Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
World J Urol ; 39(6): 1935-1940, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32897395

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report stoma stenosis rates and efferent channel (EC) complications at long term follow-up for Turin pouch (TP). METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent TP between March 2006 and May 2018. The TP is a U-shaped right colon pouch. The EC was conceived by the tubularization of 5 cm of the colon wall with the use of a stapler and sutured to the skin (EC-cutaneostomy). The ureters are sutured separately to the last 10 cm of ileum before the ileocecal valve. In literature, catheterization problems have been described on average in 20.3% of patients and stoma stenosis in 19.5% of the patients with flap valve systems. RESULTS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients underwent a TP procedure. The median age was 55 years (IQR: 52-60). Median operative time was 201 min (IQR: 170-210), median reconstructive time was 61 min (IQR: 55-65) and the blood loss was 244 ml (IQR: 150-300) and 4 patients (10.5%) needed blood transfusions. The median follow-up was 52 months (IQR: 37-92). Complete 24h continence was achieved in 34 (89%) patients. Seven (18.4%) patients reported difficulties in EC catheterization and 4 (10.5%) patients had stoma stenosis. This study is limited by the relatively small number of patients. CONCLUSION: In relation to similar systems, the TP seems to offer comparatively good functional results but EC and stoma complications were lower than other pouch variants in literature.


Asunto(s)
Reservorios Cólicos , Derivación Urinaria , Constricción Patológica/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
World J Urol ; 34(10): 1367-72, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26897499

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to identify the appropriate level of Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) in older patients (>70 years) with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) to achieve survival benefit following radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1008 older patients (>70 years) who underwent RP with pelvic lymph node dissection for high-risk prostate cancer (preoperative prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL or clinical stage ≥T2c or Gleason ≥8) from 14 tertiary institutions between 1988 and 2014. The study population was further grouped into CCI < 2 and ≥2 for analysis. Survival rate for each group was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method and competitive risk Fine-Gray regression to estimate the best explanatory multivariable model. Area under the curve (AUC) and Akaike information criterion were used to identify ideal 'Cut off' for CCI. RESULTS: The clinical and cancer characteristics were similar between the two groups. Comparison of the survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier curve between two groups for non-cancer death and survival estimations for 5 and 10 years shows significant worst outcomes for patients with CCI ≥ 2. In multivariate model to decide the appropriate CCI cut-off point, we found CCI 2 has better AUC and p value in log rank test. CONCLUSION: Older patients with fewer comorbidities harboring high-risk PCa appears to benefit from RP. Sicker patients are more likely to die due to non-prostate cancer-related causes and are less likely to benefit from RP.


Asunto(s)
Clasificación del Tumor/métodos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Medición de Riesgo , Anciano , Biopsia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata/patología , Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 20(4): 407-412, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28485390

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several randomized controlled trials assessed the outcomes of patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) before radical prostatectomy (RP). The majority of them included mainly low and intermediate risk prostate cancer (PCa) without specifically assessing PCa-related death (PCRD). Thus, there is a lack of knowledge regarding a possible effect of NHT on PCRD in the high-risk PCa population. We aimed to analyze the effect of NHT on PCRD in a multicenter high-risk PCa population treated with RP, using a propensity-score adjustment. METHODS: This is a retrospective multi-institutional study including patients with high-risk PCa defined as: clinical stage T3-4, PSA >20 ng ml-1 or biopsy Gleason score 8-10. We compared PCRD between RP and NHT+RP using competing risks analysis. Correction for group differences was performed by propensity-score adjustment. RESULTS: After application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 1573 patients remained for analysis; 1170 patients received RP and 403 NHT+RP. Median follow-up was 56 months (interquartile range 29-88). Eighty-six patients died of PCa and 106 of other causes. NHT decreased the risk of PCRD (hazard ratio (HR) 0.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.80; P=0.0014). An interaction effect between NHT and radiotherapy (RT) was observed (HR 0.3; 95% CI 0.21-0.43; P<0.0008). More specifically, of patients who received adjuvant RT, those who underwent NHT+RP had decreased PCRD rates (2.3% at 5 year) compared to RP (7.5% at 5 year). The retrospective design and lack of specific information about NHT are possible limitations. CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity-score adjusted analysis from a large high-risk PCa population, NHT before surgery significantly decreased PCRD. This effect appeared to be mainly driven by the early addition of RT post-surgery. The specific sequence of NHT+RP and adjuvant RT merits further study in the high-risk PCa population.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Urologia ; 77 Suppl 16: 42-6, 2010.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21104661

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The presence of a single site bone metastasis in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare clinical event. We report a single case of RCC with solitary vertebral metastasis and review of literature about renal tumor spreading in order to understand the anatomic explanation for this peculiar clinical case. METHODS: We have considered the single case and reviewed current and past literature to describe the anatomic and functional background of this clinical situation. RESULTS: There are rare cases of single vertebral metastasis from RCC and these are characterized from a contemporary neoplastic thrombus. The neoplastic thrombus could justify the tumoral back-flow into the paravertebral anasthomoses and so into vertebral venous sinusoids. The rich anasthomotic system that surrounds kidneys and the experimental evidence of anasthomotic links among perirenal Lejars venous system and paravertebral Batson's venous system could explain these clinical evidences. CONCLUSION: Enrolment of para-vertebral Batson's venous system could have a major role in the RCC vertebral metastatic diffusion.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Vértebras Lumbares/patología , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Humanos , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Interferones/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Renales/irrigación sanguínea , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/etiología , Vértebras Lumbares/irrigación sanguínea , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes , Nefrectomía , Músculos Psoas/patología , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Radiografía , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Ciática/etiología , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Sunitinib , Venas
5.
Urologia ; 77 Suppl 16: 59-64, 2010.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21104665

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Many methods have been suggested to assess bladder outlet obstruction, as defined by the gold standard of pressure flow studies. A comprehensive review of the literature on the different methods used to diagnose bladder outlet obstruction by non-invasive means was performed in order to compare those methods to invasive urodynamics in terms of sensitivity and specificity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE search was done of the published literature covering from December 2003 on non-invasive methods, including only single measures to diagnose bladder outlet obstruction. We performed a comparison between all methods in terms of sensitivity and specificity for each test. For many techniques these values were calculated directly from the data presented in the article. RESULTS: There has been applied many methods to diagnose bladder outlet obstruction. Those methods were divided into uroflowmetry, condom-catheter method, penile cuff method and Doppler ultrasonography urodynamics. Each method has been described and discussed in terms of its role in adding information to the diagnostic work-up for bladder outlet obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure flow studies still remain the gold standard for assessing bladder outlet obstruction. However non-invasive urodynamics is a promising branch. Probably the most reliable information is given by the association of numerous methods together.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico , Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico , Urodinámica , Condones , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Masculino , Manometría , Presión , Reología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Cateterismo Urinario
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA