Oral azacitidine modulates the bone marrow microenvironment in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in remission: A subanalysis from the QUAZAR AML-001 trial.

Oral azacitidine (Oral-AZA) maintenance therapy improved relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) significantly versus placebo for AML patients in remission after intensive chemotherapy (IC) in the phase 3 QUAZAR AML-001 study. Immune profiling was performed on the bone marrow (BM) at remission and on-treatment in a subset of patients with the aim of identifying prognostic immune features and evaluating associations of on-treatment immune effects by Oral-AZA with clinical outcomes. Post-IC, increased levels of lymphocytes, monocytes, T cells and CD34 + CD117+ BM cells were prognostically favourable for RFS. CD3+ T-cell counts were significantly prognostic for RFS in both treatment arms. At baseline, high expression of the PD-L1 checkpoint marker was identified on a subset of CD34 + CD117+ BM cells; many of which were PD-L2+. High co-expression of T-cell exhaustion markers PD-1 and TIM-3 was associated with inferior outcomes. Oral-AZA augmented T-cell numbers during early treatment, increased CD4+:CD8+ ratios and reversed T-cell exhaustion. Unsupervised clustering analysis identified two patient subsets defined by T-cell content and expression of T-cell exhaustion markers that were enriched for MRD negativity. These results indicate that Oral-AZA modulates T-cell activity in the maintenance setting of AML, and these immune-mediated responses are associated with clinical outcomes.

Multiple cereblon genetic changes are associated with acquired resistance to lenalidomide or pomalidomide in multiple myeloma.

Emergence of drug resistance to all available therapies is the major challenge to improving survival in myeloma. Cereblon (CRBN) is the essential binding protein of the widely used immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and novel CRBN E3 ligase modulator drugs (CELMoDs) in myeloma, as well as certain proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), in development for a range of diseases. Using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data from 455 patients and RNA sequencing (RNASeq) data from 655 patients, including newly diagnosed (WGS, n = 198; RNASeq, n = 437), lenalidomide (LEN)-refractory (WGS, n = 203; RNASeq, n = 176), and pomalidomide (POM)-refractory cohorts (WGS, n = 54; RNASeq, n = 42), we found incremental increases in the frequency of 3 CRBN aberrations, namely point mutations, copy losses/structural variations, and a specific variant transcript (exon 10 spliced), with progressive IMiD exposure, until almost one-third of patients had CBRN alterations by the time they were POM refractory. We found all 3 CRBN aberrations were associated with inferior outcomes to POM in those already refractory to LEN, including those with gene copy losses and structural variations, a finding not previously described. This represents the first comprehensive analysis and largest data set of CBRN alterations in myeloma patients as they progress through therapy. It will help inform patient selection for sequential therapies with CRBN-targeting drugs.

Correction to: Evaluation of the bioequivalence and food effect on the bioavailability of CC-486 (oral azacitidine) tablets in adult patients with cancer.

In the original publication of the article the author has found few incorrect values in the Table 1.

Evaluation of the bioequivalence and food effect on the bioavailability of CC-486 (oral azacitidine) tablets in adult patients with cancer.

PURPOSE: CC-486 is an oral formulation of azacitidine that allows for extended dosing schedules to prolong azacitidine exposure to malignant cells and maximize clinical activity. CC-486 300 mg daily, administered for 14 or 21 days of 28-day treatment cycles, is currently under investigation in two ongoing phase III trials. The 300-mg daily dose in these studies is administered as two 150-mg tablets (Formulation A). METHODS: We evaluated the bioequivalence of one 300-mg CC-486 tablet (Formulation B) with Formulation A and food effect on Formulation B, in adult patients with cancer in a 2-stage crossover design study. RESULTS: The ratios of the geometric means of the maximum azacitidine plasma concentration (Cmax) and of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞) were 101.5% and 105.7%, demonstrating the bioequivalence of Formulations A and B. Formulation B was rapidly absorbed under fasted and fed conditions. The geometric mean of Cmax was significantly decreased by ~ 21% in the fed state. Median Tmax was reached at 2 h and 1 h post-dose in fed and fasted states, respectively (P < 0.001). Nevertheless, systemic drug exposure (AUC) in fed and fasted states was within the 80-125% boundaries of bioequivalence and differences in Cmax and Tmax are not expected to have a clinical impact. CONCLUSION: The single 300-mg CC-486 tablet was bioequivalent to two 150-mg tablets, which have shown to be efficacious and generally well-tolerated in clinical trials, and can be taken with or without food.

Multivariate dose response test.

In neuroscience clinical research, patients are frequently treated with different doses of the same drug to determine a dose level that is efficacious with tolerable adverse effects. Efficacy is usually evaluated using multiple psychometric instruments. Most often the instruments are either binary or ordinal scaled. Conventional assessment of treatment efficacy is conducted per each instrument individually. However, it is important to combine these to provide an overall evaluation of the treatment efficacy. In this paper, we consider a statistical test of dose-response based on the simultaneous assessment of efficacy measured via the various instruments using a multivariate method. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the proposed test. Data from a neuroscience clinical trial is used to demonstrate the proposed method.

Bivariate or composite plots of endpoints.

Clinical trials often identify two endpoints or response measures of interest. Depending on the drugs and the disease, the endpoints may be correlated or uncorrelated, reflect efficacy or safety, or one or both may be considered as primary. For visualization, plots of each endpoint from baseline to the end of the trial are presented for each treatment group. This paper illustrates the usefulness of developing bivariate, composite plots of both endpoints jointly. Two applications are presented: one of a fixed combination drug for treating allergic rhinitis, and the other of a dose comparison trial in duodenal ulcer.

A phase II study of irinotecan, high-dose 24-h continuous intravenous infusion of floxuridine and leucovorin (IFLUX) for advanced, previously untreated colorectal cancer.

Our objectives were to determine response rate, time to progression, overall survival and tolerability of novel combination chemotherapy, consisting of irinotecan, high-dose 24-h continuous intravenous infusion of floxuridine and leucovorin in advanced previously untreated colorectal cancer. Thirty-eight patients with advanced colorectal cancer were treated at Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, from 2000 to 2004, and received weekly intravenous infusion of irinotecan at 110 mg/m with a combination of 120 mg/kg floxuridine and 500 mg/m leucovorin administered as a 24-h continuous intravenous infusion. The treatment cycle consisted of 4 weeks of consecutive therapy followed by 2 weeks of rest. Five (13%) patients achieved complete response, 10 (26%) patients achieved partial response, 17 (45%) patients attained stable disease and six (16%) patients progressed. The overall response rate was 39% in this study. This chemotherapy regiment was well tolerated; the most common grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia (16%), anemia (16%), vomiting (24%), diarrhea (16%), and hand-and-foot syndrome (26%). The median time to progression was 11.5 months (347.5 days) with 95% confidence intervals of 6.8-12.9 months (206-389 days). The time to progression ranged from 1.8 to 34 months. The median survival of the patients in this trial was 31.28 months (952 days) with a confidence interval of 20.9-38.0 months (629-1141 days). Intravenous infusion of floxuridine and leucovorin is beneficial as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer, demonstrating a prolonged time to progression and overall survival with acceptable tolerability and manageable toxicity profile.