[Acute myelogenous leukemia developed at the 26th week of gestation].

We report here a 35-year-old pregnant woman with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). She was diagnosed with AML (M2) in August 2009, coinciding with the 26(th) week of pregnancy. She underwent a cesarean section at 27 weeks gestation, delivering a very low birth weight male infant (1,066 g). One week later, she received induction chemotherapy with idarubicin and cytarabine. She achieved complete remission after two courses of chemotherapy. The incidence of acute leukemia during pregnancy is low. Chemotherapy after the 2(nd) trimester is not associated with an increased rate of fetal malformation. However, there are some reports that in utero exposure to chemotherapy during any trimester of pregnancy carries a significant risk for an unfavorable outcome including low birth weight, fetal or neonatal death, and intrauterine growth retardation. Decision on the choice of treatment for acute leukemia during pregnancy should be case-dependent. If an infant has grown sufficiently to be viable outside uterus and the patient does not demonstrate a severe bleeding tendency, delivery by cesarean section preceding chemotherapy is one option.

Postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for the high-risk uterine cervical cancer.

AIM: To determine whether concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) can improve the survival rate of high-risk uterine cervical cancer. MATERIAL & METHODS: We analyzed 16 cases of uterine cervical cancer that had undergone radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy from 2003 to 2008. The patients were eligible if they had histologically confirmed positive parametrial involvement, positive pelvic lymph nodes or non-squamous cell carcinoma. They received 50 Gy of external beam radiotherapy (RT) for the pelvis which was combined with chemotherapy. Cisplatin was administered intravenously every 3 weeks at a dose of 70 mg/m(2) during the RT. For renal function complication case, carboplatin was administered weekly. For control purposes, there were 14 cases treated in our hospital from 1995 to 2003 who had received only RT. RESULTS: We did not find any statistically significant difference in the disease-free survival rate between the CCRT group and the RT group. However, the overall survival rate was significantly higher for patients in the CCRT group compared with the RT group in positive lymph node cases and non-squamous cell carcinoma cases. Adverse effects were more frequent in the CCRT group. Over grade 3 toxicities were manifested as leukopenia, diarrhea and anemia. There was no local recurrence in CCRT group patients. CONCLUSION: CCRT seems to be beneficial for improving the survival rate of either positive lymph node or non-squamous cell carcinoma cases in high-risk uterine cervical cancer patients.

Erythematous and bullous rash strongly indicating toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with the use of intravenous ritodrine hydrochloride.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a very rare drug reaction associated with a high mortality rate. This condition warrants prompt recognition, diagnosis and treatment. Only one case report of TEN that was possibly induced by ritodrine hydrochloride, a tocolytic agent, was found in English literature. Here, we report the case of a 26-year-old pregnant woman who was suspected with TEN following the intravenous administration of ritodrine hydrochloride in the 35(th) week of gestation. An emergency cesarean section was performed because the labor pains caused systemic intolerable haphalgesia. After the surgery, intensive dermatological treatment commenced, which helped her recover from the serious condition. The result of the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test for ritodrine hydrochloride was positive. When a skin eruption appears during the administration of ritodrine, we must consider the benefits as well as the risks of continuous use of tocolytic agents because there is a risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome or TEN.