Population-based study of the sensitivity of axillary ultrasound imaging in the preoperative staging of node-positive invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative staging of the axilla is important to allow decisions regarding neoadjuvant treatment and the management of the axilla. Invasive lobular carcinoma metastases are difficult to detect because of the infiltrative pattern of the nodal spread. In this study the sensitivity of preoperative axillary staging between invasive lobular (ILC) and ductal (IDC) carcinoma was compared. METHODS: All women diagnosed with pure ILC or IDC in the West of Scotland in 2012-2014 were identified from a database maintained prospectively within the Managed Clinical Network. Pretreatment axillary ultrasound imaging (AUS), core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) results were compared between ILC and IDC. RESULTS: Some 602 women with ILC and 4199 with IDC had undergone axillary surgery, of whom 209 and 1402 respectively had nodal metastases. Pretreatment AUS sensitivity was significantly lower in ILC than in IDC (32·1 versus 50·1 per cent respectively, P < 0·001; OR 0·47, 95 per cent c.i. 0·34 to 0·64). Core biopsy had equally high sensitivity of 86 per cent in both subtypes; however, FNAC was significantly less sensitive in both ILC (55 per cent; P = 0·003) and IDC (75·6 per cent; P = 0·006). Multivariable analysis revealed that cT3-4 status and symptomatic presentation were both significant in predicting nodal metastasis in patients with ILC and false-negative AUS findings (OR 3·77, 95 per cent c.i. 1·69 to 8·42, P = 0·001; and OR 1·92, 1·24 to 2·98, P = 0·003, respectively). CONCLUSION: AUS is inferior in detecting axillary node metastasis in ILC compared with IDC. Women with cT3-4 lobular carcinoma may benefit from ultrasound-guided axillary biopsy regardless of the ultrasonographic appearance of the nodes.

Routine four-quadrant cavity shaving at the time of wide local excision for breast cancer reduces re-excision rate.

INTRODUCTION: Breast conservation therapy (BCT) has been shown to have comparable long-term survival outcomes when compared with mastectomy. Clearance of excision margin is one of the mainstays of the surgical treatment, which if not achieved at the first operation of BCT results in the need for subsequent surgery. METHODS: This study evaluated the impact of routinely taken cavity shavings on re-excision rates. This retrospective two-centre study describes the use of routine four-quadrant cavity shaving in 449 patients with consecutively treated with wide local excision for invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ. RESULTS: The overall incomplete excision rate was 10.6%. Routine cavity shaving prevented the need for re-excision in 84 patients (18.7%) and identified the need for further re-excision in 33 patients (7.3%). Median time from surgery to radiotherapy was 50 days (range 13-209) for non-re-excised patients versus 78 days (range 47-260) for re-excised patients (p<0.001). Median time to chemotherapy (n=75) was 44 days (range 14-106) for non-re-excised patients versus 56 days (range 35-116) for re-excised patients (p=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that routine cavity shaving decreases re-excision rate in patients treated with wide local excision and prevents delays to adjuvant treatment due to incomplete excision.

Ten-year follow-up of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The oncological safety of skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) followed by immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is debated owing to a presumed compromise in the completeness of mastectomy. Current evidence is poor as it is based mostly on short-term follow-up data from highly selected patients. METHODS: A prospectively maintained institutional database was searched to identify patients who underwent SSM and IBR between 1995 and 2000. A retrospective review of medical records was carried out, including only patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. During this time all patients treated with mastectomy were offered IBR regardless of tumour stage. RESULTS: Follow-up data from 253 consecutive patients with IBR were reviewed. Patients with incomplete follow-up data and those undergoing SSM for recurrent disease following previous lumpectomy were disregarded, leaving 207 for analysis. Offering IBR to all women requiring mastectomy resulted in a large proportion of patients with advanced disease. During a median follow-up of 119 months, 17 (8·2 per cent) locoregional, six (2·9 per cent) local and 22 (10·6 per cent) distant recurrences were detected; the overall recurrence rate was 39 (18·8 per cent). Overall recurrence rate was associated with axillary lymph node metastasis (P = 0·009), higher stage (P < 0·001) and higher tumour grade (P = 0·031). The breast cancer-specific survival rate was 90·8 per cent (19 of 207 women died from recurrence). CONCLUSION: Based on these long-term follow-up data, SSM combined with IBR is an oncologically safe treatment option regardless of tumour stage.

Impact of national guidelines on family history breast cancer surveillance.

The breast cancer risk of women already under family history surveillance was accurately assessed according to national guidelines in an attempt to rationalize the service. Women attending two breast units in Glasgow between November 2003 and February 2005 were included. One thousand and five women under annual surveillance were assessed and had their relatives diagnoses verified. Four hundred and ninety-seven women were at significantly increased risk and eligible for follow-up. Five hundred and eight (50%) women attending were not eligible for family history surveillance, and 498 (98%) of these women accepted discharge. In conclusion, national guidelines have helped to more clearly define women who should undergo surveillance. This avoids unnecessary and potentially harmful routine investigations, and the service has been improved.

The effect of postoperative complications on survival and recurrence after surgery for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review investigated the impact of complications on long term outcomes for patients with primary invasive operable breast cancer. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using appropriate keywords, and meta-analysis using a random effects model completed. RESULTS: Ten retrospective cohort studies, including 37,657 patients were included. Five studies identified a relationship between wound complications, infection and pyrexia and recurrence or recurrence-free survival. Risk of recurrence, 1-year and 5-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival were related to complications, particularly for patients with poor Nottingham Prognostic Index. Five studies failed to demonstrate a relationship between complications and prognosis. Complication was found to significantly affect 5-year recurrence-free survival (HR 1.48 95 % CI 1.02-2.14, p = 0.04) but not recurrence (HR 2.39, 95 %CI 0.94-6.07, p = 0.07), with a high degree of heterogeneity amongst analysed studies (I2 = 95 %). DISCUSSION: Further research is needed to quantify the effects of postoperative complication on prognosis following surgery for breast cancer.

Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery is oncologically safe when compared to wide local excision and mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Support for the oncological safety of oncoplastic breast conservation surgery (OBCS) is mostly based on evidence comparing recurrence rates after OBCS to wide local excision (WLE). However, OBCS is often indicated for larger cancers and oncological results should also be compared to patients treated with mastectomy. In this study we compared recurrence and survival following OBCS, mastectomy and WLE. METHODS: Patients treated with OBCS between 2009 and 2012 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. For comparison, consecutive patients treated with WLE or mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction (Ms ± IR) over the same time period were identified. Histological variables of patients were compared using Fisher Exact or Chi squared tests, and recurrence and survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression survival analysis. RESULTS: 980 patients' data were analysed (OBCS: n = 104; WLE: n = 558; Ms ± IR: n = 318). Tumour size, grade, nodal status, ER, and PR expression of patients treated with OBCS were all significantly more adverse compared with patients treated with WLE (p < 0.001). These histological variables were similar in patients treated with Ms ± IR and OBCS. 5-year local recurrence rates were similar in all three groups (WLE: 3.4 per cent, OBCS: 2 per cent, Ms ± IR: 2.6 per cent; log rank = 0.973), while distant recurrence rates were higher after Ms ± IR and OBCS (Ms ± IR:13.1 per cent, OBCS:7.5 per cent, WLE:3.3 per cent; log rank: p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: OBCS is oncologically safe in patients even when histological results are similar to patients treated with Ms ± IR.

Serum inhibitor activity of granulocyte-macrophage colony formation in patients with cancer.

The serum inhibitor activities of granulocyte-macrophage colony formation were evaluated by the in vitro culture technique in 60 patients with cancer and control subjects including 24 normal adults and 27 patients with a variety of nonneoplastic disorders. The inhibitor activity in cancer patients (mean, 59%) was significantly higher (p less than 0.001) than was that in normal adults (mean, 31%) and patients with nonneoplastic diseases (mean 36%). There was no difference in the inhibitor activity between the latter two groups of subjects. There was no correlation between the serum inhibitor activity in cancer patients and the histological type or primary site of tumor, the estimated duration of extent of disease, and serum albumin levels. Preliminary observations indicated that the inhibitor activity may be associated with serum lipoproteins. There was no significant difference in serum colony-stimulating activity among cancer patients, normal subjects, and patients with nonneoplastic diseases.

Epirubicin at two dose levels with prednisolone as treatment for advanced breast cancer: the results of a randomized trial.

