A Review of the Cardiovascular Safety of Prucalopride in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.

Prokinetic agents, specifically 5-hydroxytryptamine type 4 (5-HT 4 ) receptor agonists, have been shown to provide relief in chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). The first-generation 5-HT 4 agonists were initially withdrawn from use owing to associations with serious cardiovascular (CV) events. This review summarizes CV safety data for prucalopride, a high-affinity 5-HT 4 agonist approved in the United States in 2018 for adults with CIC. No significant effects of prucalopride on CV safety were observed in animal models or early-phase clinical studies, including a thorough QT study at therapeutic (2 mg) or supratherapeutic (10 mg) doses. Among 1,750 patients with CIC who received prucalopride (2-4 mg) in 5 phase 3 studies, no trends in CV adverse events, electrocardiogram parameters, or blood pressure were documented; ≤1.0%-2.0% of patients had prolonged QT interval corrected for heart rate (HR) using Fridericia formula after placebo or prucalopride treatment, and low HR occurred in ≤6.1% and ≤3.3% of these patients, respectively. In two 24-month observational studies among 2,468 patients, changes in electrocardiogram parameters over time were minor, except at occasional time points when significant changes from baseline were reported for HR or QT interval. In a real-world European CV safety study among 35,087 patients (prucalopride, 5,715; polyethylene glycol 3350 [PEG3350], 29,372), results were consistent for no evidence of increased risk of major adverse CV events among patients treated with prucalopride vs PEG3350 (incidence rate ratio = 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.36-1.14). Studies to date have not raised concerns regarding the impact of prucalopride treatment on CV parameters.

Effects of Teduglutide on Diarrhea in Pediatric Patients with Short Bowel Syndrome-Associated Intestinal Failure.

OBJECTIVES: This post-hoc analysis evaluated the effect of teduglutide treatment on diarrhea in patients with short bowel syndrome-associated intestinal failure (SBS-IF). METHODS: Data from 2 open-label, multicenter, phase 3 pediatric SBS-IF clinical trials of teduglutide (NCT01952080 and NCT02682381) were pooled where possible. The primary objective was to evaluate the change in stool consistency, frequency, and volume from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 of treatment in patients who received any teduglutide dose from both studies ("total teduglutide"). Safety assessments included gastrointestinal adverse event reporting. RESULTS: Overall, 101 patients were analyzed. Among the total teduglutide group (n = 87), there were significant changes from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 in mean (standard error) Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) score [-1.8 (0.26; P < 0.0001) and -2.2 (0.27; P < 0.0001), respectively], parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluid (PN/IV) volume [-16.9 (1.7; P < 0.0001) and -20.1 (2.3; P < 0.0001) mL/kg/day, respectively], and enteral nutrition volume [9.2 (1.7; P < 0.0001) and 9.6 (2.3; P = 0.0002) mL/kg/day, respectively]. Among patients in the standard of care group (n = 14) there were numerical changes in BSFS score, and enteral nutrition volume at weeks 12 and 24; significant changes in PN/IV volume [-6.9 (1.5) mL/kg/day; P = 0.0041] were observed at 24 weeks, but not at 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: In this post-hoc analysis, short-term treatment with teduglutide was associated with improved stool consistency, as well as trends towards reductions in PN/IV requirements and advancements in enteral nutrition volume in children with SBS-IF. Further research assessing the impact of patient-level factors on stool characteristics when using teduglutide is warranted.

Teduglutide improves liver chemistries in short bowel syndrome-associated intestinal failure: Post hoc analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatic complications are common in patients with short bowel syndrome-associated intestinal failure (SBS-IF). Teduglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-2 analogue, demonstrated efficacy in reducing parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluid dependence among patients with SBS-IF in phase 3 clinical studies. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from two separate randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational phase 3 clinical studies. Adult patients with SBS-IF with parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluid dependence without liver disease at baseline were randomized to treatment with the glucagon-like peptide-2 analogue teduglutide (0.05 or 0.10 mg/kg/day) or placebo subcutaneously once daily for 24 weeks. Mixed-effects models assessed the baseline predictors of change in liver chemistries. RESULTS: Between baseline and week 24, teduglutide treatment (n = 109) was associated with least squares mean reductions in aspartate aminotransferase (-7.51 IU/L; P = 0.014), alanine aminotransferase (-12.15 IU/L; P = 0.002), and bilirubin (-5.03 µmol/L [-0.057 mg/dl]; P < 0.001) compared with that of the placebo (n = 59). These values were independent of reductions in parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluid dependence. CONCLUSION: Teduglutide treatment was associated with reductions in liver chemistries by week 24, which is beneficial for patients with SBS-IF beyond improvements in parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluid dependence. Future studies should examine how long-term teduglutide might mitigate the risk of liver disease in patients with SBS-IF.

Clinical Outcomes Before and After Prucalopride Treatment: An Observational Study in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: This real-world US-based claims study compared constipation-related symptoms and complications 6 months before and after prucalopride initiation in adults with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). METHODS: This observational, retrospective cohort analysis used the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database and the Medicare Supplemental Database (January 2015-June 2020). Prucalopride-treated patients (≥18 years old) who had ≥1 constipation-related International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification ( ICD-10-CM ) diagnosis code during the baseline or study period were included. The proportions of patients with constipation-related symptoms (abdominal pain, abdominal distension [gaseous], incomplete defecation, and nausea) and constipation-related complications (anal fissure and fistula, intestinal obstruction, rectal prolapse, hemorrhoids, perianal venous thrombosis, perianal/perirectal abscess, and rectal bleeding) were examined. Constipation-related symptoms and complications were identified using ICD-10-CM , ICD-10 - Procedure Coding System , or Current Procedural Terminology codes. Data were stratified by age (overall, 18-64 years, and ≥65 years). RESULTS: This study included 690 patients: The mean (SD) patient age was 48.0 (14.7) years, and 87.5% were women. The proportions of patients overall with constipation-related symptoms decreased 6 months after prucalopride initiation (abdominal pain [50.4% vs 33.3%, P < 0.001]; abdominal distension [gaseous] [23.9% vs 13.3%, P < 0.001]; and nausea [22.6% vs 17.7%, P < 0.01]; no improvements observed for incomplete defecation). Similarly, the proportions of patients overall with constipation-related complications decreased 6 months after prucalopride initiation (intestinal obstruction [4.9% vs 2.0%, P < 0.001]; hemorrhoids [10.7% vs 7.0%, P < 0.05]; and rectal bleeding [4.1% vs 1.7%, P < 0.05]). DISCUSSION: This study suggests that prucalopride may be associated with improved constipation-related symptoms and complications 6 months after treatment initiation.

Effects of treatment cessation and re-treatment in randomized controlled trials of prucalopride in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation.

BACKGROUND: Prucalopride is a selective, high-affinity serotonin type 4 receptor agonist approved for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) in adults. We investigated the impact of prucalopride cessation and re-treatment on efficacy and safety. METHODS: Data were from two randomized controlled trials in adults with CIC. In a dose-finding trial, complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed during a 4-week run-out period after a 4-week treatment period (TP; prucalopride 0.5-4 mg once daily or placebo). In a re-treatment trial, CSBMs and TEAEs were assessed during two 4-week TPs (prucalopride 4 mg once daily or placebo) separated by a 2- or 4-week washout period. KEY RESULTS: In the dose-finding trial (N = 234; 43-48 patients/group), mean CSBMs/week and the proportion of responders (≥3 CSBMs/week) were higher with prucalopride than placebo during the TP, but similar in all groups 1-4 weeks after treatment cessation. TEAEs were less frequent following treatment cessation. In the re-treatment trial (efficacy analyses: prucalopride, n = 189; placebo, n = 205), the proportion of responders was similar in both TPs and significantly higher (p ≤ 0.001) with prucalopride (TP1, 38.6%; TP2, 36.0%) than placebo (TP1, 10.7%; TP2, 11.2%). Most patients who responded to prucalopride in TP1 responded again in TP2 (71.2%). TEAEs were less frequent in TP2 than TP1. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Prucalopride cessation resulted in a loss of clinical effect to baseline levels within 7 days. Similar efficacy and safety were observed between TP1 and TP2 after prucalopride was re-initiated following a washout period.

Safety of an investigational formulation of budesonide (budesonide oral suspension) for eosinophilic oesophagitis: an integrated safety analysis of six phase 1-3 clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Questions remain regarding the safety of swallowed topical corticosteroids in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE). AIM: To assess the safety of an investigational formulation of budesonide (budesonide oral suspension; BOS) from six trials. METHODS: Safety data were integrated from six trials (healthy adults: SHP621-101 [phase 1]; patients with EoE: MPI 101-01 and MPI 101-06 [phase 2]; SHP621-301, SHP621-302 and SHP621-303 [phase 3]) for participants who received ≥1 dose of study drug (BOS 2.0 mg twice daily [b.i.d.], BOS any dose [including BOS 2.0 mg b.i.d.] and placebo). Adverse events (AEs), laboratory testing, bone density and adrenal AEs were assessed. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates were calculated for AEs and AEs of special interest (AESIs). RESULTS: Overall, 514 unique participants were included (BOS 2.0 mg b.i.d., n = 292; BOS any dose, n = 448; placebo, n = 168). The BOS 2.0 mg b.i.d., BOS any dose and placebo groups totalled 93.7, 122.4 and 25.0 participant-years of exposure (PY), respectively. Proportions of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) and AESIs (any) reported were higher for BOS than placebo; however, most were mild/moderate in severity. The most commonly reported AESIs (exposure-adjusted incidence rates [per 100 PY]) in the BOS 2.0 mg b.i.d., BOS any dose and placebo groups were infections (133.5, 154.4 and 136.2, respectively) and gastrointestinal AEs (84.3, 80.9 and 92.1, respectively). Adrenal AEs were more frequent with BOS 2.0 mg b.i.d. and BOS any dose than placebo (44.8, 34.3 and 24.0, respectively). TEAEs and AESIs related to study drug or leading to discontinuation were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: BOS was well-tolerated; most TEAEs with BOS were mild/moderate in severity. GOV NUMBERS: SHP621-101 (no clinical trials registration number), MPI 101-01 (NCT00762073), MPI 101-06 (NCT01642212), SHP621-301 (NCT02605837), SHP621-302 (NCT02736409) and SHP621-303 (NCT03245840).