Assessing trends in cytokine-CYP drug interaction and relevance to drug dosing.

The regulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters by cytokines has been extensively studied, in vitro and in clinic. Cytokine-mediated suppression of CYPs or drug transporters may increase or decrease the systemic clearance of drug substrates that are primarily cleared via these pathways; neutralization of cytokines by therapeutic proteins may thereby alter systemic exposures of such drug substrates. The FDA recommends evaluating such clinical drug interactions during clinical development and has provided labeling recommendations for therapeutic proteins. To determine the clinical relevance of these drug interactions to dose adjustments, trends in steady-state exposures (AUCss) of CYP-sensitive substrates co-administered with cytokine modulators as reported in the UW DIDB were extracted and examined for each of the CYPs. Co-administration of CYP3A (midazolam/simvastatin), CYP2C19 (omeprazole), or CYP1A2 (caffeine/tizanidine) substrates with anti-IL-6 and with anti-IL-23 therapeutics led to changes in systemic exposures of CYP substrates ranging from ~ -58% to ~35%; no significant trends were observed for CYP2D6 (dextromethorphan) and CYP2C9 (warfarin) substrates. Although none of these changes in systemic exposures have been reported as clinically meaningful, dose adjustment of midazolam for optimal sedation in acute care settings has been reported. Simulated concentration-time profiles of midazolam under conditions of elevated cytokine levels when co-administered with tocilizumab, suggest a ~6-7 fold increase in midazolam clearance suggesting potential implications of cytokine- CYP drug interactions on dose adjustments of sensitive CYP3A substrates in acute care settings. Additionally, this article also provides a brief overview of non-clinical and clinical assessments of cytokine-CYP drug interactions, in drug discovery and development. Significance Statement Significance statement: There has been significant progress in understanding cytokine-mediated drug interactions for CYP-sensitive substrates. This article provides an overview of the progress in this field, including a trend analysis of systemic exposures of CYP-sensitive substrates co-administered with anti-IL-x therapeutics. In addition, the review also provides a perspective of current methods used to assess these drug interactions during drug development, and a focus on individualized medicine, particularly in acute care settings.

Improved characterization of the pharmacokinetics of acalabrutinib and its pharmacologically active metabolite, ACP-5862, in patients with B-cell malignancies and in healthy subjects using a population pharmacokinetic approach.

This analysis aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of acalabrutinib and its active metabolite, ACP-5862. A total of 8935 acalabrutinib samples from 712 subjects and 2394 ACP-5862 samples from 304 subjects from 12 clinical studies in patients with B-cell malignancies and healthy subjects were analysed by nonlinear mixed-effects modelling. Acalabrutinib PK was characterized by a 2-compartment model with first-order elimination. The large variability in absorption was adequately described by transit compartment chain and first-order absorption, with between-occasion variability on the mean transit time and relative bioavailability. The PK of ACP-5862 was characterized by a 2-compartment model with first-order elimination, and the formation rate was defined as the acalabrutinib clearance multiplied by the fraction metabolized. Health status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and coadministration of proton-pump inhibitors were significant covariates. However, none of the investigated covariates led to clinically meaningful changes in exposure, supporting a flat dosing of acalabrutinib.

Acalabrutinib CYP3A-mediated drug-drug interactions: Clinical evaluations and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling to inform dose adjustment strategy.

AIMS: Clinical drug interaction studies with itraconazole and rifampicin have demonstrated that acalabrutinib is a sensitive substrate of CYP3A. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed based on the data of these studies. One of the active CYP3A metabolites, ACP-5862, was identified but never studied in a drug interaction scenario. This study aims to evaluate both parent and metabolite exposure change with coadministration of moderate CYP3A inhibitors and its impact on safety and efficacy. METHODS: In an open label, randomized, 2-period study, we investigated the effect of coadministration of fluconazole or isavuconazole on the pharmacokinetics of acalabrutinib. Bruton tyrosine kinase receptor occupancy and safety were compared between different treatments. Experimental data were compared to PBPK simulation results. RESULTS: Least square means of acalabrutinib maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve increased 1.37 (1.14-1.64) and 1.60 (1.45-1.77)-fold in the presence of isavuconazole and 1.48 (1.10-1.98) and 2.16 (1.94-2.40)-fold in the presence of fluconazole, respectively. For ACP-5862, these values are 0.72 (0.63-0.82) and 0.91 (0.86-0.97) fold for isavuconazole and 0.65 (0.49-0.87) and 0.95 (0.91-0.99) fold for fluconazole coadministration. The PBPK model was able to recover acalabrutinib and ACP-5862 PK profiles in the study. Bruton tyrosine kinase receptor occupancy change was minimal in the presence of isavuconazole. There were no deaths, serious adverse events (AEs), or subject discontinuation due to AEs in this study. Only mild (Grade 1) AEs were reported during the study, by 17% of the study population. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the impact of fluconazole and isavuconazole on the pharmacokinetics of acalabrutinib and ACP-5862, and suggest that no dose adjustment is needed for concomitant administration with moderate CYP3A inhibitors. the current PBPK model can be used to propose dose adjustment for drug interactions via CYP3A.

Clinical evaluation of the potential drug-drug interactions of savolitinib: Interaction with rifampicin, itraconazole, famotidine or midazolam.

AIMS: We investigated savolitinib pharmacokinetics (PK) when administered alone or in combination with rifampicin, itraconazole or famotidine, and investigated midazolam PK when administered with or without savolitinib in healthy males. METHODS: Savolitinib PK was evaluated before/after: rifampicin (600 mg once daily [QD] for 5 days); itraconazole (200 mg QD for 5 days); a single dose of famotidine (40 mg QD) 2 hours before savolitinib. Midazolam PK was evaluated before/after midazolam (1 mg QD) with or without savolitinib (600 mg QD). Each study enrolled 20, 16, 16 and 14 volunteers, respectively. Plasma samples were collected to determine the effect on PK. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (GMR, %) (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) for savolitinib alone and in combination for Cmax , AUC respectively, were 45.4 (41.4-49.9), 38.5 (34.2-43.3) in the rifampicin study (n = 18); 105.2 (87.7-126.3), 108.4 (96.3-122.1) in the itraconazole study (n = 16); and 78.8 (67.7-91.7), 87.4 (81.2-94.2) in the famotidine study (n = 16). The GMRs (90% CIs) for midazolam alone and in combination with savolitinib for Cmax , AUC respectively, were 84.1 (70.0-101.0), 96.7 (92.4-101.1) (n = 14). Savolitinib alone or in combination was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Co-dosing of rifampicin significantly reduced exposure to savolitinib vs savolitinib alone; co-dosing of itraconazole or midazolam with savolitinib had no clinically significant effect on savolitinib or midazolam PK, respectively. Co-dosing of famotidine with savolitinib reduced exposure to savolitinib, although this was not considered clinically meaningful. No new savolitinib-related safety findings were observed.

Exposure-response analysis of acalabrutinib and its active metabolite, ACP-5862, in patients with B-cell malignancies.

AIMS: Examine relationships between the systemic exposure of acalabrutinib, a highly selective, next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and its active metabolite (ACP-5862) vs. efficacy and safety responses in patients with B-cell malignancies who received acalabrutinib as monotherapy or in combination with obinutuzumab. METHODS: For exposure-efficacy analyses, patients with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia were assessed for best overall response, progression-free survival and tumour regression. For exposure-safety analyses, incidences of grade ≥2 adverse events (AEs), grade ≥3 AEs and grade ≥2 events of clinical interest were assessed in patients with B-cell malignancies. Acalabrutinib and ACP-5862 pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter estimates were obtained from population PK modelling. Exposure calculations were based on study dosing regimens. Total active moieties were calculated to account for contributions of ACP-5862 to overall efficacy/safety. RESULTS: A total of 573 patients were included (exposure-efficacy analyses, n = 274; exposure-safety analyses, n = 573). Most patients (93%) received acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily. Median total active area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24h,ss ) and total active maximal concentration at steady-state (Cmax,ss ) were similar for patients who received acalabrutinib as monotherapy or in combination with obinutuzumab, and for responders and nonresponders. No relationship was observed between AUC24h,ss /Cmax,ss and progression-free survival or tumour regression. Acalabrutinib AUC24h,ss and Cmax,ss were generally comparable across groups regardless of AE incidence. CONCLUSION: No clinically meaningful correlations between acalabrutinib PK exposure and efficacy and safety outcomes were observed. These data support the fixed acalabrutinib dose of 100 mg twice daily in the treatment of patients with B-cell malignancies.

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics, Excretion, and Metabolism of Zoliflodacin, a Novel Spiropyrimidinetrione Antibiotic, in Healthy Volunteers.

Zoliflodacin is a novel spiropyrimidinetrione with activity against bacterial type II topoisomerases that inhibits DNA biosynthesis and results in accumulation of double-strand cleavages in bacteria. We report results from two phase 1 studies that investigated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of zoliflodacin and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) after single doses in healthy volunteers. In the single ascending dose study, zoliflodacin was rapidly absorbed, with a time to maximum concentration of drug in serum (Tmax) between 1.5 and 2.3 h. Exposure increased dose proportionally up to 800 mg and less than dose proportionally between 800 and 4,000 mg. Urinary excretion of unchanged zoliflodacin was <5.0% of the total dose. In the fed state, absorption was delayed (Tmax, 4 h), accompanied by an increase in the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) at 1,500- and 3,000-mg doses. In the ADME study (3,000 mg orally), the PK profile of zoliflodacin had exposure (AUC and maximum concentration of drug in serum [Cmax]) similar to that of the ascending dose study and a median Tmax of 2.5 h. A total of 97.8% of the administered radioactivity was recovered in excreta, with urine and fecal elimination accounting for approximately 18.2% and 79.6% of the dose, respectively. The major clearance pathway was via metabolism and elimination in feces with low urinary recovery of unchanged drug (approximately 2.5%) and metabolites accounting for 56% of the dose excreted in the feces. Zoliflodacin represented 72.3% and metabolite M3 accounted for 16.4% of total circulating radioactivity in human plasma. Along with the results from these studies and based upon safety, PK, and PK/pharmacodynamics targets, a dosage regimen was selected for evaluation in a phase 2 study in urogenital gonorrhea. (The studies discussed in this paper have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifiers NCT01929629 and NCT02298920.).

Pharmacokinetic Study of Osimertinib in Cancer Patients with Mild or Moderate Hepatic Impairment.

Osimertinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), undergoes significant hepatic elimination. In this phase 1 study, we assessed the effects of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of osimertinib in patients with malignant solid tumors. In part A, patients with normal hepatic function, mild hepatic impairment, and moderate hepatic impairment, according to the Child-Pugh classification, received a single 80 mg oral dose of osimertinib. Standard PK measures were assessed. In part B, patients could continue osimertinib treatment if deemed clinically appropriate. We compared these study results with a population PK analysis including other osimertinib clinical studies. Geometric mean osimertinib plasma concentrations were lower in patients with mild (n = 7) or moderate hepatic impairment (n = 5) versus normal hepatic function (n = 10): C max was reduced to 51% and 61%, respectively; area under the curve was reduced to 63% and 68%, respectively. PK results for the metabolites were similar. No apparent differences in the safety profile were found between patients with normal hepatic function and patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Comparison of these study results with National Cancer Institute-Organ Dysfunction Working Group criteria from population PK analysis showed osimertinib exposure was not affected by hepatic impairment. No dose adjustment is required for osimertinib when treating patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. No apparent differences in the safety of osimertinib were found between patients with normal hepatic function and mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Phase I studies of AZD1208, a proviral integration Moloney virus kinase inhibitor in solid and haematological cancers.

BACKGROUND: Proviral integration Moloney virus (PIM) kinases (PIM1, 2 and 3) are overexpressed in several tumour types and contribute to oncogenesis. AZD1208 is a potent ATP-competitive PIM kinase inhibitor investigated in patients with recurrent or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or advanced solid tumours. METHODS: Two dose-escalation studies were performed to evaluate the safety and tolerability, and to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), of AZD1208 in AML and solid tumours. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary efficacy of AZD1208. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients received treatment: 32 in the AML study over a 120-900 mg dose range, and 25 in the solid tumour study over a 120-800 mg dose range. Nearly all patients (98.5%) in both studies experienced adverse events, mostly gastrointestinal (92.5%). Dose-limiting toxicities included rash, fatigue and vomiting. AZD1208 was not tolerated at 900 mg, and the protocol-defined MTD was not confirmed. AZD1208 increased CYP3A4 activity after multiple dosing, resulting in increased drug clearance. There were no clinical responses; PD analysis showed biological activity of AZD1208. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of single-agent clinical efficacy with AZD1208, PIM kinase inhibition may hold potential as an anticancer treatment, perhaps in combination with other agents.

Effect of multiple-dose osimertinib on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and rosuvastatin.

AIM: We report on two Phase 1, open-label, single-arm studies assessing the effect of osimertinib on simvastatin (CYP3A substrate) and rosuvastatin (breast cancer resistance protein substrate [BCRP] substrate) exposure in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer who have progressed after treatment with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to determine, upon coadministration, whether osimertinib could affect the exposure of these agents. METHODS: Fifty-two patients in the CYP3A study (pharmacokinetic [PK] analysis, n = 49), and 44 patients in the BCRP study were dosed (PK analysis, n = 44). In the CYP3A study, patients received single doses of simvastatin 40 mg on Days 1 and 31, and osimertinib 80 mg once daily on Days 3-32. In the BCRP study, single doses of rosuvastatin 20 mg were given on Days 1 and 32, and osimertinib 80 mg once daily on Days 4-34. RESULTS: Geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratios (90% confidence intervals) of simvastatin plus osimertinib for area under the plasma concentration-time curves from zero to infinity (AUC) were 91% (77-108): entirely contained within the predefined no relevant effect limits, and Cmax of 77% (63, 94) which was not contained within the limits. GLSM ratios of rosuvastatin plus osimertinib for AUC were 135% (115-157) and Cmax were 172 (146, 203): outside the no relevant effect limits. CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib is unlikely to have any clinically relevant interaction with CYP3A substrates and has a weak inhibitory effect on BCRP. No new safety concerns were identified in either study.

The effect of itraconazole and rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of osimertinib.

AIMS: We investigated the effects of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor (itraconazole) or inducer (rifampicin) on the pharmacokinetics of the epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib, in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in two Phase I, open-label, two-part clinical studies. Part one of both studies is reported. METHODS: In the itraconazole study (NCT02157883), patients received single-dose osimertinib 80 mg on Days 1 and 10 and itraconazole (200 mg twice daily) on Days 6-18 orally. In the rifampicin study (NCT02197247), patients received osimertinib 80 mg once daily on Days 1-77 and rifampicin 600 mg once daily on Days 29-49. RESULTS: In the itraconazole study (n = 36), the geometric least squares mean (GMLSM) ratios (osimertinib plus itraconazole/osimertinib alone) for Cmax and AUC were 80% (90% CI 73, 87) and 124% (90% CI 115, 135), respectively, below the predefined no-effect upper limit of 200%. In the rifampicin study (n = 40), the GMLSM ratios (osimertinib plus rifampicin/osimertinib alone) for Css,max and AUCτ were 27% (90% CI 24, 30) and 22% (90% CI 20, 24), respectively, below the predefined no-effect lower limit of 50%. The induction effect of rifampicin was apparent within 7 days of initiation; osimertinib Css,max and AUCτ values returned to pre-rifampicin levels within 3 weeks of rifampicin discontinuation. No new osimertinib safety findings were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib can be co-administered with CYP3A4 inhibitors, but strong CYP3A inducers should be avoided if possible.

Managing the Risk of CYP3A Induction in Drug Development: A Strategic Approach.

Induction of cytochrome P450 (P450) can impact the efficacy and safety of drug molecules upon multiple dosing with coadministered drugs. This strategy is focused on CYP3A since the majority of clinically relevant cases of P450 induction are related to these enzymes. However, the in vitro evaluation of induction is applicable to other P450 enzymes; however, the in vivo relevance cannot be assessed because the scarcity of relevant clinical data. In the preclinical phase, compounds are screened using pregnane X receptor reporter gene assay, and if necessary structure-activity relationships (SAR) are developed. When projects progress toward the clinical phase, induction studies in a hepatocyte-derived model using HepaRG cells will generate enough robust data to assess the compound's induction liability in vivo. The sensitive CYP3A biomarker 4ß-hydroxycholesterol is built into the early clinical phase I studies for all candidates since rare cases of in vivo induction have been found without any induction alerts from the currently used in vitro methods. Using this model, the AstraZeneca induction strategy integrates in vitro assays and in vivo studies to make a comprehensive assessment of the induction potential of new chemical entities. Convincing data that support the validity of both the in vitro models and the use of the biomarker can be found in the scientific literature. However, regulatory authorities recommend the use of primary human hepatocytes and do not advise the use of sensitive biomarkers. Therefore, primary human hepatocytes and midazolam studies will be conducted during the clinical program as required for regulatory submission.

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response of osimertinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

AIMS: To develop a population (pop) pharmacokinetic (PK) model for osimertinib (AZD9291) and its metabolite (AZ5104) and investigate the exposure-response relationships for selected efficacy and safety parameters. METHODS: PK, safety and efficacy data were collected from two non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient studies (n = 748) and one healthy volunteer study (n = 32), after single or multiple once-daily dosing of 20-240 mg osimertinib. Nonlinear mixed effects modelling was used to characterise the popPK. Individual exposure values were used to investigate the relationship with response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST 1.1) efficacy parameters and key safety parameters (rash, diarrhoea, QTcF). RESULTS: A popPK model that adequately described osimertinib and its metabolite AZ5104 in a joint manner was developed. Body weight, serum albumin and ethnicity were identified as significant covariates on PK in the analysis, but were not found to have a clinically relevant impact on osimertinib exposure. No relationship was identified between exposure and efficacy over the dose range studied. A linear relationship was observed between exposure and the occurrence of rash or diarrhoea, and between concentration and QTcF, with a predicted mean (upper 90% confidence interval) increase of 14.2 (15.8) ms at the maximum concentration for an 80 mg once-daily dose at steady state. CONCLUSIONS: PopPK and exposure-response models were developed for osimertinib and AZ5104. There was no relationship between exposure and efficacy but a linear relationship between exposure and safety endpoints (rash, diarrhoea and QTcF) was observed.

Absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of 14C-ETX0914, a novel inhibitor of bacterial type-II topoisomerases in rodents.

1. ETX0914 is a novel bacterial topoisomerase inhibitor that has a novel mode-of-inhibition and is in clinical development for the treatment of infections caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae. 2. The in vitro biotransformation studies of ETX0914 using mouse, rat, dog and human hepatocytes showed moderate intrinsic clearance in mouse and rat and low intrinsic clearance in dog and human. 3. Following intravenous administration of [14C]-ETX0914 in rats, the mean recovery of administered dose in urine, bile and feces was approximately 15%, 55% and 24%, respectively. Unchanged ETX0914 recovered in urine and bile was less than 5% of the dose, indicating that ETX0914 underwent extensive metabolism in rats. Metabolites M1, M2, M4, M6 and M12 detected in both rat and mouse urine samples were not detected in mouse urine when predosed with 1-aminobenzotriazole, indicating that these metabolites were cytochrome P450 mediated products. The major fecal metabolites observed in rats were not formed when ETX0914 was incubated with fresh feces from germ free rats under sterile condition or in incubations with rat intestinal microsome and cytosol, suggesting that most likely ETX0914 was directly excreted into gut lumen where metabolites were formed as intestinal microflora-mediated products. The major sites of metabolism by CYP enzymes were in the morpholine and oxazolidinone rings while it was benzisoxazole reduction with the gut microflora.

In vitro and in vivo metabolism of 14C-AZ11, a novel inhibitor of bacterial DNA gyrase/type II topoisomerase.

1. (2R,4S,4aS)-11-Fluoro-2,4-dimethyl-8-((S)-4-methyl-2-oxooxazolidin-3-yl)-2,4,4a,6-tetrahydro-1H,1'H-spiro [isoxazolo[4,5-g][1,4]oxazino[4,3-a]quinoline-5,5'-pyrimidine]-2',4',6'(3'H)-trione (AZ11) is a novel mode-of-inhibition bacterial topoisomerase inhibitor that entered preclinical development for the treatment of Gram-positive bacteria infection. 2. The in vitro biotransformation studies of AZ11 using mouse, rat, dog and human hepatocytes showed low-intrinsic clearance in all species attributed to microsomal metabolism. 3. After a single intravenous administration of [14C]AZ11 in bile duct cannulated rats, the mean percentage of dose recovered in rat urine, bile and feces was approximately 18, 36 and 42%, respectively. Unchanged AZ11 recovered in rat urine and bile was less than 9% of the dose, indicating that AZ11 underwent extensive metabolism in rats. 4. The most abundant in vivo metabolite detected in urine and bile was M1 formed via ring opening on the piperidine and morpholine rings accounting for 20% of the administered dose. The major fecal metabolite was M5, which accounted for approximately 32% of administered dose. M5 was not formed when AZ11 incubated with rat intestinal microsomes and cytosol but was formed when incubated with fresh rat feces, suggesting that unchanged AZ11 was directly excreted into gut lumen where M5 formed as an intestinal microflora-mediated product. This process could have significant impact on bioavailability or exposure of AZ11 in rat.

Assessment of the mass balance recovery and metabolite profile of avibactam in humans and in vitro drug-drug interaction potential.

Avibactam, a novel non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor with activity against Ambler class A, class C, and some class D enzymes is being evaluated in combination with various ß-lactam antibiotics to treat serious bacterial infections. The in vivo mass balance recovery and metabolite profile of [(14)C] avibactam (500 mg/1-h infusion) was assessed in six healthy male subjects, and a series of in vitro experiments evaluated the metabolism and drug-drug interaction potential of avibactam. In the mass balance study, measurement of plasma avibactam (using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method) and total radioactivity in plasma, whole blood, urine, and feces (using liquid scintillation counting) indicated that most of the avibactam was excreted unchanged in urine within 12 hours, with recovery complete (>97% of the administered dose) within 96 hours. Geometric mean avibactam renal clearance (158 ml/min) was greater than the product of unbound fraction of drug and glomerular filtration rate (109.5 ml/min), suggesting that active tubular secretion accounted for some renal elimination. There was no evidence of metabolism in plasma and urine, with unchanged avibactam the major component in both matrices. Avibactam demonstrated in vitro substrate potential for organic anion transporters 1 and 3 (OAT1 and OAT3) proteins expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells (Km > 1000 µM; >10-fold the Cmax of a therapeutic dose), which could account for the active tubular secretion observed in vivo. Avibactam uptake by OAT1 and OAT3 was inhibited by probenecid, a potent OAT1/OAT3 inhibitor. Avibactam did not interact with various other membrane transport proteins or cytochrome P450 enzymes in vitro, suggesting it has limited propensity for drug-drug interactions involving cytochrome P450 enzymes.

Longitudinal Circulating Tumor DNA Modeling to Predict Disease Progression in First-Line Mutant Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

This exploratory, post hoc analysis aimed to model circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and predict disease progression in patients with treatment-naïve locally advanced/metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm)-positive non-small cell lung cancer, from the FLAURA trial (NCT02296125). Patients were randomized 1:1 and received osimertinib 80 mg once daily (q.d.) or comparator EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib 250 mg q.d. or erlotinib 150 mg q.d.). Plasma was collected at baseline and multiple timepoints until treatment discontinuation. Patients with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) imaging data and detectable EGFR mutations (Ex19del/L858R) at baseline and ≥ 3 additional timepoints were evaluable. Joint modeling was conducted to characterize the relationship between longitudinal changes in ctDNA and probability of progression-free survival (PFS). A Bayesian joint model of ctDNA and PFS was developed solving differential equations with the ctDNA dynamics and the PFS time-to-event probability. Of 556 patients, 353 had detectable ctDNA at baseline. Evaluable patients (with available imaging and ≥ 3 additional timepoints, n = 320; ctDNA set) were divided into training (n = 259) and validation (n = 61) sets. In the validation set, the model predicted a median PFS of 17.7 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.9-28.3) for osimertinib (n = 23) and 9.1 months (95% CI: 6.3-14.8) for comparator (n = 38), consistent with observed RECIST PFS (16.4 months and 9.7, respectively). The model demonstrates that EGFRm ctDNA dynamics can predict the risk of disease progression in this patient population and could be used to predict RECIST-defined disease progression.

Contribution of artifacts to N-methylated piperazine cyanide adduct formation in vitro from N-alkyl piperazine analogs.

In the liver microsome cyanide (CN)-trapping assays, piperazine-containing compounds formed significant N-methyl piperazine CN adducts. Two pathways for the N-methyl piperazine CN adduct formation were proposed: 1) The α-carbon in the N-methyl piperazine is oxidized to form a reactive iminium ion that can react with cyanide ion; 2) N-dealkylation occurs followed by condensation with formaldehyde and dehydration to produce N-methylenepiperazine iminium ion, which then reacts with cyanide ion to form the N-methyl CN adduct. The CN adduct from the second pathway was believed to be an artifact or metabonate. In the present study, a group of 4'-N-alkyl piperazines and 4'-N-[¹³C]methyl-labeled piperazines were used to determine which pathway was predominant. Following microsomal incubations in the presence of cyanide ions, a significant percentage of 4'-N-[¹³C]methyl group in the CN adduct was replaced by an unlabeled natural methyl group, suggesting that the second pathway was predominant. For 4'-N-alkyl piperazine, the level of 4'-N-methyl piperazine CN adduct formation was limited by the extent of prior 4'-N-dealkylation. In a separate study, when 4'-NH-piperaziens were incubated with potassium cyanide and [¹³C]-labeled formaldehyde, 4'-N-[¹³C]methyl piperazine CN-adduct was formed without NADPH or liver microsome suggesting a direct Mannich reaction is involved. However, when [¹³C]-labeled methanol or potassium carbonate was used as the one-carbon donor, 4'-N-[¹³C]methyl piperazine CN adduct was not detected without liver microsome or NADPH present. The biologic and toxicological implications of bioactivation via the second pathway necessitate further investigation because these one-carbon donors for the formation of reactive iminium ions could be endogenous and readily available in vivo.

A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate Absolute Bioavailability and Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion of Savolitinib in Healthy Male Volunteers.

Savolitinib is an oral MET (hepatocyte growth factor receptor) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with demonstrated preliminary efficacy in several cancer types. Previous pharmacokinetics assessments showed that savolitinib is rapidly absorbed but there are limited data on the absolute bioavailability and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of savolitinib. This open-label, two-part, phase 1 clinical study (NCT04675021) used a radiolabeled micro-tracer approach to evaluate absolute bioavailability and a traditional approach to determine the ADME of savolitinib in healthy male adult volunteers (N = 8). Pharmacokinetics, safety, and metabolic profiling and structural identification from plasma, urine, and fecal samples were also assessed. Volunteers received a single oral savolitinib 600 mg dose followed by intravenous 100 µg of [14 C]savolitinib in Part 1 and a single oral 300 mg [14 C]savolitinib dose (≤4.1 MBq [megabecquerel] [14 C]) in Part 2. Following Part 1, absolute oral bioavailability was 69%, the median time of maximum observed concentration was 3.5 hours, and the mean terminal half-life was 6.1 hours. Following Part 2, 94% of the radioactivity administered was recovered, with 56% and 38% in urine and feces, respectively. Exposure to savolitinib and metabolites M8, M44, M2, and M3 accounted for 22%, 36%, 13%, 7%, and 2%, respectively, of plasma total radioactivity. Approximately 3% of the dose was excreted as unchanged savolitinib in urine. Most savolitinib elimination occurred via metabolism by several different pathways. No new safety signals were observed. Our data show that the oral bioavailability of savolitinib is high and the majority of savolitinib elimination occurs via metabolism and is excreted in the urine.

Brain exposure of osimertinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases: A positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging study.

Brain metastases (BMs) are associated with poor prognosis in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible, EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor that potently and selectively inhibits EGFR-sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations with efficacy in EGFRm NSCLC including central nervous system (CNS) metastases. The open-label phase I positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study (ODIN-BM) assessed [11 C]osimertinib brain exposure and distribution in patients with EGFRm NSCLC and BMs. Three dynamic 90-min [11 C]osimertinib PET examinations were acquired together with metabolite-corrected arterial plasma input functions at: baseline, after first oral osimertinib 80 mg dose, and after greater than or equal to 21 days of osimertinib 80 mg q.d. treatment. Contrast-enhanced MRI was performed at screening and after 25-35 days of osimertinib 80 mg q.d.; treatment effect was assessed per CNS Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and per volumetric changes in total BM using a novel analysis approach. Four patients (aged 51-77 years) completed the study. At baseline, ~1.5% injected radioactivity reached the brain (IDmax[brain] ) 22 min (median, Tmax[brain] ) after injection. Total volume of distribution (VT ) in whole brain was numerically higher compared with the BM regions. After a single oral osimertinib 80 mg dose, there was no consistent decrease in VT in whole brain or BMs. After greater than or equal to 21 days' daily treatment, VT in whole brain and BMs were numerically higher versus baseline. MRI revealed 56%-95% reduction in total BMs volume after 25-35 days of osimertinib 80 mg q.d. treatment. The [11 C]osimertinib crossed the blood-brain and brain-tumor barriers and had a high, homogeneous brain distribution in patients with EGFRm NSCLC and BMs.

Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Single Dose of Acalabrutinib in Subjects With Hepatic Impairment.

Acalabrutinib received approval for the treatment of adult patients with mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 prior therapy and adult patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma. This study investigated the impact of hepatic impairment (HI) on acalabrutinib pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety at a single 50-mg dose in fasted subjects. This study was divided into 2 parts: study 1, an open-label, parallel-group study in Child-Pugh class A or B subjects and healthy subjects; and study 2, an open-label, parallel-group study in Child-Pugh class C subjects and healthy subjects. Baseline characteristics and safety profiles were similar across groups. Acalabrutinib exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve) increased slightly (1.90- and 1.48-fold) in subjects with mild (Child-Pugh class A) and moderate (Child-Pugh class B) hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects. In severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C), acalabrutinib exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration) increased ≈5.0- and 3.6-fold, respectively. Results were consistent across total and unbound exposures. Severe hepatic impairment did not impact total/unbound metabolite (ACP-5862) exposures; the metabolite-to-parent ratio decreased to 0.6 to 0.8 (vs 3.1-3.6 in healthy subjects). In summary, single oral dose of 50-mg acalabrutinib was safe and well tolerated in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment and in healthy control subjects. In subjects with severe hepatic impairment, mean acalabrutinib exposure increased by up to 5-fold and should be avoided. Acalabrutinib does not require dose adjustment in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.