Treatment free remission (TFR) after second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2G-TKIs) treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): from feasibility to safety.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) prevalence is currently increasing due to the great efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Discontinuation of treatment in the long-term, owing to avoid off-target side effects or treatment-free remission (TFR), has become an additional treatment goal in CML patients who achieved a deep molecular response (DMR). Second-generation TKIs (2 G-TKIs) have a significantly higher rate of DMR than imatinib. Hence, especially in young patients with a strategy of TFR, 2 G-TKIs are becoming the most frequently used TKIs and may increase TFR attempts in the future. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the main findings extrapolated from clinical trials and real-life evidence regarding 2 G-TKIs discontinuation were discussed, through broad research on Medline, Embase, and archives from EHA and ASH congresses. EXPERT OPINION: Overall, TFR rate after 2 G-TKIs is ranging from 40% to 60% for selected patients with sustained DMR and it can be considered a safe procedure, that have become, nowadays, a daily practice. However, many crucial aspects regarding treatment choices, timings, as well as predictive factors, patient communication, and optimal strategies need to be better clarified to improve successful TFR rate.

Real-Life Management of FLT3-Mutated AML: Single-Centre Experience over 24 Years.

We analyzed 140 patients with a median age of 51 years; 21% had WBC ≥ 100 × 109/L, and 52% had an NPM1 co-mutation. Until 2018, 101 patients received chemotherapy; thereafter, 39 received 3+7+midostaurin. The overall CR rate was 64%, higher in NPM1 mutant patients (73%). Univariate analysis showed that NPM1 mutation (p = 0.032) and WBC < 100 × 109/L (p = 0.013) positively influenced the response, with a trend for FLT3i administration (p = 0.052). Multivariate analysis confirmed WBC count as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.017). In CR1, 41/90 patients underwent allogeneic and 18 autologous transplantation. The median EFS was 1.1 vs. 1.6 years in autografted and allografted patients, respectively (p = 0.9). The one-year non-relapse mortality was 0.00% for autologous and 28% for allogeneic transplants (p = 0.007); CIR at 1 and 3 years was higher in autologous transplants (39% vs. 15% and 57% vs. 21%, p = 0.004). The median survival was not reached in the FLT3i group. Overall, 69 patients received stem cell transplantation (18 autologous, 51 allogeneic). Post-transplant FLT3i was resumed in eight patients, all alive after a median of 65 months. Allogeneic transplantation is crucial in FLT3-mutated AML, but the next challenge will be to identify which patients can benefit from transplants in CR1 and in which to intensify post-transplant therapy.

Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. A multicentric experience.

COVID-19 disease has a strong impact on hematological patients; those receiving autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) represent a particularly vulnerable group, in which the effectiveness of vaccination is very variable. Chiarucci et al. showed that patients affected by non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and treated with rituximab experienced a lower rate of immunization against SARS-CoV-2 (54%), as well as significantly lower IgG antibody titers. In our multicenter retrospective observational study, we included 82 patients who underwent aHSCT, divided into two groups: 58 patients vaccinated after aHSCT (group A) and 24 vaccinated before getting transplantation (group B). In group A, 39 (67%) patients had positive serology, and the rate of positivity increased with time after aHSCT. In the subgroup of patients with NHL, the administration of rituximab predicted negative serology, particularly when administered in the 6 months before vaccination (13% response rate). Patients affected by plasma cells had a higher rate of positivity (83% overall), independently of the time to aHSCT. In group B, no patient who initially showed positive serology became negative after transplantation, so the aHSCT did not affect the response to the vaccination. Our study confirmed the role of rituximab as a negative predictor of response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, whereas the conditioning and transplantation procedure itself seemed to be less important.