Paratenon preserving repair of the midsubstance acute Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis with best- and worst-case analyses for rerupture rates.

INTRODUCTION: Paratenon preserving techniques to facilitate acute Achilles tendon rupture repair (AATR) functions by maintaining vascularity and biology for optimal healing response. Therefore, the purpose is to evaluate the outcomes following paratenon preserving repair of the midsubstance AATR. The hypothesis was that paratenon-preserving techniques demonstrate high return to play rates and low complication rates for the repair of the midsubstance AATR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed by two authors using specific search terms and eligibility criteria. The assessment of the evidence was two-fold: level and quality of evidence. A meta-analysis of proportions for the various complication rates was performed using the restricted maximum likelihood method following the Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation. Fixed effects models were employed if I2 < 25% (low heterogeneity), and random effects models were employed if I2 ≥ 25% (moderate to high heterogeneity). RESULTS: The pooled return to play rate was 90.3%. The pooled rerupture rate as reported was 0.9% (best-case scenario 0.8% and worst-case scenario 6.8%). No meaningful subgroup analysis for rerupture rates could be performed based on the meta-regression. The pooled complication rate other than reruptures was 4.8%. The pooled infection rates were 0.3%, DVT rates were 1.6%, and sural nerve injury rates were 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Paratenon preserving techniques that are minimally invasive in nature demonstrated safe and favorable outcomes with high return to play rates and low complication rates for the repair of the midsubstance AATR.

Return to Play and Functional Outcomes Following Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Return to play (RTP) and functional outcomes are critical to treatment success for acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR). This systematic review and meta-analysis explored treatment superiority essential in optimal treatment selection concerning individual patients and their expectations regarding RTP and functional outcomes. This study was in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. The included studies were assessed regarding the level and quality of evidence. Fixed-effects models were employed for I2 < 25% and random-effects models for I2 ≥ 25%. The RTP rate meta-analysis of surgical vs conservative treatment revealed no significant difference. This was similar to the subgroup analysis of open repair and conservative treatment. The RTP rate and Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) meta-analysis of open repair + earlier rehabilitation (ER) vs + later rehabilitation (LR) also revealed no significant differences. The mean time to RTP meta-analysis of open repair + ER vs + LR showed that open repair + ER was significantly favored (-4.19 weeks; p = .002). The ATRS meta-analysis of conservative treatment with ER vs with LR revealed no significant difference. This meta-analysis has revealed that the RTP rates following treatment of AATR are high. Therefore, the decision for surgical vs conservative treatment or open repair + ER vs + LR for AATR should not be selected based on the expectation of RTP. However, open repair + ER can be advocated over + LR for reduced mean time to RTP.

Inconsistent radiographic diagnostic criteria for lisfranc injuries: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiographic diagnostic criteria and propose standardised radiographic criteria for Lisfranc injuries. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The various radiographic criteria for the diagnosis of Lisfranc injuries were extracted. Descriptive statistics were presented for all continuous (as mean ± standard deviation) and categorical variables (as frequencies by percentages). RESULTS: The literature search included 29 studies that totalled 1115 Lisfranc injuries. The risk of bias ranged from "Low" to "Moderate" risk according to the ROBINS-I tool. The overall recommendations according to the GRADE assessment ranged from "Very Low" to "High". 1st metatarsal to 2nd metatarsal diastasis was the most common of the 12 various radiographic diagnostic criteria observed, as was employed in 18 studies. This was followed by 2nd cuneiform to 2nd metatarsal subluxation, as was employed in 11 studies. CONCLUSION: The radiographic diagnostic criteria of Lisfranc injuries were heterogeneous. The proposition for homogenous radiographic diagnostic criteria is that the following features must be observed for the diagnosis of Lisfranc injuries: 1st metatarsal to 2nd metatarsal diastasis of ≥ 2 mm on anteroposterior view or 2nd cuneiform to 2nd metatarsal subluxation on anteroposterior or oblique views. Further advanced imaging by CT or MRI may be required in patients with normal radiographs but with continued suspicion for Lisfranc injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4, systematic review.

Lower re-rupture rates but higher complication rates following surgical versus conservative treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.

PURPOSE: To systematically review and evaluate the current meta-analyses for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR). This study can provide clinicians with a clear overview of the current literature to aid clinical decision-making and the optimal formulation of treatment plans for AATR. METHODS: Two independent reviewers searched PubMed and Embase on June 2, 2022 based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Assessment of evidence was twofold: level of evidence (LoE) and quality of evidence (QoE). LoE was evaluated using published criteria by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and the QoE by the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) scale. Pooled complication rates were highlighted for significance in favour of one treatment arm or no significance. RESULTS: There were 34 meta-analyses that met the eligibility criteria, with 28 studies of LoE 1, and the mean QoE was 9.8 ± 1.2. Significantly lower re-rupture rates were reported with surgical (2.3-5%) versus conservative treatment (3.9-13%), but conservative treatment was favoured in terms of lower complication rates. The re-rupture rates were not significantly different between percutaneous repair or minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared to open repair, but MIS was favoured in terms of lower complication rates (7.5-10.4%). When comparing rehabilitation protocols following open repair (four studies), conservative treatment (nine studies), or combined (three studies), there was no significant difference in terms of re-rupture or obvious advantage in terms of lower complication rates between early versus later rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: This systematic review found that surgical treatment was significantly favoured over conservative treatment for re-rupture, but conservative treatment had lower complication rates other than re-rupture, notably for infections and sural nerve injury. Open repair had similar re-rupture rates to MIS, but lower complication rates; however, the rate of sural nerve injuries was lower in open repair. When comparing earlier versus later rehabilitation, there was no difference in re-rupture rates or obvious advantage in complications between open repair, conservative treatment, or when combined. The findings of this study will allow clinicians to effectively counsel their patients on the postoperative outcomes and complications associated with different treatment approaches for AATR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Limited evidence of adjuvant biologics with bone marrow stimulation for the treatment of osteochondral lesion of the talus: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the complication rates, continuous functional outcome scores, and return to play data following bone marrow stimulation (BMS) versus biologics ± BMS for the treatment of osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT). METHODS: A systematic review was performed. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched using specific search terms and eligibility criteria according to the PRISMA guidelines. The level of evidence was assessed using published criteria by The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, and the quality of evidence using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables as frequencies (percentages). RESULTS: BMS versus BMS + hyaluronic acid (HA): no complications in either treatment arm were reported. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score was 43.5 to 67.3 points and 44.0 to 72.4 points, respectively. The mean 10 mm Visual Analogue Scale pain score was 7.7 to 3.8 points and 7.5 to 2.5 points, respectively. BMS versus BMS + concentrated bone marrow aspirate (CBMA): the pooled overall complication rate was 17/64 (26.6%) versus 11/71 (15.5%), respectively (non-significant). The pool revision rate was 15/64 (23.4%) versus 6/71 (8.5%), respectively (p = 0.016). There has been a notable poor reporting of complication rates for the use of ADSC and PRP as adjuvant biological therapies to BMS for the treatment of OLT. CONCLUSION: There was an overall limited comparative clinical evidence of adjuvant biologics with BMS versus BMS alone for the treatment of OLT. BMS + HA and BMS + CBMA can provide superior outcomes, albeit the currently limited evidence. Further studies are warranted to establish the true clinical superiority of the various biologics ± BMS versus BMS alone. These studies must also compare the various biologics against one another to determine, if any, the optimal biologic for OLT. Clinicians should counsel patients accordingly on these findings as required. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Concentrated Bone Marrow Aspirate Injection for Hallux Sesamoid Disorders.

Concentrated bone marrow aspirate (CBMA) offers an alternative to sesamoid resection in end stage sesamoid pathology. CBMA potentiates the anti-inflammatory effect, stimulates local tissue regeneration and osteogenesis, when injected into bone. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes in a cohort of athletes following CBMA injection for the treatment of hallux sesamoid disorders. A retrospective case series of consecutive patients treated with CBMA injection for hallux sesamoid disorders were identified. Radiographs, Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score were collected pre- and postinjections. Descriptive statistics were presented as the mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and frequency as percentages for categorical variables. Fifteen consecutive patients with were included with a mean follow-up time of 20.1 (range 12-34) months. Significant improvement in all scoring subscales of the FAOS and VAS score was noted preinjection compared to final follow-up postinjection (p < .001). Eight of 11 patients that were involved in sports prior to the CBMA injection returned to play, with 7 successfully returning to preinjury level status. Three patients required further treatment (20%). The case series suggests that CBMA injection is a safe and effective treatment option for hallux sesamoid disorders with a high rate of return to play.

Autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus: high rate of return to play in the athletic population.

PURPOSE: (1) To determine the rate of return to play following autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) and (2) report subsequent rehabilitation protocols. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library databases was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines based on specific eligibility criteria. Return to play data was meta-analysed and subsequent rehabilitation protocols were summarised. Level of evidence and quality of evidence (Zaman's criteria) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Nine studies that totalled 205 ankles were included for review. The mean follow-up was 44.4 ± 25.0 (range 16-84) months. The mean OLT size was 135.4 ± 56.4 mm2. The mean time to return to play was 5.8 ± 2.6 months. The mean rate of return to play was 86.3% (range 50-95.2%), with 81.8% of athletes returning to pre-injury status. Based on the fixed-effect model, the rate of return to play was 84.07%. Significant correlation was found between increase age and decrease rate of return to play (R2 = 0.362, p = 0.00056). There was no correlation between OLT sizes and rate of return to play (R2 = 0.140, p = 0.023). The most common time to ankle motion post-surgery was immediately and the most common time to full weight-bearing was 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review indicated a high rate of return to play following AOT in the athletic population. Size of OLT was not found to be a predictor of return to play, whereas advancing age was a predictor. Rehabilitation protocols were largely inconsistent and were primarily based on individual surgeon protocols. However, the included studies were of low level and quality of evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Treatment Options for Turf Toe: A Systematic Review.

Turf toe is hyperextension injury of the plantar plate at the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Etiologies have often included sports/activities with excessive forefoot axial loading and/or violent pivotal movements. The purpose of the systematic review was to systematically review and present an overview for the current evidence-based treatment options of turf toe. Both authors systematically reviewed the PubMed and EMBASE databases from inception to April 2016 based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The level of evidence and quality of evidence were assessed by using the Level of Evidence for Primary Research Question of the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, and the quality of evidence was assessed with use of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Data were collected and categorized into: case reports and case series. Eight studies (16 turf toes) met the aforementioned criteria and were included. Five case reports and 3 case series reported various treatment options for turf toe. Specifically, 3 studies reported solely conservative treatment (n = 5), 1 study reported solely surgical treatment (n = 1), and 4 studies involved patients in conservative and/or surgical treatments (n = 10). All studies were of level of clinical evidence 4 and quality of clinical evidence score 2 (poor quality). Conservative treatment included closed reduction and immobilization, and surgical treatment included plantar plate tenodesis. Restricted dorsiflexion was the most common complication reported. Turf toe is an underreported injury with no evidence-based treatment guideline to date. Future studies of higher level and quality of evidence with a specific classification system (Jahss or Anderson) consistently reported are warranted for the development of an optimal guideline to determine the most appropriate treatment for each specific severity in injury.

Knee-to-Talus Donor-Site Morbidity Following Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis with Best-case and Worst-case Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the promising clinical results of autologous osteochondral transplantation in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus, the occurrence of knee donor-site morbidity remains a concern. However, the proportion of patients experiencing donor-site morbidity is not well established because of important variations in estimates drawn by heterogeneous studies with loss to followup, often made at short-term (< 1 year). Therefore, both a meta-analysis of studies that assumed no patients lost to followup had donor-site morbidity and assumed all patients lost to followup had donor-site morbidity may help to estimate the true risk of donor-site morbidity. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To evaluate the proportion of patients who developed knee donor-site morbidity after autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesion of the talus, by (1) meta-analysis of the proportion of patients experiencing donor-site morbidity in the best-case scenario as reported, in which no patients lost to followup were assumed to have donor-site morbidity and (2) meta-analysis of the percentage of patients who had donor-site morbidity in the worst-case scenario, in which all patients lost to followup were assumed to have donor-site morbidity and (3) present the characteristics of studies associated with the reporting of donor-site morbidity. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library databases was performed from their inception to October 2017 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies that reported knee donor-site morbidity after autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesion of the talus, mean followup ≥ 1 year, full-text studies published in a peer-review journal and written in English. Quality of evidence (Case Series Quality Appraisal Checklist), sample size, mean patient age, study design, mean followup time, and observed rate of knee donor-site morbidity were evaluated. Twenty-six studies with 915 ankles (904 patients) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Approximately half of the included studies were of small cohort (n < 30, 12 studies), and 12 of 26 studies did not report at all on loss to followup. In the studies that reported loss to followup (14 of 26), a total of 32 patients (35 ankles) were reported lost. Random-effects models were used to estimate the risk of donor-site morbidity as between-study heterogeneity was determined to be high in both meta-analyses that assumed that no patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity (I = 82.1%) and the one that assumed all patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity (I = 88.7%). Multivariable metaregression was used to estimate the association between study characteristics and the observed proportion of patients who experienced of donor-site morbidity. If there was evidence of an association between a study characteristic and proportion, a subgroup analysis was performed. RESULTS: The estimated proportion of donor-site morbidity was 6.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-11.8), assuming that no patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity and 10.8% (95% CI, 4.8-18.3) assuming that all patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity after a mean followup of 43.8 ± 24.7 months (range, 15.9-120 months). There was a negative association between study sample size and proportion of donor-site morbidity (ß = -0.26; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.12; p < 0.001 assuming that no patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity and ß = -0.31; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.13; p < 0.001 assuming that all patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity); that is, as study size increased, the proportion of patients reported with donor-site morbidity decreased. In larger studies (n ≥ 30), the estimated percentage of donor-site morbidity was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.2%-5.0%; I = 47.6%) assuming that no patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity, and 5.0% (95% CI, 2.1%-9.0%; I = 74.5%) assuming all patients lost to followup experienced donor-site morbidity. High between-study heterogeneity (differences in methodology) could not be completely explained by variability in study sample size, mean patient age, design, or mean followup time, and may be attributable to other factors such as inconsistent definitions of donor-site morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated proportion of donor-site morbidity after autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesion of the talus ranged from 6.7% to 10.8% in the current meta-analysis. However, subgroup analysis demonstrated that larger studies (n ≥ 30) estimated a lower donor-site morbidity risk (< 5.0%) than smaller studies (n < 30). This estimate should be interpreted in light of the fact that nearly half of the included studies did not report on loss to followup, and so their estimates of donor-site morbidity may be low. In addition, high between-study heterogeneity and the inclusion of predominantly retrospective studies with small sample sizes likely contributed to estimates that suffered from a high risk of bias, probably in favor of the surgical treatment being studied. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Objective Assessment of Adherence to Inhalers by Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

RATIONALE: Objective adherence to inhaled therapy by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been reported. OBJECTIVES: To objectively quantify adherence to preventer Diskus inhaler therapy by patients with COPD with an electronic audio recording device (INCA). METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. On discharge from hospital patients were given a salmeterol/fluticasone inhaler with an INCA device attached. Analysis of this audio quantified the frequency and proficiency of inhaler use. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients with COPD (n = 244) were recruited. The mean age was 71 years, mean FEV1 was 1.3 L, and 59% had evidence of mild/moderate cognitive impairment. By combining time of use, interval between doses, and critical technique errors, thus incorporating both intentional and unintentional nonadherence, a measure "actual adherence" was calculated. Mean actual adherence was 22.6% of that expected if the doses were taken correctly and on time. Six percent had an actual adherence greater than 80%. Hierarchical clustering found three equally sized well-separated clusters corresponding to distinct patterns. Cluster 1 (34%) had low inhaler use and high error rates. Cluster 2 (25%) had high inhaler use and high error rates. Cluster 3 (36%) had overall good adherence. Poor lung function and comorbidities were predictive of poor technique, whereas age and cognition with poor lung function distinguished those with poor adherence and frequent errors in technique. CONCLUSIONS: These data may inform clinicians in understanding why a prescribed inhaler is not effective and to devise strategies to promote adherence in COPD.

Limited evidence for adipose-derived stem cell therapy on the treatment of osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the effects of adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) in the clinical setting. METHODS: A literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library Database up to January 2017 for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Criteria for inclusion were clinical studies demonstrating the effects of ADSCs on OA, and written in English. The following variables were analyzed: donor site, volume of adipose tissue, preparation of ADSCs, clinical outcomes, and complication rate. RESULTS: Sixteen studies (knee: 14 studies, multiple joints: 1 study, ankle: 1 study) were included in this systematic review. All of the studies prepared ADSCs in the form of the stromal vascular fraction (SVF). Inconsistencies between studies were found with regards to reported clinical variability, donor sites of SVF, and reported clinical outcomes. Nine studies used either platelet-rich plasma (PRP) (7/16) or fibrin (4/16) or both PRP and Fibrin (1/16), as an adjunct at time of SVF injection. All of the studies reported an improvement in clinical outcomes with the use of SVF. Five studies reported a 90% satisfaction rate, and no study reported any complications with liposuction. Five studies reported on complications, with a 5% incidence of swelling and pain. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrated that ADSCs are currently used in the form of SVF. While SVF may produce favorable clinical outcomes with minimal risk of side effects on osteoarthritis, the variability in the data and the use of biological adjuvants have confounded the effectiveness of ADSCs. This study will help surgeons understand the limitations in the literature on ADSCs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level IV studies.

Single-Level Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Compared with Cage Screw Implants: 2-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Especially Adjacent Level Ossification.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective single-center, single-surgeon cohort study. PURPOSE: Our goal was to compare the 2-year clinical and radiological results of artificial disc replacement (ADR) and cage screw (CS) implants in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with CS implants are an acceptable alternative to traditional cageplate construct due to perceived decreased complications of dysphagia. However, patients may experience adjacent segment disease because of increased motion and intradiscal pressure. ADR is an alternative to restore the physiological kinematics of the operated disc. Few studies directly compare ADR and CS construct for their efficacy. METHODS: Patients who received single-level ADR or CS between January 2008 and December 2018 were included. Data collected was preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively (6, 12, 24 months). Demographic information, surgical information, complications, follow-up surgery, and outcome ratings (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA], Neck Disability Index [NDI], Visual Analog Scale [VAS] neck and arm, 36-item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36], EuroQoL-5 Dimension [EQ-5D]) were gathered. The radiological assessment included motion segment height, adjacent disc height, lordosis, cervical lordosis, T1 slope, the sagittal vertical axis C2-7, and adjacent level ossification development (ALOD). RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included (ADR: 37 and CS: 21). At 6 months, both groups' JOA, VAS, NDI, SF-36, and EQ-5D scores significantly improved, and the positive trends persisted at 2 years. Noted no significant difference in the enhancement of clinical scores except for the VAS arm (ADR: 5.95 vs. CS: 3.43, p =0.001). Radiological parameters were comparable except for the progression of ALOD of the subjacent disc (ADR: 29.7% vs. CS: 66.9%, p =0.02). No significant difference in adverse events or severe complications seen. CONCLUSIONS: ADR and CS obtain good clinical results for symptomatic single-level cervical DDD. ADR demonstrated a significant advantage over CS in the improvement of VAS arm and reduced progression of ALOD of the adjacent lower disc. No statistically significant difference of dysphonia or dysphagia between the two groups were seen, attributed to their comparable zero profile.

Correlation between preseason body composition and sports injury in an English Premier League professional football team.

Objectives: To identify the correlation between preseason body composition and incidence coupled with injury burden throughout the season in adult male professional football players. Methods: A retrospective case series was performed for linear regression analysis of preseason body composition variables and injury data. R2 >0.10 was deemed of adequate correlation. Results: All 36 professional football players in the male first team of an English Premier League professional football team were recruited, with none lost to follow-up. The total and mean incidence of injuries was 83.00 and 2.31 (95% CI 1.72 to 2.89), respectively. The mean injury burden was 58.32 (95% CI 37.67 to 78.98) days missed. Simple linear regression analysis indicated no significant or adequate correlations between incidence and preseason body composition variables. Injury burden revealed non-significant adequate negative correlations to body mass (R2=0.17), body mass index (BMI) (R2=0.15), waist circumference (R2=0.17), total bone mineral density (BMD) (R2=0.11) and mean embedded structures (R2=0.10). Conclusions: Players with decreased body mass, BMI, waist circumference, total BMD and mean embedded structures may be prone to greater injury burden. Further studies with a larger sample size that incorporates multiple football teams are warranted to investigate this.

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Foot and Ankle Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) was first introduced into clinical practice in 1982 and has been a beneficial inclusion to the noninvasive treatment option of numerous orthopaedic pathologies. However, clinical evidence of the use of ESWT for various foot and ankle disorders has been limited with a consensus on its efficacy yet available. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature, to provide a critical evaluation and meta-analysis for the use of ESWT in foot and ankle disorders. METHODS: The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically reviewed and clinical studies that reported ESWT use for various foot and ankle disorders included. RESULTS: A total of 24 clinical studies that included 12 randomized controlled trials and 12 case series were identified. Analysis of the evidence has indicated that ESWT can help manage plantar fasciitis, calcaneal spur, Achilles tendinopathy and Morton's neuroma. Meta-analysis of the change in pre- to post-VAS overall scores for plantar fasciitis significantly favored ESWT compared to placebo/conservative treatment with a MD -3.10 (95% CI, -4.36 to -1.83; I2 = 68%; P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence has suggested that ESWT can provide symptomatic benefit to plantar fasciitis treatment, with minimal and unremarkable side effects. Overall, ESWT has been demonstrated to be a safe treatment option with a favorable complication profile. Further well-designed studies of ESWT for the treatment of calcaneal spurs, Achilles tendinopathy and Morton's neuroma are warranted to more soundly and safely support its current use. Future studies are suggested to investigate the optimization of ESWT treatment protocols.

Correlation Between Gastrocnemius Tightness and Heel Pain Severity in Plantar Fasciitis.

BACKGROUND: It is known that there is an association between gastrocnemius tightness and plantar fasciitis, but this has never been quantified. The purpose of the study was to determine the correlation between gastrocnemius tightness and the severity of heel pain in plantar fasciitis. METHODS: Thirty-three patients were prescribed physiotherapist-directed gastrocnemius stretching exercises, a Strassburg Sock or night splint, and silicone heel insoles as required. Outcome measures included (1) gastrocnemius tightness, (2) 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) for pain on the first steps in the morning, and (3) 100-mm VAS for the worst pain felt during the previous week. Gastrocnemius tightness was measured by the difference in maximal ankle dorsiflexion between knee bent and straight with a goniometer. RESULTS: The mean gastrocnemius tightness was 22 degrees at baseline compared with 9 degrees at the final follow-up (P < .01). A reduction in VAS for pain on the first steps in the morning and VAS for the worst pain felt during the previous week from baseline to final follow-up was observed (P < .01). Correlation analysis of 105 data points between gastrocnemius tightness and VAS for pain on the first steps in the morning was R = 0.757 (P < .001), and between gastrocnemius tightness and VAS for the worst pain felt during the previous week was R = 0.781 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The study observed a strong, statistically significant correlation between gastrocnemius tightness and the severity of heel pain in plantar fasciitis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Bubble concept for sporting tournaments during the COVID-19 pandemic: Football Club World Cup.

OBJECTIVES: To report the person-to-staff transmission of COVID-19 with the implementation of a bubble concept that included testing, hygiene, distancing and monitoring strategies to mitigate risks. METHODS: A prospective case series included all staff on-site involved in the Football Club World Cup. The tournament was conducted within 'bubbles'. All personnel travelling to the tournament were required to be in possession of a negative RT-PCR test within 72 hours of arrival and subjected to a testing schedule during the tournament. Each location was assigned a COVID-19 protocol enforcement officer to ensure adherence to regular testing, hygiene measures, physical distancing and daily symptom reporting (via ScribePro app). RESULTS: The study involved 70 recruited staff with a combined 1321 test days on the symptom checker app. The mean number of days completed on the symptom checker app was 18.87 days (range: 7-28). Of the five questions asked as part of the daily symptom checker, only one was answered positively (0.015%). This individual was isolated, assessed within 20 min and tested. The initial diagnosis was likely a non-COVID-19-related viral illness. Further testing returned three negative tests during the remainder of the tournament. CONCLUSIONS: There was no person-to-staff transmission of COVID-19 during the tournament within our sample. The organisation of a sporting tournament during the COVID-19 pandemic is possible with risk mitigation strategies. These strategies include setting up a bubble with regular testing, hygiene measures, physical distancing and daily symptom reporting.

Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Complication Rates With Best- and Worst-Case Analyses for Rerupture Rates.

BACKGROUND: An acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) is a common injury. The controversy that has surrounded the optimal treatment options for AATRs warrants an updated meta-analysis that is comprehensive, accounts for loss to follow-up, and utilizes the now greater number of available studies for data pooling. PURPOSE: To meta-analyze the rates of all complications after the treatment of AATRs with a "best-case scenario" and "worst-case scenario" analysis for rerupture rates that assumes that all patients lost to follow-up did not or did experience a rerupture, respectively. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: Two authors performed a systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines on February 17, 2020. The included studies were assessed in terms of the level of evidence, quality of evidence, and quality of the literature. A meta-analysis by fixed-effects models was performed if heterogeneity was low (I2 < 25%) and by random-effects models if heterogeneity was moderate to high (I2≥ 25%). RESULTS: Surgical treatment was significantly favored over nonsurgical treatment for reruptures. Nonsurgical treatment was significantly favored over surgical treatment for complications other than reruptures, notably infections. Minimally invasive surgery was significantly favored over open repair for complications other than reruptures (no difference for reruptures), in particular for minor complications. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrated that surgical treatment was superior to nonsurgical treatment in terms of reruptures. However, the number needed to treat analysis produced nonmeaningful values for all treatment options, except for surgical versus nonsurgical treatment and minimally invasive surgery versus open repair. No single treatment option was revealed to be profoundly favorable with respect to every complication. The results of this meta-analysis can guide clinicians and patients in their treatment decisions that should be made jointly and on a case-by-case basis.

Limited Evidence for Biological Adjuvants in Hindfoot Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Comparative Studies.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of biological adjuvants in patients managed with hindfoot arthrodesis. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines with use of specific search terms and eligibility criteria. Assessment of evidence was threefold: level of evidence by criteria as described in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, quality of evidence according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and conflicts of interest. Meta-analysis was performed with fixed-effects models for studies of low heterogeneity (I2 < 25%) and with random-effects models for studies of moderate to high heterogeneity (I2 ≥ 25%). RESULTS: A total of 1,579 hindfeet were recruited across all studies, and 1,527 hindfeet were recorded as having completed treatment and follow-up visits. The duration of follow-up ranged from 2.8 to 43 months. Twelve of the 17 included studies comprised patients with comorbidities associated with reduced healing capacity. Based on the random-effects model for nonunion rates for autograft versus allograft, the risk ratio was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.13 to 5.21; I2 = 56%; p = 0.83) in favor of lower nonunion rates for autograft. Based on the random-effects model for rhPDGF/ß-TCP versus autograft, the risk ratio was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.10; I2 = 59%; p = 0.30) in favor of lower nonunion rates for rhPDGF/ß-TCP. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of data to support the meaningful use of biological adjuvants as compared with autograft/allograft for hindfoot arthrodesis. The meta-analysis favored the use of autograft when compared with allograft but favored rhPDGF/ß-TCP when compared with autograft in the short term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for the Treatment of Hamstring Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With Best-Worst Case Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hamstring injuries are common and account for considerable time lost to play in athletes. Platelet-rich plasma has potential as a means to accelerate healing of these injuries. PURPOSE: (1) To present the evidence of platelet-rich plasma injection in the treatment of hamstring injuries, (2) evaluate the "best-case scenario" in dichotomous outcomes, and (3) evaluate the "worst-case scenario" in dichotomous outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Two authors systematically reviewed the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, with any discrepancies resolved by mutual consensus. The level of evidence was assessed per the criteria of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and the quality of evidence by the Coleman Methodology Score. Meta-analysis by fixed effects models was used if heterogeneity was low (I2 < 25%) and random effects models if heterogeneity was moderate to high (I2≥ 25%). P values <.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies were included with 207 hamstring injuries in the platelet-rich plasma group and 149 in the control group. Random-effects model for mean time to return to play that compared platelet-rich plasma + physical therapy to physical therapy alone non-significantly favored platelet-rich plasma + physical therapy (mean difference, -5.67 days). The fixed effects model for reinjury rates, which also compared platelet-rich plasma + physical therapy with physical therapy alone nonsignificantly favored platelet-rich plasma + physical therapy (risk ratio, 0.88). The best-case scenario fixed effects model for reinjury rates nonsignificantly favored platelet-rich plasma + physical therapy (risk ratio, 0.82). The worst-case scenario fixed effects model for reinjury rates nonsignificantly favored physical therapy alone (risk ratio, 1.13). The mean ± SD complication rate for either postinjection discomfort, pain, or sciatic nerve irritation was 5.2% ± 2.9% (range, 2.7% to 9.1%). CONCLUSION: There has been statistically nonsignificant evidence to suggest that PRP injection ± PT reduced mean time to RTP or reinjury rates compared to no treatment or PT alone for hamstring injuries in a short-term follow-up. The complication profiles were favorable. Further studies of high quality and large cohorts are needed to better support or disprove the consensus of the systematic review and meta-analysis.