Validation of a 40-gene expression profile test to predict metastatic risk in localized high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Current staging systems for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) have limited positive predictive value for identifying patients who will experience metastasis. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a gene expression profile (GEP) test for predicting risk for metastasis in localized, high-risk cSCC with the goal of improving risk-directed patient management. METHODS: Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary cSCC tissue and clinicopathologic data (n = 586) were collected from 23 independent centers in a prospectively designed study. A GEP signature was developed using a discovery cohort (n = 202) and validated in a separate, nonoverlapping, independent cohort (n = 324). RESULTS: A prognostic 40-GEP test was developed and validated, stratifying patients with high-risk cSCC into classes based on metastasis risk: class 1 (low risk), class 2A (high risk), and class 2B (highest risk). For the validation cohort, 3-year metastasis-free survival rates were 91.4%, 80.6%, and 44.0%, respectively. A positive predictive value of 60% was achieved for the highest-risk group (class 2B), an improvement over staging systems, and negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity were comparable to staging systems. LIMITATIONS: Potential understaging of cases could affect metastasis rate accuracy. CONCLUSION: The 40-GEP test is an independent predictor of metastatic risk that can complement current staging systems for patients with high-risk cSCC.

Primary dermal melanoma: a unique subtype of melanoma to be distinguished from cutaneous metastatic melanoma: a clinical, histologic, and gene expression-profiling study.

BACKGROUND: Primary dermal melanoma (PDM) is a subtype of melanoma confined to the dermis that may be morphologically impossible to distinguish from cutaneous metastatic melanoma (CMM). OBJECTIVE: We sought to better characterize PDM by describing the clinical, histologic, and molecular features of 49 cases of PDM and determine whether a gene expression-profiling test could help distinguish PDM from CMM. METHODS: We describe 49 cases of PDM and determined whether any clinical or histopathologic features had a statistically significant relationship with outcome. Secondly, we performed a melanoma gene expression-profiling test on a subset of the PDM and CMM cases. RESULTS: Overall recurrence was infrequent and seen in 9 of 49 cases. Six patients had locoregional recurrences and 3 patients had distant metastasis. None of the clinical or histologic parameters showed a statistically significant relationship with recurrence. There was a statistically significant association of a class I signature by DecisionDx-Melanoma assay (Castle Biosciences Inc, Friendswood, TX) for PDM whereas CMM were more frequently class II (P value = .023). LIMITATIONS: The mean follow-up time was 26 months. CONCLUSIONS: Most conventional staging parameters used for prognosis in cutaneous melanoma have limited applicability to PDM. The melanoma prognostic assay may be a useful tool for distinguishing PDM from CMM.

Desmoplastic nevus of chronically sun-damaged skin: an entity to be distinguished from desmoplastic melanoma.

Desmoplastic (sclerotic) nevus (DSN) can often be difficult to differentiate from desmoplastic melanoma (DM). This can be especially difficult when DSNs occur in a background of heavy solar elastosis. We have observed numerous examples of DSNs occurring in chronically sun-damaged (CSD) skin. In a subset of these cases, we have observed notable pleomorphism and nuclear atypia raising concern for the possibility of DM. In this study, we evaluated the clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical findings in 23 cases of DSN occurring in CSD skin and compared them with 10 cases of DM. DSN on CSD skin is seen in adults (mean, 53.2 years) with a female predominance (70%) and upper (57%) and lower (17%) extremity anatomic locations. Most DSNs present as small flesh-colored macules or papules. Typical histologic features include symmetry, limited junctional growth, presence of a lentiginous component often with focal and limited pagetoid spread (extension across only a few rete ridges), and lack of deep extension. DSN and DM had a statistically significant difference in immunohistochemical staining for Melan-A and p75. Melan-A was positive in 18 of 20 DSNs and only 2 out of 10 DMs, whereas p75 was positive in all DMs (10/10) and was weakly positive in 11 of 20 DSN cases. We believe that our study offers some useful clinical, histologic, and immunohistochemical clues to help differentiate DSNs on CSD skin from DMs.

Nonoverlapping Clinical and Mutational Patterns in Melanomas from the Female Genital Tract and Atypical Genital Nevi.

Genital melanomas (GM) are the second most common cancer of the female external genitalia and may be confused with atypical genital nevi (AGN), which exhibit atypical histological features but have benign behavior. In this study, we compared the clinical, histological, and molecular features of 19 GM and 25 AGN. We described chromosomal copy number aberrations and the mutational status of 50 oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in both groups. Our study showed that a pigmented lesion occurring in mucosal tissue, particularly in postmenopausal women, was more likely to be a melanoma than a nevus. GM had high levels of chromosomal instability, with many copy number aberrations. Furthermore, we found a completely nonoverlapping pattern of oncogenic mutations when comparing GM and AGN. In GM, we report somatic mutations in KIT and TP53. Conversely, AGN had frequent BRAF V600E mutations, which were not seen in any of the GM. Our results show that GM and AGN have distinct clinical and molecular changes and that GM have a different mutational pattern compared with AGN.

Comparative analysis of atypical spitz tumors with heterozygous versus homozygous 9p21 deletions for clinical outcomes, histomorphology, BRAF mutation, and p16 expression.

Studies have shown that atypical Spitz tumors (ASTs) with homozygous deletions in 9p21 have worse prognosis than those without this finding. Conversely, numerous studies have shown that a range of other copy number aberrations including isolated 6q23 or 3p21 loss may be seen in ASTs without conferring higher risk for aggressive behavior. We studied 31 cases of ASTs with heterozygous 9p21 loss and hypothesize that heterozygous 9p21 loss in ASTs does not confer an increased risk for aggressive behavior. We compared clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical features of 31 ASTs with heterozygous 9p21 deletions with 30 ASTs with homozygous 9p21 deletions. No ASTs with heterozygous 9p21 deletions resulted in distant metastasis. Severe cytologic atypia, a predominance of epithelioid cytomorphology and increased dermal mitotic activity were more frequent in ASTs with homozygous deletions versus ASTs with heterozygous deletions (P=0.0003, 0.0004, and 0.042, respectively). Expression of p16 and mutated BRAF proteins was also evaluated in 17 conventional (nonspitzoid) melanomas with homozygous 9p21 loss and the 2 groups of ASTs. Expression of p16 was retained in 67% of ASTs with heterozygous loss, whereas among ASTs with homozygous loss, 100% of cases had areas with complete loss of staining. Mutated BRAF protein expression was detected in 53% of conventional melanomas, in none of the ASTs with heterozygous loss, and in 1 AST with homozygous loss (P=0.0007 between homozygous ASTs and the conventional melanomas). Coexisting BRAF mutation and 9p21 deletion was more common in conventional melanomas than in ASTs with heterozygous or homozygous 9p21 deletion. BRAF mutation was highly uncommon among the ASTs.