation coefficients > or = .973); however, individual variability of performance also was high. Calculated MDC scores at the 90% confidence interval were: TUG=4.09 seconds, 6MWT=33.5 m (110 ft), and gait speed=9.4 cm/s. The 2 groups were significantly different in performance of clinical tests, with the participants who were more cognitively impaired being more physically and functionally impaired. LIMITATIONS: A single researcher for data collection limited sample numbers and prohibited blinding to dementia level. CONCLUSIONS: The TUG, the 6MWT, and gait speed are reliable outcome measures for use with people with AD, recognizing that individual variability of performance is high. Minimal detectable change scores at the 90% confidence interval can be used to assess change in performance over time and the impact of treatment.