Two hundred eleven patients with advanced breast cancer were randomized to receive either epirubicin (E) 50 mg/m2 and prednisolone (LEP) or E 100 mg/m2 and prednisolone (HEP). The intended treatment consisted of 16 courses of LEP or eight courses of HEP given at 3-weekly intervals. Reasons for stopping treatment early included progressive disease, stable disease without symptomatic improvement, or severe toxicity deemed intolerable by either the patient or physician. Toxicity was recorded at 3-weekly and response at 9-weekly intervals using the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria of response and toxicity. Two hundred nine patients were eligible for analysis, 98% of whom have been followed for more than a year. One hundred four patients received LEP and 105 HEP. Significantly worse myelosuppression, alopecia, nausea and vomiting, and mucositis were seen in the high-dose arm (P less than or equal to .001). More patients in the LEP arm stopped treatment before the fourth course than in the HEP arm, and the commonest reason for stopping was progressive disease. A similar median number of courses was given in each arm. There was a significantly higher response in the HEP arm (HEP - complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] = 41%, LEP - CR + PR = 23%). Despite this, no statistically significant differences was seen in overall survival or progression-free interval. The median survival for HEP and LEP was 44 and 46 weeks, respectively.

How to compare the oncological safety of oncoplastic breast conservation surgery - To wide local excision or mastectomy?

BACKGROUND: Comparative studies suggest that patients treated with oncoplastic breast conservation surgery (OBCS) have similar pathology to patients treated with wide local excision (WLE). However, patients treated with OBCS have never been compared to patients treated with mastectomy. The aim of this study was to identify which control group was comparable to patients undergoing OBCS. METHODS: Commonly reported histopathological variables of patients treated with OBCS, WLE or mastectomy ± immediate reconstruction (Ms ± IR) were compared using Fisher Exact or Chi squared tests. RESULTS: 1000 patients' data were analysed (OBCS: n = 119; WLE: n = 600; Ms ± IR: n = 281). Tumour size was significantly bigger after OBCS than WLE (p < 0.001), but similar to Ms ± IR (p = 0.138). Tumour grade was higher after OBCS than WLE (p < 0.001), but similar to Ms ± IR (p = 0.497). More axillary nodes were involved in patients with OBCS than WLE (p < 0.001), but comparable to Ms ± IR (p = 0.175). ER and PR expressions were lower after OBCS compared to WLE (p = 0.007, p = 0.009), but identical to Ms ± IR (p = 1, p = 0.904 respectively). Differences in application of systemic (neo)adjuvant therapy followed the above trend. CONCLUSION: Striking similarities found between OBCS and mastectomy patients' histopathological results are in sharp contrast with previously published data. This study suggests that oncological outcomes following OBCS should be compared to mastectomy besides WLE.

Distribution of doxorubicin to normal breast and tumour tissue in patients undergoing mastectomy.

Response to cytotoxic agents is assumed to be related to the concentration of drug achieved within tumour tissue. It is also often assumed that, given similar tissue concentrations of drug, normal tissues are less responsive to the same cytotoxic agents. This can partly be explained by the number of cells in normal tissues that are differentiated. These non dividing cells, in a stable testing phase of the cell cycle (G0) are less susceptible to cytotoxic damage. Little is actually known about the relationship between tumour drug concentrations and those in the tissue of the tumour-bearing organ. In this study, we compared doxorubicin concentrations in paired samples of tumour and normal breast tissue from 17 previously untreated women undergoing mastectomy. The relative cellularities of both specimens were estimated by measuring their DNA content. There was wide variation in intra-tumoural doxorubicin concentrations (range, 220-1,590 ng/g). Normal tissue also showed marked inter-patient variation (range, 81-1,000 ng/g). For a single patient the tumour drug concentrations were significantly higher than those in normal breast tissue (P less than 0.05), and tumour: normal tissue ratios ranged from 1.27 to 8.30. Where doxorubicin concentration was expressed in terms of the relative cellularity of the tissues, there was no significant difference between, drug concentrations in the tumour and those in normal breast tissue (tumour: normal ratios, 1.1:1.8). There was a significant correlation (r = 0.76, P less than 0.05) between peak serum values and tumour concentrations of drug. No correlation was found between drug concentrations achieved and the histological grade or oestrogen receptor status of the breast cancer.

Psychological morbidity in the first year after breast surgery.

In this prospective study, the psychological morbidity associated with the treatment of breast cancer was assessed. The study population comprised all patients referred to one centre with a recently diagnosed breast lump, who were to undergo surgery. Psychological morbidity was assessed preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively by modified Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. Three hundred and twenty patients completed all three questionnaires: 93 women undergoing mastectomy, 73 women having conservation therapy for breast cancer and 156 women having biopsy for benign breast disease. Patients with a breast malignancy smaller than 4 cm in diameter were treated by lumpectomy and radiotherapy, anti-oestrogen therapy or chemotherapy alone or in combination. Psychological morbidity among patients with malignant disease was significantly greater than that seen in the group with benign disease. Among cancer patients, a significant decrease in anxiety and depression occurred during the year following surgery. The study failed to demonstrate any psychological advantage associated with breast conservation.

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast -- among factors predicting for recurrence, distance from the nipple is important.

AIMS: To assess local and systemic recurrence rates and factors predicting for recurrence in patients treated for ductal carcinoma of the breast (DCIS). METHODS: Patients with DCIS treated between January 1986 and January 1997 were identified. All pathology specimens were reviewed. DCIS type, lesion size, nuclear grade and margin clearance were assessed. Mammograms were reviewed and mammographic patterns, size, type of lesion and distance from the nipple were measured. Treatments and subsequent outcomes were established by case note review. Factors predicting for recurrence were analysed by both univariant and multivariant analysis. RESULTS: Of the 220 patients, 153 (70%) had breast-conserving surgery. Sixty-seven (30%) had a mastectomy. Ninety-seven patients had adjuvant therapy of which 22 had radiotherapy alone, 54 had tamoxifen alone and 21 had radiotherapy and tamoxifen. Following mastectomy, two patients developed axillary recurrences. Following breast-conserving surgery 20 (13%) patients developed local recurrences, of which one developed systemic disease and died from breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Mammographic nipple to lesion distance of <40 mm and high/intermediate nuclear grade were the only factors found to increase the likelihood of recurrence.

Gastric necrosis and perforation following splenectomy for massive splenomegaly.

Ischaemia of the greater curve of the stomach is a possible complication of splenectomy. We describe a case in which ischaemia resulted in necrosis and perforation of the stomach in a patient after splenectomy for massive splenomegaly. There are no previously reported cases in the literature.

Quality of information reporting in studies of standard and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery.

The aim of this systematic review was to establish the completeness of reporting of key patient, tumour, treatment, and outcomes information in the randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) of standard breast-conserving surgery (sBCS) considered to be the 'gold-standard', and to compare this with the reporting of the same key criteria for all published studies of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (oBCS). Pubmed (1966 to 1st April 2013), Ovid MEDLINE (1966 to 1st April 2013), EMBASE (1980 to 1st April 2013), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Issue 4, 2013) were searched separately for the following terms: (i) 'oncoplastic AND breast AND surgery'; and (ii) 'therapeutic AND mammaplasty'. Only English language and full text articles were reviewed. Following a pilot evaluation of all studies, key reporting criteria were identified. 16 RCTs of sBCS (n = 11,767 patients) were included, and 53 studies met the inclusion criteria for oncoplastic BCS (n = 3236 patients), none of which were RCTs. No study reported all of the criteria identified, with a mean of 64% of key criteria (range, 55-75%) reported in studies of sBCS, and 54% of criteria (range, 10-85%) reported in studies of oBCS. It is therefore evident that there is much room for improvement in the quality of reporting is BCS studies. Standards are proposed to give future studies of BCS a framework for reporting key information and outcomes.

Use of boost radiotherapy in oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery - a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The use of local boost radiotherapy to the tumour bed has been demonstrated in randomised-controlled trials to reduce local recurrence rates following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and is the standard of care. Oncoplastic BCS techniques with parenchymal rearrangement present new challenges to the localisation of the tumour bed and therefore delivery of local boost radiotherapy. The aim of this review was to evaluate the reporting of boost radiotherapy in the oncoplastic BCS literature. METHODS: Pubmed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for studies reporting oncoplastic BCS using volume displacement techniques. RESULTS: 24 studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 1933 patients). Use of boost radiotherapy was reported in 11 studies, in 2 of which it was for the treatment of incomplete or close margins, and marking of the tumour bed was only reported in 8 studies. None of the studies reported the number of patients where the tumour bed could not be localised. CONCLUSIONS: The use of local boost radiotherapy and tumour bed marking was not reported in the majority of studies of oncoplastic BCS. Future studies need to provide detailed information regarding the use of boost radiotherapy and difficulties determining the target volume so that current radiotherapy approaches can be reviewed and improved for these advanced techniques.

Oncoplastic breast conservation does not lead to a delay in the commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: There is hardly any evidence that oncoplastic breast conservation surgery (OBCS) does not lead to a delay in the commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy. Although this is an integral part of overall oncological safety, no controlled studies have been published so far. Therefore, our aim was to determine whether OBCS led to a delay when compared to simple wide local excision (WLE), mastectomy (Ms) or mastectomy with immediate reconstruction (MsIR). METHODS: Breast cancer patients who required adjuvant chemotherapy after OBCS, WLE, Ms and MsIR were identified from prospectively maintained institutional databases. Time between multidisciplinary team decision to offer chemotherapy and delivery of first cycle of chemotherapy was measured and compared among the four groups of patients. RESULTS: time to chemotherapy of breast cancer patients (n = 169) treated with OBCS (n = 31) were 29 [16-58] days, while it was 29.5 [15-105] days after WLE (n = 66), 29 [15-57] days after Ms (n = 56) and 31 [15-58] days after MsIR (n = 16). A combined analysis involving all four groups demonstrated no statistically significant difference (p = 0.524). Similarly, inter-group analysis revealed no significant differences in between patients treated with OBCS compared to any of the three control groups (OBCS to WLE: p = 0.433; OBCS to Ms: p = 0.800; OBCS to MsIR: p = 0.405). CONCLUSION: OBCS seems as safe as WLE, Ms or MsIR in terms of delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy, and, therefore, should not adversely affect breast cancer outcome in this respect.

Systematic review of day surgery for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, breast cancer surgery has become less invasive and potentially suitable for day surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to establish the benefits and disadvantages of day surgery for breast cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of the Cochrane Library, Medline, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO was carried out. All relevant papers were assessed for their methodological quality using a checklist designed to assess both randomised and non-randomised studies with specific questions added to address outcome measures. RESULTS: No randomised controlled trials were found in literature. Eleven observational studies were included. The rate of discharge after day surgery was universally high with very low acute readmission rates. Intractable vomiting, patient anxiety and pain control were the main reasons for failing discharge. Patient satisfaction with day surgery was high and psychological recovery was quicker, however, majority of the studies did not use validated questionnaires. The hospital costs were lower for day surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Day surgery for breast cancer is safe, with equivalent complication rates, but there is lack of evidence from randomised controlled trials. Patient satisfaction and psychological well-being is high. Further trials with validated questionnaires are required to confirm this.

Postoperative urinary retention in general surgical patients.

A prospective study has been performed to measure the incidence of postoperative urinary retention in 280 general surgical patients. Eighteen patients (6 per cent) were catheterized after a range of operations under general anaesthesia. There was no statistical difference in the retention rate between men and women. Increasing age did not predispose to retention of urine. Of 72 patients who had either herniorrhaphy, haemorrhoidectomy or testicular operations, only 1 was catheterized, whereas 16 (23 per cent) of 70 patients undergoing laparotomy were catheterized. Most of these laparotomy patients had upper abdominal procedures carried out. Those having lower abdominal operations were usually catheterized pre-operatively and were excluded from the study. There was a significantly higher incidence of retention among patients who had long anaesthetics (greater than 60 min). There was also a significantly higher incidence of retention among those who were ventilated, relaxed and reversed by atropine and neostigmine. Of those 193 patients who had opiate analgesia, 15 (8 per cent) developed retention of urine, compared with 3 (3 per cent) of the 87 patients who had non-opiate analgesia. There was a significantly higher retention rate among the patients who had opiate analgesia by intravenous infusion compared with those who had opiates by intramuscular bolus injection; 7 patients had painful and 11 had painless retention. This study suggests that postoperative retention of urine is a result more commonly of diminished awareness of bladder sensation, than of factors such as anxiety or local pain.

An investigation into digital imaging in assessing cosmetic outcome after breast surgery.

This study investigates post-operative photographic assessment in determining the cosmetic outcome of 74 breast cancer patients who underwent a breast lumpectomy and radiotherapy. Using 10 of these patients picked at random, comparison was made between a conventional photographic print, a print produced from a digital image, and a digital image viewed on a computer screen in terms of personal preference for clinical assessment. The cosmetic outcome scores obtained on the basis of these images were compared with cosmetic outcome scores obtained by direct observation both by the clinician and by the patient. In the analysis of image preference, conventional prints scored highest, but each of the image types was considered to be acceptable for assessing breast cosmesis. Statistical analysis of the cosmetic outcome scores proved that there was a significant correlation between the scores obtained from the images and the scores obtained by direct observation both by the clinician and by the patient.