Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Qual Life Res ; 30(2): 445-454, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32851601

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly fatal disease associated with significant morbidity, with a need for real-world symptom and health utility score (HUS) data. HUS can be measured using an EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, however most captured data is available in non-SCLC (NSCLC) only. As new treatment regimens become available in SCLC it becomes important to understand factors which influence health-related quality of life and health utility. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study (2012-2017) of ambulatory histologically confirmed SCLC evaluated patient-reported EQ-5D-5L-derived HUS, toxicity and symptoms. A set of NSCLC patients was used to compare differential factors affecting HUS. Clinical and demographic factors were evaluated for differential interactions between lung cancer types. Comorbidity scores were documented for each patient. RESULTS: In 75 SCLC and 150 NSCLC patients, those with SCLC had lower mean HUS ((SCLC vs NSCLC: mean 0.69 vs 0.79); (p < 0.001)) when clinically stable and with progressive disease: ((SCLC mean HUS = 0.60 vs NSCLC mean HUS = 0.77), (p = 0.04)). SCLC patients also had higher comorbidity scores ((1.11 vs 0.73); (p < 0.015)). In multivariable analyses, increased symptom severity and comorbidity scores decreased HUS in both SCLC and NSCLC (p < 0.001); however, only comorbidity scores differentially affected HUS (p < 0.0001), with a greater reduction of HUS adjusted per unit of comorbidity in SCLC. CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced SCLC had significantly lower HUS than NSCLC. Both patient cohorts are impacted by symptoms and comorbidity, however, comorbidity had a greater negative effect in SCLC patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Análisis de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven
2.
Am J Ind Med ; 64(6): 476-487, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33834530

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize detailed patterns of mesothelioma and asbestosis incidence in the workforce as part of an occupational disease surveillance program in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: The Occupational Disease Surveillance System (ODSS) cohort was established using workers' compensation claims data and includes 2.18 million workers employed from 1983 to 2014. Workers were followed for mesothelioma and asbestosis diagnoses in Ontario Cancer Registry, physician, hospital, and ambulatory care records through 2016. Trends in incidence rates were estimated over the study period. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 854 mesothelioma and 737 asbestosis cases were diagnosed during follow-up. Compared with all other workers in the ODSS, those employed in construction trades occupations had the greatest adjusted incidence rate of both mesothelioma (223 cases; HR, 2.38; 95% CI: 2.03-2.78) and asbestosis (261 cases; HR, 3.64; 95% CI: 3.11-4.25). Rates were particularly elevated for insulators, pipefitters and plumbers, and carpenters. Workers in welding and flame cutting, boiler making, and mechanic and machinery repair occupations, as well as those in industrial chemical and primary metal manufacturing industries, had strongly elevated rates of both diseases. Rates were greater than anticipated for workers in electrical utility occupations and education and related services. CONCLUSIONS: Results substantiate the risk of mesothelioma and asbestosis in occupation and industry groups in the Ontario workforce with known or suspected asbestos exposure. Sustained efforts to prevent the occurrence of additional cases of disease in high-risk groups are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Asbestosis/epidemiología , Mesotelioma/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Ocupaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de la Población , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Industrias/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos Humanos/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
Occup Environ Med ; 77(12): 847-856, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32847990

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Occupational exposure to agents in plastics and rubber manufacturing has been associated with elevated risk of certain cancers. We sought to evaluate cancer risk among workers employed in occupations and industries with these exposures as part of an ongoing surveillance programme in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: The Occupational Disease Surveillance System (ODSS) cohort was established using workers' compensation claims data and includes 2.18 million workers employed from 1983 to 2014. Workers were followed for site-specific cancer diagnoses in the Ontario Cancer Registry through 2016. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate adjusted HR and 95% CI. RESULTS: We identified 81 127 workers employed in plastics and rubber manufacturing industries or materials processing and product fabricating occupations. Compared with all other women in the ODSS, those in materials processing occupations had an elevated rate of lung cancer (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.58) that was not observed among men. An elevated rate of breast cancer was observed among female labourers (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.82) and moulders (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.37) in plastics and rubber product fabricating occupations. Overall, elevated rates were observed for oesophageal, liver, stomach, prostate and kidney cancer in job-specific subgroups, including mixing and blending, bonding and cementing, and labouring. There was little evidence of association for lymphatic or haematopoietic cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Findings for lung and breast cancer in women are consistent with other studies and warrant further attention in Ontario. Given the relatively young age at end of follow-up, surveillance in these workers should continue as the cohort ages.


Asunto(s)
Industria Manufacturera , Neoplasias/clasificación , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/clasificación , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Ocupaciones/clasificación , Ontario/epidemiología , Plásticos , Sistema de Registros , Goma , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
Oncologist ; 24(11): e1219-e1227, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31409744

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated improved outcomes with real-time patient-reported outcome questionnaires (PRO questionnaires) using questions adapted for patient use from the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Outside of the clinical trial setting, limited information exists on factors affecting the completion of PRO questionnaires in routine practice. The primary aim of this prospective cross-sectional study was to evaluate patient willingness to complete PRO questionnaires on a regular basis and to better understand responder biases to improve patient feedback. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients performing PRO-CTCAE toxicity and symptom PRO questionnaires in oncology clinics at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre from 2013 to 2016 were assessed for their willingness to complete PRO questionnaires using a nine-item, tablet-based acceptability survey. Patient-reported characteristics (i.e., age, sex, language, marital status, education, occupation, etc.), cancer type, treatment modalities, and health metrics (i.e., Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) were also collected. Characteristics were evaluated by logistic regression (odds ratios [OR]) using the primary outcome with prespecified levels of significance for univariate (p ≤ .10), and additional multivariate (p ≤ .05) testing. RESULTS: A total of 1,792 patients (median age 60 years; range 18-97) with various cancer diagnoses were assessed. A greater proportion of female (56%) and white (74%) respondents with an annual household income of <$100,000 (69%) participated. More than half (58%) of respondents were willing to complete PRO questionnaires at every clinic visit, and a high proportion (77%) found utility in reporting physical and emotional feelings to clinicians using PRO questionnaires. In general, patients did not find that PRO questionnaires made clinic visits more difficult (93%). In uni- and multivariable testing, patients were more willing to complete sleep- and fatigue-related PRO questionnaires relative to chemotoxicity-based PRO questionnaires (OR 1.52; p = .012). Patients aged 40-65 versus 18-40 years were also more likely to report high PRO questionnaire acceptability (OR 1.49; p = .025). Additional patient characteristics such as white ethnicity (OR 1.76), Canada as country of birth (OR 1.66), and English language (OR 2.15) relative to other had higher acceptability on uni- (p < .001) and multivariable (p < .001) analyses. Patients reporting treatment intent as palliative (OR 0.69; p = .0013) or hematological (OR 0.73; p = .027) were less likely to report high PRO questionnaire acceptability on univariable analysis; however, only palliative patients (OR 0.72) maintained this effect on multivariable testing (p = .012). Patients reporting higher health utility scores (per change in .05) also had significantly increased PRO questionnaire acceptability in uni- (OR 1.06; p < .001) and multivariable (OR 1.05; p = .008) analyses. No significant differences in PRO questionnaire acceptability were seen between cancer types, education level, household income, employment status, or treatment modality. CONCLUSION: Routine assessment using PRO questionnaires is associated with moderate acceptability by patients with cancer. Specific patient characteristics are associated with higher completion willingness. Additional research is necessary to identify factors associated with low acceptability of PRO questionnaires and to develop site-, ethnicity-, and treatment-specific instruments to assess the value of PRO questionnaires for symptom monitoring in clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study will help to identify the clinical, demographic, and survey characteristics associated with willingness to complete patient-reported outcome questionnaires regularly in the cancer outpatient setting.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/clasificación , Neoplasias/terapia , Nomogramas , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto Joven
5.
Occup Environ Med ; 76(9): 625-631, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31320492

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Dermatitis is the most common occupational skin disease, and further evidence is needed regarding preventable risk factors. The Occupational Disease Surveillance System (ODSS) derived from administrative data was used to investigate dermatitis risk among industry and occupation groups in Ontario. METHODS: ODSS cohort members were identified from Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) accepted lost time claims. A case was defined as having ≥2 dermatitis physician billing claims during a 12-month period within 3 years of cohort entry. A 3-year look-back period prior to cohort entry was used to exclude prevalent cases without a WSIB claim. Workers were followed for 3 years or until dermatitis diagnosis, age 65 years, emigration, death or end of follow-up (31 December 2016), whichever occurred first. Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models estimated HRs and 95% CIs. The risk of dermatitis was explored using a job exposure matrix that identifies exposure to asthmagens, many of which also cause contact dermatitis. RESULTS: Among 597 401 workers, 23 843 cases of new-onset dermatitis were identified. Expected elevated risks were observed among several groups including furniture and fixture industries, food and beverage preparation and chemicals, petroleum, rubber, plastic and related materials processing occupations and workers exposed to metal working fluids and organic solvents. Decreased risk was observed among farmers, nurses and construction industries, and occupations exposed to latex and indoor cleaning products. CONCLUSIONS: ODSS can contribute to occupational dermatitis surveillance in Ontario by identifying occupational groups at risk of dermatitis that can then be prioritised for prevention activities.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Industrias , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Ocupaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Medición de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
6.
PLoS One ; 18(4): e0284323, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37058469

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of links between mental illness and risk of bloodborne infectious disease could inform preventive and therapeutic strategies in individuals with mental illness. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to estimate the seroprevalence of hepatitis B and C in individuals with and without a prior prescription for antipsychotic medications, and to determine whether differences in seroprevalence could be explained by differential distribution in known infection risk factors. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between receipt of antipsychotic medication and HBV and HCV seropositivity. RESULTS: Those who had HBV core antibody had 1.64 (95% CI: 0.89, 3.02) times the odds and those with HCV antibody (anti-HCV) had 3.48 (95% CI: 1.71, 7.09) times the odds of having a prescription for at least one antipsychotic medication compared to those who did not have HBV core antibody or HCV antibody, respectively. While prior antipsychotic receipt was a potent risk marker for HCV seropositivity, risk was explained by adjusting for known bloodborne infection risk factors (adjusted ORs 1.01 [95% CI: 0.50, 2.02] and 1.38 [95% CI: 0.44, 4.36] for HBV and HCV, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Prior receipt of antipsychotic medications is a strong predictor of HCV (and to a lesser extent HBV) seropositivity. Treatment with antipsychotic medications should be considered as additional risk markers for individuals who may benefit from targeted prevention, screening, and harm reduction interventions for HCV.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Infecciones por VIH , Hepatitis B , Humanos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Encuestas Nutricionales , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Hepatitis B/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Hepatitis B/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis C , Prevalencia , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones
7.
Clin Lung Cancer ; 23(2): e154-e164, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34688531

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Recent advances in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treatments necessitate a better understanding of real-world health utility scores (HUS) in patients treated under current standards to facilitate robust pharmaco-economic assessments. METHODS: In this single institution cohort observational study, HUS were evaluated in patients with SCLC through EQ-5D questionnaires at outpatient visits (encounters). In addition, patients completed questionnaires relating to treatment toxicities and cancer symptoms. Clinical and pathological variables were abstracted from electronic medical records and disease status at each patient visit was documented. The impact of these variables on HUS were explored. RESULTS: There were 282 clinical encounters (12% newly diagnosed; 37% stable on treatment; 22% progressing on treatment; 29% stable off therapy/other) in 111 SCLC patients (58% male; 64% extensive stage (ES) SCLC). At the first encounter 29% of patients had an ECOG performance status (PS) ≥ 2. ES-SCLC, bone metastases, female sex, progressive disease and/or PS were each significantly associated with decreased HUS in multivariable analyses. Patients clinically stable on first line therapy had generally steady HUS longitudinally, with differences in HUS between limited disease (LD) and ES patients emerging as treatment progressed. Decreased HUS were associated with increased severity of the majority of measured symptoms (fatigue/tiredness, loss of appetite, pain, drowsiness, shortness of breath, anxiety, depression, and overall well-being; each p<0.001), supporting the value of EQ-5D-derived HUS in assessing health utility. CONCLUSION: Our HUS values in chemotherapy-treated SCLC are clinically relevant and are associated with specific clinico-demographic, symptom and toxicity factors.


Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/terapia , Anciano , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Fatiga/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/psicología
8.
Am J Med ; 134(8): 952-962.e4, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33775644

RESUMEN

Optimal strategies for integration of clinical practice guidelines into electronic medical records and its impact on processes of care and clinical outcomes in diabetic patients are not well understood. A systematic review of CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases in August 2016, November 2017, and June 2020 was conducted. Studies investigating integration of diabetes guidelines into ambulatory care electronic medical records reporting quantitative results were included. After screening 15,783 records, 21 articles were included. Lipid and blood pressure control consistently improved with guideline integration, but A1c control remained equivocal. Electronic guideline integration improved microvascular complication screening, vaccination, and documentation of cardiovascular risk factors, while medication prescription and blood pressure, lipid, and A1c documentation did not improve. Studies employing a combination of electronic record intervention strategies were associated with improvement in monitoring and attainment of guideline and screening targets. Thus, strategies employing combinations of interventions to incorporate guidelines into electronic records may improve processes of care and some clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 55(2): 292-299, 2019 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30084958

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The management of patients with locally advanced thymic malignancies remains controversial. Differing combinations of surgical resection, chemotherapy and radiation are used in the management of initial and relapsed disease. Treatment-related toxicities and quality of life could inform therapeutic options. This study describes health utility scores (HUS) in survivors with locally advanced thymic malignancies and investigates the impact of multimodality regimens on HUS. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study (2014-2017), patients with Masaoka Stage II-IVa thymic malignancies completed various self-reported questionnaires, including EuroQol-5-Dimensions with visual analogue scale (VAS), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale tools. Trimodality versus uni- or bimodality regimens and aggressive versus non-aggressive management of recurrent disease were compared using regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the 72 patients, 43 (60%) were male with a median age of 58 years, 65 (90%) had thymoma while 7 (10%) had thymic carcinomas; and median time since diagnosis was 50.5 months (range: 3-266). Median HUS and VAS did not differ between groups (trimodality n = 24 vs uni- or bimodality n = 48: HUS = 0.77 vs 0.80, P = 0.29; VAS = 80 vs 75, P = 0.79, respectively). The distributions of patient-reported ECOG were also similar (P = 0.86). Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale scores for every assessed symptom were similar for different modalities of therapy. Median scores on these tools were also similar regardless of recurrence status or management of relapsed disease (aggressive versus non-aggressive). CONCLUSION: Survivors with Stage II-IVa thymic malignancies report favourable HUS, VAS and self-reported ECOG with minimal symptom burden. These outcomes may be independent of number and type of initial treatment modalities or management of recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias del Timo/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias del Timo/fisiopatología , Neoplasias del Timo/terapia
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 1(8): e186019, 2018 12 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30646311

RESUMEN

Importance: Follow-up of participants in randomized trials may be limited by logistic and financial factors. Some important randomized trials have been extended well beyond their original follow-up period by linkage of individual participant information to routinely collected data held in administrative records and registries. Objective: To perform a scoping review of randomized clinical trials extended by record linkage to characterize this literature and explore any additional insights into treatment effectiveness provided by long-term follow-up using record linkage. Data Sources: A literature search in Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials was performed for the period January 1, 1945, through November 25, 2016. Study Selection: Various combinations of search terms were used, as there is no accepted terminology. Determination of study eligibility and extraction of information about trial characteristics and outcomes, for both original and extended trial reports, were performed in duplicate. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Assessment of study eligibility and data extraction were performed independently by 2 reviewers. All analyses were descriptive. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes in the pairs of original and extended trials were categorized according to whether any benefits or harms from interventions were sustained, were lost, or emerged during long-term follow-up. Results: A total of 113 extended trials were included in the study. Linkage to administrative and registry data extended follow-up by between 1 and 55 years. The most common interventions were pharmaceuticals (47 [41.6%]), surgery (19 [16.8%]), and disease screening (19 [16.8%]). End points most frequently studied through record linkage included mortality (88 [77.9%]), cancer (41 [36.3%]), and cardiovascular events (37 [32.7%]). One hundred four trial extensions (92.0%) were analyzed according to the original trial randomization. The reports provided details of 155 analyses of study outcomes. Seventy-four analyses (47.7%) identified statistically significant benefits in the trial extension phase. In 21 of these (28.4%), benefits were significant only in this period. Null results in both the original and extended trials were seen in 34 of the analyses (21.9%). Loss of significant benefits of an intervention were seen in 12 analyses (7.7%). Statistically significant harms were seen in 16 trial extension analyses (10.3%), and in 14 of these (87.5%), the harms were significant only in the trial extension phase. Conclusions and Relevance: Trial extension by linkage to routinely collected data is a versatile underused approach that may add critical insights beyond those of the original trial. Some beneficial and harmful outcomes of interventions are captured only in the extension phase of randomized trials.


Asunto(s)
Estudios de Seguimiento , Registro Médico Coordinado , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Investigación Biomédica/métodos , Investigación Biomédica/normas , Minería de Datos/métodos , Minería de Datos/normas , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA