Timing to Carotid Endarterectomy Affects Early and Long Term Outcomes of Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate early and long-term outcomes according to the timing to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) of symptomatic carotid stenosis. METHODS: Consecutive CEAs with selective shunting for symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50% performed between 2009 and 2020. Patients had acute neurological impairment on presentation, defined as <5 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). We grouped patients according to time between index event and CEA: the first group was operated between 0 and 2 days, the second group between 3 and 7 days, the third group between 8 and 14 days and the last group after 15 days. Thirty-day neurological status improvement was defined as a decrease (≥1) in the 30-day NIHSS score versus NIHSS score immediately before surgery. RESULTS: Five hundred CEAs were performed. The perioperative combined stroke and mortality rate was 3.6% (18/500), representing a perioperative mortality rate of 0.2 (n = 1) and stroke rate of 3.4% (n = 17). Overall freedom from stroke was 95% at 1 year, 89 % at 6 years, and 88% at 10 years. Annual stroke rate was 0.6% after the 30-day period. Thirty-day improvement in neurologic status occurred in 103 patients (20.6%), while in 380 (76%) neurologic status was unchanged, and 17 (3.4%) experienced worsening of their neurologic status. Patients treated within 7 days from the index event had significant benefit (OR = 2.6) in the 30-day neurological improvement versus those treated after 7 days from the index event. Timing to CEA <2 days increased significantly the risk of late stroke (OR = 9.7). CONCLUSIONS: The ideal timing for performing CEA is between 3 and 7 days from the index event if NIHSS <5 as it is associated with the best rates of improvement in neurological status and durability in the long term. Very early CEA (<48 hrs) was associated with increased late stroke occurrence.

Long-term analysis of standard abdominal aortic endovascular repair using different grafts focusing on endoleak onset and its evolution.

OBJECTIVE: To report long-term results of standard EVAR focusing on endoleak onset (ELo) and its evolution. METHODS: 880 EVARs using different stentgrafts (1999-2015) were included. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and AAA-related mortality. Timing of ELo after EVAR was categorized as follows: ELo1 = 0-2 years, ELo2 = 2-4 years, ELo3 = 4-6 years, ELo4 = 6-8 years, and ELo5 ≥ 8 years. The rate of sac shrinkage/sac expansion and the need to re-intervene were the variables considered to determine EL evolution. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 60 months (IQR: 36-84). Summary follow-up index was 0.99. Survival rate was 94.5% at 2 years, 57.7% at 10 years, 33.3% at 14 years. Freedom from AAA-related-death rate was 99.3% at 14 years. Freedom from endoleak was 86.4% at 2 years, 68.3% at 10 years, and 48.6% at 14 years. EL rate was 1.9% (n = 19),16.6% (n = 146), 0.8% (n = 7), and 0.4% (n = 4) for type I, II, III and IV, respectively. Only type II EL showed a significant difference in the ELo (Elo1 = 31%; ELo2 = 12.8%; ELo3 = 9.4%; Elo4 = 10.2%; Elo5 = 11.4%; P < .001). Sac shrinkage occurred in 791 (90%) patients while 89 (10%) had a persistent sac expansion at the last follow-up. Freedom from reintervention was 95.6% at 2 years, 86.4% at 10 years, and 80% at 14 years. 48 out of 176 (27.2%) patients with EL underwent reintervention. The re-intervention rate was significantly higher within the first two years of follow-up if compared to the following years (17.6% vs. <10%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: An active lifelong surveillance follow-up can guarantee good long-term EVAR outcomes. Reinterventions and type II EL were more frequent in the first two-year of follow-up.