Paradoxical GH increase after oral glucose load in subjects with and without acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE: A paradoxical GH rise after the glucose load (GH-Par) is described in about one-third of acromegalic patients. Here, we evaluated the GH profile in subjects with and without acromegaly aiming to refine the definition of GH-Par. DESIGN: Observational case-control study. METHODS: Our cohort consisted of 60 acromegalic patients, and two groups of subjects presenting suppressed GH (< 0.4 µg/L) and high (non-acro↑IGF-1, n = 116) or normal IGF-1 levels (non-acro, n = 55). The distribution of GH peaks ≥ 120% from baseline, insulin, and glucose levels were evaluated over a 180-min time interval after glucose intake. RESULTS: A similar proportion of subjects in all three groups shows a GH ratio of ≥ 120% starting from 120 min. Re-considering the definition of paradoxical increase of GH within 90 min, we observed that the prevalence of GH peaks ≥ 120% was higher in acromegaly than in non-acro↑IGF-1 and non-acro (respectively 42%, 16%, and 7%, both p < 0.001). In patients without GH-Par, a late GH rebound was observed in the second part of the curve. Higher glucose peak (p = 0.038), slower decline after load, 20% higher glucose exposure (p = 0.015), and a higher prevalence of diabetes (p = 0.003) characterized acromegalic patients with GH-Par (with respect to those without). CONCLUSIONS: GH-Par response may be defined as a 20% increase in the first 90 min after glucose challenge. GH-Par, common in acromegaly and associated with an increased prevalence of glucose metabolism abnormalities, is found also in a subset of non-acromegalic subjects with high IGF-1 levels, suggesting its possible involvement in the early phase of the disease.

Second-line tests in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic hypercortisolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The clinical and hormonal overlap between neoplastic (CS) and non-neoplastic (NNH/pCS) hypercortisolism is a challenge. Various dynamic tests have been proposed to allow an early discrimination between these conditions, but to date there is no agreement on which of them should be used. AIM: To provide an overview of the available tests and to obtain a quantitative synthesis of their diagnostic performance in discriminating NNH/pCS from CS. METHODS: The included articles, published between 1990 and 2022, applied one or more second line tests to differentiate NNH/pCS from CS patients. For the NNH/pCS group, we admitted the inclusion of patients presenting clinical features and/or biochemical findings suggestive of hypercortisolism despite apparent lack of a pCS-related condition. RESULTS: The electronic search identified 339 articles. After references analysis and study selection, we identified 9 studies on combined dexamethasone-corticotropin releasing hormone (Dex-CRH) test, 4 on Desmopressin test and 3 on CRH test; no study on Dex-Desmopressin met the inclusion criteria. Dex-CRH test provided the highest sensitivity (97%, 95 CI% [88%; 99%]). CRH tests showed excellent specificity (99%, 95% CI [0%; 100%]), with low sensitivity. Although metaregression analysis based on diagnostic odds ratio failed to provide a gold standard, CRH test (64.77, 95% CI [0.15; 27,174.73]) seemed to lack in performance compared to the others (Dex-CRH 138.83, 95% CI [49.38; 390.32] and Desmopressin 110.44, 95% CI [32.13; 379.63]). DISCUSSION: Both Dex-CRH and Desmopressin tests can be valid tools in helping discrimination between NNH/pCS and CS. Further studies are needed on this topic, possibly focusing on mild Cushing's Disease and well-characterized NNH/pCS patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022359774 , identifier CRD42022359774.