Percutaneous Image-Guided Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Unresectable, Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To describe safety and effectiveness of percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) for treatment of unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 patients (23 women, 27 men; age range, 46-91 y; median age, 62.5 y) with biopsy-proven, unresectable LAPC who received percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided IRE. The primary objective was to assess the safety profile of the procedure; the secondary objective was to determine overall survival (OS). All patients had prior chemotherapy (1-5 lines, median 2), and 30 (60%) of 50 patients had prior radiation therapy. Follow-up included CT at 1 month and at 3-month intervals thereafter. RESULTS: There were no treatment-related deaths and no 30-day mortality. Serious adverse events occurred in 10 (20%) of 50 patients (abdominal pain [n = 7], pancreatitis [n = 1], sepsis [n = 1], gastric leak [n = 1]). Median OS was 27.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.7-32.5 months) from time of diagnosis and 14.2 months (95% CI, 9.7-16.2 months) from time of IRE. Patients with tumors ≤ 3 cm (n = 24) had significantly longer median OS than patients with tumors > 3 cm (n = 26): 33.8 vs 22.7 months from time of diagnosis (P = .002) and 16.2 vs 9.9 months from time of IRE (P = .031). Tumor size was confirmed as the only independent predictor of OS at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous image-guided IRE of unresectable LAPC is associated with an acceptable safety profile.

Percutaneous irreversible electroporation for the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases with a proposal for a new response evaluation system.

PURPOSE: To describe an initial experience with irreversible electroporation (IRE) in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CLM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing IRE for the management of CLM was performed. Procedures were done percutaneously under general anesthesia. Patients were then followed for adverse events, tumor response, and survival. RESULTS: Between March 2010 and February 2013, 29 patients underwent percutaneous ablation of 58 tumors in 36 IRE sessions. Most patients (89%) had an absolute or relative contraindication to thermal ablation. The median age was 62 years, and the median time from diagnosis to IRE was 28 months. The median number of lesions treated per patient was two, and the median tumor size was 2.7 cm. Patients had received previous chemotherapy regimens (range, 1-5 per patient). A new Metabolic Imaging And Marker Integration response evaluation criteria was used for response assessment, and was a predictor of progression-free and overall survival. The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 18% (95% confidence interval, 0%-35%), and the 2-year overall survival rate was 62% (95% confidence interval, 37%-87%). Complications included arrhythmias (n = 1) and postprocedure pain (n = 1). Both patients recovered without sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous IRE of CLM is feasible and safe. A new response evaluation system for colorectal cancer appears to be prognostic.

A phase 1 trial of E7974 administered on day 1 of a 21-day cycle in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: E7974, a synthetic analog of hemiasterlin, interacts with the tubulin molecule and overcomes resistance to other antitubulin drugs (taxanes and vinca alkaloids). METHODS: In a phase 1 study, E7974 was given intravenously over a 2- to 5-minute infusion on day 1 of every 21-day cycle. Adult patients with advanced refractory solid tumors who had adequate organ function and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2 were eligible for this study. A modified Fibonacci schema was used. The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was the dose where <2 of 6 patients developed a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (19 men and 9 women; median age, 64 years) treated at different cohort dose levels (0.18 mg/m(2) , 0.27 mg/m(2) , 0.36 mg/m(2) , 0.45 mg/m(2) , and 0.56 mg/m(2) ) received a total of 66 courses of E7974. The MTD was established at 0.45 mg/m(2) , where 1 of 6 patients experienced DLT (grade 4 febrile neutropenia). Of the 17 refractory colon cancer patients with a median of 3 prior treatments, stable disease was seen in 7 patients (41%). There were no tumor responses. Median progression-free survival was 1.2 months, and median overall survival was 6.7 months. In pharmacokinetic analysis, E7974 was characterized by a fast and moderately large distribution (37.95-147.93 L), slow clearance (2.23-7.15 L/h), and moderate to slow elimination (time to half-life, 10.4-30.5 hours). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that E7974 once every 21-day cycle shows antitumor activity in patients with refractory solid tumors. The recommended phase 2 dose is 0.45 mg/m(2).

Phase Ib study of drozitumab combined with first-line mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

In this multicenter phase Ib study, drozitumab was given in combination with the mFOLFOX6 regimen and bevacizumab in patients with previously untreated, locally advanced recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer on day 1 of every 14-day cycle. Nine patients were treated at 2 different cohort dose levels of drozitumab. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred at either dose level and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Two patients had a partial response of 4.93 and 4.96 months duration. Cohort 2 dose level is the recommended starting dose level for future trials.

A retrospective study of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in unresectable or borderline-resectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) is superior to gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have a good performance status. We investigated this combination as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: In this retrospective series, we included patients with unresectable LAPC who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX with growth factor support. The primary analysis endpoint was R0 resection rate. RESULTS: Eighteen treatment-naïve patients with unresectable or borderline resectable LAPC were treated with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. The median age was 57.5 years and all had ECOG PS of 0 or 1. Eleven (61 %) had tumors in the head of the pancreas and 9 (50 %) had biliary stents placed prior to chemotherapy. A total of 146 cycles were administered with a median of 8 cycles (range 3-17) per patient. At maximum response or tolerability, 7 (39 %) were converted to resectability by radiological criteria; 5 had R0 resections, 1 had an R1 resection, and 1 had unresectable disease. Among the 11 patients who remained unresectable after FOLFIRINOX, 3 went on to have R0 resections after combined chemoradiotherapy, giving an overall R0 resection rate of 44 % (95 % CI 22-69 %). After a median follow-up of 13.4 months, the 1-year progression-free survival was 83 % (95 % CI 59-96 %) and the 1-year overall survival was 100 % (95 % CI 85-100 %). Grade 3/4 chemotherapy-related toxicities were neutropenia (22 %), neutropenic fever (17 %), thrombocytopenia (11 %), fatigue (11 %), and diarrhea (11 %). Common grade 1/2 toxicities were neutropenia (33 %), anemia (72 %), thrombocytopenia (44 %), fatigue (78 %), nausea (50 %), diarrhea (33 %) and neuropathy (33 %). CONCLUSIONS: FOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiotherapy is feasible as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with unresectable LAPC. The R0 resection rate of 44 % in this population is promising. Further studies are warranted.

Emerging cell-cycle inhibitors for pancreatic cancer therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) present with advanced disease that is lethal and notoriously difficult to treat. The research focused initially on combining cytotoxic therapies with gemcitabine, and over the past decade, a large number of studies have been published that aimed to target the molecular abnormalities implicated in pancreatic tumor growth. AREAS COVERED: The cell cycle is a tightly regulated series of events that governs cell replication and division. Deregulation of cell cycle kinases have been implicated in PC tumorigenesis. In this review, we discuss the potential and limitations of current cyclin-kinase inhibitors. We also summarize progress in evaluating other mitotic kinase inhibitors and novel cell-cycle kinase inhibitors as potential therapeutic agents in PC. EXPERT OPINION: While the successful development and approval of cell-cycle inhibitors for PC therapy remains unresolved, pre-clinical identification of resistant mechanisms would help design better early- phase clinical trials where relevant combinations may be evaluated prior to Phase II testing. The authors believe that cell-cycle kinases are important anti-cancer targets that operate in collaboration with other oncogenes intimately involved in uncontrolled tumor proliferation and by providing a unique, targeted, and complimentary anti-cancer mechanism, expand the available armamentarium against PC.

Percutaneous irreversible electroporation for downstaging and control of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Treatment of unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) usually includes chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy in an attempt to downstage these tumors to the extent of resectability, but outcomes remain poor. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an ablative modality that may be useful in this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of percutaneous IRE in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRE was performed in patients with pancreatic cancer whose tumors remained unresectable after, or who were intolerant of, standard therapy. The procedures were all done percutaneously under general anesthesia. Patients were then followed for adverse events, tumor response, and survival. RESULTS: Fifteen IRE procedures were performed in 14 patients (one was treated twice). Three patients had metastatic disease and 11 had LAPC. All patients had received chemotherapy previously, and 11 had received radiation. The median tumor size was 3.3 cm (range, 2.5-7 cm). Immediate and 24-hour postprocedural scans demonstrated patent vasculature in the treatment zone in all patients. Two patients underwent surgery 4 and 5 months after IRE, respectively. Both had margin-negative resections, and one had a pathologic complete response; both remain disease-free after 11 and 14 months, respectively. Complications included spontaneous pneumothorax during anesthesia (n = 1) and pancreatitis (n = 1), and both patients recovered completely. There were no deaths directly related to the procedure. All three patients with metastatic disease at IRE died from progression of their disease. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous IRE for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is feasible and safe. A prospective trial is being planned.

Erlotinib (tarceva) for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.

Erlotinib (Tarceva) is a small-molecule, orally dosed, anti-cancer drug that inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor. Randomized, controlled clinical studies have demonstrated that erlotinib significantly improved survival in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer and, in combination with chemotherapy, in patients with untreated pancreatic cancer. In this article, we describe the clinical evidence and value of erlotinib as a therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer and discuss ongoing clinical studies to optimize its use in various settings and to identify appropriate patient populations.

A Phase I/II Open-Label Multicenter Single-Arm Study of FABLOx (Metronomic 5-Fluorouracil Plus nab-Paclitaxel, Bevacizumab, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin) in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.

Purpose: To evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of metronomic 5-fluorouracil plus nab-paclitaxel, bevacizumab, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FABLOx) in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). Methods: A total of 12 treatment-naive patients (aged 18-65 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [ECOG PS] ≤1) with MPC received 5-fluorouracil 180 mg/m2 per day (days 1-14 continuous infusion); nab-paclitaxel 75 mg/m2, leucovorin 20 mg/m2, and oxaliplatin 40 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, and 15); and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg (days 1 and 15) administered intravenously in each 28-day cycle. The primary end-point was incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycle 1. Safety was further evaluated as a secondary end-point; preliminary efficacy was also examined. Results: Two DLTs (grade 3 anemia requiring transfusion and grade 3 mucositis unresponsive to treatment within 4 days of onset) were observed in one of six patients enrolled in dose cohort 1. Cohort 1 was expanded from 6 to 12 patients to further evaluate safety, per the investigators' recommendation. All patients discontinued treatment. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were abdominal pain, fatigue, mucositis, and decreased neutrophil count. Objective response rate was 33% (four partial responses). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-11.3) and 9.9 (95% CI, 4.4-13.2) months, respectively; 1-year PFS and OS rates were 12.2% (95% CI, 0.7-40.8) and 38.9% (95% CI, 12.6-65.0). Conclusion: FABLOx is feasible and tolerable in patients newly diagnosed with MPC. However, preliminary efficacy data are inconclusive for continued investigation in a phase II trial.

DNA damage repair deficiency as a predictive biomarker for FOLFIRINOX efficacy in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Patients with pathogenic germline and somatic variants in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes may derive greater benefit with platinum-based chemotherapy in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study investigates the role of DDR genes as a predictive biomarker for response to first-line platinum chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX in metastatic PDAC patients. Demographic, clinical, and pathologic variables were collected for patients with metastatic PDAC who received FOLFIRINOX as frontline treatment and who had germline and somatic genetic testing. Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were correlated to the presence of DDR pathogenic variants. Forty patients with metastatic PDAC met inclusion criteria. Germline genetic testing revealed germline pathogenic variants in DDR genes in 5 patients (12%), and somatic pathogenic variants in DDR genes in 4 patients (10%). Median PFS was significantly longer in patients with any (germline or somatic) pathogenic variant in DDR genes than in those without alterations 18.5 vs. 6.9 months (log-rank P=0.003). When restricted to the presence or absence of germline pathogenic variants in DDR genes, the median PFS was 18.5 vs. 7.4 months (log-rank P=0.005). The median OS for the entire cohort was 11.5 months was not statistically different between the two groups, however there were no deaths in the subgroup with germline pathogenic variants in DDR genes treated with frontline FOLFIRINOX. A subset of patients with metastatic PDAC and germline or somatic pathogenic variants in DDR genes have a statistically superior PFS when treated with the platinum containing regimen FOLFIRINOX. The role of DDR gene alterations as a predictive biomarker for FOLFIRINOX benefit should be further evaluated in prospective trials.

Role of combined-modality therapy in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer.

The majority of patients with nonmetastatic rectal cancer are candidates for an aggressive multimodality approach with curative intent. Preoperative staging is critical in determining which patients should be offered neoadjuvant therapy. Available staging tools include digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound, computed tomography, positron-emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging scans. Magnetic resonance imaging has emerged as the most accurate staging modality in experienced centers. Multidisciplinary preoperative patient evaluation, better staging techniques, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, acceptance of shorter distal rectal margins, and transanal excision of T1 N0 rectal tumors in close proximity to the anal sphincter have resulted in decreased rates of abdominoperineal resections. Total mesorectal excision has been adopted as the standard surgical approach because of a reduction in rates of pelvic relapse. Preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy was shown to decrease the local recurrence rate, but not overall survival, in patients with resectable rectal cancer. The addition of chemotherapy to radiation was consistently shown to improve local control, and in some trials, improved overall survival. Neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy are superior to adjuvant combined-modality therapy because of higher rates of sphincter preservation, less toxicity, and lower local recurrence rates. For patients with stage II or III disease, neoadjuvant continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), concurrently with pelvic radiation, followed by postoperative 5-FU-based chemotherapy, remains the standard multimodality approach. Ongoing trials are testing the integration of newer cytotoxic agents such as capecitabine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and biologic agents such as cetuximab and bevacizumab to chemoradiation.

The nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine regimen for patients with refractory advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

The phase III MPACT trial for metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) showed improved overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and response rates (RRs) for first-line nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) and gemcitabine (the AG combination) compared to gemcitabine monotherapy. The safety and efficacy of the AG combination has not been systematically studied as second-line therapy or beyond for metastatic PC. We conducted an IRB-approved retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed between September 2010 and August 2014 with advanced refractory PC that received combination treatment with AG at our institution. Demographic and survival data were extracted from the registry. Patients received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle with subsequent dose modifications based on tolerance. Data on 59 patients was available; the median age was 61; 55% were male; 56% received AG as second line therapy and 44% received it as third-line or beyond. Five (10%) patients had a confirmed partial response (PR), 23 (47%) had stable disease (SD) and 21 (43%) had disease progression as their best response. Among the 31 (52%) patients who received prior gemcitabine, 18 (58%) had clinical benefit; 3 had a PR and 15 had SD. The median OS was 3.9 months and the median progression-free survival was 3 months. Toxicity was similar to what was reported in the MPACT trial. This retrospective analysis suggests that AG is active in PC patients previously treated with either fluoropyrimidine-based therapy or gemcitabine-based therapy with manageable toxicities.

Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate.

PURPOSE: This phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter study compared the overall survival associated with irinotecan plus gemcitabine (IRINOGEM) versus gemcitabine monotherapy (GEM) in patients with chemotherapy-naive, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IRINOGEM patients received starting doses of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and irinotecan 100 mg/m2 given weekly for 2 weeks every 3-week cycle. GEM patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 weekly for 7 of 8 weeks (induction) and then weekly for 3 of 4 weeks. The primary end point of the trial was survival. Secondary end points included tumor response, time to tumor progression (TTP), changes in CA 19-9, and safety. RESULTS: In each arm, 180 randomly assigned patients comprised the intent-to-treat population evaluated for efficacy; 173 IRINOGEM and 169 GEM patients were treated. Median survival times were 6.3 months for IRINOGEM (95% CI, 4.7 to 7.5 months) and 6.6 months for GEM (95% CI, 5.2 to 7.8 months; log-rank P =.789). Tumor response rates were 16.1% (95% CI, 11.1% to 22.3%) for IRINOGEM and 4.4% (95% CI, 1.9% to 8.6%) for GEM (chi2 P <.001). Median TTP was 3.5 months for IRINOGEM versus 3.0 months for GEM (log-rank P =.352). However, subset analyses in patients with locally advanced disease suggested a TTP advantage with IRINOGEM versus GEM (median, 7.7 v 3.9 months). CA 19-9 progression was positively correlated with tumor progression. The incidence of grade 3 diarrhea was higher in the IRINOGEM group but grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities and quality-of-life outcomes were similar. CONCLUSION: IRINOGEM safely improved the tumor response rate compared with GEM but did not alter overall survival.

A cohort study evaluating the role of surgery for lung metastases from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Surgery may be curative in some patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We analyzed the role of lung metastatectomy in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, cases were defined as mCRC patients with lung metastases (LM's) who underwent metastatectomy. Controls had LM's but did not undergo resection. RESULTS: There were 28 cases and 46 controls. The median overall survival (OS) was 53 months among the cases and 26.3 months for the controls. The cases were more likely to have 1 or 2 lung metastases, unilateral versus bilateral LM's, metachronous versus synchronous presentation of LM's and more likely to have a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level less than 10 ng/ml at diagnosis. The interval from diagnosis to the development of lung metastases was significantly longer in cases versus controls (22.9 versus 8.5 months). CONCLUSION: Patients selected using these criteria may have prolonged survival with therapy that includes lung metastatectomy.

Treatment of relapsed small-cell lung cancer--a focus on the evolving role of topotecan.

Despite the high response rates to chemotherapy, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is among the most lethal malignancies. Long-term survival is anecdotal for patients with extensive disease; 5-years survival is < or =5% for those with limited disease. All patients with extensive disease and most patients with limited disease will experience disease progression and become candidates for second-line therapy. Although a number of agents have demonstrated antitumor activity in relapsed SCLC, including paclitaxel, docetaxel, etoposide, cisplatin, and carboplatin, topotecan is the only single agent currently approved in the United States for the treatment of recurrent disease. Topotecan is a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor with established antitumor activity in recurrent SCLC and has a predictable, noncumulative toxicity profile. Furthermore, topotecan has been shown to provide symptom improvement in this predominantly palliative setting. Evidence also suggests that topotecan readily penetrates the blood-brain barrier and might be active in the relatively large subset of SCLC patients who experience brain metastases. This article reviews the clinical utility of topotecan in recurrent SCLC, including its efficacy, tolerability, and quality-of-life effect, when used as monotherapy and in novel combination regimens.

5-fluorouracil-induced coronary vasospasm.

BACKGROUND: Cardiotoxicity is a rare but well-documented adverse effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The underlying cause of this side effect of 5-FU is uncertain. METHODS: We present a case report of a 63-year-old man treated for metastatic colon cancer who experienced chest pain while being treated with the FOLFIRI regimen. This case report documents coronary artery spasm on catheterization observed with the continuous infusion of 5-FU. RESULTS: Cardiac catheterization obtained within 36 hours of the onset of chest pain revealed marked coronary vasospasm in the obtuse marginal coronary artery and a right coronary artery with a critical obstructive atherosclerotic plaque. Electrocardiogram revealed the myocardium area associated with the event was diffuse rather than localized to the right coronary artery. CONCLUSIONS: This observation supports the vasospastic hypothesis for 5-FU-induced angina. Although rare, this type of cardiotoxicity with 5-FU is a potentially lethal side effect. Therapy with 5-FU should be discontinued and patients should be promptly treated.

New agents in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer: focus on gemcitabine.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 20%-25% of all new cases of lung cancer and represents the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States. Given the tumor's systemic nature and chemoresponsiveness, chemotherapy has become the cornerstone of its management. Chemotherapy significantly prolongs survival; however, most of the patients still die within 2 years of diagnosis. Combination chemotherapy represents the treatment of choice for this disease. In the United States, cisplatin/etoposide is the regimen most frequently used for the first-line therapy of SCLC patients because of its better therapeutic index. Upon recurrence, topotecan is the Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment based on a phase III trial that showed no statistically significant differences in survival or response for topotecan compared with CAV (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine) but a better disease-related symptom improvement compared to baseline favoring the topoisomerase I inhibitor. Newer agents, with novel mechanisms of action, have shown activity against SCLC and are being tested in many different combinations. Among these agents, gemcitabine has attractive mechanisms of action and toxicity profile. Gemcitabine is a pyrimidine nucleoside antimetabolite, analogue to cytosine arabinoside, which through incorporation into the DNA leads to inhibition of DNA synthesis and cytotoxicity. As a single agent, gemcitabine has modest activity against SCLC. However, like with many other drugs, response rates improve when gemcitabine is used in combination regimens. Phase II and III studies of combinations with classic drugs for the management of SCLC patients such as cisplatin and/or etoposide and gemcitabine demonstrate comparable results to those of standard therapies. The gemcitabine/paclitaxel and gemcitabine/topoisomerase I inhibitor combinations are also of great interest, and preliminary results in previously treated patients are promising. The proper role of gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with SCLC awaits future testing in randomized phase III trials.

Gemcitabine and irinotecan in locally advanced or metastatic biliary cancer: preliminary report.

Chemotherapy has had limited success in biliary tract cancer. Of the newer agents, gemcitabine (Gemzar) and irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) both have single-agent activity in patients with advanced disease. We conducted a phase II trial to study the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine plus irinotecan in patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. The study has enrolled 14 patients with histologically or cytologically documented cancer of the biliary tract or gallbladder with bidimensionally measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, decompressed biliary tree, and no prior exposure to chemotherapy. Gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 and irinotecan at 100 mg/m2 were both administered on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. In patients who had less than grade 3 hematologic and less than grade 2 nonhematologic toxicity following cycle 1, the dose of irinotecan was increased to 115 mg/m2 for subsequent cycles. A total of 65 cycles of chemotherapy have been administered, with an average of 4.5 cycles per patient (range: 1 to 11 cycles). The median treatment duration was 3 months (range: 0.75 to 8 months). An objective partial response was determined radiographically in two patients (14%) while stable disease for periods ranging from 4 to 11.5 months was noted in six patients (43%). Toxicity consisted of grade 3/4 neutropenia in seven patients (50%) with no episodes of febrile neutropenia, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in four (28%), grade 3 diarrhea in two (14%), and grade 3 nausea in one patient. The combination of gemcitabine plus irinotecan appears to possess modest clinical activity, and it is well tolerated in patients with advanced biliary cancer. Patient accrual is ongoing to this study.

A phase II study of capecitabine plus docetaxel in gemcitabine-pretreated metastatic pancreatic cancer patients: CapTere.

PURPOSE: Docetaxel and capecitabine combination is synergistic in preclinical models. We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of this combination as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPC), pretreated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Eligible patients were treated with capecitabine 800 mg/m(2) orally PO bid on days 1-14 in combination with intravenous docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. The primary end point was overall response rate. Using a three-stage sequential design, two interim analyses for early stopping due to lack of efficacy were planned and conducted after 13 and 26 patients were accrued. Secondary end points included time to treatment failure, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and 50 % drop in CA19-9 levels. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were evaluable for toxicity and 42 evaluable for response, at a median age of 64 years. The majority of patients (74 %) had ECOG PS 0-1. Six patients (14 %) achieved a partial tumor response, and stable disease for ≥2 cycles was observed in 59 % of patients (n = 25). Thirty-five percent (n = 11/31) of patients had a ≥50 % decrease in CA19-9 levels. The median PFS was 3.7 months (95 % CI 2.1-4.3 months), and the median OS was 5.3 months (95 % CI 4.3-8.6 months). Treatment was generally well tolerated. Grade 3 toxicity and grade 4 toxicity were seen in 45 and 5 % of patients, respectively. One patient had a potential treatment-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of capecitabine and docetaxel is active and well tolerated in mPC patients pretreated with gemcitabine-based therapy.

Successful use of Trastuzumab with anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by trastuzumab maintenance in patients with advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is no standard chemotherapy regimen that is universally accepted for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Trastuzumab added to chemotherapy improves survival in patients with metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (Her2/neu)-overexpressing gastric cancer. Data are lacking for the combination of trastuzumab with other chemotherapy regimens, apart from the cisplatin/fluorouracil backbone used in the pivotal TOGA trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we included patients with gastric cancer with HER2 overexpression who received trastuzumab in addition to their first-line chemotherapy, with or without trastuzumab maintenance therapy. The end-points were response and tolerance to treatment. RESULTS: We identified seven patients who met the search criteria; six had metastatic disease and one had locally advanced unresectable disease. Four patients received epirubicin/oxaliplatin/capecitabine/trastuzumab, and the others had non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy with trastuzumab. All patients had radiological responses to treatment - one had a complete response and six had partial responses. Among the four patients who received anthracycline-based chemotherapy with trastuzumab, there was a transient decline in cardiac ejection fraction in three, but all resolved without sequelae. All patients received a period of chemotherapy induction followed by trastuzumab monotherapy for maintenance. The median progression-free survival was 14.6 months and median overall survival was 16.4 months. CONCLUSION: Trastuzumab is an important agent for the treatment of HER2-overexpressing gastric cancer. We recorded an acceptable safety and efficacy profile in this small cohort treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by trastuzumab maintenance.