RESUMEN
Vaccinations are fundamental tools in preventing infectious diseases, especially in immunocompromised patients like those affected by non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). The COVID-19 pandemic made clinicians increasingly aware of the importance of vaccinations in preventing potential life-threatening SARS-CoV-2-related complications in NHL patients. However, several studies have confirmed a significant reduction in vaccine-induced immune responses after anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody treatment, thus underscoring the need for refined immunization strategies in NHL patients. In this review, we summarize the existing data about COVID-19 and other vaccine's efficacy in patients with NHL and propose multidisciplinary team-based recommendations for the management of vaccines in this specific group of patients.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Linfoma no Hodgkin , Vacunación , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Linfoma no Hodgkin/terapia , Linfoma no Hodgkin/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on vaccines' Research and Development, on vaccines' market, and on immunization programmes and policies. The need to promptly respond to the health emergency boostered resources' al-location and innovation, while new technologies were made available. Regulatory procedures were revised and expedited, and global production and distribution capacities significantly increased. Aim of this review is to outline the trajectory of research in vaccinology and vaccines' pipeline, highlighting major challenges and opportunities, and projecting future perspectives in vaccine preventables diseases' prevention and control. Study Design: Narrative review. Methods: We comprehensively consulted key biomedical databases including "Medline" and "Embase", preprint platforms, including"MedRxiv" and "BioRxiv", clinical trial registries, selected grey literature sources and scientific reports. Further data and insights were collected from experts in the field. We first reflect on the impact that the COVID-19 had on vaccines' Research and Development, regulatory frameworks, and market, we then present updated figures of vaccines pipeline, by different technologies, comparatively highlighting advantages and disadvantages. We conclude summarizing future perspectives in vaccines' development and immunizations strategies, outlining key challenges, knowledge gaps and opportunities for prevention strategies. Results: COVID-19 vaccines' development has been largely supported by public funding. New technologies and expetited autho-rization and distribution processes allowed to control the pandemic, leading vaccines' market to grow exponentially. In the post-pandemic era investments in prevention are projected to decrease but advancements in technology offer great potential to future immunization strategies. As of 2023, the vaccine pipeline include almost 1,000 candidates, at different Research and Development phase, including innovative recombinant protein vaccines, nucleic acid vaccines and viral vector vaccines. Vaccines' technology platforms development varies by disease. Overall, vaccinology is progressing towards increasingly safe and effective products that are easily manufacturable and swiftly convertible. Conclusions: Vaccine research is rapidly evolving, emerging technologies and new immunization models offer public health new tools and large potential to fight vaccines preventables diseases, with promising new platforms and broadened target populations. Real-life data analysis and operational research is needed to evaluate how such potential is exploited in public health practice to improve population health.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Desarrollo de Vacunas , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Pandemias/prevención & control , Predicción , Investigación Biomédica/tendencias , Vacunología/tendencias , Vacunología/métodos , Programas de Inmunización/tendencias , Desarrollo de Medicamentos/tendenciasRESUMEN
Introduction: In Italy, at the beginning of the COVID19 pandemic, only emergency and life-saving elective surgical procedures were allowed with obvious limitations in terms of numbers of operable cases. The aim of our study is to evaluate the performance of surgical activities by Apulian healthcare facilities (Southern Italy) under the pandemic emergency pressure. Methods: The surgical procedures in study were identified via the Apulian regional archive of hospital discharge forms. We used the ICD9 codes in order to define the elective and urgency surgeries in analysis, and we extended our search to all procedures performed from 2019 to 2021. Results: The number of all procedures decreased from 2019 to 2020; the reduction was higher for elective surgery (-43.7%) than urgency surgery (-15.5%). In 2021, an increase compared to 2020 was recorded for all procedures; nevertheless, elective surgeries registered a further slightly decrease compared to 2019 (-12.4%), while a slightly increase was observed for urgency surgeries (+3.5%). No particular variation was observed considering sex and age at surgery of the patients, and days of hospitalization from 2019 to 2021. Conclusions: The impact of COVID19 on Apulian regional health system has been extremely shocked and has required the implementation of strategies aimed at containing the infection and guaranteeing health services as far as possible. A new paradigm of hospital care for SARS-COV-2 patients in the post-emergency phase in Italy is needed, in order to optimize the resources available and to guarantee high standards of quality and efficiency for citizens.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Italia/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Pandemias , Urgencias Médicas/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Niño , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
Introduction: The recent surge in migration to and within the European Union and European Economic Area has brought the development of migration policy, including health policy, to the forefront of regional priorities. While migrants, in general, do not pose a health threat to the host population, specific subgroups of migrants, including refugees, asylum seekers, and irregular migrants, are particularly vulnerable to infectious diseases. To support public health policies in this area, the Emergency Preparedness and Management' working group of the Italian Society of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health has conducted a systematic narrative review with the aim to comprehensively analyze the infectious disease risk within the refugee and asylum seeker populations in EU, EEA, and EU-applicant countries. Methods: Forty-two studies were systematically selected from scientific articles in the MEDLINE/PubMed database from January 1, 2008, to June 1, 2023. The infectious risk associated with each infectious disease among refugees and asylum seekers, as well as the strategies to prevent and control outbreaks, was collected from all available studies. Results: The congregate living conditions in refugee camps, transit centers, and temporary housing facilities make this population particularly vulnerable to infectious diseases. As such, implementing stringent hygiene and preventive measures is critical to safeguarding the health of refugees and reducing the risk of outbreaks that may affect both the refugee population and the host communities. Conclusion: Effective vaccination and preventive strategies for migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers are vital for public health and the well-being of these populations. They should be delivered as part of universal health care. By addressing barriers and implementing tailored programs, we can ensure equitable access to vaccines and protect the health of these vulnerable individuals.
Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Unión Europea , Refugiados , Migrantes , Humanos , Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Europa Oriental/epidemiología , Política de Salud , Campos de Refugiados , Refugiados/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Migrantes/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Background: Post COVID-19 syndrome is a frequent disabling outcome, leading to a delay in social reintegration and return to working life. Study design: This was a prospective observational cohort study. The main objective was to explore the effectiveness of a Spa rehabilitation treatment on the improvement of post COVID-19 dyspnoea and fatigue, also analyzing the relationship between such symptoms. Additionally, it was assessed if different clinical characteristics could predispose patients in experiencing post COVID-19 symptoms or could influence the effectiveness of a Spa intervention. Methods: From July to November 2021, 187 post COVID-19 patients were enrolled in the study. All the patients complained persi-sting dyspnoea, whose impact on daily activities was assessed using the modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale. 144 patients (77.0%) reported also fatigue. The Spa treatment was started at least 3 months after COVID-19 acute phase. At the end of the treatment, patients were asked to rate the improvement in the dyspnoea and fatigue sensation. 118 patients also underwent the modified Borg Dyspnoea Scale for severity estimation of Exertion Dyspnoea and the Barthel index for severity estimation of Physical Limitation. Results: 165 out of 187 patients (88.2%) reported an improvement in dyspnoea, while 116 out 144 patients (80.6%) reported an improvement in both dyspnoea and fatigue. On a total of 118 subjects, a clinically significant improvement in the modified Borg Dyspnoea Scale (i.e. Delta Borg equal or more than -2.0 points) was reached by the 50.8% of patients, while a clinically significant improvement in the Barthel index (i.e. Delta Barthel equal or more than +10.0 points) was reached by the 51.7% of them. The 31.4% of patients reached a minimal clinically important improvement in both the modified Borg Dyspnoea Scale and the Barthel index. No risk factors were associated to a clinically impacting dyspnoea at entry, while a BMI>30 Kg/m2 was the main risk factor for chronic fatigue. Presence of respiratory comorbidities, obesity and severe acute COVID-19 (phenotype 4) configured risk factors for the lack of improvement of dyspnoea after the treatment, while no risk factors were associated to a lack of improvement for fatigue. Older age, obesity and comorbidities seemed to make more difficult to reach a clinically meaningful improvement in the modified Borg Dyspnoea Scale and the Barthel index after treatment. Female gender may imply more physical limitation at entry, while male patients seem to show less improvement in the Barthel index after treatment. Conclusions: Dyspnoea and fatigue were confirmed to be important post COVID-19 symptoms even in younger subjects of wor-king age and subjects with absent or modest pulmonary alterations at distance from acute COVID-19. A Spa health resort seems to be an effective "low-intensity" setting for a rehabilitation program of such patients. There is a strong relationship in terms of improvement between dyspnoea and fatigue, even if risk factors for their occurrence appear to be different. The improvement in exertion dyspnoea and physical limitation seemed to be less mutually related, probably due to a greater complexity in the asses-sment questionnaires. Some risk factors may predict a lack of improvement in symptoms after treatment.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Disnea , Fatiga , Colonias de Salud , Humanos , Disnea/rehabilitación , Disnea/etiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/rehabilitación , COVID-19/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fatiga/rehabilitación , Fatiga/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de Cohortes , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Splenectomy/asplenia is a condition associated with immune-compromission and specific vaccines are recommended for these patients, including the anti-COVID-19 vaccine. Among the high-risk group for which vaccination was prioritized in Italy, the immunocompromised patients after therapies or treatments were included. The Apulian regional archive of hospital discharge forms was used to define the list of splenectomized Apulian inhabitants, considering data from 2015 through 2020. The overall vaccination status of asplenic patients was assessed via data collected from the Regional Immunization Database. The history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the infectious disease outcomes were extracted from the Italian Institute of Health platform "Integrated surveillance of COVID-19 cases in Italy". 1219 Apulian splenectomized inhabitants were included; the incidence rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 15.0 per 100 persons-year with a proportion of re-infection equal to 6.4%; the proportion of hospitalization was 2.9%, with a case-fatality rate of 2.6%. The vaccine coverage (VC) for the anti-COVID-19 vaccine basal routine was 64.2%, for the first booster dose was 15.4%, and for the second booster dose was 0.6%. A multifactorial approach is needed to increase the vaccination uptake in this sub-group population and to increase the awareness of the asplenia-related risks to patients and health personnel.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , VacunaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Scanty data on the anti- SARS-CoV-2 IgG level decay after two-dose BNT162b2 vaccination have been published in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) on TNF inhibitors (TNFi). Similarly, no reports on the immunogenicity of a booster dose in such patients have been provided yet.We aimed to investigate the IgG level decay after two-dose BNT162b2 vaccination and the immunogenicity and safety of the booster dose in PsA patients on TNFi. METHODS: Forty patients with classified PsA on TNFi undergoing booster dose with the BNT162b2 mRNA SARS- CoV-2 vaccine (BioNTech/Pfizer) were enrolled. Fifteen days after the third shot, serum IgG levels against SARS-CoV-2 (Abbott®ARCHITECT i2000SR, positivity cut-off 50 AU/mL) were assayed in all patients. Clinimetrics and treatment data were gathered. TNFi treatment was not discontinued. Sera from healthcare professionals were considered as healthy controls for 1:1 propensity score-matching. Student's t-test and logistic regression were used for investigating differences in immunogenicity between groups and predictors of antibody response. RESULTS: Even though the decay of IgG levels showed similar magnitude between groups, PsA patients had a lower IgG level than matched controls at 4 months after two-dose vaccination (2009.22±4050.22 vs. 6206.59±4968.33 AU/mL, respectively p=0.0006). Booster dose restored IgG levels to a similar extent in both groups (15846.47±12876.48 vs. 20374.46±12797.08 AU/ml p=0.20, respectively). Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) did not change before and after vaccination (6.68±4.38 vs. 4.95±4.20, p=0.19). CONCLUSIONS: A BNT162b2 booster dose should be recommended in PsA patients on TNFi as its administration restores anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels similar to healthy individuals.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica , COVID-19 , Humanos , Vacuna BNT162 , SARS-CoV-2 , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Inmunoglobulina G , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Vacunación , Vacunas de ARNmRESUMEN
AIMS: In order to better define the need for influenza vaccination in people with diabetes (DM), we collected all available evidence on the effect of DM as a risk factor for complications of both seasonal and pandemic influenza, and on the specific effectiveness of vaccines in patients with DM. DATA SYNTHESIS: Two distinct systematic searches on MEDLINE, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov and Embase databases were performed, one for each metanalysis, collecting all observational studies and randomized clinical trials performed on humans up to May 31st, 2022. We retrieved 34 observational studies comparing risk for influenza complications in people with or without diabetes, and 13 observational studies assessing vaccine effectiveness on preventing such complications. Mortality for influenza and hospitalization for influenza and pneumonia resulted significantly higher in individuals with versus without DM, both when unadjusted and adjusted data are analyzed. In diabetic individuals vaccinated for influenza overall hospitalization, hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia and overall mortality are significantly lower in comparison with not vaccinated DM subjects, both when unadjusted and adjusted data were analyzed. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that: 1) influenza is associated with more severe complications in diabetic versus not diabetic individuals and 2) influenza vaccination is effective in preventing clinically relevant outcomes in adults with DM with a NNT (number needed to treat) of 60, 319, and 250 for all-cause hospitalization, specific hospitalization, and all-cause mortality, respectively. The identification of diabetic patients as the target of vaccination campaigns for influenza appears to be justified by available clinical evidence.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Adulto , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , VacunaciónRESUMEN
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients on JAK inhibitors (JAKi) have an increased HZ risk compared to those on biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). Recently, the Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (RZV) became available worldwide, showing good effectiveness in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Nevertheless, direct evidence of the immunogenicity of such a vaccine in those on JAKi or anti-cellular bDMARDs is still lacking. This prospective study aimed to assess RZV immunogenicity and safety in RA patients receiving JAKi or anti-cellular bDMARDs that are known to lead to impaired immune response. Patients with classified RA according to ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria on different JAKi or anti-cellular biologics (namely, abatacept and rituximab) followed at the RA clinic of our tertiary center were prospectively observed. Patients received two shots of the RZV. Treatments were not discontinued. At the first and second shots, and one month after the second shot, from all patients with RA, a sample was collected and RZV immunogenicity was assessed and compared between the treatment groups and healthy controls (HCs) receiving RZV for routine vaccination. We also kept track of disease activity at different follow-up times. Fifty-two consecutive RA patients, 44 females (84.61%), with an average age (±SD) of 57.46 ± 11.64 years and mean disease duration of 80.80 ± 73.06 months, underwent complete RZV vaccination between February and June 2022 at our center. At the time of the second shot (1-month follow-up from baseline), anti-VZV IgG titer increased significantly in both groups with similar magnitude (bDMARDs: 2258.76 ± 897.07 mIU/mL; JAKi: 2059.19 ± 876.62 mIU/mL, p < 0.001 for both from baseline). At one-month follow-up from the second shot, anti-VZV IgG titers remained stable in the bDMARDs group (2347.46 ± 975.47) and increased significantly in the JAKi group (2582.65 ± 821.59 mIU/mL, p = 0.03); still, no difference was observed between groups comparing IgG levels at this follow-up time. No RA flare was recorded. No significant difference was shown among treatment groups and HCs. RZV immunogenicity is not impaired in RA patients on JAKi or anti-cellular bDMARDs. A single shot of RZV can lead to an anti-VZV immune response similar to HCs without discontinuing DMARDs.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/efectos adversos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Inmunogenicidad VacunalRESUMEN
In March, people living with HIV infection (PLWH) were included in the risk category of fragile people for severe COVID-19 receiving priority access to vaccination with BNT162b2 vaccine. The aim of the study was to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the two doses regimen. The antibodies titer for severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was evaluated after 21 days since the first administration (Time 1), 1 (Time 2), and 3 (Time 3) months post-vaccination. Information regarding virological and immunological conditions at baseline, previous SARS-CoV-2 state of infection, other immunodeficiencies, current antiretroviral therapy (ART), comorbidities, and severe adverse events (SAE) to vaccination was collected. Six hundred and ninety-seven patients were tested for quantitative anti-spike antibodies at Time 1, 577 patients had a second detection at Time 2, and 491 patients had the third detection. Baseline characteristics of the study population are reported in Table 1. At the time of vaccine administration, all patients were on ART (except one long-term nonprogressor); 632 (90.7%) patients had undetectable HIV-RNA; 12 (1.7%) patients were immunosuppressed due to chemotherapy or other immunosuppressive drugs; 345 (49.5%) patients had at least one COVID-19 related comorbidity and 155 (22.2%) had two or more comorbidities. No SAEs were reported. Final serological results are available for 694 patients after the first dose, 577 and 491 after the second and third ones, respectively; positive titer (values ≥ 50 AU/ml) was demonstrated in 653 (94.1%), 576 (99.8%), 484 (98.6%) patients, respectively. Only one patient was a nonresponder after completing vaccination, who was a newly diagnosed one for HIV infection. All vaccinations were well tolerated, with no SAEs. BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was immunogenic and safe in PLWH.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por VIH , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , ARN Mensajero , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas Sintéticas , Vacunas de ARNmRESUMEN
Evidence of the association between traumatic experiences and psychosis are uncertain with respect to temporal order, clinical outcomes and the role of the age and genetic liability. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to explore the temporal relationship between the development of psychosis and traumatic exposure using prospective studies and to examine the role of moderation factors on overall effect sizes. Studies were identified by searching Embase-Ovid, PsycINFO (EBSCO), Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science databases, and yielded an initial total of 9016 papers, leaving finally 23 after the screening process. Three sets of meta-analyses estimated the risk of developing psychotic experiences or full clinical psychosis by having experienced maltreatment by an adult or bullying by peers or parental death, using the random-effects model. Bullying by peers (OR = 2.28 [1.64, 4.34]), maltreatment by an adult (OR = 2.20 [1.72, 2.81]) and parental death (OR = 1.24 [1.06, 1.44]) all increased the risk of psychosis. Moderator analysis showed that negative effects of bullying were detected especially in those with genetic liability for psychosis and exposure to multiple trauma types; studies with higher prevalence of males showed a stronger risk for those exposed to parental death. No significant meta-regression was found between the risk of developing a full clinical psychosis or a psychotic experience. Lack of studies hampered the results about the age of trauma occurrence. The cumulative effect of being bullied from peers and experiencing other adversities during childhood and/or adolescence, together with genetic liability for psychosis, appears to confer the highest risk for developing psychotic symptoms later in life.
Asunto(s)
Acoso Escolar , Muerte Parental , Trastornos Psicóticos , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Trastornos Psicóticos/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The recent COVID-19 pandemic produced a significant increase in cases and an emergency state was induced worldwide. The current knowledge about the COVID-19 disease concerning diagnoses, patient tracking, the treatment protocol, and vaccines provides a consistent contribution for the primary prevention of the viral infection and decreasing the severity of the SARS-CoV-2 disease. The aim of the present investigation was to produce a general overview about the current findings for the COVID-19 disease, SARS-CoV-2 interaction mechanisms with the host, therapies and vaccines' immunization findings. METHODS: A literature overview was produced in order to evaluate the state-of-art in SARS-CoV-2 diagnoses, prognoses, therapies, and prevention. RESULTS: Concerning to the interaction mechanisms with the host, the virus binds to target with its Spike proteins on its surface and uses it as an anchor. The Spike protein targets the ACE2 cell receptor and enters into the cells by using a special enzyme (TMPRSS2). Once the virion is quietly accommodated, it releases its RNA. Proteins and RNA are used in the Golgi apparatus to produce more viruses that are released. Concerning the therapies, different protocols have been developed in observance of the disease severity and comorbidity with a consistent reduction in the mortality rate. Currently, different vaccines are currently in phase IV but a remarkable difference in efficiency has been detected concerning the more recent SARS-CoV-2 variants. CONCLUSIONS: Among the many questions in this pandemic state, the one that recurs most is knowing why some people become more seriously ill than others who instead contract the infection as if it was a trivial flu. More studies are necessary to investigate the efficiency of the treatment protocols and vaccines for the more recent detected SARS-CoV-2 variant.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas Virales , Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina 2 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Peptidil-Dipeptidasa A/metabolismo , ARN , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/metabolismoRESUMEN
In the preregistration trial, data on efficacy of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infection were not collected. This study aimed to evaluate vaccine effectiveness (VE) against documented infection. Bari Policlinico University Hospital health care workers (HCWs) who completed the vaccination schedule were matched with HCWs who had refused vaccination. VE for documented infection was 61.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.2%-82.0%) 14-20 days after first dose, 87.9% (95% CI, 51.7%-97.0%) 21-27 days after first dose, and 96.0% (95% CI, 82.2%-99.1%) 7 or more days after second dose. Unvaccinated HCWs remain a concern in the context of the pandemic emergency.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Vacuna BNT162 , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Interactions of malignant multiple myeloma (MM) plasma cells (MM-cells) with the microenvironment control MM-cell growth, survival, drug-resistance and dissemination. As in MM microvascular density increases in the bone marrow (BM), we investigated whether BM MM endothelial cells (MMECs) control disease progression via the junctional adhesion molecule A (JAM-A). Membrane and cytoplasmic JAM-A levels were upregulated in MMECs in 111 newly diagnosed (NDMM) and 201 relapsed-refractory (RRMM) patients compared to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and healthy controls. Elevated membrane expression of JAM-A on MMECs predicted poor clinical outcome. Mechanistically, addition of recombinant JAM-A to MMECs increased angiogenesis whereas its inhibition impaired angiogenesis and MM growth in 2D and 3D in vitro cell culture and chorioallantoic membrane-assays. To corroborate these findings, we treated MM bearing mice with JAM-A blocking mAb and demonstrated impaired MM progression corresponding to decreased MM-related vascularity. These findings support JAM-A as an important mediator of MM progression through facilitating MM-associated angiogenesis. Collectively, elevated JAM-A expression on bone marrow endothelial cells is an independent prognostic factor for patient survival in both NDMM and RRMM. Blocking JAM-A restricts angiogenesis in vitro, in embrio and in vivo and represents a suitable druggable molecule to halt neoangiogenesis and MM progression.
Asunto(s)
Molécula A de Adhesión de Unión , Mieloma Múltiple , Animales , Médula Ósea , Ecosistema , Células Endoteliales , Homeostasis , Humanos , Ratones , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Microambiente TumoralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chickenpox is a highly contagious disease caused by the varicella zoster virus (VZV), and in infants, adolescents, adults, pregnant women, and the immunocompromised it can be serious. The best way to prevent chickenpox is immunization with the varicella vaccine. Protective levels of antibodies induced by the varicella vaccine decline over time, but there is currently no formal recommendation for testing anti-varicella zoster virus (VZV) IgG levels in immunized healthcare workers (HCWs). METHODS: The aims of this study were to evaluate the seroprevalence of circulating anti-VZV IgG in a sample a sample of students and residents of the medical school of the University of Bari, the long-term immunogenicity of the varicella vaccine, and the effectiveness of a strategy consisting of a third vaccine booster dose. The study population was screened as part of a biological risk assessment conducted between April 2014 and October 2020. A strategy for the management of non-responders was also examined. RESULTS: The 182 students and residents included in the study had a documented history of immunization (two doses of varicella vaccine). The absence of anti-VZV IgG was determined in 34% (62/182; 95%CI = 27.2-41.4%), with serosusceptibility more common among males than females (p < 0.05). After a third varicella dose, seroconversion was achieved in 100% of this previously seronegative group. No serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of the study population immunized against VZV lacked a protective antibody titer, but a third dose of vaccine restored protection. Since it is highly unlikely that VZV will be eliminated in the immediate future, the loss of immunity in a substantial portion of the population implies a risk of varicella outbreaks in the coming years. Screening for varicella immunity in routine assessments of the biological risk of medical students and HCWs may help to prevent nosocomial VZV infections.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Personal de Salud , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología , Inmunización Secundaria/métodos , Vacunación/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Varicela/sangre , Varicela/virología , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are highly exposed to SARS-CoV-2 infection given their specific tasks. The IgG-IgM serological assay has demonstrated good accuracy in early detection in symptomatic patients, but its role in the diagnosis of asymptomatic patients is uncertain. The aim of our study was to assess IgM and IgG prevalence in sera in a large cohort of HCWs previously subjected to Nasopharyngeal swab test (NST) after accurate risk assessment due to positive COVID-19 patient exposure during an observation period of 90 days. METHODS: 2407 asymptomatic HCWs that had close contact with COVID-19 patients in the period between April 8th and June 7th were screened with NST based on the RT-PCR method. In parallel, they underwent large-scale chemiluminescence immunoassays involving IgM-IgG serological screening to determine actual viral spread in the same cohort. RESULTS: During the 90-day observation period, 18 workers (0.75%) resulted positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection at the NST, whereas the positivity rates for IgM and IgG were 11.51% and 2.37%, respectively (277 workers). Despite high specificity, serological tests were inadequate for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with previous positive NST results (IgM and IgG sensitivities of 27.78% and 50.00%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate a widespread low viral load of SARS-CoV-2 among hospital workers. However, serological screening showed very low sensitivity with respect to NST in identifying infected workers, and negative IgG and IgM results should not exclude the diagnosis of COVID-19. IgG-IgM chemiluminescence immunoassays could increase the diagnosis of COVID-19 only in association with NST, and this association is considered helpful for decision-making regarding returning to work.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Personal de Salud , Hospitales , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G , Inmunoglobulina M , Italia/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Salud Pública , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Levels of antibodies induced by the measles virus-containing vaccine have been shown to decline over time, but there is no formal recommendation about testing immunized subjects (in particular, healthcare workers [HCWs]) to investigate the persistence of measles immunoglobulin G (IgG). METHODS: This study aims to evaluate the long-term immunogenicity of measles vaccine in a sample of medical students and residents of the University of Bari who attended the Hygiene Department for a biological risk assessment (April 2014-June 2018). RESULTS: Two thousand immunized (2 doses of measles-mumps-rubella [MMR] vaccine) students and residents were tested; 305 of these (15%) did not show protective anti-measles IgG. This proportion was higher among subjects who received vaccination at ≤15 months (20%) than in those who received vaccination at 16-23 months (17%) and at ≥24 months (10%) (P < .0001). After an MMR vaccine booster dose, we noted a seroconversion of 74% of seronegative HCWs. The overall seroconversion rate after a second dose (booster) was 93%. No serious adverse events were noted after the booster doses. CONCLUSIONS: An important proportion of subjects immunized for measles do not show a protective IgG titer in the 10 years after vaccination. Our management strategy seems consistent with the purpose of evidencing immunological memory.
Asunto(s)
Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/inmunología , Sarampión/prevención & control , Morbillivirus/inmunología , Virus de la Parotiditis/inmunología , Paperas/prevención & control , Virus de la Rubéola/inmunología , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Vacunación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Italia , Masculino , Sarampión/virología , Paperas/virología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/virología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Pneumothorax in newborns can be life-threatening. The traditional treatment of pneumothorax is chest drain placement. Recently, modified pigtail catheter has been proposed as a less traumatic approach despite limited experience in infants. To compare the effectiveness and safety of pigtail catheters versus traditional straight chest drains in term and preterm infants with pneumothorax, in two tertiary neonatal units: Policlinico Hospital in Bari, IT and John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford, UK. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 47 newborns with pneumothorax admitted to the two units between October 2009 and June 2017, and treated with either pigtail catheters or straight chest drains. Three newborns (6.7%) were excluded from the study because they were treated with both types of drains. The remaining 44 neonates were included in the analysis. Overall, 56.8% (n = 25/44) of pneumothoraces were drained with pigtail catheters and 43.2% (n = 19/44) with straight drains. No differences in gestational age and birth weight were found. The success rate, defined as complete radiological resolution of the pneumothorax after drainage, was significantly higher in the pigtail group (96.0% versus 73.7%; p < 0.05). Days of drainage, length of hospital stay and duration of respiratory support were not significantly different. Subcutaneous emphysema and drain dislodgement/malfunction occurred only in the straight drain group (0.0% versus 11.1%; p = 0.181). No significant differences in mortality between the two groups were found (28.0% pigtail group versus 26.3% straight drain group; p > 0.05).Conclusion: Pigtail catheters are a safe and effective alternative to traditional chest drains for infants with pneumothorax. What is Known:⢠Air leaks in newborns can represent an emergency, especially among preterms;⢠The first treatment in a life-threatening pneumothorax is thoracentesis with needle aspiration or placement of a chest drain.What is New:⢠Pigtail catheter have been described as an alternative to traditional chest drains;⢠Pigtail catheters are a safe and effective alternative to traditional chest drains for infants with pneumothorax.
Asunto(s)
Tubos Torácicos , Drenaje/instrumentación , Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/métodos , Neumotórax/terapia , Drenaje/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular and renal disease are nowadays among the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Western Countries. Low birth weight has been recently considered a key factor in determining cardiovascular disease and long-term renal disease in adulthood. METHODS: In our study we analyzed, through echocardiography, eco color Doppler of carotid arteries, ultrasound of abdominal aorta and kidneys, morphological characteristics of cardiovascular and renal system, in a group of children born preterm with very low birth weight, (birth weight<1500 grams) and in a group of children, age and sex matched, born at term with weight appropriate for gestational age. Fifteen children born very low birth weight preterm (cases), aged from 3 to 5 years, and 15, age and sex matched children, born appropriate for gestational age at term (controls) were enrolled in the study. RESULTS: The two groups were homogeneous for interventricular septum diameter, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, left atrial diameter, and ejection fraction. Left ventricular end diastolic diameter was higher in case compared to controls (P=0.04), while aortic diameter root smaller (P=0.005). E and A waves peak velocities and E/A ratio resulted lower in cases compared to controls (P=0.02, P<0.001and P<0.001, respectively). Tei index, S, e' and a' waves velocities were similar in the two groups, while E/e' ratio was higher in cases (P=0.046). Intima-media thickness and antero-posterior diameter of abdominal aorta values did not differ in cases versus controls. Longitudinal diameters of both kidneys were reduced in cases compared to controls (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by the small sample size, our study highlighted an increased size of the left ventricle and altered left ventricular diastolic function in children born very low birth weight preterm, but no long-term consequences on systolic performance and vascular structure have been found. The finding of smaller kidneys in ex-preterm very low birth weight children could explain their higher susceptibility to develop renal disease in adulthood.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Recien Nacido Prematuro/fisiología , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso/fisiología , Riñón/anomalías , Adolescente , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Preescolar , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Recent literature suggests that lung ultrasound might have a role in the diagnosis and management of bronchiolitis. The aim of the study is to evaluate the relationship between an ultrasound score and the clinical progression of bronchiolitis: need for supplemental oxygen, duration of oxygen therapy and hospital stay. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational single-center study, conducted in a pediatric unit during the 2017-2018 epidemic periods. All consecutive patients admitted with clinical signs of acute bronchiolitis, but without the need for supplemental oxygen, underwent a lung ultrasound in the first 24 h of hospital care. The lung involvement was graded based on the ultrasound score. During clinical progression, need for supplemental oxygen, duration of oxygen therapy and duration of hospital stay were recorded. Results: The final analysis included 83 patients, with a mean age of 4.5 ± 4.1 months. The lung ultrasound score in patients that required supplemental oxygen during hospitalization was 4.5 ± 1.7 (range: 2.0-8.0), different from the one of the not supplemented infants (2.5 ± 1.8; range: 0.0-6.0; p < 0.001). Ultrasound score was associated with the need for supplemental oxygen (OR = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.5-3.3; p < 0.0001). Duration of oxygen therapy was not associated with LUS score (p > 0.05). Length of hospital stay (coef. = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.2-0.7; p < 0.0001) correlates with LUS score. Conclusion: Lung ultrasound score correlates with the need of supplemental oxygen and length of hospital stay in infants with acute bronchiolitis.