RESUMEN
Neisseria gonorrhoeae is widespread globally. Primary prevention is unsuccessful and antimicrobial resistance threatens optimal management. There is no specific vaccine and natural infection studies show that N. gonorrhoeae can avoid and suppress immune responses. In addition to extensive variation in expression and specificity of many gonococcal surface antigens, it induces a robust inflammatory response through the Th17 pathway with a large influx of neutrophils and inflammatory cytokines but evades macrophages. The Th1- and Th2-mediated response is suppressed, resulting in low, short-lived antibody titers. Real-world evidence suggests that gonorrhea cases are reduced among recipients of N. meningitidis group B vaccines containing outer membrane vesicles (OMV). Although the first randomized trial of an OMV-containing MenB vaccine against N. gonorrhoeae infection did not show statistically significant vaccine efficacy, ongoing trials might shed further light. Several candidate vaccine antigens for a gonococcal-specific vaccine are being evaluated preclinically but only one has reached clinical trials.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a severe and life-threatening disease. In the United States (US), vaccine coverage with MenACWY and MenB meningococcal vaccines is suboptimal among adolescents/young adults aged 16-23 years. A combined meningococcal vaccine (MenABCWY) could increase convenience (e.g., fewer injections) and improve coverage. The objective was to quantify preferences for hypothetical meningococcal vaccine profiles among adolescents/young adults and parents. METHODS: An online discrete choice experiment was conducted among 16- to 23-year-olds, and parents of 16- to 18-year-olds. Attributes (3 × 4) and levels (1 × 2) were based on the literature and focus groups. Participants made ten pair-wise forced trade-off choices, systematically varied using a D-optimal design. Random parameter logit quantified the relative importance of vaccination attributes and estimated the trade-offs. Differences in preferences by subgroups were assessed. RESULTS: Totals of 300 adolescents and young adults (median age 20 years) and 300 parents (median age 46 years) completed the survey. Overall, 89.6% of 16- to 23-year-olds and 69.1% of parents preferred a simplified hypothetical meningococcal vaccination profile, e.g., with fewer injections (3 vs. 4) and fewer healthcare provider (HCP) visits (2-3 vs. 4). Having HCP advice and clear Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations impacted vaccination choice, with both groups reporting high trust in HCP information (83.3% among 16- to 23-year-olds; 98.7% among parents). Barriers to vaccination included lack of HCP advice or awareness of meningococcal vaccines, and income level and out-of-pocket costs for parents. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents/young adults and parents demonstrated a significant preference for a meningococcal vaccine that is more convenient (such as combined MenABCWY). Parents' vaccination preferences differed by income level and out-of-pocket costs, suggesting financial barriers to vaccination may exist which could result in IMD prevention inequalities. Findings from this study provide important information to support patient-facing informed policy discussions. A simplified vaccination schedule and strong recommendation could help improve vaccine uptake, schedule compliance, disease prevention, and reduce inequalities in IMD risk and prevention. A graphical abstract is available with this article.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a potentially life-threatening disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis infection. We reviewed case reports of IMD from newborns, infants, children, and adolescents, and described the real-life clinical presentations, diagnoses, treatment paradigms, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched for IMD case reports on patients aged ≤ 19 years published from January 2011 to March 2023 (search terms "Neisseria meningitidis" or "invasive meningococcal disease", and "infant", "children", "paediatric", pediatric", or "adolescent"). RESULTS: We identified 97 publications reporting 184 cases of IMD, including 25 cases with a fatal outcome. Most cases were in adolescents aged 13-19 years (34.2%), followed by children aged 1-5 years (27.6%), children aged 6-12 years (17.1%), infants aged 1-12 months (17.1%), and neonates (3.9%). The most common disease-causing serogroups were W (40.2%), B (31.7%), and C (10.4%). Serogroup W was the most common serogroup in adolescents (17.2%), and serogroup B was the most common in the other age groups, including children aged 1-5 years (11.5%). The most common clinical presentations were meningitis (46.6%) and sepsis (36.8%). CONCLUSIONS: IMD continues to pose a threat to the health of children and adolescents. While this review was limited to case reports and is not reflective of global epidemiology, adolescents represented the largest group with IMD. Additionally, nearly half of the patients who died were adolescents, emphasizing the importance of monitoring and vaccination in this age group. Different infecting serogroups were predominant in different age groups, highlighting the usefulness of multivalent vaccines to provide the broadest possible protection against IMD. Overall, this review provides useful insights into real-life clinical presentations, treatment paradigms, diagnoses, and clinical outcomes to help clinicians diagnose, treat, and, ultimately, protect patients from this devastating disease.
RESUMEN
The four-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) is indicated for the prevention of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B. Co-administering 4CMenB with other vaccines may improve vaccine uptake provided that the safety and immunogenicity of either are not affected. Published literature on the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of 4CMenB co-administered with other routine childhood and adulthood vaccines was reviewed. From 282 publications identified, data were collated from 10 clinical studies, 3 real-world studies, and 3 reviews. The evidence showed that 4CMenB co-administration is not associated with significant safety concerns or clinically relevant immunological interferences. The increased reactogenicity (e.g., fever) associated with 4CMenB co-administration can be adequately managed with prophylactic paracetamol in children. Thus, 4CMenB co-administration has the potential to maximize vaccine coverage and improve protection against IMD globally.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis Serogrupo B , Niño , Humanos , Vacunas Meningococicas/efectos adversos , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Serogrupo , Acetaminofén , FiebreRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (NmB) antigens are inherently diverse with variable expression among strains. Prediction of meningococcal B (MenB) vaccine effectiveness therefore requires an assay suitable for use against large panels of epidemiologically representative disease-causing NmB strains. Traditional serum bactericidal antibody assay using exogenous human complement (hSBA) is limited to the quantification of MenB vaccine immunogenicity on a small number of indicator strains. AREAS COVERED: Additional and complementary methods for assessing strain coverage developed previously include the Meningococcal Antigen Typing System (MATS), Meningococcal Antigen Surface Expression (MEASURE) assay, and genotyping approaches, but these do not estimate vaccine effectiveness. We provide a narrative review of these methods, highlighting a more recent approach involving the hSBA assay in conjunction with expanded NmB strain panels: hSBA assay using endogenous complement in each vaccinated person's serum (enc-hSBA) against a 110-strain NmB panel and the traditional hSBA assay against 14 (4 + 10) NmB strains. EXPERT OPINION: The enc-hSBA is a highly standardized, robust method that can be used in clinical trials to measure the immunological effectiveness of MenB vaccines under conditions that mimic real-world settings as closely as possible, through the use of endogenous complement and a diverse, epidemiologically representative panel of NmB strains.
Meningococcal disease refers to illnesses caused by the bacterium Neisseria meningitidis (meningococcus), including infections of the brain lining and spinal cord (meningitis) and bloodstream (septicemia). It is rare but often severe and can be deadly. Invasive meningococcal disease can be prevented through vaccination. Nearly all cases are caused by six serogroups (types) of meningococci, including meningococcal serogroup B. Vaccines are available against meningococcal serogroup B but, because of the uncommonness of the disease, standard clinical trials could not be performed to prove these vaccines are effective. Instead, an indirect measure, called the 'hSBA assay' (serum bactericidal antibody assay using human complement), is used to measure the ability of vaccines to provide protection against specific N. meningitidis strains that have antigens (substances that cause the immune system to react) sharing characteristics with components of the vaccines. However, meningococcal serogroup B strains are diverse in the genetic composition and expression of vaccine antigens. Hence, a large number of N. meningitidis serogroup B strains would have to be tested to make sure that the vaccine is effective against these strains. This is not feasible using the traditional hSBA assay, which requires a human complement (a protein system, which is part of the immune system) that has not come from the vaccinated person and is difficult and time-consuming to source. Recently, an alternative hSBA assay was developed that uses the complement present in each vaccinated person's blood (endogenous complement) and which overcomes these challenges. By allowing testing against a broad panel of N. meningitidis serogroup B strains, this new assay may enable a more accurate estimation of the effectiveness of vaccines against serogroup B meningococci.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis Serogrupo B , Neisseria meningitidis , Humanos , Determinación de Anticuerpos Séricos Bactericidas/métodos , Serogrupo , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos , Antígenos Bacterianos/genética , Neisseria meningitidis Serogrupo B/genética , Proteínas del Sistema Complemento , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & controlRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Neisseria meningitidis causes invasive meningococcal disease and, globally, significant morbidity, with serogroup B (MenB) being the most common cause of endemic disease and outbreaks in several regions. Extensive use of the four-component serogroup B meningococcal vaccine (4CMenB; Bexsero, GSK) and its inclusion in immunization programs in several countries have generated substantial safety data during the 9 years since its first authorization in 2013. AREAS COVERED: 4CMenB safety data from clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance studies (2011 to 2022), and spontaneously reported adverse events of medical interest from the GSK global safety database. We discuss these safety findings in relation to the benefit of 4CMenB vaccination and implications for further enhancing vaccine confidence. EXPERT OPINION: 4CMenB has been consistently well tolerated across clinical trials and post-licensure surveillance studies, despite a higher incidence of fever reported in infants than with other pediatric vaccines. Surveillance data have not identified any significant safety issues, consistent with an acceptable safety profile of 4CMenB. These findings highlight the need to balance the risk of relatively common, transient, post-immunization fever with the benefit of affording protection that reduces the risk of uncommon but potentially fatal meningococcal infection.
The four-component serogroup B meningococcal vaccine 4CMenB (Bexsero®, GSK) was licensed in 2013 and has acquired substantial safety evidence through clinical trial and real-world data. Availability of real-world and clinical 4CMenB safety evidence is important to help address vaccination hesitancy. This comprehensive review of safety data, from 9 years of 4CMenB use including recent data from the real world, shows no significant safety issues in a variety of age groups. Data show that transient fever may occur after vaccination. Invasive meningococcal disease, although rare, can be life-threatening. Abundant safety data from this review can help reassure individuals and healthcare providers on the use of 4CMenB.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis Serogrupo B , Neisseria meningitidis , Lactante , Niño , Humanos , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , SerogrupoRESUMEN
Invasive meningococcal disease is a life-threatening infection preventable through vaccination. Pediatric vaccination rates have declined during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This survey aimed to understand how parents' attitudes and behaviors have changed during the pandemic with regard to immunization and, more specifically, meningococcal vaccination. An online survey was emailed to parents of eligible children 0-4 years, following the selection process from UK, France, Germany, Italy, Brazil, Argentina, and Australia; and of adolescents 11-18 years from US. Data collection took place 19 January-16 February 2021. Quotas were set to ensure a representative sample. Eleven questions relating to general perceptions around vaccination and attitudes and behaviors toward meningitis vaccination were displayed. On 4,962 parents (average 35 years) participating in the survey, most (83%) believed important for their child to continue receiving recommended vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nearly half of routine vaccine appointments were delayed or canceled due to the pandemic, and 61% of respondents were likely to have their children catch up once COVID-19 restrictions were lifted. 30% of meningitidis vaccination appointments were canceled or delayed during the pandemic, and 21% of parents did not intend to reschedule them because of lockdown/stay at home regulations, and fear of catching COVID-19 in public places. It is crucial to communicate clear instructions to health workers and the general population and to provide appropriate safety precautions in vaccination centers. This will help to maintain vaccination rates and limit infections to prevent future outbreaks.
What is the context? Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is an uncommon infection that can lead to permanent disabilities and even death.Meningitis vaccination can prevent IMDs caused by Neisseria meningitidis.Vaccination rates have declined during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.What is new? We collected opinion of parents from the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Brazil, Argentina, Australia, and the US, to understand their attitudes and behaviors toward meningitis vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic.Results were reviewed by health care professional experts as well as by patient authors (IMD survivors).Most (83%) of the 4,962 parents believed that it is important for their child to continue receiving recommended vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic.Half of the scheduled appointments for meningitis vaccination were canceled or delayed during the COVID-19 pandemic, mainly due to lockdown regulations and fear of catching COVID-19.Twenty-one percent of the parents who had their child's meningitis vaccination appointment canceled, did not intend to reschedule it.What is the impact? It is crucial that clear information is communicated by health care authorities and practitioners about the availability of vaccination during pandemic and the safety precautions that are taken.Collected opinions emphasize the importance of continuing vaccinations against infectious diseases during a pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Adolescente , Humanos , Niño , Pandemias , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , PadresRESUMEN
Background: The benefits of preventive interventions lack comprehensive evaluation in standard health technology assessments (HTA), particularly for rare and transmissible diseases. Objective: To identify possible considerations for future HTA using analogies between the treatment and prevention of rare diseases. Study design: An Expert panel meeting assessed whether one HTA assessment framework can be applied to assess both rare disease treatments and preventive interventions. Experts also evaluated the range of value elements currently included in HTAs and their applicability to rare, transmissible, and/or preventable diseases. Results: A broad range of value should be considered when assessing rare, transmissible disease prevention. Although standard HTA can be applied to transmissible diseases, the risk of local outbreaks and the need for large-scale prevention programs suggest a modified assessment framework, capable of incorporating prevention-specific value elements in HTAs. A 'Rule of Prevention' framework was proposed to allow broader value considerations anchored to severity, equity, and prevention benefits in decision-making for preventive interventions for rare transmissible diseases. Conclusion: The proposed prevention framework introduces an explicit initial approach to consistently assess rare transmissible diseases, and to incorporate the broader value of preventive interventions compared with treatment.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Invasive meningococcal disease due to serogroup B (MenB) is an uncommon but life-threatening disease. The 4-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) is the only MenB vaccine with real-world evidence supporting a reduction in incidence without safety concerns. AREAS COVERED: We reviewed recommendations and real-world implementation of 4CMenB in National Immunization Programs (NIPs) and implications for clinical practice through a non-systematic literature search. EXPERT OPINION: 4CMenB is registered in 45 countries, 33 of which recommend it clinically: nine for infants, children, adolescents, and high-risk groups; 11 for infants and high-risk groups; the US for individuals aged 16-23 years and high-risk groups; two for infants; 10 for high-risk groups and/or outbreak control. Dosing schedule varies between countries. To date, nine countries include 4CMenB in their NIP: UK, Andorra, Ireland, Italy, San Marino, Lithuania, Malta, Czech Republic, and Portugal. Australia funds it for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children under 2 years, and high-risk individuals. South Australia funds for all infants and adolescents. Many factors influenced introduction into NIPs: disease burden, public awareness, cost-effectiveness, prior meningococcal vaccination programs, efficacy and safety profile. In the future, more countries might consider including 4CMenB in their NIP due to growing evidence on effectiveness and safety.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis Serogrupo B , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Serogrupo , Vacunación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a life-threatening disease that can rapidly progress to death or leave survivors with severe, life-long sequelae. Five meningococcal serogroups (A, B, C, W and Y) account for nearly all IMD. Meningococcal serogroup distribution fluctuates over time across the world and age groups. Here, we consider the potential public health impact of a pentavalent MenABCWY vaccine developed to help further control meningococcal disease and improve immunisation rates. RESULTS: The GSK MenABCWY vaccine combines the antigenic components of MenACWY-CRM (Menveo®) and 4CMenB (Bexsero®), building on a wide body of clinical experience and real-world evidence. Both approved vaccines have acceptable safety profiles, demonstrate immunogenicity, and are broadly used, including in national immunisation programmes in several countries. Since the advent of quadrivalent vaccines, public health in relation to IMD has improved, with a decline in the overall incidence of IMD and an increase in vaccine coverage. CONCLUSION: A pentavalent MenABCWY has the potential to provide further public health benefits through practical, broad IMD protection programmes encompassing serogroups A, B, C, W and Y, and is currently in late-stage development.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Humanos , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Salud Pública , Vacunas Combinadas , Vacunas ConjugadasRESUMEN
Infections with Neisseria meningitidis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae have different clinical manifestations, but the bacteria share up to 80-90% genome sequence identity. The recombinant meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccine 4CMenB consists of four antigenic components that can be present in non-B meningococcal and gonococcal strains. This comprehensive review summarizes scientific evidence on the genotypic and phenotypic similarities between vaccine antigens and their homologs expressed by non-B meningococcal and gonococcal strains. It also includes immune responses of 4CMenB-vaccinated individuals and effectiveness and impact of 4CMenB against these strains. Varying degrees of strain coverage were estimated depending on the non-B meningococcal serogroup and antigenic repertoire. 4CMenB elicits immune responses against non-B meningococcal serogroups and N. gonorrhoeae. Real-world evidence showed risk reductions of 69% for meningococcal serogroup W clonal complex 11 disease and 40% for gonorrhea after 4CMenB immunization. In conclusion, functional antibody activity and real-world evidence indicate that 4CMenB has the potential to provide some protection beyond MenB disease.
RESUMEN
Introduction: In Asia Pacific, most countries recommend a monovalent hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine dose at birth followed by primary vaccination series including three or four doses of combination vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, with or without Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), HBV or poliomyelitis antigens. If hexavalent conjugate vaccines against diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-HBV-inactivated poliovirus-Hib (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib) replace the vaccines included in the primary vaccination series, co-administration of lower-valent vaccines would be avoided but infants would receive ≥4 doses of HBV-containing vaccines before the age of 2 years. Areas covered: We searched for clinical trials conducted in the South-East Asia and Western Pacific Regions (World Health Organization geographic definition), investigating vaccination regimens with >3 doses of HBV-containing vaccines in infants, including a monovalent HBV vaccine birth dose and ≥1 dose of GSK's hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine. Expert opinion: The six clinical trials included in this review showed that infants who received the monovalent HBV vaccine at birth and three or four doses of DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine achieved protective immunogenic titers with a clinically acceptable safety profile. Our results support the integration of hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine within existing national recommendations in the Asia Pacific region to reduce the number of injections during infancy.
Asunto(s)
Difteria/prevención & control , Infecciones por Haemophilus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/administración & dosificación , Hepatitis B/prevención & control , Poliomielitis/prevención & control , Tétanos/prevención & control , Vacunas Conjugadas/inmunología , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , Bases de Datos Factuales , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/administración & dosificación , Haemophilus influenzae tipo b/inmunología , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/inmunología , Virus de la Hepatitis B/inmunología , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Vacunas Combinadas/inmunología , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Background: Cervical cancer is caused by the human papillomavirus and is a leading cause of cancer death among young Korean women. Current screening programmes could benefit from the addition of HPV vaccination into their schedule to help reduce disease burden. Two-dose vaccination schedules targeting HPV types 16 and 18, which are responsible for most cervical cancer cases, have recently been approved. Of the two available vaccines, AS04-adjuvanted HPV16/18 vaccine (AS04-HPV16/18v) provides greater protection against non-vaccine oncogenic HPV, while HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine (4vHPVv) provides protection against genital warts. Methods: The health and economic consequences of introducing a two-dose HPV vaccination programme in 12-year-old girls together with screening were assessed in the Korean healthcare setting using a previously-published Markov model. Results: Compared with screening alone, AS04-HPV16/18v was cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio below and within the Korean Won [KRW] 20-30 million treshold). When comparing the two vaccines, at 3% discount rate, AS04-HPV16/18v dominated 4vHPVv (i.e., provided 174 more quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), 304 more life-years (LYs) and cost-savings of KRW 980 million). At a 5% discount rate, AS04-HPV16/18v provided comparable QALYs (albeit 5 fewer), 105 more LYs and cost-savings of KRW 292 million compared with 4vHPVv. Results were particularly sensitive to the discount rate used, as the health benefits of preventing cervical cancer are observed much later than those of preventing genital warts. Conclusion: For the Korean setting, HPV vaccination with a two-dose schedule is a cost-effective option, and AS04-HPV16/18v is likely to offer better health outcomes at a cost-saving compared with 4vHPVv.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/economía , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/economía , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/economía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/economía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Vacunación/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Papillomavirus Humano 16/inmunología , Papillomavirus Humano 18/inmunología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , República de Corea , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virologíaRESUMEN
We assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a three-dose primary vaccination schedule with the combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated poliovirus/Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (DTPa-IPV/Hib) in Korean infants. In this phase III open-label, multicenter study (NCT01309646), healthy infants aged 42-69 days (randomized 1:1) received three doses of either pentavalent DTPa-IPV/Hib (DTPa-IPV/Hib group) or DTPa-IPV and Hib vaccines administered separately (DTPa-IPV+Hib group) at 2, 4, 6 months of age. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of DTPa-IPV/Hib compared to DTPa-IPV+Hib vaccines in terms of immune responses to all vaccine antigens, 1 month post-dose 3. Solicited symptoms (local and general) were recorded during 4 days, and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) during 31 days, after each vaccination. Serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded throughout the study duration. The immunogenicity of the pentavalent DTPa-IPV/Hib vaccine was non-inferior compared to concomitant administration of DTPa-IPV+Hib vaccines. One month post-dose 3, nearly all infants had antibody levels above the seroprotective thresholds for anti-diphtheria toxoid, anti-tetanus toxoid, anti-polyribosyl-ribitol phosphate, and anti-poliovirus type 1, 2 and 3, and had antibody levels above the seropositive thresholds for anti-pertussis toxoid (PT), anti-filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) and anti-pertactin (PRN) antibodies. A vaccine response for PT, FHA and PRN was observed in at least 96.7% of study participants. Anti-PRP geometric mean concentrations appeared lower for the DTPa-IPV/Hib group (8.456 µg/mL) than for the DTPa-IPV+Hib group (18.700 µg/mL). In both groups, the most common solicited symptoms were injection site redness and irritability. Fifty-seven SAEs were reported throughout the study; none were considered to be vaccination related.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/inmunología , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/inmunología , Esquemas de Inmunización , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/inmunología , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta Inmunológica , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Femenino , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/administración & dosificación , República de Corea , Vacunas Combinadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Combinadas/inmunologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cervical cancer is the tenth most common cancer and the eighth most frequent cause of death among women in Singapore. As human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the necessary cause of cervical cancer, the risk of cervical cancer can be substantially reduced through vaccination. This study was conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two-dose HPV vaccination as part of a national vaccination programme for 12-year-old girls in Singapore, from the perspective of the healthcare payer. METHODS: A lifetime Markov cohort model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing the AS04-adjuvanted HPV-16/18 vaccine (AS04-HPV-16/18v) to the current cervical screening programme in Singapore. Furthermore, the cost-effectiveness of the AS04-HPV-16/18v was compared with the HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine (4vHPV). Model inputs were derived from local data, where possible, and validated by clinical experts in Singapore. RESULTS: Introduction of the AS04-HPV-16/18v in Singapore was shown to prevent 137 cervical cancer cases and 48 cervical cancer deaths when compared with screening alone. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of SGD 12,645 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, which is cost-effective according to the World Health Organization threshold for Singapore. When discounted at 3%, AS04-HPV-16/18v was dominant over 4vHPV, with cost savings of SGD 80,559 and 28 additional QALYs gained. In the one-way sensitivity analysis, AS04-HPV-16/18v remained cost-effective compared with screening alone and dominant compared with 4vHPV. CONCLUSION: AS04-HPV-16/18v is the most cost-effective choice for reducing the burden of cervical cancer through universal mass vaccination for 12-year-old girls in Singapore.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/economía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Papillomavirus Humano 16 , Papillomavirus Humano 18 , Humanos , Cadenas de Markov , Modelos Estadísticos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/economía , Prevalencia , Probabilidad , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Servicios de Salud Escolar , Singapur , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virologíaRESUMEN
Purpose: To comparatively evaluate the results of a 2-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme with the AS04-adjuvanted HPV16/18 vaccine (AS04-HPV-16/18v) or HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine (4vHPVv), in addition to cervical cancer (CC) screening, in Malaysia. Methods: A lifetime Markov model replicating the natural history of HPV in 13-year-old girls was adapted to Malaysia to assess the impact of vaccination on pre-cancerous lesions, genital warts and CC cases, CC deaths, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs from the perspective of the Malaysian Ministry of Health. Vaccine effectiveness was based on efficacy and HPV type distribution. Both vaccines were assumed to have equal efficacy against vaccine-type HPV but differed for protection against non-vaccine types. Vaccine price parity was used and health and cost outcomes were discounted at 3%/annum. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the results. Results: The model predicted that AS04-HPV-16/18v would result in 361 fewer CC cases and 115 fewer CC deaths than 4vHPVv, whereas 4vHPVv averted 4,241 cases of genital warts over the cohort's lifetime. Discounted total costs showed savings of 18.50 million Malaysian Ringgits and 246 QALYs in favour of AS04-HPV-16/18v. In one-way sensitivity analyses, the discount rate was the most influential variable for costs and QALYs, but AS04-HPV- 16/18v remained dominant throughout. A two-way sensitivity analysis to assess the longevity of cross-protection for both vaccines confirmed the base-case. Conclusions: In Malaysia, the use of AS04-HPV-16/18v, in addition to screening, was modelled to be dominant over 4vHPVv, with greater estimated CC benefits and lower costs.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Papillomavirus Humano 16/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/economía , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/economía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/economía , Vacunación/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Malasia/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Pronóstico , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Haemophilus influenzae frequently colonizes the nasopharynx of children and adults, which can lead to a variety of infections. We investigated H. influenzae carriage in the nasopharynx of 360 children, in terms of (1) the prevalence of strains with decreased susceptibility, and (2) the presence of amino acid substitutions in PBP3. One hundred twenty-three strains were isolated (34.2%, 123/360), 122 of which were classified as nontypable H. influenzae (NTHi). Of these, ß-lactamase-nonproducing ampicillin-susceptible strains accounted for 26.2%, ß-lactamase-producing-ampicillin-resistant strains for 9.0%, ß-lactamase-nonproducing ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR) strains for 40.2%, and ß-lactamase-producing amoxicillin-/clavulanic acid-resistant (BLPACR) for 24.6%, respectively. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns were so diverse that they were clustered into 41 groups. The amino acid substitutions in the transpeptidase domain (292 amino acids) of ftsI in BLNAR isolates showed that group IIb accounted for 30.6%, IIc for 8.2%, IId for 16.3%, III for 32.7%, and the others for 12.2%. Moreover, groups IIb (56.7%; 17/30) and III (23.3%; 7/30) were prevalent among BLPACR strains. They were subclassified into more diverse sequence subtypes by analysis of the entire PBP3 (610 amino acids). Groups IIb, IIc, IId, and III exhibited 13, four, six, and four sequence subtypes, respectively. Such a genetic diversity is likely indicative of significant potential for decreased antimicrobial susceptibility in nasopharyngeal-colonizing NTHi strains.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones por Haemophilus/tratamiento farmacológico , Haemophilus influenzae/efectos de los fármacos , Nasofaringe/microbiología , Sustitución de Aminoácidos , Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio/farmacología , Ampicilina/farmacología , Resistencia a la Ampicilina , Preescolar , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Genes Bacterianos , Infecciones por Haemophilus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Haemophilus/microbiología , Haemophilus influenzae/genética , Haemophilus influenzae/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , República de Corea/epidemiología , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismoRESUMEN
Intraocular (IO) retinoblastoma (RB) has traditionally been treated with enucleation (ENU) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Recently, clinical trials are in progress to cure RB without ENU or EBRT in order to salvage the globe and to avoid unacceptable side effects of EBRT. We performed a pilot study to treat patients with advanced Reese-Ellsworth (RE) stage IO RB with initial chemotherapy (CRx) followed by local therapy (LT) and adjuvant CRx. Ten eyes (8 RE group V, 2 RE group IV) from 9 patients were enrolled from March 2001 to November 2001. All tumors responded to CRx. In 5 of 10 eyes, the RB was enough to be treated with LT after chemoreduction. One patient who underwent LT is waiting for ENU due to post-cryotherapy complication. For a median follow-up of 13 months (8-16 mo), 4 eyes that received LT and adjuvant CRx were relapse-free. A patient with bilateral RB who failed to be a candidate for LT was rescued with high-dose CRx and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Consequently, by treating patients according to our strategy, we were able to salvage 6 out of 10 eyes without ENU or EBRT. These results suggest that chemoreduction followed by LT and adjuvant CRx might offer the opportunity to salvage the globe and vision even in patients with advanced stage IO RB.