Signaling in microbial communities with open boundaries.

Microbial communities such as swarms or biofilms often form at the interfaces of solid substrates and open fluid flows. At the same time, in laboratory environments these communities are commonly studied using microfluidic devices with media flows and open boundaries. Extracellular signaling within these communities is therefore subject to different constraints than signaling within classic, closed-boundary systems such as developing embryos or tissues, yet is understudied by comparison. Here, we use mathematical modeling to show how advective-diffusive boundary flows and population geometry impact cell-cell signaling in monolayer microbial communities. We reveal conditions where the intercellular signaling lengthscale depends solely on the population geometry and not on diffusion or degradation, as commonly expected. We further demonstrate that diffusive coupling with the boundary flow can produce signal gradients within an isogenic population, even when there is no flow within the population. We use our theory to provide new insights into the signaling mechanisms of published experimental results, and we make several experimentally verifiable predictions. Our research highlights the importance of carefully evaluating boundary dynamics and environmental geometry when modeling microbial cell-cell signaling and informs the study of cell behaviors in both natural and synthetic systems.

Precision of Protein Thermometry.

Temperature sensing is a ubiquitous cell behavior, but the fundamental limits to the precision of temperature sensing are poorly understood. Unlike in chemical concentration sensing, the precision of temperature sensing is not limited by extrinsic fluctuations in the temperature field itself. Instead, we find that precision is limited by the intrinsic copy number, turnover, and binding kinetics of temperature-sensitive proteins. Developing a model based on the canonical TlpA protein, we find that a cell can estimate temperature to within 2%. We compare this prediction with in vivo data on temperature sensing in bacteria.

Physical constraints on accuracy and persistence during breast cancer cell chemotaxis.

Directed cell motion in response to an external chemical gradient occurs in many biological phenomena such as wound healing, angiogenesis, and cancer metastasis. Chemotaxis is often characterized by the accuracy, persistence, and speed of cell motion, but whether any of these quantities is physically constrained by the others is poorly understood. Using a combination of theory, simulations, and 3D chemotaxis assays on single metastatic breast cancer cells, we investigate the links among these different aspects of chemotactic performance. In particular, we observe in both experiments and simulations that the chemotactic accuracy, but not the persistence or speed, increases with the gradient strength. We use a random walk model to explain this result and to propose that cells' chemotactic accuracy and persistence are mutually constrained. Our results suggest that key aspects of chemotactic performance are inherently limited regardless of how favorable the environmental conditions are.

Cells function as a ternary logic gate to decide migration direction under integrated chemical and fluidic cues.

Cells sense various environmental cues and subsequently process intracellular signals to decide their migration direction in many physiological and pathological processes. Although several signaling molecules and networks have been identified in these directed migrations, it still remains ambiguous to predict the migration direction under multiple and integrated cues, specifically chemical and fluidic cues. Here, we investigated the cellular signal processing machinery by reverse-engineering directed cell migration under integrated chemical and fluidic cues. We imposed controlled chemical and fluidic cues to cells using a microfluidic platform and analyzed the extracellular coupling of the cues with respect to the cellular detection limit. Then, the cell's migratory behavior was reverse-engineered to build a cellular signal processing system as a logic gate, which is based on a "selection" gate. This framework is further discussed with a minimal intracellular signaling network of a shared pathway model. The proposed framework of the ternary logic gate suggests a systematic view to understand how cells decode multiple cues and make decisions about the migration direction.

Signaling in microbial communities with open boundaries.

Microbial communities such as swarms or biofilms often form at the interfaces of solid substrates and open fluid flows. At the same time, in laboratory environments these communities are commonly studied using microfluidic devices with media flows and open boundaries. Extracellular signaling within these communities is therefore subject to different constraints than signaling within classic, closed-boundary systems such as developing embryos or tissues, yet is understudied by comparison. Here, we use mathematical modeling to show how advective-diffusive boundary flows and population geometry impact cell-cell signaling in monolayer microbial communities. We reveal conditions where the intercellular signaling lengthscale depends solely on the population geometry and not on diffusion or degradation, as commonly expected. We further demonstrate that diffusive coupling with the boundary flow can produce signal gradients within an isogenic population, even when there is no flow within the population. We use our theory to provide new insights into the signaling mechanisms of published experimental results, and we make several experimentally verifiable predictions. Our research highlights the importance of carefully evaluating boundary dynamics and environmental geometry when modeling microbial cell-cell signaling and informs the study of cell behaviors in both natural and synthetic systems.

Deduction of signaling mechanisms from cellular responses to multiple cues.

Cell signaling networks are complex and often incompletely characterized, making it difficult to obtain a comprehensive picture of the mechanisms they encode. Mathematical modeling of these networks provides important clues, but the models themselves are often complex, and it is not always clear how to extract falsifiable predictions. Here we take an inverse approach, using experimental data at the cell level to deduce the minimal signaling network. We focus on cells' response to multiple cues, specifically on the surprising case in which the response is antagonistic: the response to multiple cues is weaker than the response to the individual cues. We systematically build candidate signaling networks one node at a time, using the ubiquitous ingredients of (i) up- or down-regulation, (ii) molecular conversion, or (iii) reversible binding. In each case, our method reveals a minimal, interpretable signaling mechanism that explains the antagonistic response. Our work provides a systematic way to deduce molecular mechanisms from cell-level data.

Signal processing capacity of the cellular sensory machinery regulates the accuracy of chemotaxis under complex cues.

Chemotaxis is ubiquitous in many biological processes, but it still remains elusive how cells sense and decipher multiple chemical cues. In this study, we postulate a hypothesis that the chemotactic performance of cells under complex cues is regulated by the signal processing capacity of the cellular sensory machinery. The underlying rationale is that cells in vivo should be able to sense and process multiple chemical cues, whose magnitude and compositions are entangled, to determine their migration direction. We experimentally show that the combination of transforming growth factor-ß and epidermal growth factor suppresses the chemotactic performance of cancer cells using independent receptors to sense the two cues. Based on this observation, we develop a biophysical framework suggesting that the antagonism is caused by the saturation of the signal processing capacity but not by the mutual repression. Our framework suggests the significance of the signal processing capacity in the cellular sensory machinery.