Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Z Rheumatol ; 65(4): 315-22, 324-6, 2006 Jul.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16710651

RESUMEN

Rheumatic diseases in childhood and adolescence differ from those of adulthood according to type, manifestation, treatment and course. A specialized therapy, starting as early as possible, improves the prognosis, can prevent long-term damage and saves the costs of long-term care. Only a specialized pediatric care system can guarantee optimum quality of the processes involved and the results for rheumatology in childhood and adolescence within a global financial system. This requires adequate structural quality of the specialized clinics and departments for pediatric rheumatology. The management of rheumatic diseases in childhood and adolescence is comprehensive and requires a multidisciplinary, specialized and engaged team which can cover the whole spectrum of rheumatic diseases with their various age-dependent aspects. In order to guarantee an adequate, cost-efficient routine, a specialized center which concentrates on inpatient care should treat at least 300 patients with pediatric rheumatic diseases per year. The diagnoses should be divided among the various disease categories with at least 70% of them involving inflammatory rheumatic diseases. For the inpatient care of small children, an accompanying person (parent) is necessary, requiring adequate structures and services. Patient rooms as well as diagnostic (radiography, sonography, etc.) and therapeutic services (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, pool, etc.) must be adequate for small children and school children as well as adolescents. Suitable mother-child units must also be provided and a school for patients is required within the clinic. A pediatric rheumatologist must be available 24 h a day, and it must be possible to reach other specialists within a short time. For painful therapeutic procedures, age-appropriate pain management is obligatory. A continuous adjustment of these recommendations to changing conditions in health politics is intended.


Asunto(s)
Departamentos de Hospitales/normas , Arquitectura y Construcción de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Pediátricos/normas , Hospitales Especializados/normas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/normas , Enfermedades Reumáticas/terapia , Adolescente , Niño , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/normas , Diagnóstico Precoz , Alemania , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/normas , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Enfermedades Reumáticas/diagnóstico , Especialización/normas
2.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 63(12): 1638-44, 2004 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15115709

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe a registry set up to monitor children treated with etanercept in Germany and Austria. METHODS: Giannini's criteria, duration of morning stiffness, number of swollen, tender and contracted joints, adverse events, and reasons for discontinuation were assessed. RESULTS: 322 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and 12 additional patients with non-JIA rheumatic diagnoses were included. Therapeutic efficacy was observed from one month after treatment was started. The number of patients with significant improvement and the degree of improvement increased during the first year. The mean (SD) number of tender and swollen joints decreased from 9 (9) and 8.4 (9) to 3.0 (6.5) and 4.5 (7) after one month, and to 2.2 (5.5) and 3.3 (5.5) after three months; morning stiffness decreased from 45 (65) minutes to 12 (30) and 7 (19) after one and three months (p<0.001 for all). Using Gianinni's criteria of 30%, 50%, and 70% improvement, a therapeutic response in JIA patients was achieved in, respectively, 66%, 54%, and 30% after one month, 78%, 61%, and 38% after three months, and 83%, 72%, and 52% after six months. Therapeutic efficacy was lower in patients with systemic onset arthritis. Overall tolerability was good: in 592 patient treatment-years there were 69 reports of adverse events in 56 patients, including one CNS demyelination. There were no opportunistic infections or lupus-like reactions. Treatment was discontinued in 53 JIA patients, in 25 because of lack of efficacy. CONCLUSION: Etanercept treatment was safe and led to a significant improvement in most JIA patients resistant to conventional treatment.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunoglobulina G/uso terapéutico , Receptores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Austria , Niño , Quimioterapia Combinada , Etanercept , Alemania , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/efectos adversos , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Inducción de Remisión , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA