Familial risk and heritability of diagnosed borderline personality disorder: a register study of the Swedish population.

Family and twin studies of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) have found familial aggregation and genetic propensity for BPD, but estimates vary widely. Large-scale family studies of clinically diagnosed BPD are lacking. Therefore, we performed a total-population study estimating the familial aggregation and heritability of clinically diagnosed BPD. We followed 1,851,755 individuals born 1973-1993 in linked Swedish national registries. BPD-diagnosis was ascertained between 1997 and 2013, 11,665 received a BPD-diagnosis. We identified relatives and estimated sex and birth year adjusted hazard ratios, i.e., the rate of BPD-diagnoses in relatives to individuals with BPD-diagnosis compared to individuals with unaffected relatives, and used structural equation modeling to estimate heritability. The familial association decreased along with genetic relatedness. The hazard ratio was 11.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.6-83.8) for monozygotic twins; 7.4 (95% CI = 1.0-55.3) for dizygotic twins; 4.7 (95% CI = 3.9-5.6) for full siblings; 2.1 (95% CI = 1.5-3.0) for maternal half-siblings; 1.3 (95% CI = 0.9-2.1) for paternal half-siblings; 1.7 (95% CI = 1.4-2.0) for cousins whose parents were full siblings; 1.1 (95% CI = 0.7-1.8) for cousins whose parents were maternal half-siblings; and 1.9 (95% CI = 1.2-2.9) for cousins whose parents were paternal half-siblings. Heritability was estimated at 46% (95% CI = 39-53), and the remaining variance was explained by individually unique environmental factors. Our findings pave the way for further research into specific genetic variants, unique environmental factors implicated, and their interplay in risk for BPD.

Childhood symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and borderline personality disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Childhood attention-deficit /hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is known to be associated with adult Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). We investigated if any of the subdimensions of childhood ADHD, that is, impulsivity, inattention, or hyperactivity was more prominent in this association. METHODS: In a nation-wide cohort (N = 13,330), we utilized parent reported symptoms of childhood ADHD and clinically ascertained adult BPD diagnoses. The summed total scores of ADHD symptoms and its three subdimensions were used and standardized for effect size comparison. Associations were analyzed using Cox regression with sex and birth-year adjustments. Secondary outcomes were BPD-associated traits (i.e., self-harm and substance use) analyzed using logistic- and linear regression respectively. RESULTS: ADHD symptom severity was positively associated with BPD with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-1.79) per standard deviation increase in total ADHD symptoms. Impulsivity was the most prominent subdimension with the only statistically significant association when analyzed in a model mutually adjusted for all ADHD subdimensions-HR for inattention: 1.15 (95% CI: 0.85-1.55), hyperactivity: 0.94 (95% CI: 0.69-1.26), impulsivity: 1.46 (95% CI: 1.12-1.91). In secondary analyses, weak positive associations were seen between total ADHD symptom score and self-harm and substance use. In analyses by subdimensions of ADHD, associations were weak and most prominent for inattention in the model with self-harm. CONCLUSION: Childhood ADHD symptoms were associated with subsequent development of BPD diagnosis and appeared to be driven primarily by impulsivity. Our findings are important for understanding the association between childhood symptoms of ADHD and subsequent BPD.