CD73 Is an Immunometabolic Biomarker of Poor Prognosis in Patients With Primary Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Hematologic Malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Impaired immunity may drive the increased incidence and aggression of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) in patients with hematologic malignancy; however, precise mechanisms and prognostic biomarkers remain undefined. CD73 maintains elevated immunosuppressive adenosine levels and is associated with poor prognosis in several tumor microenvironments. OBJECTIVE: Identify poor outcome biomarkers in patients with cSCC and hematologic malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Differentially expressed genes in tumors from patients with hematologic malignancy experiencing good (n = 8) versus poor (n = 7) outcomes were identified by NanoString analysis. Results were validated at the protein level using CD73 immunohistochemistry in cSCC patients with (n = 38) and without (n = 29) hematologic malignancy. RESULTS: Forty-eight genes were differentially expressed in tumors from patients with hematologic malignancy experiencing good versus poor outcomes. CD73 gene expression was >2-fold higher in patients with poor versus good outcomes or normal skin. Significantly increased CD73 protein levels were observed in cSCC tumors with poor versus good outcomes from patients with hematologic malignancies (p < .01), whereas no differences were noted in tumors with poor versus good outcomes from patients without hematologic malignancies (p = .49). CONCLUSION: CD73 is highly expressed in poor prognosis cSCC from patients with hematologic malignancy and may represent a useful biomarker and potential therapeutic target.

Defining and quantifying histopathologic risk factors for regional and distant metastases in a large cohort of vulvar squamous cell carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (vSCC) is a rare tumor with a good prognosis when treated at a localized stage. However, once regional/distant metastasis occurs, vSCC can be rapidly fatal. Thus, it is important to identify tumor prognostic features so that high-risk cases can be prioritized for further diagnostic workup and treatment. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of regional/distant metastasis at presentation and sentinel lymph node status for vSCC based on histopathologic characteristics. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 15,188 adult vSCC cases from the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2012 to 2019. RESULTS: We provide specific estimates of the risk of clinically positive nodes and metastatic disease at presentation and sentinel lymph node positivity according to tumor size, moderate/poor tumor differentiation, and lymph-vascular invasion. These histopathologic factors were all significantly associated with the tested clinical outcomes in a multivariable analysis. Moderate (hazard ratio, 1.190; P < .001) and poor differentiation (hazard ratio, 1.204; P < .001) and lymph-vascular invasion (hazard ratio, 1.465; P < .001) were also associated with significantly poorer overall survival. LIMITATIONS: Data on disease-specific survival not available in the data set. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the association of the histopathologic characteristics of vSCC with clinically important outcomes. These data may provide individualized information when discussing diagnostic/treatment recommendations, particularly regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy. These data may also guide future staging and risk stratification efforts for vSCC.

Gender Differences in Clinical Practice and Medicare Reimbursement Among Mohs Surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Medicare reimbursement and clinical activity between male and female dermatologic surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment data from 2018 was performed for all dermatologists performing MMS. Provider gender, place of service, number of services, and average payment per service was recorded for all relevant procedure codes. RESULTS: Women represented 31.5% of the 2,581 surgeons who performed MMS in 2018. Women were paid significantly less than men (mean difference, -$73,033). On average, women performed 123 fewer cases than their male counterparts. When surgeons were stratified by productivity, remuneration was the same. CONCLUSION: Remuneration from CMS was disparate between male and female dermatologic surgeons, which may be attributed to submission of fewer charges by women. Further efforts are necessary to better evaluate and address causes for this discrepancy, because greater parity of opportunity and pay would greatly benefit this subspecialty of dermatology.

Assessing Rates of Positive Surgical Margins After Standard Excision of Vulvar Melanomas.

BACKGROUND: Vulvar melanoma is a rare malignancy with frequent recurrence and poor prognosis. National guidelines recommend wide local excision of these tumors with allowances for narrower margins for anatomic and functional limitations, which are common on specialty sites. There is presently a lack of data of margin positivity after standard excision of vulvar melanomas. OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the rate of positive margins after standard excision of vulvar melanomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of surgically excised vulvar melanomas from the NCDB diagnosed from 2004 to 2019. RESULTS: We identified a total of 2,226 cases. Across surgical approaches and tumor stages, 17.2% (Standard Error [SE]: 0.8%) of cases had positive surgical margins. Among tumor stages, T4 tumors were most commonly excised with positive margins (22.9%, SE: 1.5%). On multivariable survival analysis, excision with positive margins was associated with significantly poorer survival (Hazard Ratio 1.299, p = .015). CONCLUSION: We find that positive margin rates after standard excision of vulvar malignancies are higher than for other specialty site melanomas. Our data suggest that use of surgical approaches with complete margin assessment may improve local control and functional outcomes for patients with vulvar melanoma as they have for patients with other specialty site melanomas.

Evaluating Rates of Positive Margins After Standard Excision of Cutaneous Adnexal Malignancies.

BACKGROUND: It is recommended to excise adnexal neoplasms with standard local excision or Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), although many occur on high-risk sites such as the head and neck (H&N) and exhibit subclinical extension. Minimal evidence exists on the efficacy of standard excisions for these tumors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of positive surgical margins after standard excision of adnexal tumors. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of cutaneous adnexal malignancies from the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2004 to 2019. RESULTS: The authors identified a total of 4,402 cases treated with standard excision. Tumors on the H&N were approximately twice as likely as those on the trunk and extremities (T&E) to be excised with positive margins (odds ratio 2.146, p < .001), with the highest estimated rate for eccrine adenocarcinoma (12.1%, SE: 2.3%). The subtype with the highest positive margin rate on the T&E was microcystic adnexal carcinoma (8.0%, SE: 2.9). Positive margins were associated with poorer overall survival on multivariable survival analysis (hazard ratio 1.299, p = .015). CONCLUSION: The authors present subtype- and site-specific positive margin rates for adnexal tumors treated with standard excision, which suggest that tumors on the H&N and some T&E subtypes, should be considered for MMS.

Applying Occam's Razor and Descending the Reconstructive Ladder: The Modified Cheek Advancement Flap for Reconstruction of Nasal Defects.

Nasal reconstruction has important functional and cosmetic considerations, as proper repair of nasal defects is necessary to maintain function of the nasal airway and to recreate the normal appearance of this central facial structure. Cheek advancement flaps provide matched, mobile, and highly vascularized tissue for the reconstruction of nasal defects, allowing for the concealment of incisions within natural creases in a one-stage approach. However, cheek advancement flaps are often underutilized for nasal reconstruction because of their difficulty in restoring nasal contour. We describe reconstruction of 19 nasal dorsal and sidewall defects 0.8 to 3 cm in size. We incorporated a periosteal anchoring suture to maintain/restore nasal contour and additionally removed a half standing cone inferior to the defect to prevent encroachment of the nasal ala or alar crease. All patients were evaluated at least 3 months postoperatively. In all patients, we were able to restore concavity of the nasofacial sulcus, preserve the biconvex nasal tips, prevent alar flaring and retraction, and conserve the alar groove. All patients had excellent functional and cosmetic outcomes. We believe this modified cheek advancement flap provides functionally and aesthetically superior results and can be considered as a first-line approach for repair of nasal dorsal and sidewall defects in subselected patients.

Skin Cancers and Lung Transplant.

It is well known that solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) have a 65- to 100-fold increase in the risk of developing skin cancer, namely, nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) such as cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). In addition, these patients are also at increased risk for development of melanoma as well as other less common cutaneous malignancies (Merkel's cell carcinoma, Kaposi's sarcoma). SOTRs with NMSC (namely cSCC) are also at significantly increased risk of poor clinical outcomes including local recurrence, nodal and distant metastasis, and disease-specific death relative to patients who are not immunosuppressed. Increased surveillance and monitoring in patients at risk of aggressive disease and poor outcomes who are on immunosuppression is essential in patients with lung transplants given the high degree of immunosuppression. Increased awareness of risks, treatments, and management allows for improved outcomes in these patients. This article will provide an overview of the risk factors for the development of cutaneous malignancies in organ transplant recipients as well as a detailed discussion of various immunosuppressant and prophylactic medications used in this patient population that contribute to the risk of developing cutaneous malignancies, with an emphasis on NMSC (cSCC and BCC) in lung transplant recipients. Finally, this article includes a discussion on the clinical and dermatologic management of this high-risk immunosuppressed population including a review of topical and systemic agents for field therapy of actinic damage and chemoprevention of keratinocyte carcinomas. In addition, indications for additional treatment and preventive measures such as adjuvant radiation treatment after surgical management of cutaneous malignancies and potential modification of immunosuppressive medication regimens are discussed.

Current Research in Melanoma and Aggressive Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer.

There have been several significant advances in cancer treatment in the last decade that are applicable to the treatment of melanoma and advanced nonmelanoma skin cancers. Among these are the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed death legand-1 (PDL-1) axis, as well as targeted inhibitors of the BRAF/MEK signaling cascade in melanoma, and the hedgehog signaling pathway in basal cell carcinoma (BCC). These immune-based and targeted therapies have dramatically changed the treatment options for locally advanced and metastatic melanoma, Merkel's cell carcinoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), and BCC. In this article, we will briefly review the currently approved targeted and immunotherapy-based treatments for locally advanced and metastatic melanoma, Merkel's cell carcinoma, and cSCC and discuss various combinations of approved therapies, as well as emerging therapeutic candidates that are currently in clinical trials, including novel checkpoint inhibitors in development, intratumoral oncolytic agents (viral and nonviral), and various immune-based therapies such as toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, adoptive T-cell therapy, T-cell costimulation, and innate immune cell therapy. For advanced BCC, we will discuss trials investigating the currently approved smoothened (SMO) inhibitors for neoadjuvant use, emerging SMO inhibitors in development, topical SMO inhibitors, alternative targets in the hedgehog signaling pathway, and the use of anti-PD-1 agents for advanced BCC both alone and in combination with SMO inhibitors.

Skin cancer in transplant recipients: Scientific retreat of the international immunosuppression and transplant skin cancer collaborative and skin care in organ transplant patients-Europe.

The International Immunosuppression and Transplant Skin Cancer Collaborative (ITSCC) is an organization of more than 500 physicians and scientists focused on the treatment of cutaneous malignancies following solid organ transplantation and in other forms of immunosuppression. It is well known that solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) have an approximate 100-fold increase in the risk of developing skin cancer with consensus guidelines recommending these patients be managed as high risk for local recurrence and metastasis associated with poor outcomes. In September 2018, ITSCC and its European counterpart, the Skin Care in Organ Transplant Patients-Europe (SCOPE), held their biennial scientific retreat in Essex, MA to discuss novel findings in the pathogenesis of cutaneous malignancy including new treatment and prevention strategies in this at-risk population for significant morbidity and mortality from their cutaneous disease. This meeting report is a summary of the novel findings discussed.

Stratification of Poor Outcomes for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Immunosuppressed Patients Using the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition and Brigham and Women's Hospital Staging Systems.

BACKGROUND: Staging systems for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) include Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) and American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, eighth edition (AJCC-8). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare AJCC-8 and BWH staging systems for CSCC in immunosuppressed patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of immunosuppressed patients diagnosed with primary CSCC from 2012 to 2016. The main end point was any poor outcome (PO), which included local recurrence, nodal metastasis, and disease-specific death. RESULTS: Fifty-eight immunosuppressed patients had 263 CSCCs. Fifty percent of tumors were AJCC-8 T1, 44.7% T2, and 4.8% T3. Fifty percent of tumors were BWH T1, 48.5% T2a, 1.3% T2b, and 0.4% T3. Risk of PO for AJCC-8 was 1.7%, 8.8%, and 36.4% for T1, T2, and T3, respectively (p < .01). Risk of PO for BWH was 1.8%, 9.9%, 33.3%, and 100.0% for T1, T2a, T2b, and T3, respectively (p < .01). Thirty-six percent of AJCC-8 T3/T4 tumors had POs compared with 5.1% in low T1/T2 stages (p = .002). Fifty percent of BWH T2b/T3 tumors had POs compared with 5.3% in low T1/T2a stages (p = .01). CONCLUSION: AJCC-8 and BWH staging systems stratify CSCC with similar distinctiveness, homogeneity, and monotonicity for immunosuppressed patients.

Expertise in Head and Neck Cutaneous Reconstructive Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The management of skin cancers has evolved with the development of Mohs micrographic surgery and a greater emphasis on surgical training within dermatology. It is unclear whether these changes have translated into innovations and contributions to the reconstructive literature. OBJECTIVE: To assess contributions from each medical specialty to the cutaneous head and neck oncologic reconstructive literature. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of the head and neck reconstructive literature from 2000 through 2015 based on a priori search terms relating to suture technique, linear closure, advancement, rotation, transposition and interpolation flaps, and identified the specialty of the senior authors. RESULTS: The authors identified 74,871 articles, of which 1,319 were relevant. Under suture technique articles, the senior authors were primarily dermatologists (58.2%) and plastic surgeons (20.3%). Under linear closure, the authors were dermatologists (48.1%), plastic surgeons (22.2%), and otolaryngologists (20.4%). Under advancement and rotation flaps, the senior authors were plastic surgeons (40.5%, 38.9%), dermatologists (38.1%, 34.2%), and otolaryngologists (14.4%, 21.6%). Under transposition and interpolation flaps, the senior authors were plastic surgeons (47.3%, 39.4%), dermatologists (32.3%, 27.0%), and otolaryngologists (15.3%, 23.4%). CONCLUSION: The primary specialties contributing to the cutaneous head and neck reconstructive literature are plastic surgery, dermatology, and otolaryngology.

Dermatologist Practices During Total Body Skin Examinations: A Survey Study.

Though screening for skin cancer is an essential practice in dermatology, limited data are published on dermatologists' total body skin examination (TBSE) behaviors. We surveyed 6500 dermatologists on their TBSE practices, including questions about less commonly examined body sites. We found varied TBSE practices among all dermatologists and discrepancies in examinations between dermatologists of opposite genders. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(5):516-520.