United States' experience in nuchal translucency measurement: variation according to provider characteristics in over five million ultrasound examinations.

OBJECTIVE: The Nuchal Translucency Quality Review (NTQR) program has provided standardized education, credentialing and epidemiological monitoring of nuchal translucency (NT) measurements since 2005. Our aim was to review the effect on NT measurement of provider characteristics since the program's inception. METHODS: We evaluated the distribution of NT measurements performed between January 2005 and December 2019, for each of the three primary performance indicators of NT measurement (NT median multiples of the median (MoM), SD of log10 NT MoM and slope of NT with respect to crown-rump length (CRL)) for all providers within the NTQR program with more than 30 paired NT/CRL results. Provider characteristics explored as potential sources of variability included: number of NT ultrasound examinations performed annually (annual scan volume of the provider), duration of participation in the NTQR program, initial credentialing by an alternative pathway, provider type (physician vs sonographer) and number of NT-credentialed providers within the practice (size of practice). Each of these provider characteristics was evaluated for its effect on NT median MoM and geometric mean of the NT median MoM weighted for the number of ultrasound scans, and multiple regression was performed across all variables to control for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of 5 216 663 NT measurements from 9340 providers at 3319 sites, the majority (75%) of providers had an NT median MoM within the acceptable range of 0.9-1.1 and 85.5% had NT median MoM not statistically significantly outside this range. Provider characteristics associated with measurement within the expected range of performance included higher volume of NT scans performed annually, practice at a site with larger numbers of other NT-credentialed providers, longer duration of participation in the NTQR program and alternative initial credentialing pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Annual scan volume, duration of participation in the NTQR program, alternative initial credentialing pathway and number of other NT-credentialed providers within the practice are all associated with outcome metrics indicating quality of performance. It is critical that providers participate in ongoing quality assessment of NT measurement to maintain consistency and precision. Ongoing assessment programs with continuous feedback and education are necessary to maintain quality care. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Nuchal Translucency Quality Review (NTQR) program: first one and half million results.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of first-trimester nuchal translucency (NT) measurement by providers (physician-sonologists and sonographers) within the Nuchal Translucency Quality Review (NTQR) program. METHODS: After training and credentialing providers, the NTQR monitored performance of NT measurement by the extent to which an individual's median multiple of the normal median (MoM) for crown-rump length (CRL) was within the range 0.9-1.1 MoM of a published normal median curve. The SD of log10 MoM and regression slope of NT on CRL were also evaluated. We report the distribution between providers of these performance indicators and evaluate potential sources of variation. RESULTS: Among the first 1.5 million scans in the NTQR program, performed between 2005 and 2011, there were 1 485 944 with CRL in the range 41-84 mm, from 4710 providers at 2150 ultrasound units. Among the 3463 providers with at least 30 scans in total, the median of the providers' median NT-MoMs was 0.913. Only 1901 (55%) had a median NT-MoM within the expected range; there were 89 above 1.1 MoM, 1046 at 0.8-0.9 MoM, 344 at 0.7-0.8 MoM and 83 below 0.7 MoM. There was a small increase in the median NT-MoM according to providers' length of time in the NTQR program and number of scans entered annually. On average, physician-sonologists had a higher median NT-MoM than did sonographers, as did those already credentialed before joining the program. The median provider SD was 0.093 and the median slope was 13.5%. SD correlated negatively with the median NT-MoM (r = -0.34) and positively with the slope (r = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Even with extensive training, credentialing and monitoring, there remains considerable variability between NT providers. There was a general tendency towards under-measurement of NT compared with expected values, although more experienced providers had performance closer to that expected.