Administration of indinavir and low-dose ritonavir (800/100 mg twice daily) with food reduces nephrotoxic peak plasma levels of indinavir.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare indinavir peak plasma (Cmax) values after administration of indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg on an empty stomach or with food. High indinavir Cmax values have been associated with indinavir-related nephrotoxicity. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, cross-over pharmacokinetic study performed at steady state. HIV-infected patients who had been using indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg twice daily for at least 4 weeks were randomized to take this combination with a light breakfast (two filled rolls and 130 ml of fluid) on a first study day, and without food on a second day, or in the reverse order. The pharmacokinetics of indinavir and ritonavir were assessed after plasma and urine sampling during 12 h. RESULTS: Data for nine patients were evaluated. Administration of indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg on an empty stomach resulted in a higher indinavir Cmax [geometric mean (GM) ratio - fasting/fed and 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28 (1.08-1.52), P=0.01] and a trend to a shorter indinavir tmax (P=0.07) compared to administration with food. The mode of administration of indinavir/ritonavir did not affect plasma indinavir Cmax and AUC values, parameters that have been associated with the antiviral efficacy of indinavir, nor the urinary excretion of indinavir. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg on an empty stomach results in a higher indinavir Cmax compared to ingestion with a light meal. Stated the other way round, intake with a light meal reduces indinavir Cmax, which probably reflects a food-induced delay in the absorption of indinavir. It is recommended to administer indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg with food, as a possible means to prevent indinavir-related nephrotoxicity in patients who start or continue with this regimen.

The first echinocandin: caspofungin.

The antifungal agent caspofungin is the first echinocandin that has been approved in the US and in Europe for treatment of invasive aspergillosis in adult patients who are refractory to or intolerant of conventional amphotericin B, its lipid-based formulations, and/or itraconazole. It is given as a 70 mg loading dose and a 50 mg daily maintainance dose as a one hour infusion. Due to low intestinal absorption an oral formulation has not been developed. Caspofungin is active against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. by inhibition the synthesis of beta-(1,3)-D-glucan, a cell wall component. The drug is inactive against Cryptococcus spp., Fusarium spp., Trichosporon spp., Rhizopus spp., and Pseudoallescheria spp. In invasive aspergillosis caspofungin resulted in higher response rates compared to a historic control under standard therapy. Efficacy data on persistently febrile neutropenic patients are pending. In several multicenter randomised double blind trials on candida infections caspofungin proved to be at least non-inferior to standard therapies. Reports of combination therapy or highly effective antifungal treatment (HEAT) in limited patient numbers are promising. New trials of combination therapy are warranted.

Progressive multifocal leukencephalopathy in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy: survival and risk factors of death.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical course and risk factors of death in highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-treated patients with progressive multifocal leukencephalopathy (PML); to evaluate the efficacy of cidofovir in addition to HAART. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter cohort study of PML in HIV-1-infected patients. Diagnosis of PML was confirmed by histology or by positive polymerase chain reaction for JC virus (JCV) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or was made by typical radiologic and clinical findings. RESULTS: Thirty-five cases of PML were identified. The diagnosis was made by histology (9 cases), detection of JCV in CSF (17 cases), and by radiologic findings (9 cases). Upon manifestation of PML, 15/35 patients had never received HAART, and 11/35 were on HAART for >6 months (median 1126 days). In 9/35 cases, clinical manifestation of PML occurred within 6 months after initiation of HAART. All patients received HAART after PML diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 553 days (range 28-2694 days), the median survival time was not reached. In 12 patients who were treated concomitantly with cidofovir, cumulative survival was significantly shorter than in patients without cidofovir (P = 0.03). Patients in whom PML was diagnosed while on HAART demonstrated a trend toward a shorter survival than HAART-naive patients (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: PML continues to occur in HIV-1-infected patients even when they are treated with HAART. Patients developing PML on HAART had a trend toward a shorter median survival compared with treatment-naive patients, and cidofovir therapy was not associated with improved survival in this cohort.