Live Confocal Tissue Assessment With SYTO16/PI and WGA Staining Visualizes Acute Organ Damage and Predicts Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our prospective clinical trial was to test a tissue staining technique (real-time confocal analysis [RTCA]) as a rapid assessment tool for donor kidney quality and function in human kidney transplantation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Tools for objective graft tissue viability assessment before kidney transplantation are lacking. RTCA has recently been established and tested in a pilot study using rodent kidneys. METHODS: RTCA was performed in kidney biopsies stained with SYTO16/PI and WGA. A score between -3 (100% nonviable) and +3 (100% viable) describes the sum of viable cells divided by the number of nonviable cells per examined area (glomerulus, proximal, and distal tubules). The primary study endpoint was the delayed graft function (DGF). RESULTS: Seventy-one kidney transplant recipients were transplanted. The median recipient and donor age were 58.5 and 57 years, respectively. Cold ischemia time was 13.6 ±â€Š4.7 hours; anastomosis time was 30.8 ±â€Š8.7 minutes (mean ±â€ŠSD). Overall, 23 (33.8%) patients developed DGF. The RTCA score was significantly lower in kidneys developing DGF -0.43 ±â€Š1.78 versus no DGF 0.91 ±â€Š2.17, P = 0.01. The Remuzzi score did not differ between DGF and no DGF, P = 0.13. Remuzzi score and RTCA score correlate inversely significantly; P = 0.004. In the multivariate analysis, solely RTCA score was revealed as a significant independent factor predicting DGF; P = 0.015, Wald = 5.95, odds ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.55 to 0.94. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that RTCA is feasible and clinically meaningful. The RTCA score predicts DGF and is a valid option to be applied in renal transplantation.

Multifactorial White Matter Damage in the Acute Phase and Pre-Existing Conditions May Drive Cognitive Dysfunction after SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Neuropathology-Based Evidence.

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to better understand the mechanisms underlying acute and long-term neurological symptoms after COVID-19. Neuropathological studies can contribute to a better understanding of some of these mechanisms. METHODS: We conducted a detailed postmortem neuropathological analysis of 32 patients who died due to COVID-19 during 2020 and 2021 in Austria. RESULTS: All cases showed diffuse white matter damage with a diffuse microglial activation of a variable severity, including one case of hemorrhagic leukoencephalopathy. Some cases revealed mild inflammatory changes, including olfactory neuritis (25%), nodular brainstem encephalitis (31%), and cranial nerve neuritis (6%), which were similar to those observed in non-COVID-19 severely ill patients. One previously immunosuppressed patient developed acute herpes simplex encephalitis. Acute vascular pathologies (acute infarcts 22%, vascular thrombosis 12%, diffuse hypoxic-ischemic brain damage 40%) and pre-existing small vessel diseases (34%) were frequent findings. Moreover, silent neurodegenerative pathologies in elderly persons were common (AD neuropathologic changes 32%, age-related neuronal and glial tau pathologies 22%, Lewy bodies 9%, argyrophilic grain disease 12.5%, TDP43 pathology 6%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support some previous neuropathological findings of apparently multifactorial and most likely indirect brain damage in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection rather than virus-specific damage, and they are in line with the recent experimental data on SARS-CoV-2-related diffuse white matter damage, microglial activation, and cytokine release.

A case of severe C4d-positive kidney allograft dysfunction in the absence of histomorphologic features of rejection.

Acute antibody-mediated (humoral) renal allograft rejection has emerged as a clinicopathological entity that carries a poor prognosis. Its diagnosis is based on typical pathohistologic features, serologic detection of donor-specific alloantibodies and the immunohistochemical finding of endothelial deposits of the complement split product C4d. We herein report a case of severe antibody-mediated graft injury after spousal-donor kidney transplantation. Despite an increased risk for humoral presensitization in the female recipient (three previous pregnancies), donor-specific alloantibodies were not detectable before transplantation. After initial graft function, severe graft dysfunction occurred one week after transplantation. A renal biopsy revealed no histomorphologic features of rejection. However, immunohistochemical detection of diffuse C4d deposits along peritubular capillaries suggested acute humoral rejection. The diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection was confirmed by the detection of de-novo production of anti-donor alloantibodies. Graft dysfunction was resistant to high dose steroids or antilymphocyte antibody therapy. However, a recovery of graft function could be achieved by antibody elimination using immunoadsorption therapy. This case reinforces the high diagnostic value of C4d staining. In severe graft dysfunction humoral immune mechanisms should be considered, even when histopathologic features of humoral rejection are completely absent.