Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Circulation ; 141(9): e120-e138, 2020 03 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31992057

RESUMEN

Each decade, the American Heart Association (AHA) develops an Impact Goal to guide its overall strategic direction and investments in its research, quality improvement, advocacy, and public health programs. Guided by the AHA's new Mission Statement, to be a relentless force for a world of longer, healthier lives, the 2030 Impact Goal is anchored in an understanding that to achieve cardiovascular health for all, the AHA must include a broader vision of health and well-being and emphasize health equity. In the next decade, by 2030, the AHA will strive to equitably increase healthy life expectancy beyond current projections, with global and local collaborators, from 66 years of age to at least 68 years of age across the United States and from 64 years of age to at least 67 years of age worldwide. The AHA commits to developing additional targets for equity and well-being to accompany this overarching Impact Goal. To attain the 2030 Impact Goal, we recommend a thoughtful evaluation of interventions available to the public, patients, providers, healthcare delivery systems, communities, policy makers, and legislators. This presidential advisory summarizes the task force's main considerations in determining the 2030 Impact Goal and the metrics to monitor progress. It describes the aspiration that these goals will be achieved by working with a diverse community of volunteers, patients, scientists, healthcare professionals, and partner organizations needed to ensure success.


Asunto(s)
American Heart Association , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Salud Global , Formulación de Políticas , Vigilancia de la Población , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/normas , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
Milbank Q ; 98(3): 641-663, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32869916

RESUMEN

Policy Points Well-being In the Nation (WIN) offers the first parsimonious set of vetted common measures to improve population health and social determinants across sectors at local, state, and national levels and is driven by what communities need to improve health, well-being, and equity. The WIN measures were codesigned with more than 100 communities, federal agencies, and national organizations across sectors, in alignment with the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act, and Healthy People 2030. WIN offers a process for a collaborative learning measurement system to drive a learning health and well-being system across sectors at the community, state, and national levels. The WIN development process identified critical gaps and opportunities in equitable community-level data infrastructure, interoperability, and protections that could be used to inform the Federal Data Strategy.


Asunto(s)
Salud Poblacional , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Delaware/epidemiología , Técnica Delphi , Equidad en Salud/normas , Equidad en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Política de Salud , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Colaboración Intersectorial , Bibliotecas , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Salud Poblacional/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
Eval Health Prof ; 46(4): 309-319, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36373963

RESUMEN

Multi-sector partnerships are core in efforts to improve population health but are often not as fully developed or positioned to advance health and equity in their communities as believed to be. Therefore, measuring the collaborations multi-sector partnerships undertake is important to document the inputs, processes, and outcomes that evolve as they work together towards achieving their goals, which ultimately creates a greater sense of shared accountability. In this study we present the development and validation of the Assessment for Advancing Community Transformation (AACT), a new tool designed to measure readiness to advance health and health equity. Development of the AACT included initial item pool creation, external evaluation from five subject matter experts, and pilot testing (including user feedback surveys) among 103 individuals. Validation of the AACT was performed using a series of confirmatory factor analyses on an expanded dataset representing 352 individuals from 49 multi-sector collaboratives across the United States. The results of our study indicate the items in the AACT align to six domains created during the scale development process, and that the tool demonstrates desirable measurement characteristics for use in research, evaluation, and practice.


Asunto(s)
Equidad en Salud , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Análisis Factorial
4.
Am J Orthopsychiatry ; 91(3): 322-331, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34138626

RESUMEN

Transforming communities to be healthier and more equitable prosents a systemic challenge best addressed by those with native knowledge of the system. Community coalitions are a promising structure for tackling local health inequities, if they approach the change process with multiple local stakeholders and with systemic change in mind. Maturity models offer a framework for system assessment by defining sequential stages toward ideal development. Providing coalitions with a structure for self-assessing community change, the Community Transformation Map (CTM) is a maturity model that operationalizes concepts hypothesized to foster systemic change. This 40-item tool encourages self-assessment, dialogue, and reconciliation of community transformation priorities via an appreciative inquiry process. The CTM was created and applied with 18 community coalitions participating in the 100 Million Healthier Lives initiative. It was iteratively drafted with representatives from across the initiative. These coalitions self-administered the CTM four times over 24 months. Coalitions used the CTM to reconcile perspectives, identify priorities, and create transformation action plans. After the fourth administration, ten semistructured interviews were conducted with coalition members. Thematic analysis revealed good contextual validity. Coalitions saw value in the CTM's productive dialogue and the shared understanding it created, but reported perceived burden in conducting repeated administration. The CTM's value is in structuring community members' reflection on complex, systemic problems. The CTM is rooted in international improvement and change principles and continues to be adapted for other change initiatives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).


Asunto(s)
Salud Pública , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA