Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 31
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(7)2024 Apr 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38610554

RESUMEN

Screening methods available for colorectal cancer (CRC) to date are burdened by poor reliability and low patient adherence and compliance. An altered pattern of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath has been proposed as a non-invasive potential diagnostic tool for distinguishing CRC patients from healthy controls (HC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of an innovative portable device containing a micro-gas chromatograph in enabling rapid, on-site CRC diagnosis through analysis of patients' exhaled breath. In this prospective trial, breath samples were collected in a tertiary referral center of colorectal surgery, and analysis of the chromatograms was performed by the Biomedical Engineering Department. The breath of patients with CRC and HC was collected into Tedlar bags through a Nafion filter and mouthpiece with a one-way valve. The breath samples were analyzed by an automated portable gas chromatography device. Relevant volatile biomarkers and discriminant chromatographic peaks were identified through machine learning, linear discriminant analysis and principal component analysis. A total of 68 subjects, 36 patients affected by histologically proven CRC with no evidence of metastases and 32 HC with negative colonoscopies, were enrolled. After testing a training set (18 CRC and 18 HC) and a testing set (18 CRC and 14 HC), an overall specificity of 87.5%, sensitivity of 94.4% and accuracy of 91.2% in identifying CRC patients was found based on three VOCs. Breath biopsy may represent a promising non-invasive method of discriminating CRC patients from HC.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Respiratorias , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Humanos , Datos Preliminares , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico
2.
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol ; 27(4): 217-220, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29214888

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gallbladder carcinoma is a rare but aggressive malignant neoplasm. The incidence of intra- or post-operative incidental gallbladder carcinoma diagnosis following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is estimated to be 1-2%. Aggressive re-resection is warranted as the majority of patients have residual disease either in the liver or the lymph nodes. However the use of a minimally invasive surgical approach (MISA) to perform a radicalization in these patients has not been investigated yet. We retrospectively analyzed surgical and oncologic outcome of a small selected cohort of patients with incidental gallbladder carcinoma whom underwent redo radicalization surgery by MISA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From April 2012 to June 2014 at our department six patients (three females and three males) with incidental findings of gallbladder carcinoma pT1b (stage I) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and referred to our center from other secondary-level referral hospitals, underwent a redo surgery for radicalization by means of laparoscopic (n. 3) or robotic approach (n. 3). A retrospective analysis of prospective collected data was performed. RESULTS: The redo procedure consisted of a liver resection (segments IVb + V) and lymph nodes clearance of hepatoduodenal hilum and common hepatic artery. Conversion rate was zero. Median operative time was 290 (250-310) min. Estimate blood loss was 175 (100-350) ml. Total hospital stay was 6 (5-10) days. All liver resections were performed without inflow vascular clamping. One patient was re-operated for hemoperitoneum while peri-operative mortality was zero. Oncologically, an R0 resection was always achieved with a mean number of lymph nodes retrieved of 17,5 (14-22). The stage of the neoplasm was confirmed in all cases but one, who was found to have a pN1 status (stage IIIb). At 21 (6-32) months follow-up all patients are alive and no recurrence has been observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that radicalization of patients with stage I incidental postoperative gallbladder carcinoma can be done by a MISA without compromising the oncologic outcome. Larger studies are needed to validate these results.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tempo Operativo , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
World J Surg ; 39(8): 2052-60, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25813824

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With the advance of modern laparoscopic technology, laparoscopic colorectal surgery and laparoscopic liver surgery are both worldwide accepted. Preliminary brief series have shown the feasibility of combined laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM). We aim to report a large International multicenter series of laparoscopic simultaneous resection of CRC and SCRLM. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2013, 142 laparoscopic liver resections were performed with simultaneous colorectal surgery for SCRLM. The surgical and postoperative variables evaluated were the duration of the intervention, blood loss, transfusion rate, conversion rate, resection margin, specific and overall morbidity, perioperative mortality, length of hospital stay, and survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed examining postoperative morbidity in the all cohort of patients. RESULTS: The median number of liver lesions was 1 (1-9) and the median larger diameter at diagnosis was 28 (2-100) mm. The median operative time was 360 (120-690) min. Seven patients (4.9%) required conversion. The global morbidity was 31.0% and the mortality was 2.1%. After a median follow-up of 29 (1-108) months, 40 patients (28.2%) developed tumor recurrence. Curative treatment of recurrence was possible in 17 patients (12.0%), including a second liver resection in 13 patients (9.1%), which was performed by laparoscopy in 7 patients (4.9%). Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals were 98.8, 82.1, and 71.9%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, ASA score≥3 [OR 13.6 (1.8-99.6); P=0.01] and operative time [OR 1.008 (1.001-1.016); P=0.03] were independent predictors of postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Our combined data show that in experienced centers, simultaneous laparoscopic approach is technically feasible, safe, and associated with good oncological outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/cirugía , Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Hepatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma/secundario , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Surg Endosc ; 28(10): 2973-9, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24853851

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH), although safely feasible in experienced hands and in selected patients, is a formidable challenge because of the technical demands of controlling hemorrhage, sealing bile ducts, avoiding gas embolism, and maintaining oncologic surgical principles. The enhanced surgical dexterity offered by robotic assistance could improve feasibility and/or safety of minimally invasive major hepatectomy. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes of LMH and robotic-assisted major hepatectomy (RMH). METHODS: Pooled data from four Italian hepatobiliary centers were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic data, operative, and postoperative outcomes were collected from prospectively maintained databases and compared. RESULTS: Between January 2009 and December 2012, 25 patients underwent LMH and 25 RMH. The two groups were comparable for all baseline characteristics including type of resection and underlying pathology. Conversion to open surgery was required in one patient in each group (4%). No difference was noted in operative time, estimated blood, and need for allogenic blood transfusions. Intermittent pedicle occlusion was required only in LMH (32% vs. 0; p = 0.004). Length of hospital stay, including time spent in intensive care unit, was similar between the two groups, but patients undergoing LMH showed quicker recovery of bowel activity, with shorter time to first flatus (1 vs. 3 days; p = 0.023) and earlier tolerance to oral liquid diet (1 vs. 2 days; p = 0.001). No difference was noted in complication rate, 90-day mortality, and readmission rate. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective multi-institution study confirms that selected patients can safely undergo minimally invasive major hepatectomy, either LMH or RMH. The fact that intermittent pedicle occlusion could be avoided in RMH suggests improved surgical ability to deal with bleeding during liver transection, but further studies are needed before any final conclusion can be drawn.


Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Robótica , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 117: 109522, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38531290

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Lemmel's syndrome is a rare disease presenting with obstructive jaundice, secondary to common bile duct compression by duodenal diverticulum. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 79-year-old female was admitted to our emergency department with cholangitis and obstructive jaundice, due to choledocal compression by two periampullary diverticula, with major papilla opening near the biggest one (periampullary diverticulum type III). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography didn't succeed sphincterotomy, therefore laparoscopic rendez-vous was performed. DISCUSSION: This case is an example of an unusual cause of obstructive jaundice, which should be mentioned along with choledocolithiasis and biliary or ampullary neoplasms, in order to avoid delay in diagnosis and management. CONCLUSION: The commonest treatment of Lemmel's syndrome reported in literature is ERCP with sphincterotomy, but when endoscopic management fails, interventional radiology and surgery should also be considered.

6.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 117: 109542, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38531291

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Amyand's hernia is a rare type of inguinal hernia which contains vermiform appendix in the inguinal sac, seldom complicated by acute appendicitis. It is usually repaired by open inguinal approach, but laparoscopic technique has been increasingly described in literature; nevertheless, standard of care is far from being defined. Here we report the case of Amyand's hernia complicated by acute appendicitis and simultaneous symptomatic left inguinal hernia, both repaired by laparoscopic technique. CASE PRESENTATION: A 85-years-old man presented with acute appendicitis in Amyand's hernia and simultaneous incarcerated left inguinal hernia. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: After complete preoperative work-up, the patient underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and laparoscopic bilateral hernia repair with mesh. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic approach may be safe and feasible for Amyand's hernia treatment in emergency setting when performed by expert hands, with minimized risk of surgical site infection (SSI), quick recovery and reduced hospital stay. Laparoscopic hernia repair with mesh can be a reasonable approach in selected cases of bilateral or recurrent hernia, and concomitant intrabdominal inflammation, especially when contamination is scarse and limited to a restricted area.

7.
Case Rep Nephrol Dial ; 14(1): 15-19, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38298244

RESUMEN

Introduction: During the last year, the features of peritoneal dialysis patients have changed, and the cases in which there is a need to perform abdominal surgery are growing. Reports of abdominal surgery in patients who are able to continue peritoneal dialysis are increasing. The minimally invasive techniques represent the preferred and safest approach. Such techniques are associated with reduced hospitalization time, less invasiveness, peritoneal integrity preservation, and reduced intra-abdominal inflammation due to regenerative processes. Case Presentation: In this case report, we present a case of major abdominal surgery, in the form of hepatic metastasectomy, performed with the robotic-assisted technique, which allowed catheter and intracorporeal dialysis preservation. The patient showed a strong determination to continue with peritoneal dialysis as long as possible. During the switch to hemodialysis, he performed prophylactic antibiotic therapy to preserve the peritoneal catheter, and the patient was instructed to have a reduced water intake, avoiding excessive ultrafiltration potentially deteriorating the residual renal function. Special care was also taken to avoid any nephrotoxic drug. The peritoneal treatment was restarted after 3 weeks with low volume exchange for the first 10 days, and the pre-surgery dialysis volumes were then re-established. After surgery, the patient showed adequate clearance of solutes and ultrafiltration similar to the preoperative period. The patient did not encounter any wound complications. Conclusion: Robotic surgery represents a further aid in peritoneal dialysis preservation after abdominal surgery. A detailed communication with the patient before performing this kind of procedure and a strong will to preserve the peritoneal method are essential.

8.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(13)2024 Jun 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39001423

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The rising diffusion of vascular resections during complex pancreatectomy for malignancy, for both oncological and technical matters, brought with it the use of vascular shunts, either temporary or definitive, to prevent bowel congestion and liver ischemia. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the technical feasibility of vascular shunts during advanced pancreatic surgery, analyzing intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library Central, according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies published before 2006 were excluded, considering the lack of a standardized definition of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The main outcomes evaluated were the overall complication rate and shunt patency. RESULTS: Among 789 papers retrieved from the database search, only five fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the review, amounting to a total of 145 patients undergoing a shunt creation at the time of pancreatectomy. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was found to be the most common diagnosis and pancreaticoduodenectomy was the main surgical procedure, accounting for 88% and 83% of the overall cohort, respectively. The distal splenorenal shunt was the most performed. Overall, 44 out of 145 patients (30%) experienced postoperative complications; the long-term patency of definitive shunts was 83% (110 out of 120 patients). CONCLUSIONS: An increasing number of patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC are becoming amenable to resection and shunt creation may facilitate vascular resection with clear margins, becoming a valid tool of modern pancreatic surgery.

9.
Updates Surg ; 76(1): 43-55, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37875725

RESUMEN

Despite the increasing trend in liver resections for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases (NCNNLM), the role of surgery for these liver malignancies is still debated. Registries are an essential, reliable tool for assessing epidemiology, diagnosis, and therapeutic approach in a single hub, especially when data are dispersive and inconclusive, as in our case. The dissemination of this preliminary survey would allow us to understand if the creation of an International Registry is a viable option, while still offering a snapshot on this issue, investigating clinical practices worldwide. The steering committee designed an online questionnaire with Google Forms, which consisted of 37 questions, and was open from October 5th, 2022, to November 30th, 2022. It was disseminated using social media and mailing lists of the Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and New Technologies (SICE), the Association of Italian Surgeons in Europe (ACIE), and the Spanish Chapter of the American College of Surgeons (ACS). Overall, 141 surgeons (approximately 18% of the total invitations sent) from 27 countries on four continents participated in the survey. Most respondents worked in general surgery units (62%), performing less than 50 liver resections/year (57%). A multidisciplinary discussion was currently performed to validate surgical indications for NCNNLM in 96% of respondents. The most commonly adopted selection criteria were liver resectability, RECIST criteria, and absence of extrahepatic disease. Primary tumors were generally of gastrointestinal (42%), breast (31%), and pancreaticobiliary origin (13%). The most common interventions were parenchymal-sparing resections (51% of respondents) of metachronous metastases with an open approach. Major post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo > 2) occurred in up to 20% of the procedures, according to 44% of respondents. A subset analysis of data from high-volume centers (> 100 cases/year) showed lower post-operative complications and better survival. The present survey shows that NCNNLM patients are frequently treated by surgeons in low-volume hospitals for liver surgery. Selection criteria are usually based on common sense. Liver resections are performed mainly with an open approach, possibly carrying a high burden of major post-operative complications. International guidelines and a specific consensus on this field are desirable, as well as strategies for collaboration between high-volume and low-volume centers. The present study can guide the elaboration of a multi-institutional document on the optimal pathway in the management of patients with NCNNLM.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Cirujanos , Humanos , Europa (Continente) , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Laparoscopía/métodos , Italia/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía
10.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(11)2024 May 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38893202

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: the role of minimally invasive liver surgery has been progressively developed, with the practice increasing in safety and feasibility also with respect to major liver resections. The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility and safety of major liver resection in elderly patients. METHODS: data from a multicentric retrospective database including 1070 consecutive robotic liver resections in nine European hospital centers were analyzed. Among these, 131 were major liver resections. Patients were also divided in two groups (<65 years old and ≥65 years old) and perioperative data were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: a total of 131 patients were included in the study. Operative time was 332 ± 125 min. Postoperative overall complications occurred in 27.1% of patients. Severe complications (Clavien Dindo ≥ 3) were 9.9%. Hospital stay was 6.6 ± 5.3 days. Patients were divided into two groups based on their age: 75 patients < 65 years old and 56 patients ≥ 65 years old. Prolonged pain, lung infection, intensive care stay, and 90-day readmission were worse in the elderly group. The two groups were matched for ASA and Charlson comorbidity score and, after statistical adjustment, postoperative data were similar between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: robotic major liver resection in elderly patients was associated with satisfying short-term outcomes.

11.
Surg Oncol ; 54: 102081, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729088

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In this article we aimed to perform a subgroup analysis using data from the COVID-AGICT study, to investigate the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancers (PC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The primary endpoint of the study was to find out any difference in the tumoral stage of surgically treated PC patients between 2019 and 2020. Surgical and oncological outcomes of the entire cohort of patients were also appraised dividing the entire peri-pandemic period into six three-month timeframes to balance out the comparison between 2019 and 2020. RESULTS: Overall, a total of 1815 patients were surgically treated during 2019 and 2020 in 14 Italian surgical Units. In 2020, the rate of patients treated with an advanced pathological stage was not different compared to 2019 (p = 0.846). During the pandemic, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) has dropped significantly (6.2% vs 21.4%, p < 0.001) and, for patients who didn't undergo NCT, the latency between diagnosis and surgery was shortened (49.58 ± 37 days vs 77.40 ± 83 days, p < 0.001). During 2020 there was a significant increase in minimally invasive procedures (p < 0.001). The rate of postoperative complication was the same in the two years but during 2020 there was an increase of the medical ones (19% vs 16.1%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The post-pandemic dramatic modifications in healthcare provision, in Italy, did not significantly impair the clinical history of PC patients receiving surgical resection. The present study is one of the largest reports available on the argument and may provide the basis for long-term analyses.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pronóstico , Pandemias
12.
Surg Endosc ; 27(6): 1881-6, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23247741

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Standard oncologic liver resections performed on elderly patients (≥70 years old) have been shown to be safe and effective. The aim of this study was to analyze operative and oncologic short-term outcomes of totally laparoscopic liver resections (TLLR) performed on elderly patients for malignancies. METHODS: We performed a retrospective statistical analysis of prospectively recorded data of TLLR performed from October 2008 to February 2012 by a single hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups according to age (<70 vs. ≥ 70 years old) and perioperative outcomes were compared. RESULT: A total of 60 TLLR for malignancies were identified of which 25 patients (42 %) were aged ≥ 70 years (Group A) and 35 (58 %) were aged <70 years (Group B). There was no difference in operative time (170 vs. 180 min, p = 0.267), median blood loss (200 vs. 250 ml, p = 0.183), number and time of Pringle maneuver (p = 0.563 and p = 0.180), blood transfusion rate (4 vs. 17 %, p = 0.222), conversion rate (4 vs. 9 %, p = 0.443), morbidity rate (12 vs. 20 %, p = 0.797), and perioperative mortality rate (0 vs. 3 %, p = 0.688). An R0 resection was achieved in 92 (Group A) versus 83 % (Group B) (p = 0.265). At a median follow-up of 18 months, 12 % of patients in Group A experienced a disease recurrence with a related mortality rate similar to that of Group B (8 vs. 12 %, p = 0.375). CONCLUSION: This retrospective comparative study shows that TLLR performed on elderly for liver neoplasm are feasible and safe and lead to short-term outcomes similar to those of younger patients.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Hepatectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hepatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(23)2023 Nov 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38067233

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To date, no standardized protocols nor a quantitative assessment of the near-infrared fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green (NIR-ICG) are available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the timing of fluorescence as a reproducible parameter and its efficacy in predicting anastomotic leakage (AL) in colorectal surgery. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 108 patients undergoing minimally invasive elective procedures for colorectal cancer was prospectively enrolled. The difference between macro and microperfusion (ΔT) was obtained by calculating the timing of fluorescence at the level of iliac artery division and colonic wall, respectively. RESULTS: Subjects with a ΔT ≥ 15.5± 0.5 s had a higher tendency to develop an AL (p < 0.01). The ΔT/heart rate interaction was found to predict AL with an odds ratio of 1.02 (p < 0.01); a cut-off threshold of 832 was identified (sensitivity 0.86, specificity 0.77). Perfusion parameters were also associated with a faster bowel motility resumption and a reduced length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the timing of fluorescence provides a quantitative, easy evaluation of tissue perfusion. A ΔT/HR interaction ≥832 may be used as a real-time parameter to guide surgical decision making in colorectal surgery.

14.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2023(6): rjad360, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37388510

RESUMEN

Acinar cystic transformation (ACT), also known as 'acinar cell cystadenoma', is an uncommon cystic neoplasm of pancreas with unknown malignant potential. This case regards a woman with symptomatic pancreatic head ACT, revealed with pathological exam of specimen after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A 57-years-old patient presented mild hyperbilirubinemia and recurrent cholangitis; she underwent to ERCP, EUS and MRI, and these exams revealed a large cyst of the pancreatic head that caused biliary compression. The discussion of the case by the multidisciplinary group indicated surgical resection. Pancreatic ACT is so rare, and its preoperative diagnosis is difficult. The symptoms of the patients and the features of the cyst are the criteria to choose a surgical resection.

15.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2023(3): rjad145, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36998264

RESUMEN

Solid pseudopapillary tumour is a rare low-grade malignant potential carcinoma of the pancreas that typically occurs in females in their third decade. It most commonly occurs in the tail of the pancreas, although any site can be affected. Surgical resection is the standard treatment and offers an excellent prognosis. We report a case of a 17-year-old female with an acute onset abdominal pain and a radiological diagnosis of a cystic lesion in the distal pancreas. A robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy was performed. Robotic-assisted surgery is an emerging technique for the treatment of pancreatic neoplasms. This approach can be considered for younger patients, thanks to the potential advantages of the robotic Da Vinci Xi System.

16.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 33(6): 579-585, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37130329

RESUMEN

Background: A preliminary analysis from the COVID-Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgical Treatment (AGICT) study showed that the rate of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for elective and urgent procedures did not decrease during the pandemic year. In this article, we aimed to perform a subgroup analysis using data from the COVID-AGICT study to evaluate the trend of MIS during the COVID-19 pandemic period in Italy. Methods: This study was conducted collecting data of MIS patients from the COVID-AGICT database. The primary endpoint was to demonstrate whether the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic scenario reduced MIS for elective treatment of gastrointestinal cancer (GIC) in Italy in 2020. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the impact of the pandemic period on perioperative outcomes in the MIS group. Results: In the pandemic year, 62% of patients underwent surgery with a minimally invasive approach, compared to 63% in 2019 (P = .23). In 2020, the proportion of patients undergoing elective MIS decreased compared to the previous year (80% versus 82%, P = .04), and the rate of urgent MIS did not differ between the 2 years (31% and 33% in 2019 and 2020 - P = .66). Colorectal cancer was less likely to be treated with MIS approach during 2020 (78% versus 75%, P < .001). Conversely, the rate of MIS pancreatic resection was higher in 2020 (28% versus 22%, P < .002). Conversion to an open approach was lower in 2020 (7.2% versus 9.2% - P = .01). Major postoperative complications were similar in both years (11% versus 11%, P = .9). Conclusion: In conclusion, although MIS for elective treatment of GIC in Italy was reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic period, our study revealed that the overall proportion of MIS (elective and urgent) and postoperative outcomes were comparable to the prepandemic period. ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT04686747).


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Humanos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Surg Oncol ; 47: 101907, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36924550

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This Italian multicentric retrospective study aimed to investigate the possible changes in outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: Our primary endpoint was to determine whether the pandemic scenario increased the rate of patients with colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers resected at an advanced stage in 2020 compared to 2019. Considering different cancer staging systems, we divided tumors into early stages and advanced stages, using pathological outcomes. Furthermore, to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical outcomes, perioperative data of both 2020 and 2019 were also examined. RESULTS: Overall, a total of 8250 patients, 4370 (53%) and 3880 (47%) were surgically treated during 2019 and 2020 respectively, in 62 Italian surgical Units. In 2020, the rate of patients treated with an advanced pathological stage was not different compared to 2019 (P = 0.25). Nevertheless, the analysis of quarters revealed that in the second half of 2020 the rate of advanced cancer resected, tented to be higher compared with the same months of 2019 (P = 0.05). During the pandemic year 'Charlson Comorbidity Index score of cancer patients (5.38 ± 2.08 vs 5.28 ± 2.22, P = 0.036), neoadjuvant treatments (23.9% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.001), rate of urgent diagnosis (24.2% vs 20.3%, P < 0.001), colorectal cancer urgent resection (9.4% vs. 7.37, P < 0.001), and the rate of positive nodes on the total nodes resected per surgery increased significantly (7 vs 9% - 2.02 ± 4.21 vs 2.39 ± 5.23, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic did not influence the pathological stage of colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers at the time of surgery, our study revealed that the pandemic scenario negatively impacted on several perioperative and post-operative outcomes.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía
18.
World J Surg ; 36(8): 1738-43, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22484570

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The goal of the present study was to evaluate the effects of preoperative oral carbohydrate supplementation (OCH) on the postoperative metabolic stress response of patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. METHODS: The study was designed as a controlled, prospective, cohort study including 38 patients treated with OCH (800 mL the day before surgery and 400 mL within 3 h before the induction of anesthesia) and 38 controls matched for surgical procedure. Fasting glucose, insulin, insulin resistance (HOMA-IR index), cortisol, and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were assessed before and after surgery (postoperative day (POD) 1, 2, and 3). RESULTS: The administration of OCH resulted in lower fasting glucose, HOMA-IR index, cortisol, and IL-6 on both POD 1 and POD 2. At multivariable regression analyses, the reduction of these parameters was independent of sex, age, body mass index, and major abdominal surgery. Particularly, models including OCH treatment explained 70, 63, and 66 % of the variance of the increase in IL-6 levels at POD 1, POD 2, and POD 3, respectively. The effect of OCH on changes in glucose, insulin resistance, and cortisol on POD 1 and POD 2 disappeared after the inclusion of IL-6 in the models. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with OCH was associated with attenuation of the postoperative metabolic stress response. We hypothesize that modulation of the inflammatory response is one of the mechanisms involved.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Carbohidratos/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Resistencia a la Insulina/fisiología , Administración Oral , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Glucemia/metabolismo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Ayuno/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/metabolismo , Inflamación/metabolismo , Insulina/metabolismo , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Laparoscopía , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/metabolismo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Periodo Posoperatorio , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Prospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
19.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 95: 107245, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35661496

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Burned-out testicular cancer is a rare phenomenon to be taken into account for differential diagnosis in males presenting with retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 54-years-old male complaining of abdominal pain over the past several months was found on CT to have a large mass adjacent to the inferior vena cava, with the imaging features of a malignant lymphadenopathy. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The hematologist who evaluated the case suggested a biopsy of the retroperitoneal mass: a seminoma was diagnosed on pathological examination. Then a testicular US revealed a focal peripheral hypoechoic region with no associated internal vascularization within the right testicle. CONCLUSION: This case report highlights the need for routine scrotal examination in all men presenting with an abdominal mass in order to rule out the possibility of an intra-abdominal seminoma.

20.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 93: 106925, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35279522

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Dunbar syndrome is a rare disorder due to the external compression of the celiac trunk by the median arcuate ligament. The symptoms include abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting with a significative reduction in patients' quality of life. Laparoscopy has proven to be a safe procedure. The aim of this study is to present a case of Dunbar syndrome undergoing laparoscopic surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 40-year-old male patient presented at Emergency Room with upper abdominal pain and dyspepsia, related to food intake. A selective arteriography of the celiac trunk revealed stenosis due to compression of the celiac artery. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Laparoscopic decompression of the celiac trunk by the median arcuate ligament was performed. Postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the 5th postoperative day. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgical division of the arcuate ligament is feasible and safe and it can restore patients' quality of life.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA