Sustained post-rituximab B-cell depletion is common in ANCA-associated vasculitis and is affected by sex and renal function.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the increasing use of rituximab in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), it remains unclear what the optimal dosing is, especially for maintenance of remission. A deeper understanding of post-rituximab B-cell repopulation patterns may aid better-tailored treatment. METHODS: This is a monocentric, retrospective study including ANCA-positive AAV patients receiving a single course of rituximab induction. CD19+ B cells were longitudinally monitored with flow cytometry. B-cell repopulation was defined as CD19+ >10 cells/µL. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included, the majority with microscopic polyangiitis (75%), myeloperoxidase-ANCA positivity (75%) and with renal involvement (79%). During a median follow-up of 54 months since the first rituximab infusion, 44 patients (62%) repopulated B cells, with a median time to repopulation of 39 months (range 7-102). Patients experiencing B-cell depletion lasting longer than the overall median time to repopulation (39 months) exhibited a lower risk of flare and higher risk of serious infection. In multivariate Cox regression, higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-2.98 per 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 eGFR] and female sex (HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.37-5.31) were independent predictors of increased rate of B-cell repopulation. CONCLUSION: A subset of AAV patients develop sustained post-rituximab B-cell depletion, which associates with reduced risk of flare and increased risk of serious infection in the long term. Preserved renal function and female sex are associated with faster B-cell repopulation. These observations further highlight the need to personalize immunosuppression to improve clinical outcomes.

Ten-year experience of an outpatient clinic for CKD-5 patients with multidisciplinary team and educational support.

PURPOSE: To analyze the results of an outpatient clinic with a multidisciplinary team and educational support for patients with late-stage CKD (lsCKD), to check its possible effect on their outcomes. METHODS: Longitudinal cohort study on patients followed up in the MaReA (Malattia Renale Avanzata = CKD5) outpatient clinic at ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia from 2005 to 2015 for at least six months. Trajectory of renal function over time has been evaluated only in those patients with at least four estimations of eGFR before referring to MaReA. RESULTS: Seven hundred and six patients were enrolled, their mean age was 72 ± 14 years, 59% were males. At the end of the study, 147 (21%) were still on MaReA, 240 (34%) on dialysis, 92 (13%) on very low-protein diet (VLPDs), 13 (2%) on pre-hemodialysis clinic, 23 (3%) improved renal function, 10 (1%) transplanted, 62 (9%) transferred/lost to follow-up, and 119 (17%) died. Optimal dialysis start (defined as start with definitive dialysis access, as an out-patient and without lsCKD complications) occurred in 180/240 (75%) patients. The results showed a slower eGFR decrease during MaReA follow-up compared to previous renal follow-up: - 2.0 vs. - 4.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 BSA/year (p < 0.05), corresponding to a median delay of 17.7 months in dialysis start in reference to our policy in starting dialysis. The patient cumulative survival was 75% after 24 months and 25% after 70. LIMITATIONS: (1) lack of a control group, (2) one-center-study, (3) about all patients were Caucasians. CONCLUSION: The follow-up of lsCKD patients on MaReA is associated with an optimal and delayed initiation of dialysis.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in dialysis and kidney transplant patients: immunological and serological response.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis and kidney transplant patients with moderate-severe COVID-19 have a high mortality rate, around 30%, that is similar in the two populations, despite differences in their baseline characteristics. In these groups, the immunology of the disease has been poorly explored. METHODS: Thirty-two patients on dialysis or with kidney transplant and SARS-CoV-2 infection requiring hospitalization (COV group) were included in our study. Lymphocyte subsets, dendritic cell (DC) counts and monocyte activation were studied. SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike/anti-nucleocapsid were monitored, and baseline cytokines and chemokines were measured in 10 patients. RESULTS: The COV group, compared to healthy subjects and uninfected dialysis/kidney transplant controls, showed lower numbers of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, Natural-Killer (NK), B cells, plasmacytoid and myeloid DCs, while the proportion of terminally differentiated B-cells was increased. IL6, IL10, IFN-α and chemokines involved in monocyte and neutrophil recruitment were higher in the COV group, compared to uninfected dialysis/kidney transplant controls. Patients with severe disease had lower CD4 + , CD8 + and B-cell counts and lower monocyte HLA-DR expression. Of note, when comparing dialysis and kidney transplant patients with COVID-19, the latter group presented lower NK and pDC counts and monocyte HLA-DR expression. Up to 60 days after symptom onset, kidney transplant recipients showed lower levels of anti-spike antibodies compared to dialysis patients. CONCLUSIONS: During SARS-CoV-2 infection, dialysis and kidney transplant patients manifest immunophenotype abnormalities; these are similar in the two groups, however kidney transplant recipients show more profound alterations of the innate immune system and lower anti-spike antibody response.