Hereditary angioedema outcomes in US patients switched from injectable long-term prophylactic medication to oral berotralstat.

BACKGROUND: Berotralstat, a first-line, once-daily, oral plasma kallikrein inhibitor for long-term prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema (HAE), is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the safety, effectiveness, and impact on treatment satisfaction in patients who switched from injectable long-term prophylactics to oral berotralstat monotherapy (150 mg daily) at US sites in the international open-label APeX-S study. METHODS: APeX-S was an open-label, Phase II study of berotralstat conducted in 22 countries. Here, we focus on APeX-S patients enrolled at US sites who switched from injectable long-term prophylactics to berotralstat 150 mg once-daily monotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients discontinued lanadelumab (n = 21), subcutaneous C1 esterase inhibitor (n = 11), or intravenous C1 esterase inhibitor (n = 2) and switched to berotralstat 150 mg monotherapy. Vomiting, diarrhea, and upper respiratory tract infection were the most common adverse events (each 11.8%). Mean monthly attack rates were consistently low after the switch to berotralstat. The mean (SEM) monthly attack rate was 0.29 (0.11) at Month 1, 0.48 (0.15) at Month 6, and 0.58 (0.23) at Month 12. The median attack rate was 0 attack/mo throughout 12 months of treatment. Improvements were observed in the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication from baseline to Month 12 after the switch to berotralstat monotherapy, with the greatest improvements in convenience. CONCLUSION: The transition from injectable prophylactic medication to berotralstat was generally well tolerated. Patients switching to berotralstat monotherapy maintained good control of their HAE symptoms and reported improved treatment satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03472040.

Changes in the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and red blood cell transfusion in patients with cancer amidst regulatory and reimbursement changes.

PURPOSE: Evaluate changes in use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and red blood cell transfusion in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy following regulatory and reimbursement actions. METHODS: Calendar year patient cohorts (2005-2013) with breast, colorectal, lung, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, ovarian, or prostate cancer and receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy were identified within the Marketscan database. Incidence of ESA treatment and transfusion were estimated in each year, as was median number of ESA administrations. Clinical characteristics associated with ESA administration and transfusions were evaluated by using multivariable logistic regression. Additionally, annual new ESA user cohorts within the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records database (2011-2014) were examined to assess hemoglobin levels at ESA initiation. RESULTS: Across all tumor types, ESA use decreased substantially (breast cancer: 53.7 to 3.2%; lung cancer: 66.0 to 13.3%, non-Hodgkin lymphoma: 39.8 to 3.8%), transfusion use increased (2 to 5.5%, 5.5 to 18.2%, and 4.5 to 9.1%, respectively), and median number of ESA administrations declined. Across all tumor types, proportion of patients initiating an ESA with hemoglobin >10 g/dL was <10% from 2011 onward. In recent years, cancer patients who are older, female, and have chronic kidney disease or moderate or severe liver disease were most likely to receive ESAs. CONCLUSION: Subsequent to important regulatory and reimbursement ESA-related actions, total ESA exposure among cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy declined substantially. Today, fewer patients receive ESA therapy, and among those treated, more are initiated at hemoglobin levels <10 g/dL and are exposed for a shorter duration, consistent with current product labeling.

Erythropoiesis stimulating agents and reno-protection: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) were proposed to enhance survival of renal tissues through direct effects via activation of EPO receptors on renal cells resulting in reduced cell apoptosis, or indirect effects via increased oxygen delivery due to increased numbers of Hb containing red blood cells. Thus through several mechanisms there may be benefit of ESA administration on kidney disease progression and kidney function in renal patients. However conflicting ESA reno-protection outcomes have been reported in both pre-clinical animal studies and human clinical trials. To better understand the potential beneficial effects of ESAs on renal-patients, meta-analyses of clinical trials is needed. METHODS: Literature searches and manual searches of references lists from published studies were performed. Controlled trials that included ESA treatment on renal patients with relevant renal endpoints were selected. RESULTS: Thirty two ESA controlled trials in 3 categories of intervention were identified. These included 7 trials with patients who had a high likelihood of AKI, 7 trials with kidney transplant patients and 18 anemia correction trials with chronic kidney disease (predialysis) patients. There was a trend toward improvement in renal outcomes in the ESA treated arm of AKI and transplant trials, but none reached statistical significance. In 12 of the anemia correction trials, meta-analyses showed no difference in renal outcomes with the anemia correction but both arms received some ESA treatment making it difficult to assess effects of ESA treatment alone. However, in 6 trials the low Hb arm received no ESAs and meta-analysis also showed no difference in renal outcomes, consistent with no benefit of ESA/ Hb increase. CONCLUSIONS: Most ESA trials were small with modest event rates. While trends tended to favor the ESA treatment arm, these meta-analyses showed no reduction of incidence of AKI, no reduction in DGF or improvement in 1-year graft survival after renal transplantation and no significant delay in progression of CKD. These results do not support significant clinical reno-protection by ESAs.

Efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alpha in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the efficacy of darbepoetin alpha (DA) for treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)-related anaemia. Eligible studies were prospective, interventional, and reported World Health Organization, French-American-British, or International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) criteria. Outcomes included erythroid response rate (primary); haemoglobin response; change in haemoglobin, transfusion status, and quality-of-life (QoL); and safety. Ten studies (N = 647) were analysed. Erythroid response rate range was 38-72%; median response duration range was 12-51+ months. Patients with erythropoietin (EPO) <100 iu/l had 35% [95% confidence interval (CI): 22-48%; P < 0·001) better response than patients with EPO >100 iu/l. Erythropoesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-naïve patients had 17% (95% CI: 3-32%; P = 0·022) greater response rate than those previously treated with ESA. Nonetheless, previously treated patients had response rates of 25-75%. Higher baseline haemoglobin levels, higher dose, transfusion-independence and low-risk IPSS status were reported by several studies to be associated with better response. QoL, transfusion rates and haemoglobin levels improved with treatment. Hypertension, thromboembolism and progression to acute myeloid leukaemia were reported in 2%, 1% and 1% of patients, respectively. This meta-analysis suggests that DA treatment can be useful for improving erythroid response in MDS patients with anaemia, even among patients previously treated with ESA.

Berotralstat for long-term prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema in Japan: Parts 2 and 3 of the randomized APeX-J Phase III trial.

Background: Berotralstat is a once-daily oral inhibitor of plasma kallikrein for the prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) in patients ≥12 years. APeX-J aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of berotralstat in Japan. Methods: APeX-J was a Phase III trial comprising 3 parts (NCT03873116). Part 1 was a randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of berotralstat 150 or 110 mg over 24 weeks. Part 2 was a 28-week dose-blinded phase in which berotralstat-treated patients continued the same dose and placebo patients were re-randomized to berotralstat 150 or 110 mg. In Part 3, all patients remaining on study received berotralstat 150 mg in an open-label manner for up to an additional 52 weeks. The primary endpoint of Parts 2 and 3 was long-term safety and tolerability, and secondary endpoints examined effectiveness. Results: Seventeen patients entered Part 2, and 11 continued into Part 3. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 14/17 patients (82.4%) in Parts 2 or 3; the most common were nasopharyngitis, abdominal pain, cystitis, influenza, and vertigo. One patient (5.9%) experienced a drug-related TEAE (Grade 4 increased hepatic enzyme). No drug-related serious TEAEs were reported. For patients who completed 26 months of treatment with berotralstat 150 mg (n = 5), mean (standard error of the mean) monthly HAE attack rates and on-demand medication use decreased from baseline by 1.15 (0.09) attacks/month and 2.8 (0.64) doses/month, respectively. Sustained improvements were also observed in patient quality of life and treatment satisfaction. Conclusions: Long-term prophylaxis with berotralstat raised no new safety signals and was effective at reducing attacks and improving patient-reported outcomes. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03873116. Registered March 13, 2019. Retrospectively registered.

Once-Daily Oral Berotralstat for Long-Term Prophylaxis of Hereditary Angioedema: The Open-Label Extension of the APeX-2 Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Berotralstat is a first-line, once-daily oral plasma kallikrein inhibitor approved for prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks in patients 12 years or older. OBJECTIVE: This analysis examined the safety and effectiveness of long-term prophylaxis with berotralstat. METHODS: APeX-2 was a phase 3, parallel-group, multicenter trial in patients with HAE caused by C1-inhibitor deficiency (NCT03485911). Part 1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of 150 and 110 mg of berotralstat over 24 weeks. In part 2, berotralstat-treated patients continued the same treatment, and placebo-treated patients were re-randomized to 150 or 110 mg of berotralstat for 24 weeks. In part 3, all patients were treated with open-label berotralstat at 150 mg, which could be continued for up to an additional 4 years. In part 3, the primary endpoint was long-term safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included HAE attack rates and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Eighty-one patients entered part 3. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 82.7% of patients, with most being mild or moderate in severity. The most common TEAEs were nasopharyngitis, urinary tract infection, abdominal pain, arthralgia, coronavirus infection, and diarrhea. Drug-related TEAEs occurred in 14.8% of patients, but none were serious. For patients who completed 96 weeks of berotralstat treatment (n = 70), the mean (standard error) change in attack rate from baseline was -2.21 (0.20) attacks/mo. Clinically meaningful improvements in QoL were also observed, with the largest improvements in the functioning domain. CONCLUSION: Berotralstat was generally well tolerated, provided rapid and sustained reductions in HAE attacks and improved QoL over 96 weeks.

A retrospective evaluation of chemotherapy dose intensity and supportive care for early-stage breast cancer in a curative setting.

Early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) is commonly treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy, and maintaining full-dose chemotherapy on the planned schedule is associated with improved patient outcome. Retrospective analysis of patients with ESBC treated from 1997 to 2000 showed that 56 % of patients received a relative dose intensity (RDI) <85 % (Lyman et al., J Clin Oncol 21(24):4524-4531, 2003). To determine current practice, we evaluated treatment patterns at 24 US community- and hospital-based oncology practices, 79 % of which participated in the previous study. Data were abstracted from medical records of 532 patients with surgically resected ESBC (stage I-IIIa) treated from 2007 to 2009, who were ≥18 years old and had completed ≥1 cycle of one of the following regimens: docetaxel + cyclophosphamide (TC); doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide (AC); AC followed by paclitaxel (AC-T); docetaxel + carboplatin + trastuzumab (TCH); or docetaxel + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide (TAC). Endpoints included RDI, dose delays, dose reductions, grade 3/4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia (FN), FN-related hospitalization, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use, and antimicrobial use. In this study, TC was the most common chemotherapy regimen (42 %), and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens were more common relative to the previously published results (89 vs <4 %). Overall, 83.8 % of patients received an RDI ≥85 %, an improvement over the previous study where 44.5 % received an RDI ≥85 %. Other changes seen between this and the previous study included a lower incidence of dose delays (16 vs 25 %) and dose reductions (21 vs 37 %) and increased use of primary prophylactic G-CSF (76 vs ~3 %). Here, 40 % of patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia, 3 % had FN, 2 % had an FN-related hospitalization, and 30 % received antimicrobial therapy; these measures were not available in the previously published results. Though RDI was higher here than in the previous study, 16.2 % of patients still received an RDI <85 %. Understanding factors that contribute to reduced RDI may further improve chemotherapy delivery, and ultimately, patient outcomes.

Assessment of HAE prophylaxis transition from androgen therapy to berotralstat: A subset analysis of the APeX-S trial.

Background: Given the recent approval of oral berotralstat in several countries for hereditary angioedema (HAE) prophylaxis, transition from long-term androgens to berotralstat may occur in clinical practice. The open-label, Phase II APeX-S trial provided an opportunity to assess the safety and effectiveness of berotralstat in patients previously treated with differing durations of androgens and shorter transition periods. Therefore, we examined the safety, effectiveness, and impact on quality of life of berotralstat after prior androgen use in patients from the APeX-S trial. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations were also examined because of the association with androgen exposure and hepatic function impairment. Methods: We conducted an analysis of a subset of 39 patients from the APeX-S trial aged ≥12 years with HAE due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1-INH) with prior androgen use who discontinued androgen therapy within <60 days of receiving berotralstat. Patients received daily berotralstat (150 mg) and were divided into subgroups for this analysis based on time between androgen discontinuation and berotralstat commencement (<14 days versus 14 to <60 days). Results: Berotralstat was generally well tolerated, with nasopharyngitis (21%), upper respiratory tract infection (15%), nausea (15%), diarrhea (15%), and abdominal pain (10%) being the most common adverse events occurring in ≥10% of the total subset. Only 7/145 (5%) of all APeX-S study patients with a prior history of androgen therapy experienced ALT elevations, 6 of which were grade 3 or 4 toxicities. All 7 patients recovered without sequelae and belonged to the subgroup of patients who transitioned <14 days after discontinuing androgens (n = 18). A reduction in monthly attack rate versus Month 1 was observed over 12 months for all patients who transitioned from prior androgen therapy to berotralstat prophylaxis in under 60 days, irrespective of duration of prior androgen therapy or timing of transition (N = 39). Similarly, meaningful patient-reported improvements from both Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication scores were achieved, with a sustained benefit shown over the berotralstat treatment period. Conclusions: Berotralstat treatment led to sustained HAE symptom control irrespective of duration of prior androgen therapy or timing of transition. Most patients safely transitioned from long-term androgens to berotralstat. Although occurring in a small group of patients, liver-related adverse events following berotralstat treatment may be associated with a shorter androgen washout period, but further research is required to confirm this. Clinical trial registration: NCT03472040. Retrospectively registered March 21, 2018.

Assessing the effect of darbepoetin alfa on patient-reported fatigue in chemotherapy-induced anemia in four randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

PURPOSE: This analysis examined the effects of darbepoetin alfa on hemoglobin and fatigue outcomes in patients with cancer using latent growth curve modeling (LGM). METHODS: Data from 4 clinical trials of darbepoetin alfa in lung cancer (2 studies; n = 547; n = 288), lymphoproliferative malignancies (n = 339), and non-myeloid malignancies (n = 320) were analyzed separately. Fatigue was assessed using the FACT-Fatigue (FACT-F) scale. Effects of darbepoetin alfa on changes in hemoglobin and FACT-F scores were evaluated using LGM, controlling for age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, health status, and total transfusions. RESULTS: Patients receiving darbepoetin alfa had higher rates of change in hemoglobin (standardized regression coefficient [[Formula: see text]] = 0.30 to 0.53, all P < 0.05) than placebo. Patients with greater rates of change in hemoglobin reported improvements in fatigue outcomes ([Formula: see text] = 0.28 to 0.59, all P < 0.05). The total standardized effect of darbepoetin alfa on fatigue outcomes corresponded to a mean change of 0.9 to 3.5 points in FACT-F scores, with one trial demonstrating changes exceeding the minimal important difference of 3 points. CONCLUSIONS: Darbepoetin alfa improved hemoglobin which was associated with improved fatigue across the 4 trials. Clinically, meaningful improvement in fatigue was seen in 2 trials. More complex statistical analysis models of treatment may assist in understanding the effects of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on patient-reported outcomes.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Noninferiority Study of the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Darbepoetin Alfa for Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in Patients With Advanced NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated noninferiority of darbepoetin alfa versus placebo for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in anemic patients with NSCLC treated to a 12.0-g/dL hemoglobin (Hb) ceiling. METHODS: Adults with stage IV NSCLC expected to receive two or more cycles of myelosuppressive chemotherapy and Hb less than or equal to 11.0 g/dL were randomized 2:1 to blinded 500 µg darbepoetin alfa or placebo every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was OS; a stratified Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate noninferiority (upper confidence limit for hazard ratio [HR] < 1.15). Secondary endpoints were PFS and incidence of transfusions or Hb less than or equal to 8.0 g/dL from week 5 to end of the efficacy treatment period. RESULTS: The primary analysis set included 2516 patients: 1680 were randomized to darbepoetin alfa; 836 to placebo. The study was stopped early per independent Data Monitoring Committee recommendation after the primary endpoint was met with no new safety concerns. Darbepoetin alfa was noninferior to placebo for OS (stratified HR = 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83‒1.01) and PFS (stratified HR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.87‒1.04). Darbepoetin alfa was superior to placebo for transfusion or Hb less than or equal to 8.0 g/dL from week 5 to end of the efficacy treatment period (stratified odds ratio = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.57‒0.86; p < 0.001). Objective tumor response was similar between the groups (darbepoetin alfa, 36.4%; placebo, 32.6%). Incidence of serious adverse events was 31.1% in both groups. No unexpected adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Darbepoetin alfa dosed to a 12.0-g/dL Hb ceiling was noninferior to placebo for OS and PFS and significantly reduced odds of transfusion or Hb less than or equal to 8.0 g/dL in anemic patients with NSCLC receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Phase 2, single-arm trial to evaluate the effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa for correcting anaemia in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) often develop anaemia resulting in frequent transfusions and fatigue. Darbepoetin alfa is an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) approved for treating chemotherapy-induced anaemia. This single-arm, phase 2 study examined the efficacy of darbepoetin alfa 500 microg every 3 weeks (Q3W) for treating anaemia in low-risk MDS patients (after 6 weeks, poor responders received darbepoetin alfa 500 microg every 2 weeks). The primary end-point was the incidence of erythroid responses (International Working Group criteria) after 13 weeks of therapy. Secondary end-points included the incidence of erythroid responses at weeks 28 and 55, [or weeks 27 and 53 for dose escalations to every two weeks (Q2W)], and safety parameters. Analyses were stratified by the patient's previous ESA therapy status [ESA-naïve (n = 144) vs. prior ESA-treated (n = 62)]. After 13 weeks of therapy, 49% of ESA-naïve patients and 26% of prior ESA-treated patients achieved a major erythroid response. After 53/55 weeks, 59% of ESA-naïve patients and 34% of prior ESA-treated patients achieved a major erythroid response; 82% of ESA-naïve patients and 55% of prior ESA-treated patients achieved target haemoglobin of 110 g/l. Thromboembolic or related adverse events occurred in 2% of patients; no pulmonary embolisms were reported. In conclusion, darbepoetin alfa, 500 microg Q3W appeared well tolerated and increased haemoglobin levels in low-risk MDS patients.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III trial of darbepoetin alfa in lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving chemotherapy often develop anemia. Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp(TM)) is an erythropoiesis-stimulating glycoprotein that has been shown, in dose-finding studies, to be safe and clinically active when administered to patients with cancer every 1, 2, or 3 weeks. This phase III study compared the safety and efficacy of darbepoetin alfa with placebo in patients with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 320 anemic patients (hemoglobin or=25% improvement; mean difference = 13%; 95% CI = 2% to 23%, P =.019) than patients receiving placebo. Patients receiving darbepoetin alfa did not appear to have any untoward effect in disease outcome and did not develop antibodies to the drug. Adverse events were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia can safely and effectively be treated with weekly darbepoetin alfa therapy. Darbepoetin alfa decreased blood transfusion requirements, increased hemoglobin concentration, and decreased fatigue. Although no conclusions can be drawn about survival from this study, the potential salutary effect on disease outcome warrants further investigation in a prospectively designed study.

Changing patterns of chemotherapy relative dose intensity and supportive care for aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Maintaining high relative dose intensity (RDI) is associated with improved outcomes, especially in patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). To evaluate changes in practice, we examined RDI, chemotherapy treatment patterns, dose delays and reductions, neutropenia and related consequences, and supportive care in 500 patients with aggressive B-cell NHL treated between 2006-2009. We then compared the results to a previous study of patients treated between 1993-2001. Relative to the previous study, rituximab was a common addition to CHOP-21 (91% vs. 3%), more patients received an RDI ≥ 85% (68% vs. 52%), and fewer patients experienced dose reductions (21% vs. 35%), though incidences of dose delays were similar (26% vs. 23%). Incidences of febrile neutropenia (FN; 12% vs. 21%) and FN-related hospitalizations (10% vs. 16%) were lower. Finally, more patients received primary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors (75% vs. 12%). Together, these results illustrate evolving practice patterns for patients with aggressive B-cell NHL.

Treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia in breast cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial of darbepoetin alfa 200 microg every 2 weeks versus epoetin alfa 40,000 U weekly.

BACKGROUND: Current chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer result in high incidences of anemia, which can be treated with erythropoietic agents. The relative efficacy of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa was explored in this phase II, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial in anemic patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive darbepoetin alfa 200 microg every 2 weeks (n = 72) or epoetin alfa 40,000 U weekly (n = 69) for < or = 16 weeks. Clinical and hematologic endpoints and validation of a novel patient satisfaction questionnaire for anemia treatment were evaluated for all patients randomized to receive > or = 1 dose of study drug. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups. Mean changes in hemoglobin (Hb) level from baseline were similar at 1.9 g/dL for darbepoetin alfa and 1.7 g/dL for epoetin alfa. Hematopoietic responses (> or = 2 g/dL increase in Hb level from baseline or Hb level > or = 12 g/dL) were also similar between groups (88% for darbepoetin alfa and 81% for epoetin alfa). The proportions of patients who received a transfusion during treatment were 6% (95% CI, 0-11%) for darbepoetin alfa and 16% (95% CI, 7%-25%) for epoetin alfa. Most patients (67 patients receiving darbepoetin alfa [93%]; 61 patients receiving epoetin alfa [90%]) exhibited a clinically meaningful target Hb level > or = 11 g/dL. No differences in safety were observed. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that, in patients with breast cancer, darbepoetin alfa 200 microg every 2 weeks and epoetin alfa 40,000 U weekly result in comparable clinical outcomes for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia.

Utilization of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia.

PURPOSE: The patterns of use and effectiveness of therapy with darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) in hospital outpatient and community settings were evaluated. METHODS: Data were collected from medical charts at 65 oncology clinics in hospital outpatient and community settings for consecutive patients who received the first dose of either darbepoetin alfa or epoetin alfa between August 1, 2002, and February 15, 2003, and were to have had 12 weeks of follow-up data. RESULTS: Data from the charts of 3123 patients were abstracted. Of these patients, 2785 were treated with only one erythropoietic agent (1444 with darbepoetin alfa and 1341 with epoetin alfa) and were included in the analysis. The most common initial dosage of darbepoetin alfa was 200 microg every two weeks (61% of darbepoetin alfa recipients), and the most common initial dosage of epoetin alfa was 40,000 units weekly (72%). With these regimens, the dosage was escalated for 22% of darbepoetin alfa recipients and 23% of epoetin alfa recipients at a median of six weeks after the initial dose. The mean change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration after 12 weeks of therapy was similar for both groups, as was the percent of patients with red-blood-cell transfusions during treatment. CONCLUSION: The most common initial dosage of darbepoetin alfa for CIA was 200 microg every two weeks, and the most common initial dosage of epoetin alfa was 40,000 units weekly. At these dosages, the two agents appear to have similar clinical effectiveness.

A multicenter retrospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia.

BACKGROUND: Darbepoetin alfa is the second erythropoietic protein to be approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). In the clinical setting, darbepoetin alfa can be administered less frequently than epoetin alfa with similar efficacy. Practice patterns and outcomes associated with the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa in the clinical setting have not been reported. OBJECTIVE: This study compared practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for CIA at oncology practices in the United States. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data were abstracted from the medical charts of consecutive patients who began darbepoetin alfa treatment between August 1 and October 4, 2002, or epoetin alfa treatment between April 1 and July 31, 2002, and were receiving concurrent chemotherapy. These data were used to determine the initial dose and dosing schedule, dose changes, and changes in hemoglobin concentrations after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, adjusted for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and the incidence of RBC transfusions over time. To minimize potential bias, the study protocol defined specific end points and prespecified analytic techniques for assessing clinical outcomes with the 2 agents. RESULTS: The records of 1391 patients from 16 community and hospital outpatient oncology clinics were abstracted. Of these, 1293 patients (93.0%) received only 1 erythropoietic agent (darbepoetin alfa, 735 [56.8%]; epoetin alfa, 558 [43.2%]); the remainder received both agents. In the patients who received darbepoetin alfa, most (553 [75.2%]) received an initial dosage of 200 microg q2wk. A similar proportion (414 [74.2%]) received epoetin alfa at an initial dosage of 40,000 U qwk. As these were the regimens for the majority of patients whose records were abstracted, the results reported here are for these patients. The dose was increased in 63 darbepoetin alfa recipients (11.4%) and 58 epoetin alfa recipients (14.0%) at a median of 7 weeks. After 12 weeks, the 2 groups had an identical mean imputed change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration (1.0 g/dL), and the incidence of RBC transfusions during treatment was also similar between groups (darbepoetin alfa, 44553 [8.0%]; epoetin alfa, 39414 [9.4%]). CONCLUSIONS: Darbepoetin alfa 200 microg q2wk was used as a standard regimen for CIA at the 16 US oncology practices participating in this study. It appeared to be as effective as epoetin alfa 40,000 U qwk, with a reduced frequency of dosing.

Every-2-week darbepoetin alfa is comparable to rHuEPO in treating chemotherapy-induced anemia. Results of a combined analysis.

The safety and efficacy of darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp) at 3.0 microg/kg administered every 2 weeks and recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) given as 40,000 U weekly or 150 U/kg three times weekly were evaluated by pooling data from three darbepoetin alfa clinical studies. All studies enrolled anemic (hemoglobin < or = 11.0 g/dL) patients receiving multicycle chemotherapy. Open-label study drug was administered by subcutaneous injection. Hemoglobin concentrations, red blood cell transfusion requirements, and standard safety parameters were evaluated. Of 260 patients who received darbepoetin alfa at 3.0 microg/kg every 2 weeks and 115 patients who received rHuEPO three times weekly or once weekly, hematopoietic response (change in hemoglobin from baseline of > or = 2 g/dL or hemoglobin concentration of > or = 12 g/dL) was achieved in 71% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 65%-78%) of patients who received darbepoetin alfa every 2 weeks, comparable to the response in patients who received rHuEPO (71%; 95% CI = 61%-81%). The mean increase in hemoglobin concentration over 13 weeks was also similar: 1.48 g/dL (95% CI = 1.28-1.68 g/dL) for darbepoetin alfa and 1.31 g/dL (95% CI = 0.97-1.64 g/dL) for rHuEPO. The proportion of patients in the darbepoetin alfa group requiring transfusions was lower (7%; 95% CI = 4%-11%) than that in the rHuEPO group (14%; 95% CI = 8%-22%). Darbepoetin alfa every 2 weeks was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to that of rHuEPO. In conclusion, darbepoetin alfa at a dose of 3.0 microg/kg given every 2 weeks safely increases hemoglobin concentration to the same extent as rHuEPO.

Assessment of hematologic effects and fatigue in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia given darbepoetin alfa every two weeks.

The objective of this ongoing trial is to study the ability of darbepoetin alfa to reverse chemotherapy-induced anemia in cancer patients, and to relate improvement in hemoglobin with changes in fatigue and functional capacity. Eligible subjects had a nonmyeloid malignancy, were receiving multicycle chemotherapy, and were anemic, as defined by a screening hemoglobin < or = 11 g/dL. Darbepoetin alfa was administered at a starting dosage of 3 microg/kg every 2 weeks for up to eight doses (16 weeks) in an open-label, noncomparative setting. A total of 194 oncology practices contributed 1,173 subjects to this interim analysis. The mean increase in hemoglobin was 1.7 g/dL (95% CI: 1.6, 1.8) to last value on study (intent-to-treat analysis) and 2.1 g/dL (95% CI: 1.9, 2.2) for those patients receiving the full 16 weeks of therapy. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the proportion of subjects with a hematopoietic response (increase in hemoglobin > or = 2 g/dL and/or hemoglobin value > or = 12 g/dL) was 84% (95% CI:81,86). Subjects in the lower baseline hemoglobin category (< 10 g/dL) tended to have a greater hemoglobin response during treatment. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-Fatigue) subscale score increased by a mean of 6.8 points (26%) during the study, and improvements in fatigue paralleled the increases observed in hemoglobin. Study treatment-related toxicity was minimal, with the most common event being injection-site pain, seen in 2% of subjects. Experience to date with an every-2-week regimen of darbepoetin alfa indicated efficacy comparable to historical experience with weekly and 3-times-weekly regimens of epoetin alfa in treating chemotherapy-induced anemia in cancer subjects.

Effects of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on survival and other outcomes in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies: a study-level meta-analysis.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are approved to treat anemia in patients with non-myeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. ESAs reduce transfusion rates, but some clinical studies suggest that ESAs may reduce survival or increase disease progression. This study-level meta-analysis examined the effects of darbepoetin alfa, epoetin alfa or epoetin beta on mortality, disease progression and transfusion incidence in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies, using randomized, controlled trials of patients receiving chemotherapy and ESAs or standard of care. The odds ratio (OR) for mortality was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.34, random-effects model, 10 studies); the risk difference was - 0.01 (95% CI, - 0.03-0.02). The OR for disease progression was 1.02 (95% CI 0.81-1.30, random-effects model, five studies). A lower proportion of ESA-treated patients than controls received transfusions (seven studies). In this meta-analysis, ESAs reduced transfusions with no clear effect on mortality or disease progression in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies receiving chemotherapy.