Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 87
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 57(5): 757-766, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615155

RESUMEN

The use of intravenous antiplatelet therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is not fully standardized. The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of periprocedural intravenous administration of cangrelor or tirofiban in a contemporary ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population undergoing PPCI. This was a multicenter prospective cohort study including consecutive STEMI patients who received cangrelor or tirofiban during PPCI at seven Italian centers. The primary effectiveness measure was the angiographic evidence of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow < 3 after PPCI. The primary safety outcome was the in-hospital occurrence of BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) 2-5 bleedings. The study included 627 patients (median age 63 years, 79% males): 312 received cangrelor, 315 tirofiban. The percentage of history of bleeding, pulmonary edema and cardiogenic shock at admission was comparable between groups. Patients receiving cangrelor had lower ischemia time compared to tirofiban. TIMI flow before PPCI and TIMI thrombus grade were comparable between groups. At propensity score-weighted regression analysis, the risk of TIMI flow < 3 was significantly lower in patients treated with cangrelor compared to tirofiban (adjusted OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.30-0.53). The risk of BARC 2-5 bleeding was comparable between groups (adjusted OR:1.35; 95% CI: 0.92-1.98). These results were consistent across multiple prespecified subgroups, including subjects stratified for different total ischemia time, with no statistical interaction. In this real-world multicenter STEMI population, the use of cangrelor was associated with improved myocardial perfusion assessed by coronary angiography after PPCI without increasing clinically-relevant bleedings compared to tirofiban.


Asunto(s)
Adenosina Monofosfato , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Tirofibán , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Adenosina Monofosfato/administración & dosificación , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Adenosina Monofosfato/efectos adversos , Administración Intravenosa , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Italia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/tratamiento farmacológico , Tirofibán/administración & dosificación , Tirofibán/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 102(5): 779-787, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37702117

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the SYNTAX score (SS) and SYNTAX score II (SS-II) in a contemporary real-world cohort of myocardial infarction (MI) patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The role of SS and SS-II in the prognostic stratification of patients presenting with MI and undergoing PCI has been poorly investigated. METHODS: This study included MI patients treated with PCI from January 2015 to April 2020 at the University Hospital of Salerno. Patients were divided into tertiles according to the baseline SS and SS-II values. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality at long-term follow-up; secondary outcome measures were cardiovascular (CV) death and MI. RESULTS: Overall, 915 patients were included in this study. Mean SS and SS-II were 16.1 ± 10.0 and 31.6 ± 11.5, respectively. At propensity weighting adjusted Cox regression analysis, both SS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.06; p = 0.017) and SS-II (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.07-1.10; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with the risk of all-cause mortality at long-term follow-up; both SS (HR 1.04; CI 1.01-1.06; p < 0.001) and SS-II (HR 1.08; CI 1.06-1.10; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with the risk of CV death, but only SS-II showed a significant association with the risk of recurrent MI (HR 1.03; CI 1.01-1.05; p < 0.001). At 5 years, SS-II showed a significantly higher discriminative ability for all-cause mortality than SS (area under the curve: 0.82 vs. 0.64; p < 0.001). SS-II was able to reclassify the risk of long-term mortality beyond the SS (net reclassification index 0.88; 95% CI: 0.38-1.54; p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world cohort of MI patients treated with PCI, SS-II was a stronger prognostic predictor of long-term mortality than SS.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Pronóstico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Angiografía Coronaria , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/etiología , Medición de Riesgo
3.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther ; 37(4): 695-703, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35175499

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the association between body mass index (BMI) and platelet reactivity in STEMI patients treated with oral 3rd generation P2Y12 inhibitors. METHODS: Overall, 429 STEMI patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to BMI (BMI < 25 vs ≥ 25 kg/m2). A propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to balance potential confounders in patient baseline characteristics. Platelet reactivity was assessed by VerifyNow at baseline and after 3rd generation P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel) loading dose (LD). Blood samples were obtained at baseline (T0), 1 h (T1), 2 h (T2), 4-6 h (T3), and 8-12 h (T4) after the LD. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) was defined as a platelet reactivity unit value ≥ 208 units. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, patients with BMI ≥ 25 had similar values of baseline platelet reactivity, while they had higher level of platelet reactivity at 1 and 2 h after the LD and higher rate of HRPT. Furthermore, multivariate analysis demonstrated that BMI ≥ 25 was an independent predictor of HTPR at 2 h (OR 2.01, p = .009). Conversely, starting from 4 h after the LD, platelet reactivity values and HRPT rates were comparable among the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: A BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 is associated with delayed pharmacodynamic response to oral 3rd generation P2Y12 inhibitor LD, and it is a strong predictor of HTPR in STEMI patients treated by dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor or prasugrel.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Humanos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Ticagrelor , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/efectos adversos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/tratamiento farmacológico , Plaquetas , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapéutico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 99(2): 340-347, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33949766

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of coronary artery ectasia (CAE) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and to compare the long-term outcome of subjects with and without CAE undergoing emergent coronary angiography. BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of CAE in STEMI patients has been poorly investigated. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center, study included consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing emergent coronary angiography from January 2012 to December 2017. The primary endpoint was the assessment of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with versus those without CAE at the longest available follow-up. The propensity score weighting technique was employed to account for potential selection bias between groups. RESULTS: From 1,674 patients with STEMI, 154 (9.2%) had an angiographic evidence of CAE; 380 patients were included in the no CAE group. CAE patients were more often males and smokers, and showed a lower prevalence of diabetes than no CAE patients. After percutaneous coronary intervention, the corrected thrombolysis in MI frame count (p < .001) and the myocardial blush grade (p < .001) were significantly lower in CAE than in no CAE patients. The mean follow-up was 1,218.3 ± 574.8 days. The adjusted risk for the primary outcome resulted significantly higher in patients with CAE compared to those without (adjusted HR: 1.84; p = .017). No differences in terms of all-cause and cardiac death were found between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, STEMI patients with CAE had a distinct clinical and angiographic profile, and showed a significantly higher risk of recurrent MI than those without CAE.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Angiografía Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Dilatación Patológica/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther ; 36(4): 705-712, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33988835

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The clinical course of COVID-19 may be complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and thromboembolic events, which are associated with high risk of mortality. Although previous studies reported a lower rate of death in patients treated with heparin, the potential benefit of chronic oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the association between OAT with the risk of ARDS and mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective Italian study including consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from March 1 to April 22, 2020, at six Italian hospitals. Patients were divided into two groups according to the chronic assumption of oral anticoagulants. RESULTS: Overall, 427 patients were included; 87 patients (19%) were in the OAT group. Of them, 54 patients (13%) were on treatment with non-vitamin k oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and 33 (8%) with vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs). OAT patients were older and had a higher rate of hypertension, diabetes, and coronary artery disease compared to No-OAT group. The rate of ARDS at admission (26% vs 28%, P=0.834), or developed during the hospitalization (9% vs 10%, P=0.915), was similar between study groups; in-hospital mortality (22% vs 26%, P=0.395) was also comparable. After balancing for potential confounders by using the propensity score matching technique, no differences were found in term of clinical outcome between OAT and No-OAT patients CONCLUSION: Oral anticoagulation therapy, either NOACs or VKAs, did not influence the risk of ARDS or death in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , COVID-19 , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Administración Oral , Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vitamina K
6.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 54(3): 382-392, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36125640

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels with long-term outcome in patients with recent history of myocardial infarction (MI), and to investigate if diabetes may influence this association. METHODS: Consecutive MI patients who underwent urgent/emergent coronary angiography from February 2013 to June 2019 were prospectively collected. The primary outcome was the composite of MI recurrence and all-cause death. The propensity score weighting technique was used to account for covariates potentially influencing the relationship between Lp(a) levels and the study outcomes. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 1018 post-MI patients (median age 63 years). Diabetes was reported in 280 patients (27.5%), who showed lower Lp(a) levels than patients without diabetes (p = 0.026). At a median follow-up of 1121 days, the primary outcome was reported in 182 patients (17.9%). At univariable Cox regression analysis, Lp(a) was associated with the risk of the primary outcome in the overall population and in non-diabetic patients, but not in diabetics. The adjusted Cox regression analysis confirmed the independent association between Lp(a) values and the primary outcome in non-diabetic patients, but not in diabetics.Lp(a) levels > 70 mg/dL were independently associated with the risk of the primary outcome in non-diabetic patients (adjusted HR: 2.839; 95% CI, 1.382-5.832), but not in diabetics. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world post-MI population, increasing Lp(a) levels were significantly associated with the risk of recurrent MI and all-cause death, and very high Lp(a) serum concentration independently predicted long-term outcome in non-diabetic patients, but not in diabetics.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Lipoproteína(a)/sangre , Infarto del Miocardio , Angiografía Coronaria , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(3)2022 Mar 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35334575

RESUMEN

Background and objectives: Pre-existing atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent comorbidity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19; however, little is still known about its prognostic role in infected patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether the pre-existing AF as comorbidity would contribute to increase the risk for severe forms of COVID-19, worse prognosis, or even higher mortality. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to the emergency department of nine Italian Hospitals from 1 March to 30 April 2020.The prevalence and the type of pre-existing AF have been collected. The correlation between the history and type of AF and the development of severe ARDS and in-hospital mortality has been evaluated. Results: In total, 467 patients (66.88 ± 14.55 years; 63% males) with COVID-19 were included in the present study. The history of AF was noticed in 122 cases (26.1%), of which 12 (2.6%) with paroxysmal, 57 (12.2%) with persistent and 53 (11.3%) with permanent AF. Among our study population, COVID-19 patients with AF history were older compared to those without AF history (71.25 ± 12.39 vs. 65.34 ± 14.95 years; p < 0.001); however, they did not show a statistically significant difference in cardiovascular comorbidities or treatments. Pre-existing AF resulted in being independently associated with an increased risk of developing severe ARDS during the hospitalization; in contrast, it did not increase the risk of in-hospital mortality. Among patients with AF history, no significant differences were detected in severe ARDS and in-hospital mortality between patients with permanent and non-permanent AF history. Conclusions: Pre-existing AF is a frequent among COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital, accounting up to 25% of cases. It is independently associated with an increased risk of severe ARDS in hospitalized COVID-19 patients; in contrast, it did not affect the risk of death. The type of pre-existing AF (permanent or non-permanent) did not impact the clinical outcome.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , COVID-19 , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
8.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 51(12): e13638, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34287861

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a recently recognized viral infective disease which can be complicated by acute respiratory stress syndrome (ARDS) and cardiovascular complications including severe arrhythmias, acute coronary syndromes, myocarditis and pulmonary embolism. The aim of the present study was to identify the clinical conditions and echocardiographic parameters associated with in-hospital mortality in COVID-19. METHODS: This is a multicentre retrospective observational study including seven Italian centres. Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 from 1 March to 22 April 2020 were included into study population. The association between baseline variables and risk of in-hospital mortality was assessed through multivariable logistic regression and competing risk analyses. RESULTS: Out of 1401 patients admitted at the participating centres with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, 226 (16.1%) underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and were included in the present analysis. In-hospital death occurred in 68 patients (30.1%). At multivariable analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, P < .001), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE, P < .001) and ARDS (P < .001) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. At competing risk analysis, we found a significantly higher risk of mortality in patients with ARDS vs those without ARDS (HR: 7.66; CI: 3.95-14.8), in patients with TAPSE ≤17 mm vs those with TAPSE >17 mm (HR: 5.08; CI: 3.15-8.19) and in patients with LVEF ≤50% vs those with LVEF >50% (HR: 4.06; CI: 2.50-6.59). CONCLUSIONS: TTE might be a useful tool in risk stratification of patients with COVID-19. In particular, reduced LVEF and reduced TAPSE may help to identify patients at higher risk of death during hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/epidemiología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/epidemiología , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Volumen Sistólico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/diagnóstico por imagen
9.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol ; 78(1): e94-e100, 2021 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34173802

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Statin therapy has been recently suggested as possible adjuvant treatment to improve the clinical outcome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of preadmission statin therapy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and to investigate its potential association with acute distress respiratory syndrome (ARDS) at admission and in-hospital mortality. We retrospectively recruited 467 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the emergency department of 10 Italian hospitals. The study population was divided in 2 groups according to the ARDS diagnosis at admission and in-hospital mortality. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the risk of ARDS at admission and death during hospitalization among patients with COVID-19. A competing risk analysis in patients taking or not statins before admission was also performed. ARDS at admission was reported in 122 cases (26.1%). There was no statistically significant difference for clinical characteristics between patients presenting with and without ARDS. One hundred seven patients (18.5%) died during the hospitalization; they showed increased age (69.6 ± 13.1 vs. 66.1 ± 14.9; P = 0.001), coronary artery disease (23.4% vs. 12.8%; P = 0.012), and chronic kidney disease (20.6% vs. 11.1%; P = 0.018) prevalence; moreover, they presented more frequently ARDS at admission (48.6% vs. 19.4%; P < 0.001). At multivariable regression model, statin therapy was not associated neither with ARDS at admission nor with in-hospital mortality. Preadmission statin therapy does not seem to show a protective effect in severe forms of COVID-19 complicated by ARDS at presentation and rapidly evolving toward death.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Dislipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/mortalidad , Comorbilidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Dislipidemias/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
10.
J Nucl Cardiol ; 28(1): 72-85, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30761483

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The predictors of outcome in patients with de novo diagnosis of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are poorly known. METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive HFrEF patients admitted between October 2012 and November 2017 with their first episode of HF were scheduled for an outpatient follow-up. After 3 months, patients with confirmed HFrEF underwent Iodine-123 Meta-Iodobenzylguanidine imaging. We defined three study endpoints: HF rehospitalization, cardiac death and all-cause death. Eighty-four patients were enrolled. During follow-up (39.9 ± 18.6 months) HF rehospitalization occurred in 33 cases, cardiac death in 18 and all-cause death in 24. At multivariate analysis, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP; HR: 1.047; p = .027) and Late lung to heart ratio (L/H; HR: 1.341; p < .001) independently predict HF rehospitalization; left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV; HR: 1.016; p = .017), sPAP (HR: 1.064; p = .034) and Late L/H (HR: 1.323; p = .009) were predictors of cardiac death; LVESV (HR: 1.013; p = .018) and Late L/H (HR: 1.245; p = .012) were independent predictors of all-cause death. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the individual predictors confirmed their prognostic ability during follow-up; of note, the Late L/H cut-off of 1.1 improved the risk stratification capability of echocardiographic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Late L/H independently predicts HF rehospitalization, cardiac death and all-cause death in patients with de novo diagnosis of HFrEF and improves the prognostic stratification capability of conventional echocardiographic parameters.


Asunto(s)
3-Yodobencilguanidina , Técnicas de Imagen Cardíaca , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiofármacos , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia
11.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 23, 2021 01 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33413093

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors including age, male sex, hypertension, diabetes, and tobacco use, has been reported in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who experienced adverse outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between cardiovascular risk factors and in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Sciences, and SCOPUS were searched for retrospective or prospective observational studies reporting data on cardiovascular risk factors and in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19. Univariable and multivariable age-adjusted analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between cardiovascular risk factors and the occurrence of in-hospital death. RESULTS: The analysis included 45 studies enrolling 18,300 patients. The pooled estimate of in-hospital mortality was 12% (95% CI 9-15%). The univariable meta-regression analysis showed a significant association between age (coefficient: 1.06; 95% CI 1.04-1.09; p < 0.001), diabetes (coefficient: 1.04; 95% CI 1.02-1.07; p < 0.001) and hypertension (coefficient: 1.01; 95% CI 1.01-1.03; p = 0.013) with in-hospital death. Male sex and smoking did not significantly affect mortality. At multivariable age-adjusted meta-regression analysis, diabetes was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (coefficient: 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.05; p = 0.043); conversely, hypertension was no longer significant after adjustment for age (coefficient: 1.00; 95% CI 0.99-1.01; p = 0.820). A significant association between age and in-hospital mortality was confirmed in all multivariable models. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that older age and diabetes are associated with higher risk of in-hospital mortality in patients infected by SARS-CoV-2. Conversely, male sex, hypertension, and smoking did not independently correlate with fatal outcome.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , SARS-CoV-2 , Factores de Edad , Análisis de Varianza , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/mortalidad , Masculino , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Sesgo de Publicación , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Fumar/mortalidad
12.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 50(12): e13387, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32813877

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Little is still known about the prognostic impact of incident arrhythmias in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and predictors of sustained tachyarrhythmias in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, and their potential association with disease severity and in-hospital mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter observation study including consecutive patients with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 admitted to emergency department of ten Italian Hospitals from 15 February to 15 March 2020. The prevalence and the type of incident sustained arrhythmias have been collected. The correlation between the most prevalent arrhythmias and both baseline characteristics and the development of ARDS and in-hospital mortality has been evaluated. RESULTS: 414 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (66.9 ± 15.0 years, 61.1% male) were included in the present study. During a median follow-up of 28 days (IQR: 12-45), the most frequent incident sustained arrhythmia was AF (N: 71; 17.1%), of which 50 (12.1%) were new-onset and 21 (5.1%) were recurrent, followed by VT (N: 14, 3.4%) and supraventricular arrhythmias (N: 5, 1.2%). Incident AF, both new-onset and recurrent, did not affect the risk of severe adverse events including ARDS and death during hospitalization; in contrast, incident VT significantly increased the risk of in-hospital mortality (RR: 2.55; P: .003). CONCLUSIONS: AF is the more frequent incident tachyarrhythmia; however, it not seems associated to ARDS development and death. On the other hand, incident VT is a not frequent but independent predictor of in-hospital mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/epidemiología , Taquicardia Supraventricular/epidemiología , Taquicardia Ventricular/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , COVID-19/fisiopatología , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Pronóstico , Recurrencia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
13.
Pharmacol Res ; 159: 104965, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32474087

RESUMEN

Little is still known about the clinical features associated with the occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in hospitalized patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of the present study was to describe the prevalence of pre-admission antithrombotic therapies in patients with COVID-19 and to investigate the potential association between antithrombotic therapy and ARDS, as disease clinical presentation, or in-hospital mortality. We enrolled 192 consecutive patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to emergency department of five Italian hospitals. The study population was divided in two groups according to the evidence of ARDS at chest computed tomography at admission. Propensity score weighting adjusted regression analysis was performed to assess the risk ARDS at admission, and death during hospitalization, in patients treated or not with antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents. ARDS was reported in 73 cases (38 %), who showed more likely hypertension compared to those without ARDS (57.8 % vs 49.6 %; P = 0.005). Thirty-five patients (18.5 %) died during the hospitalization. Not survived COVID-19 patients showed a statistically significant increased age (77 ± 8.31 vs 65.57 ± 8.31; P = 0.001), hypertension (77.1 % vs 53.5 %; P = 0.018) and coronary artery disease prevalence (28.6 % vs 10.2 %; P = 0.009). Both unadjusted and adjusted regression analyses showed no difference in the risk of ARDS at admission, or death during hospitalization, between patients treated or not with antiplatelets or anticoagulants. Pre-admission antithrombotic therapy, both antiplatelet and anticoagulant, does not seem to show a protective effect in severe forms of COVID-19 with ARDS at presentation and rapidly evolving toward death.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Admisión del Paciente , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
14.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 93(1): E63-E70, 2019 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30144332

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and the feasibility of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) procedure made by trained operators in centers not performing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND: BAV is a valuable therapeutic tool for patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) at prohibitive risk for TAVI or surgery. METHODS: Consecutive high-risk AS patients underwent BAV in five non-TAVI centers, where BAV operators had completed a 6-month training period in high-volume TAVI centers (Group A). All clinical, echocardiographic, and procedural data were prospectively collected and compared with data of patients treated in TAVI center (Group B). RESULTS: Between June 2016 and June 2017, 55 patients (83.9 ± 7.0 years) were enrolled: 25 in Group A and 30 in Group B. After BAV, a substantial reduction of the peak-to-peak aortic valve gradient was obtained in both groups (-35.3 ± 15.2 vs -28.8 ± 13.9 mmHg, P =0.25). No major bleeding or vascular complications occurred. In-hospital death was observed in three patients of Group A and two patients of Group B (P =0.493). The mean follow-up time was 303 ± 188 days; no patients were lost. The 1-year survival free from overall death (Group A 75.8% vs Group B 68.8%; P =0.682) and heart failure rehospitalization (Group A 73.0% vs Group B 66.8%; P =0.687) was similar in the two groups. At multivariable analysis, low left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (HR: 0.943; P = 0.011) and cardiogenic shock (HR: 5.128; P = 0.002) at admission were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: BAV is a safe and effective procedure that can be performed by trained operators in centers not performing TAVI.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Valvuloplastia con Balón , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Valvuloplastia con Balón/efectos adversos , Valvuloplastia con Balón/mortalidad , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Circ J ; 82(11): 2800-2810, 2018 10 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30210070

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate long-term survival, clinical status, and echocardiographic findings of patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) undergoing MitraClip (MC) treatment and to explore the role of baseline features on outcome. Methods and Results: Randomized and observational studies of FMR patients undergoing MC treatment were collected to evaluate the overall survival, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and echocardiographic changes after MC treatment. Baseline parameters associated with mortality and echocardiographic changes were also investigated. Across 23 studies enrolling 3,253 patients, the inhospital death rate was 2.31%, whereas the mortality rate was 5.37% at 1 month, 11.87% at 6 months, 18.47% at 1 year and 31.08% at 2 years. Mitral regurgitation Grade <3+ was observed in 92.76% patients at discharge and in 83.36% patients at follow-up. At follow-up, 76.63% of patients NYHA Class I-II and there were significant improvements in left ventricular (LV) volume, ejection fraction, and pulmonary pressure. Atrial fibrillation (AF) had a significant negative effect on 1-year survival (ß=0.18±0.06; P=0.0047) and on the reduction in LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (ß=-1.05±0.47 [P=0.0248] and ß=-2.60±0.53 [P=0.0024], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: MC results in durable reductions in mitral regurgitation associated with significant clinical and echocardiographic improvements in heart failure patients. AF negatively affects LV reverse remodeling and 1-year survival after MC treatment.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/mortalidad , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
18.
Heart Fail Clin ; 12(4): 559-75, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27638026

RESUMEN

Transthoracic echocardiography is the first-line imaging modality for evaluating patients with Takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Beyond diagnosis, TTE enables detection of peculiar complications and is useful for risk stratification and management of patients with cardiogenic shock. Cardiac magnetic resonance can be used to detect myocardial edema typically associated with TTS and is helpful in the differential diagnosis with other disease states. Coronary computed tomography angiography can be performed as an alternative to coronary angiography to confirm coronary artery patency. Molecular imaging is a promising approach for identifying patients at increased risk of recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatía de Takotsubo/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética/métodos , Imagen Molecular/métodos , Cardiomiopatía de Takotsubo/patología , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único/métodos
19.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 20(4): 229-35, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25476912

RESUMEN

Aortic dissection (AD) is the most common life-threatening disease involving the aorta. It is rarely associated with systemic disorders such as Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD), a genetic syndrome characterized by cystic degeneration of kidneys, possible presence of cysts in other organs and extra-renal manifestations, including cardiovascular disorders. We performed a systematic literature search focused on the occurrence of AD associated with ADPKD (25 cases identified), and reported two cases from our experience. We selected data on sex, age, family history of ADPKD and/or AD, habitus, hypertension, renal function, presence of hepatic/pancreatic/splenic cysts, clinical presentation of AD, AD type according to the Stanford classification, treatment and outcome. Furthermore we compared this dataset with the data of the overall population with AD from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Stanford A type AD was documented in 62% of patients. As expected, the initial manifestation of AD was most commonly chest and back pain (80%). The mean age of AD occurrence appears significantly reduced in ADPKD patients compared to the general population with AD (49 ± 12 vs 62 ± 14, P < 0.001). Of note, our analysis shows a remarkably higher frequency of hypertension (90%) compared to the overall AD population (75%), although not significantly (P = 0.133). AD should be always ruled out in ADPKD subjects with chest and back pain symptoms, despite them being young and at lower risk. A careful preventive monitoring as well as an optimal blood pressure control may reduce the risk of AD and improve the outcome of these patients.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta/etiología , Disección Aórtica/etiología , Riñón Poliquístico Autosómico Dominante/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aortografía/métodos , Dolor de Espalda/etiología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riñón Poliquístico Autosómico Dominante/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Am J Emerg Med ; 33(10): 1545.e3-6, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26283614

RESUMEN

Pheochromocytoma can occur with a variety of cardiovascular signs and symptoms, and this tumor can also precipitate an acute heart failure associated with the typical clinical and instrumental findings of myocarditis. This peculiar etiology of acute myocarditis, known as "adrenergic myocarditis," should be suspected when specific "red flags" of pheochromocytoma such as headache, palpitations, diaphoresis, hypertension, orthostatic hypotension, and left ventricular dysfunction suggesting Takotsubo syndrome are detected. In fact, its diagnosis allows a specific targeted therapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Miocarditis/etiología , Feocromocitoma/complicaciones , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/cirugía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Masculino , Feocromocitoma/diagnóstico , Feocromocitoma/cirugía , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA