Blood transfusion safety in the country of Georgia: collateral benefit from a national hepatitis C elimination program.

BACKGROUND: In April 2015, the government of Georgia (country) initiated the world's first national hepatitis C elimination program. An analysis of blood donor infectious screening data was conducted to inform a strategic plan to advance blood transfusion safety in Georgia. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Descriptive analysis of blood donation records (2015-2017) was performed to elucidate differences in demographics, donor type, remuneration status, and seroprevalence for infectious markers (hepatitis C virus antibody [anti-HCV], human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], hepatitis B virus surface antigen [HBsAg], and Treponema pallidum). For regression analysis, final models included all variables associated with the outcome in bivariate analysis (chi-square) with a p value of less than 0.05. RESULTS: During 2015 to 2017, there were 251,428 donations in Georgia, representing 112,093 unique donors; 68.5% were from male donors, and 51.2% of donors were paid or replacement (friends or family of intended recipient). The overall seroprevalence significantly declined from 2015 to 2017 for anti-HCV (2.3%-1.4%), HBsAg (1.5%-1.1%), and T. pallidum (1.1%-0.7%) [p < 0.0001]; the decline was not significant for HIV (0.2%-0.1%). Only 41.0% of anti-HCV seropositive donors underwent additional testing to confirm viremia. Infectious marker seroprevalence varied by age, sex, and geography. In multivariable analysis, first-time and paid donor status were associated with seropositivity for all four infectious markers. CONCLUSION: A decline during the study period in infectious markers suggests improvement in blood safety in Georgia. Areas that need further improvement are donor recruitment, standardization of screening and diagnostic follow-up, quality assurance, and posttransfusion surveillance.

Implementing a birth registry in a developing country - experiences from Georgia. / Å opprette et fødselsregister i et utviklingsland ­ erfaringer fra Georgia.

BACKGROUND: Georgia is the first developing country in the world to have established a national digital, medical birth registry. The Georgia Birth Registry was officially inaugurated on 1 January, 2016. The purpose of this article is to assess the quality of selected variables and present preliminary results from the year 2016. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Registry resembles the Nordic birth registries in structure. There are 285 medical facilities involved, each entering 267 variables from week 12 of pregnancy to hospital discharge. In 2016, 52 399 women and 53 236 newborns were recorded as valid entries in the Georgian Birth Registry. RESULTS: The completeness of the Registry in 2016 was 93.9 %. The difference between the reported number of newborns in the Registry and in official statistics was 3441. The mean gestational age was 271.3 days and the Caesarean section rate 43.5 %. The mean birth weight was 3262 g. Newborns delivered by Caesarean section had a lower gestational age and lower birth weight compared to those delivered vaginally. INTERPRETATION: There are more newborns registered annually as Georgian citizens than the number of infants born in the country. This leads to inaccurate official reporting on perinatal mortality rates.

Advancing blood transfusion safety using molecular detection in the country of Georgia.

BACKGROUND: In 2015, the country of Georgia initiated its hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination program. Given a high background incidence of HCV infection, centralized nucleic acid testing (NAT) of blood donations was prioritized for implementation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Multiplex NAT screening for HIV, HCV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) was launched in January 2020. An analysis was conducted of serological and NAT donor/donation data for the first year of screening (through December 2020). RESULTS: A total of 54,116 donations representing 39,164 unique donors were evaluated. Overall, 671 donors (1.7%) tested positive for at least one infectious marker by serology or NAT, with the highest prevalence among donors aged 40-49 years (2.5%; n = 200), male (1.9%; n = 524), replacement (2.8%; n = 153) and first time (2.1%; n = 642) donors. Sixty donations were seronegative but NAT positive, and therefore would not have been found by traditional serology testing alone. These were more likely among female vs. male (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.06; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.05-4.05), paid (aOR 10.15; 95%CI: 2.80-36.86) or voluntary (aOR 4.30; 95%CI: 1.27-14.56) vs replacement, and repeat vs. first time (aOR 13.98; 95%CI: 4.06-48.12) donors. On repeat serological testing (including HBV core antibody [HBcAb] testing), 6 HBV + donations, 5 HCV + donations and 1 HIV + donations were deemed NAT yield (detected through the implementation of NAT, and would have otherwise been missed by serology screening alone). CONCLUSION: This analysis offers a regional model for NAT implementation, demonstrating the feasibility and clinical utility in a nationwide blood program.