Arteriovenous Graft Failure in the Veterans Health Administration: Outcome Disparities Associated with Race.

Background Vascular access for ongoing hemodialysis often fails, frequently requiring repeated procedures to maintain vascular patency. While research has shown racial discrepancies in multiple aspects of renal failure treatment, there is poor understanding of how these factors might relate to vascular access maintenance procedures after arteriovenous graft (AVG) placement. Purpose To evaluate racial disparities associated with premature vascular access failure after percutaneous access maintenance procedures following AVG placement using a retrospective national cohort from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Materials and Methods All hemodialysis vascular maintenance procedures performed at VHA hospitals between October 2016 and March 2020 were identified. To ensure the sample represented patients who consistently used the VHA, patients without AVG placement within 5 years of their first maintenance procedure were excluded. Access failure was defined as a repeat access maintenance procedure or as hemodialysis catheter placement occurring 1-30 days after the index procedure. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate prevalence ratios (PRs) measuring the association between hemodialysis maintenance failure and African American race compared with all other races. Models controlled for vascular access history, patient socioeconomic status, and procedure and facility characteristics. Results In total, 1950 access maintenance procedures in 995 patients (mean age, 69 years ± 9 [SD], 1870 men) with an AVG created in one of 61 VHA facilities were identified. Most procedures involved African American patients (1169 of 1950, 60%) and patients residing in the South (1002 of 1950, 51%). Premature access failure occurred in 215 of 1950 (11%) procedures. When compared with all other races, African American race was associated with premature access site failure (PR, 1.4; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.43; P = .02). Among the 1057 procedures in 30 facilities with interventional radiology resident training programs, there was no evidence of racial disparity in the outcome (PR, 1.1; P = .63). Conclusion African American race was associated with higher risk-adjusted rates of premature arteriovenous graft failure after dialysis maintenance. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Forman and Davis in this issue.

Do Medicare Accountable Care Organizations Reduce Disparities After Spinal Fracture?

BACKGROUND: National changes in health care disparities within the setting of trauma care have not been examined within Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) or non-ACOs. We sought to examine the impact of ACOs on post-treatment outcomes (in-hospital mortality, 90-day complications, and readmissions), as well as surgical intervention among whites and nonwhites treated for spinal fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all beneficiaries treated for spinal fractures between 2009 and 2014 using national Medicare fee for service claims data. Claims were used to identify sociodemographic and clinical criteria, receipt of surgery and in-hospital mortality, 90-day complications, and readmissions. Multivariable logistic regression analysis accounting for all confounders was used to determine the effect of race/ethnicity on outcomes. Nonwhites were compared with whites treated in non-ACOs between 2009 and 2011 as the referent. RESULTS: We identified 245,704 patients who were treated for spinal fractures. Two percent of the cohort received care in an ACO, whereas 7% were nonwhite. We found that disparities in the use of surgical fixation for spinal fractures were present in non-ACOs over the period 2009-2014 but did not exist in the context of care provided through ACOs (odds ratio [OR] 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44, 1.28). A disparity in the development of complications existed for nonwhites in non-ACOs (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.01, 1.17) that was not encountered among nonwhites receiving care in ACOs (OR 1.32; 95% CI 0.90, 1.95). An existing disparity in readmission rates for nonwhites in ACOs over 2009-2011 (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.01, 1.80) was eliminated in the period 2012-2014 (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.65, 1.09). CONCLUSIONS: Our work reinforces the idea that ACOs could improve health care disparities among nonwhites. There is also the potential that as ACOs become more familiar with care integration and streamlined delivery of services, further improvements in disparities could be realized.

Emergency General Surgery Volume and Its Impact on Outcomes in Military Treatment Facilities.

BACKGROUND: Low hospital volume for emergency general surgery (EGS) procedures is associated with worse patient outcomes within the civilian health care system. The military maintains treatment facilities (MTFs) in remote locations to provide access to service members and their families. We sought to determine if patients treated at low-volume MTFs for EGS conditions experience worse outcomes compared with high-volume centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed TRICARE data from 2006 to 2014. Patients were identified using an established coding algorithm for EGS admission. MTFs were divided into quartiles based on annual EGS volume. Outcomes included 30-d mortality, complications, and readmissions. Logistic regression models adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic differences in case-mix including EGS condition, surgical intervention, and comorbidities were used to determine the influence of hospital volume on outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 106,915 patients treated for an EGS condition at 79 MTFs. The overall mortality rate was 0.21%, with complications occurring in 8.55% and readmissions in 4.45%. After risk adjustment, lowest-volume MTFs did not demonstrate significantly higher odds of mortality (OR: 2.02, CI: 0.45-9.06) or readmissions (OR: 0.77, CI: 0.54-1.11) compared with the highest-volume centers. Lowest-volume facilities exhibited a lower likelihood of complications (OR: 0.76, CI: 0.59-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: EGS patients treated at low-volume MTFs did not experience worse clinical outcomes when compared with high-volume centers. Remote MTFs appear to provide care for EGS conditions comparable with that of high-volume facilities. Our findings speak against the need to reduce services at small, critical access facilities within the military health care system.

National Study of Triage and Access to Trauma Centers for Older Adults.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of undertriage among older injured Medicare beneficiaries, identify any regions in which undertriage is more likely to occur, and examine additional factors associated with undertriage at a national level. METHODS: Using 2009 to 2014 Medicare claims data, we identified older adults (≥65 years) receiving a diagnosis of traumatic injury, and linked claims with trauma center designation records from the American Trauma Society. Undertriage was defined as nontrauma centers treatment with an Injury Severity Score greater than or equal to 16, consistent with the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma benchmark. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate odds of undertriage by census region, adjusting for sex, race, age, Injury Severity Score, trauma center proximity, and mode of transportation. RESULTS: Forty-six percent of severely injured patients (n=125,731) were treated at a nontrauma center. Compared with that for patients in the Midwest, adjusted odds of undertriage were 100% higher for patients in Southern states (odds ratio [OR] 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.00 to 2.04) and 78% higher in Western states (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.73 to 1.82). Compared with that for patients aged 65 to 69 years, odds of undertriage gradually increased in all age groups, reaching 57% for patients older than 80 years (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.52 to 1.61). Distance to a trauma center was associated with increasing odds of undertriage, with 37% higher odds (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.40) for older adults living more than 30 miles from a trauma center compared with patients living within 15 miles. CONCLUSION: Nearly half of older adult trauma patients are undertriaged; it increases with age and distance to care and is most common in Southern and Western states. Improvements to field triage and trauma center access for older patients are urgently needed.

Does Universal Insurance and Access to Care Influence Disparities in Outcomes for Pediatric Patients with Osteomyelitis?

BACKGROUND: Healthcare disparities are an issue in the surgical management of orthopaedic conditions in children. Although insurance expansion efforts may mitigate racial disparities in surgical outcomes, prior studies have not examined these effects on differences in pediatric orthopaedic care. To assess for racial disparities in pediatric orthopaedic care that may persist despite insurance expansion, we performed a case-control study of the outcomes of children treated for osteomyelitis in the TRICARE system, the healthcare program of the United States Department of Defense and a model of universal insurance and healthcare access. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether (1) the rates of surgical intervention and (2) 90-day outcomes (defined as emergency department visits, readmission, and complications) were different among TRICARE-insured pediatric patients with osteomyelitis when analyzed based on black versus white race and military rank-defined socioeconomic status. METHODS: We analyzed TRICARE claims from 2005 to 2016. We identified 2906 pediatric patients, of whom 62% (1810) were white and 18% (520) were black. A surgical intervention was performed in 9% of the patients (253 of 2906 patients). The primary outcome was receipt of surgical intervention for osteomyelitis. Secondary outcomes included 90-day complications, readmissions, and returns to the emergency department. The primary predictor variables were race and sponsor rank. Military rank has been used as an indicator of socioeconomic status before and during enlistment, and enlisted service members, particularly junior enlisted service members, may be at risk of having the same medical conditions that affect civilian members of lower socioeconomic strata. Patient demographic information (age, sex, race, sponsor rank, beneficiary category [whether the patient is an insurance beneficiary from an active-duty or retired service member], and geographic region) and clinical information (prior comorbidities, environment of care [whether clinical care was provided in a civilian or military facility], treatment setting, and length of stay) were used as covariates in multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: After controlling for demographic and clinical factors including age, sex, sponsor rank, beneficiary category, geographic region, Charlson comorbidity index (as a measure of baseline health), environment of care, and treatment setting (inpatient versus outpatient), we found that black children were more likely to undergo surgical interventions for osteomyelitis than white children (odds ratio 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-2.50; p = 0.001). When stratified by environment of care, this finding persisted only in the civilian healthcare setting (OR 1.85; 95% CI, 1.26-2.74; p = 0.002). Additionally, after controlling for demographic and clinical factors, lower socioeconomic status (junior enlisted personnel) was associated with a higher likelihood of 90-day emergency department use overall (OR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.02-2.51; p = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: We found that for pediatric patients with osteomyelitis in the universally insured TRICARE system, many of the historically reported disparities in care were absent, suggesting these patients benefitted from improved access to healthcare. However, despite universal coverage, racial disparities persisted in the civilian care environment, suggesting that no single intervention such as universal insurance sufficiently addresses differences in racial disparities in care. Future studies can address the pervasiveness of these disparities in other patient populations and the various mechanisms through which they exert their effects, as well as potential interventions to mitigate these disparities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Disparities in Rates of Surgical Intervention Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Medicare Accountable Care Organizations.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) on the use of surgical services among racial and ethnic minorities. BACKGROUND: Health reform efforts were expected to reduce healthcare disparities. The impact of ACOs on existing disparities in access to surgical care remains unknown. METHODS: We used national Medicare data (2009-2014) to compare rates of surgery among white, African American, Hispanic, and Asian Medicare beneficiaries for coronary artery bypass grafting, colectomy, total hip arthroplasty, hip fracture repair, and lumbar spine surgery. We performed a pre-post difference in differences analysis between African American, Hispanic, and Asian patients receiving surgical care in ACO and non-ACO organizations before and after the implementation of ACOs. The time period 2009 to 2011 was considered the pre-ACO period, and 2012 to 2014 the post-ACO period. RESULTS: Rates of surgical intervention in the ACO cohort were significantly lower (P < 0.001) as compared to non-ACOs for whites, African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians in both the pre- and post-ACO periods. There was no significant difference in the adjusted change in the rate of surgical interventions among minority patients as compared to whites in ACOs and non-ACOs between 2009 to 2011 and 2012 to 2014. The odds of receiving surgical intervention were lowest for minority patients in ACOs during the post-ACO period (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found persistent differences in the use of surgery among racial and ethnic minorities between the time periods 2009 to 2011 and 2012 to 2014. These disparities were not impacted by the formation of ACOs. Programs that specifically incentivize ACOs to improve surgical access for minorities may be necessary.

Does Orthopaedic Outpatient Care Reduce Emergency Department Utilization After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) visits after elective surgical procedures are a potential target for interventions to reduce healthcare costs. More than 1 million total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) are performed each year with postsurgical ED utilization estimated in the range of 10%. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether (1) outpatient orthopaedic care was associated with reduced ED utilization and (2) whether there were identifiable factors associated with ED utilization within the first 30 and 90 days after TJA. METHODS: An analysis of adult TRICARE beneficiaries who underwent TJA (2006-2014) was performed. TRICARE is the insurance program of the Department of Defense, covering > 9 million beneficiaries. ED use within 90 days of surgery was the primary outcome and postoperative outpatient orthopaedic care the primary explanatory variable. Patient demographics (age, sex, race, beneficiary category), clinical characteristics (length of hospital stay, prior comorbidities, complications), and environment of care were used as covariates. Logistic regression adjusted for all covariates was performed to determine factors associated with ED use. RESULTS: We found that orthopaedic outpatient care (odds ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.77) was associated with lower odds of ED use within 90 days. We also found that index hospital length of stay (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10), medical comorbidities (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08-1.24), and complications (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 2.24-2.72) were associated with higher odds of ED use. CONCLUSIONS: When considering that at 90 days, only 3928 patients sustained a complication, a substantial number of ED visits (11,486 of 15,414 [75%]) after TJA may be avoidable. Enhancing access to appropriate outpatient care with improved discharge planning may reduce ED use after TJA. Further research should be directed toward unpacking the situations, outside of complications, that drive patients to access the ED and devise interventions that could mitigate such behavior. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

The impact of hepatitis C virus infection on 90-day outcomes following major orthopaedic surgery: a propensity-matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on outcomes following major orthopaedic interventions, such as joint arthroplasty or spine surgery, has not been effectively studied in the past. Most prior studies are impaired by small samples, limited surveillance for adverse events, or the potential for selection bias to confound results. In this context, we sought to evaluate the impact of HCV infection on 90-day outcomes following joint arthroplasty or spine surgery using propensity-matched techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study utilized 2006-2014 claims from TRICARE insurance. Adults who received spine surgical procedures, total knee and hip arthroplasty were identified. Covariates included demographic factors, a diagnosis of HCV and medical co-morbidities defined by International Classification of Disease-9th revision (ICD-9) code. Outcomes consisted of 30- and 90-day mortality, complications and readmission. A propensity score was used to balance the cohorts with logistic regression techniques employed to determine the influence of HCV infection on post-operative outcomes. RESULTS: The propensity-matched cohort consisted of 2262 patients (1131 with and without HCV). Following logistic regression, patients with HCV were found to have increased odds of 30-day complications (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.33, 2.64; p < 0.001), 90-day complications (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.16, 2.08; p = 0.003) and 30-day readmission (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.04, 2.05; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: HCV infection was found to increase the risk of complication and readmission following spine surgery and total joint arthroplasty. Patients should be counseled on their increased risk prior to surgery. Health systems that treat a higher percentage of patients with HCV need to consider the increased risk of complications and readmission when negotiating with insurance carriers.

Development and Validation of an Electronic Adverse Event Model for Patient Safety Surveillance in Interventional Radiology.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive adverse event (AE) surveillance programs in interventional radiology (IR) are rare. Our aim was to develop and validate a retrospective electronic surveillance model to identify outpatient IR procedures that are likely to have an AE, to support patient safety and quality improvement. METHODS: We identified outpatient IR procedures performed in the period from October 2017 to September 2019 from the Veterans Health Administration (n = 135,283) and applied electronic triggers based on posyprocedure care to flag cases with a potential AE. From the trigger-flagged cases, we randomly sampled n = 1,500 for chart review to identify AEs. We also randomly sampled n = 600 from the unflagged cases. Chart-reviewed cases were merged with patient, procedure, and facility factors to estimate a mixed-effects logistic regression model designed to predict whether an AE occurred. Using model fit and criterion validity, we determined the best predicted probability threshold to identify cases with a likely AE. We reviewed a random sample of 200 cases above the threshold and 100 cases from below the threshold from October 2019 to March 2020 (n = 20,849) for model validation. RESULTS: In our development sample of mostly trigger-flagged cases, 444 of 2,096 cases (21.8%) had an AE. The optimal predicted probability threshold for a likely AE from our surveillance model was >50%, with positive predictive value of 68.9%, sensitivity of 38.3%, and specificity of 95.3%. In validation, chart-reviewed cases with AE probability >50% had a positive predictive value of 63% (n = 203). For the period from October 2017 to March 2020, the model identified approximately 70 IR cases per month that were likely to have an AE. CONCLUSIONS: This electronic trigger-based approach to AE surveillance could be used for patient-safety reporting and quality review.

Fracture Risk After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Adjustable Gastric Banding Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Importance: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is associated with significant bone loss and may increase fracture risk, whereas substantial bone loss and increased fracture risk have not been reported after adjustable gastric banding (AGB). Previous studies have had little representation of patients aged 65 years or older, and it is currently unknown how age modifies fracture risk. Objective: To compare fracture risk after RYGB and AGB procedures in a large, nationally representative cohort enriched for older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based retrospective cohort analysis used Medicare claims data from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2014, from 42 345 severely obese adults, of whom 29 624 received RYGB and 12 721 received AGB. Data analysis was performed from April 2017 to November 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was incident nonvertebral (ie, wrist, humerus, pelvis, and hip) fractures after RYGB and AGB surgery defined using a combination of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition and Current Procedural Terminology 4 codes. Results: Of 42 345 participants, 33 254 (78.5%) were women. With a mean (SD) age of 51 (12) years, recipients of RYGB were younger than AGB recipients (55 [12] years). Both groups had similar comorbidities, medication use, and health care utilization in the 365 days before surgery. Over a mean (SD) follow-up of 3.5 (2.1) years, 658 nonvertebral fractures were documented. The fracture incidence rate was 6.6 (95% CI, 6.0-7.2) after RYGB and 4.6 (95% CI, 3.9-5.3) after AGB, which translated to a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.73 (95% CI, 1.45-2.08) after multivariable adjustment. Site-specific analyses demonstrated an increased fracture risk at the hip (HR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.82-4.49), wrist (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.33-2.14), and pelvis (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.08-2.07) among RYGB recipients. No significant interactions of fracture risk with age, sex, diabetes status, or race were found. In particular, adults 65 years and older showed similar patterns of fracture risk to younger adults. Sensitivity analyses using propensity score matching showed similar results (nonvertebral fracture: HR 1.75; 95% CI, 1.22-2.52). Conclusions and Relevance: This study of a large, US population-based cohort including a substantial population of older adults found a 73% increased risk of nonvertebral fracture after RYGB compared with AGB, including increased risk of hip, wrist, and pelvis fractures. Fracture risk was consistently increased among RYGB patients vs AGB across different subgroups, and to a similar degree among older and younger adults. Increased fracture risk appears to be an important unintended consequence of RYGB.

Alterations in 90-day morbidity, mortality, and readmission rates following spine surgery in Medicare Accountable Care Organizations (2009-2014).

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The impact of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) on healthcare quality and outcomes, including morbidity, mortality, and readmissions, has not been substantially investigated, especially following spine surgery. PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of ACO formation on postoperative outcomes in the 90-day period following spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of national Medicare claims data (2009-2014). PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent one of four lumbar spine surgical procedures in an ACO or non-ACO. OUTCOME MEASURES: The development of in-hospital mortality, complications or hospital readmission within 90 days of the surgical procedure. METHODS: The primary outcome measures included postsurgical complications and readmissions at 90 days following surgery. In-hospital mortality and 30-day outcomes were considered secondarily. The primary predictor variable consisted of ACO enrollment designation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was utilized to adjust for confounders and determine the independent effect of ACO enrollment on postsurgical outcomes. The multivariable model included a propensity score adjustment that accounted for factors associated with the preferential enrollment of patients in ACOs, namely, sociodemographic characteristics, medical co-morbidities, hospital teaching status, bed size, and location. RESULTS: In all, there were 344,813 patients identified for inclusion in this analysis with 97% (n = 332,890) treated in non-ACOs and 3% (n = 11,923) in an ACO. Although modest changes were apparent across both ACOs and non-ACOs over the time-period studied, improvements were slightly more dramatic in non-ACOs leading to statistically significant differences in both 90-day complications and readmissions. Specifically, in the period 2012-2014, ACOs demonstrated an 18% increase in the odds of 90-day complications and a 14% elevation in the odds of 90-day readmissions when compared to non-ACOs. There was no difference in hospital mortality between ACOs and non-ACOs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study of Medicare data from 2009 to 2014 failed to demonstrate superior reductions in postoperative morbidity, mortality, and readmissions for beneficiaries treated in ACOs as compared to non-ACOs. These results indicate that meaningful changes in postoperative outcomes should not be anticipated based on organizational participation in ACOs at present.

Changes in healthcare delivery following spinal fracture in Medicare Accountable Care Organizations.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) were designed to reduce healthcare costs while simultaneously improving quality. Given that the success of ACOs is predicated on controlling costs, concerns have been expressed that patients could be adversely affected through restricted access to surgery, including in the context of spine fracture care. PURPOSE: Evaluate the impact of Medicare ACO formation on the utilization of surgery and outcomes following spinal fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of Medicare claims (2009-2014). PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients treated for spinal fractures in an ACO or non-ACO. OUTCOME MEASURES: The utilization of surgery as treatment for spinal fractures, in-hospital mortality, 90-day complications, or hospital readmission within 90-days injury. METHODS: We used a pre-post study design to compare outcomes for patients treated in ACOs versus non-ACOs. Receipt of surgery for treatment of a spinal fracture was the primary outcome, with mortality, complications and readmissions treated secondarily. We used multivariable logistic regression adjusting for confounders to determine the association between environment of care (ACO vs. non-ACO) and the outcomes of interest. In all testing, beneficiaries treated in non-ACOs during 2009 to 2011 were used as the referent. RESULTS: During 2009 to 2011, 9% (n=10,866) of patients treated in non-ACOs received surgery, whereas a similar percentage (9%; n=210) underwent surgery in ACOs. This figure decreased to 8% (n=9,857) for individuals treated in non-ACOs over 2012 to 2014, although the surgical rate remained unchanged for those receiving care in an ACO (9%; n=227). There was no difference in the use of surgery among patients treated in ACOs (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.79, 1.18) over 2012 to 2014. Similar increases in the odds of mortality were observed for both ACOs and non-ACOs during this period. A marginal, yet significant increase in complications was observed among ACOs, although there was no change in the odds of readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that the formation of ACOs did not result in alterations in the use of surgery for spinal fractures or substantive changes in outcomes. As ACOs continue to evolve, more emphasis should be placed on the incorporation of measures directly related to surgical and trauma care in the determinants of risk-based reimbursements.

Changes in the Use of Lumbar Arthrodesis Procedures Within Accountable Care Organizations.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of Medicare claims data (2009-2014). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the use of lumbar fusion procedures following the formation of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Within surgical care afforded by ACOs, savings are thought to be realized by improved care coordination as well as reductions in the use of preference-sensitive procedures such as lumbar fusion. METHODS: We queried fee-for-service claims for patients enrolled in Medicare Part A and B, identifying patients who received lumbar spine fusion, discectomy, or decompression procedures. We performed a difference-in-differences analysis comparing the use of lumbar fusion in ACOs and non-ACOs in the period before (2009-2011) and after (2012-2014) ACO formation. Propensity score adjustment was used to address differences in case-mix. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the likelihood of receiving a lumbar fusion in ACOs and non-ACOs in the period before and after ACO formation. RESULTS: Within organizations that would form ACOs, the raw rate of lumbar fusion increased from 50% (n = 2183) in 2009 to 2011 to 54% (n = 2283) in 2012 to 2014. Among non-ACOs, the use of fusion increased from 52% (n = 110,160) to 59% (n = 109,917). Adjusted difference in differences in the use of lumbar fusion between ACOs and non-ACOs was -2.6 percentage points (P = 0.13). When limited to patients with spinal stenosis, ACOs significantly reduced the use of fusion (-5.8 percentage points; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that ACOs may effectively curtail the use of lumbar fusion procedures, particularly among patients with spinal stenosis. As these interventions are often associated with higher complications and need for reoperation, such practices might accrue additional health care savings for Medicare beyond those realized during the index surgical period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Development and Validation of a Bedside Risk Assessment for Sustained Prescription Opioid Use After Surgery.

Importance: The increased use of prescription opioid medications has contributed to an epidemic of sustained opioid use, misuse, and addiction. Adults of working age are thought to be at greatest risk for prescription opioid dependence. Objective: To develop a risk score (the Stopping Opioids After Surgery score) for sustained prescription opioid use after surgery in a working-age population using readily available clinical information. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this case-control study, claims from TRICARE (the insurance program of the US Department of Defense) for working-age adult (age 18-64 years) patients undergoing 1 of 10 common surgical procedures from October 1, 2005, to September 30, 2014, were queried. A logistic regression model was used to identify variables associated with sustained prescription opioid use. The point estimate for each variable in the risk score was determined by its ß coefficient in the model. The risk score for each patient represented the summed point totals, ranging from 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating lower risk of sustained prescription opioid use. Data were analyzed from September 25, 2018, to February 5, 2019. Exposures: Exposures were age; race; sex; marital status; socioeconomic status; discharge disposition; procedure intensity; length of stay; intensive care unit admission; comorbid diabetes, liver disease, renal disease, malignancy, depression, or anxiety; and prior opioid use status. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was sustained prescription opioid use, defined as uninterrupted use for 6 months following surgery. A risk score for each patient was calculated and then used as a predictor of sustained opioid use after surgical intervention. The area under the curve and the Brier score were used to determine the accuracy of the scoring system and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to evaluate model calibration. Results: Of 86 356 patients in the analysis (48 827 [56.5%] male; mean [SD] age, 46.5 [14.5] years), 6365 (7.4%) met criteria for sustained prescription opioid use. The sample used for model generation consisted of 64 767 patients, while the validation sample had 21 589 patients. Prior opioid exposure was the factor most strongly associated with sustained opioid use (odds ratio, 13.00; 95% CI, 11.87-14.23). The group with the lowest scores (<31) had a mean (SD) 4.1% (2.5%) risk of sustained opioid use; those with intermediate scores (31-50) had a mean (SD) risk of 14.9% (6.3%); and those with the highest scores (>50) had a mean (SD) risk of 35.8% (3.6%). Conclusions and Relevance: This study developed an intuitive and accessible opioid risk assessment applicable to the care of working-age patients following surgery. This tool is scalable to clinical practice and can potentially be incorporated into electronic medical record platforms to enable automated calculation and clinical alerts that are generated in real time.

Establishing benchmarks for the volume-outcome relationship for common lumbar spine surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The importance of surgeon volume as a quality measure has been defined for a number of surgical specialties. Meaningful procedural volume benchmarks have not been established, however, particularly with respect to lumbar spine surgery. PURPOSE: We aimed to establish surgeon volume benchmarks for the performance of four common lumbar spine surgical procedures (discectomy, decompression, lumbar interbody fusion, and lumbar posterolateral fusion). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of data in the Florida Statewide Inpatient Dataset (2011-2014) was carried out. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent one of the four lumbar spine surgical procedures under study comprised the study sample. OUTCOME MEASURE: The development of a complication or hospital readmission within 90 days of the surgical procedure was the surgical outcome. METHODS: For each specific procedure, individual surgeon volume was separately plotted against the number of complications and readmissions in a spline analysis that adjusted for co-variates. Spline cut-points were used to create a categorical variable of procedure volume for each individual procedure. Log-binomial regression analysis was then separately performed using the categorical volume-outcome metric for each individual procedure and for the outcomes of 90-day complications and 90-day readmissions. RESULTS: In all, 187,185 spine surgical procedures met inclusion criteria, performed by 5,514 different surgeons at 178 hospitals. Spline analysis determined that the procedure volume cut-point was 25 for decompressions, 40 for discectomy, 43 for interbody fusion, and 35 for posterolateral fusions. For surgeons who failed to meet the volume metric, there was a 63% increase in the risk of complications following decompressions, a 56% increase in the risk of complications following discectomy, a 15% increase in the risk of complications following lumbar interbody fusions, and a 47% increase in the risk of complications following posterolateral fusions. Findings were similar for readmission measures. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this work allow us to identify meaningful volume-based benchmarks for the performance of common lumbar spine surgical procedures including decompression, discectomy, and fusion-based procedures. Based on our determinations, readily achievable goals for individual surgeons would approximate an average of four discectomy and lumbar interbody fusion procedures per month, three posterolateral lumbar fusions per month, and at least one decompression surgery every other week.

Universal insurance and an equal access healthcare system eliminate disparities for Black patients after traumatic injury.

BACKGROUND: Although inequities in trauma care are reported widely, some groups have theorized that universal health insurance would decrease disparities in care for disadvantaged minorities after a traumatic injury. We sought to examine the presence of racial disparities in outcomes and healthcare utilization at 30- and 90-days after discharge in this universally insured, racially diverse, American population treated for traumatic injuries. METHODS: This work studied adult beneficiaries of TRICARE treated at both military and civilian trauma centers 2006-2014. We included patients with an inpatient trauma encounter based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9) code. The mechanism and severity of injury, medical comorbidities, region and environment of care, and demographic factors were used as covariates. Race was considered the main predictor variable with Black patients compared to Whites. Logistic regression models were employed to assess for risk-adjusted differences in 30- and 90-day outcomes between Blacks and Whites. RESULTS: A total of 87,112 patients met the inclusion criteria. Traditionally encountered disparities for Black patients after trauma, including increased rates of mortality, were absent. We found a statistically significant decrease in the odds of 90-day complications for Blacks (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.84-0.98; P = 0.01). Blacks also had lesser odds of readmission at 30-days (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.94; P = 0.002) and 90-days (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.79-0.93; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings support the idea that in a universally insured, equal access system, historic disparities for racial and ethnic minorities, including increased postinjury morbidity, hospital readmission, and postdischarge healthcare utilization, are decreased or even eliminated.

Volume-Outcome Relationship in Surgical Interventions for Spinal Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for spinal metastases is challenging and carries a high risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Procedures with such characteristics often exhibit a volume-outcome relationship. This has not been previously characterized for spinal metastasis surgery to our knowledge. METHODS: The Florida State Inpatient Database (2011 through 2014) was queried to identify patients who had undergone surgery for spinal metastases. Surgeon and hospital surgical volumes were compared with 90-day complication and readmission rates to develop procedural cut-points used to define high and low-volume providers. These were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis that was adjusted for confounders. A separate analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of race/ethnicity and insurance status on the likelihood of receiving care from a high-volume surgeon or hospital. RESULTS: This study included 3,135 patients treated by 1,488 surgeons at 162 hospitals. Patients treated at low-volume hospitals had significantly higher odds of having postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13, 1.91) and readmissions (OR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.06, 1.75). Those treated by low-volume surgeons also demonstrated a higher likelihood of complications (OR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.16, 1.69) and readmissions (OR = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.17, 1.62). The likelihood of receiving intervention from a high-volume surgeon was significantly lower for African Americans (OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.41, 0.75) and Hispanics (OR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.44, 0.83). The odds of being treated at a high-volume hospital were also significantly lower for African Americans (OR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.40, 0.84) and Hispanics (OR = 0.28; 95% CI = 0.20, 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear relationship between the volume and outcomes of surgical treatment of spinal metastases, with high-volume providers demonstrating reduced complication and readmission rates. Racial and ethnic minorities appear to experience health-care segregation when it comes to surgical care for spinal metastases. Regionalization of care for these conditions may help improve access to high-volume providers and mitigate disparities in care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Examining Healthcare Segregation Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities Receiving Spine Surgical Procedures in the State of Florida.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of the Florida Inpatient Dataset (2011-2014). OBJECTIVE: To examine healthcare segregation among African American and Hispanic patients treated with one of four common spine surgical procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Racial and ethnic minorities are known to be at increased risk of adverse events after spine surgery. Healthcare segregation has been proposed as a source for these disparities, but has not been systematically examined for patients undergoing spine surgery. METHODS: African American, Hispanic, and White patients who underwent one of the four lumbar spine surgical procedures under study were included. Volume cut-offs were previously established for surgical providers and hospitals. Surgeons and hospitals were dichotomized based on these metrics as low- or high-volume providers. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the likelihood of patients receiving surgery from a low volume provider, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: African Americans were found to be at significantly increased odds of receiving surgery from a low-volume surgeon (P < 0.001) and were significantly more likely to receive surgery at a low-volume hospital (P < 0.007) for all procedures except decompression (P = 0.56). Like findings were encountered for Hispanic patients. Hispanic patients were 55% to three-times more likely to receive surgery from a low-volume surgeon depending on the procedure and 28% to 56% more likely to be treated at a low-volume hospital. African Americans were 34% to 82% more likely to receive surgery from a low-volume surgeon depending on the procedure and 10% to 17% more likely to be treated at a low-volume hospital. CONCLUSION: The results of this work identify the phenomenon of racial and ethnic healthcare segregation among low-volume providers for lumbar spine procedures in the State of Florida. This may be a contributing factor to the increased risk of adverse events after spine surgery known to exist among minorities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Establishing objective volume-outcome measures for anterior and posterior cervical spine fusion.

OBJECTIVES: There is a growing literature on the relationship between provider volume and patient outcomes, specifically within joint arthroplasty and lumbar spine surgery. Such benchmarks have yet to be established for many other spinal procedures, including cervical fusion. We sought to determine whether outcomes-based volume measures for both surgeons and hospitals can be established for cervical spine fusion procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patient data in the Florida Statewide Inpatient Dataset (SID; 2011-14). Patients identified in the Florida SID who underwent either anterior or posterior cervical fusion were identified along with the operative surgeons and the hospitals where the procedures were performed. Socio-demographic data, as well as medical and surgical characteristics were obtained, as were the development of complications and readmissions up to 90days following hospital discharge. Surgeon and hospital volume were plotted separately against the number of complications and readmissions in an adjusted spline analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was subsequently performed to assess the effect of surgeon and hospital volume on post-operative complications and readmissions. RESULTS: There were 8960 patients with posterior cervical fusion and 57,108 anterior cervical fusions (total=66,068) identified for inclusion in the analysis. The patients of low-volume surgeons were found to have an increased (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.65, 2.02) likelihood of complications following anterior and posterior (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.24, 1.69) cervical fusion. Low-volume surgeons demonstrated increased likelihood of readmission, irrespective of anterior (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.29, 1.47) or posterior (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.16, 1.48) approach. No clinically meaningful differences in the likelihood of complications or readmissions were detected between high- and low-volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates objective volume-outcome measures for surgeons who perform anterior and posterior cervical fusions. Our results have immediate applicability to clinical practice and may be used to benchmark procedural volume. Findings with respect to hospitals speak against the need for healthcare regionalization in this specific clinical context.