Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 183(6): 1037-1048, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32286683

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Brodalumab is efficacious for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis through 52 weeks. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of brodalumab through 120 weeks, including following withdrawal and retreatment. METHODS: At baseline, patients were randomized to brodalumab (n = 222) or placebo (n = 220). At week 12, patients achieving a static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1 (sPGA 0/1) with brodalumab were rerandomized to brodalumab (n = 83) or placebo (n = 84; later re-treated with brodalumab if sPGA ≥ 3 occurred), and patients receiving placebo switched to brodalumab (n = 208). Safety was assessed by exposure-adjusted rates of treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: Among those who achieved sPGA 0/1 at week 12 and were rerandomized to brodalumab, 96% and 80% using observed data, respectively, and 74% and 61% using nonresponder imputation, respectively, achieved 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) and PASI 100 at week 120. Following withdrawal from brodalumab, return of disease occurred after a mean ± SD duration of 74·7 ± 50·5 days. Among those who switched from brodalumab to placebo at week 12, PASI 75 rates using observed data and nonresponder imputation were 55% and 51% at week 20, respectively and 94% and 75% at week 120, respectively; PASI 100 rates at week 120 were 75% and 60%, respectively. Efficacy was maintained through week 120 in those receiving brodalumab after placebo. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that brodalumab is efficacious and safe for continuous long-term treatment of psoriasis, and support the potential for response after discontinuation and retreatment.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Psoriasis , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 32(3): 397-402, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29220542

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of apremilast in biologic-naive patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and safety of switching from etanercept to apremilast in the phase 3b LIBERATE trial. METHODS: Two hundred fifty patients were randomized to placebo, apremilast 30 mg BID or etanercept 50 mg QW through Week 16; thereafter, all patients continued or switched to apremilast through Week 104 (extension phase). Skin, scalp and nail involvement at Weeks 16, 52 and 104 were assessed using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI; 0-72), Scalp Physician Global Assessment (ScPGA; 0-5) and Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI; 0-8); patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; 0-32) and pruritus visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm). RESULTS: The apremilast-extension phase (Weeks 16-104) included 226 patients in the placebo/apremilast (n = 73), apremilast/apremilast (n = 74) and etanercept/apremilast (n = 79) groups, and at Week 104, 50.7%, 45.9% and 51.9% of these patients, respectively, maintained ≥75% reduction from baseline in PASI score (based on last-observation-carried-forward analysis). Across treatment groups, ScPGA 0 (clear) or 1 (minimal) was achieved by 50.0%-59.2% of patients; NAPSI mean change from baseline was -48.1% to -51.1%; DLQI score ≤5 was achieved by 66.0%-72.5% of patients; and pruritus VAS mean change from baseline was -24.4 to -32.3. AEs in ≥5% of patients (diarrhoea, nausea, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection and headache) did not increase with prolonged apremilast exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Apremilast demonstrated significant and sustained improvements in skin, scalp, nails and PROs (pruritus and quality of life) over 104 weeks in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Safety was consistent with the known safety profile of apremilast.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 4/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 4/uso terapéutico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 4/administración & dosificación , Placebos , Psoriasis/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Talidomida/uso terapéutico
3.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 31(3): 507-517, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27768242

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Apremilast, an oral, small-molecule phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate efficacy and safety of apremilast vs. placebo in biologic-naive patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and safety of switching from etanercept to apremilast in a phase IIIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT01690299). METHODS: Two hundred and fifty patients were randomized to placebo (n = 84), apremilast 30 mg BID (n = 83) or etanercept 50 mg QW (n = 83) through Week 16; thereafter, all patients continued or switched to apremilast through Week 104. The primary efficacy endpoint was achievement of PASI-75 at Week 16 with apremilast vs. placebo. Secondary endpoints included achievement of PASI-75 at Week 16 with etanercept vs. placebo and improvements in other clinical endpoints vs. placebo at Week 16. Outcomes were assessed through Week 52. This study was not designed for apremilast vs. etanercept comparisons. RESULTS: At Week 16, PASI-75 achievement was greater with apremilast (39.8%) vs. placebo (11.9%; P < 0.0001); 48.2% of patients achieved PASI-75 with etanercept (P < 0.0001 vs. placebo). PASI-75 response was maintained in 47.3% (apremilast/apremilast), 49.4% (etanercept/apremilast) and 47.9% (placebo/apremilast) of patients at Week 52. Most common adverse events (≥5%) with apremilast, including nausea, diarrhoea, upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, tension headache and headache, were mild or moderate in severity; diarrhoea and nausea generally resolved in the first month. No new safety or tolerability issues were observed through Week 52 with apremilast. CONCLUSION: Apremilast demonstrated significant efficacy vs. placebo at Week 16 in biologic-naive patients with psoriasis, which was sustained over 52 weeks, and demonstrated safety consistent with the known safety profile of apremilast. Switching from etanercept to apremilast did not result in any new or clinically significant safety findings, and efficacy was maintained with apremilast through Week 52.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Método Doble Ciego , Etanercept/efectos adversos , Femenino , Cefalea/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nasofaringitis/inducido químicamente , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Dolor/etiología , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 4/uso terapéutico , Prurito/etiología , Psoriasis/complicaciones , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/inducido químicamente , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Evaluación de Síntomas , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/inducido químicamente , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Talidomida/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA