RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Interventions targeting the adaptive immune response are needed in multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: Evaluate laquinimod's efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: CONCERTO was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase-3 study. RRMS patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive once-daily oral laquinimod 0.6 or 1.2 mg or placebo for ⩽24 months (n = 727, n = 732, and n = 740, respectively). Primary endpoint was time to 3-month confirmed disability progression (CDP). The laquinimod 1.2-mg dose arm was discontinued (1 January 2016) due to cardiovascular events at high doses. Safety was monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: CONCERTO did not meet the primary endpoint of significant effect with laquinimod 0.6-mg versus placebo on 3-month CDP (hazard ratio: 0.94; 95% confidence interval: 0.67-1.31; p = 0.706). Secondary endpoint p values were nominal and non-inferential. Laquinimod 0.6 mg demonstrated 40% reduction in percent brain volume change from baseline to Month 15 versus placebo (p < 0.0001). The other secondary endpoint, time to first relapse, and annualized relapse rate (an exploratory endpoint) were numerically lower (both, p = 0.0001). No unexpected safety findings were reported with laquinimod 0.6 mg. CONCLUSION: Laquinimod 0.6 mg demonstrated only nominally significant effects on clinical relapses and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes and was generally well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01707992).
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente , Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Método Doble Ciego , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/patología , Quinolonas , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
Glatiramer acetate (GA) is one of the first-line disease-modifying medications that have been approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis via immune modulatory mechanisms. However, it remains unclear whether the immunomodulation effect of GA is central nervous system (CNS) antigen specific. Here, we explored the mechanism of action of GA by subcutaneously injecting GA in experimental autoimmune neuritis (EAN) rats, an animal model for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Clinical, electrophysiological and histological findings showed that neurological deficits, demyelination and axonal injury of sciatic nerves were all significantly attenuated in Lewis rats when GA was administered before immunization with peripheral nervous system antigen P0. Our results further demonstrated that GA treatment inhibited either P0 or myelin basic protein (MBP) (CNS antigen)-stimulated auto-immune T-cell proliferation in vitro. GA administrated at 10 days after induction of EAN when neurological sign became apparent also ameliorated the severity of disease, inhibited T-cell response to P0 and MBP and induced shift of proinflammatory and immune modulatory cytokines. Collectively, our findings suggested that GA attenuated neurological deficits in EAN rats and that the immune modulatory mechanisms of GA were not CNS antigen specific.
Asunto(s)
Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Neuritis Autoinmune Experimental/tratamiento farmacológico , Péptidos/farmacología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Animales , Acetato de Glatiramer , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/inmunología , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/patología , Neuritis Autoinmune Experimental/inmunología , Neuritis Autoinmune Experimental/patología , Ratas , Ratas Endogámicas Lew , Linfocitos T/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) often report neuropathic pain (NP-MS). The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine as treatment for NP-MS. METHODS: In this study, 239 adults with NP-MS (duloxetine = 118, placebo = 121) were randomized to duloxetine 60 mg (30 mg for 1 week, then 60 mg for 5 weeks) or placebo once daily for a 6-week acute therapy phase, followed by a 12-week open-label extension phase (duloxetine 30 to 120 mg/day). Eligible patients had MS for ≥ 1 year and a score ≥ 4 on daily average pain intensity (API) ratings for ≥ 4 of 7 days immediately before randomization. Patients rated API daily on an 11-point numeric scale (0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain]) in an electronic diary. The primary efficacy measure, change in weekly API ratings, was analyzed longitudinally with a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis. Completion, reasons for discontinuation, and treatment-emergent adverse event incidence were compared by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Duloxetine-treated patients had statistically greater mean improvement in API vs. placebo at Week 6 (-1.83 vs. -1.07, P = 0.001). Treatment completion did not significantly differ between groups. Discontinuation due to adverse events was statistically greater for duloxetine vs. placebo (13.6% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.012). Decreased appetite was reported significantly more often by duloxetine-treated patients (5.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This study found analgesic efficacy of duloxetine for NP-MS. Duloxetine is not approved for treatment of this condition. The duloxetine safety profile of this study was consistent with the known profile in other patient populations.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Tiofenos/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/complicaciones , Método Doble Ciego , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possible buffering effect of cognitive reserve on symptom experience for multiple sclerosis (MS) disease course. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of longitudinal data from the North American Research Committee on MS Registry. SETTING: Registry study and web-based supplemental survey. PARTICIPANTS: People with MS (N=859). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two health outcome measures, the Symptom Inventory and the Performance Scales, were collected biannually over 1 and 6 years, respectively. Active and passive cognitive reserve was measured using the Stern Leisure Activities and the Sole-Padulles Childhood Enrichment tools, respectively. Linear regression, chi-square, multilevel random-effects modeling, and classification and regression tree modeling were used to compare cross-sectional means, disease course by cognitive reserve, longitudinal trajectories, and active cognitive reserve item endorsement by disability groups, respectively. RESULTS: Patients with high-active reserve had a lesser symptom burden than those with low-active reserve independent of passive reserve (P<.01). Cognitive reserve was associated with course of disease, such that high-active patients were overrepresented among relapsing-remitting patients, and underrepresented among patients with progressive disease (χ(2)=14.7, P<.03). Longitudinal modeling revealed a significant interaction of active reserve and time in mobility, fatigue, and overall disability in the whole sample (P<.05 in all comparisons). Among patients whose disability trajectories changed over time, active cognitive reserve was associated with less deterioration (P<.001). Passive cognitive reserve evidenced no effect in the longitudinal analyses. Active cognitive reserve scores across disability groups had a similar range but comprised different items, indicating that patients maintain active cognitive reserve with different activities as the disease progresses. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that active cognitive reserve is a buffer for functional limitation across disability groupings. Cognitive reserve may provide an alternative lens for thinking about the disease course of MS, providing a longer "runway" until disability accrual through cortical remodeling. Loss of cognitive reserve may explain the onset of progressive disease in MS.
Asunto(s)
Reserva Cognitiva , Esclerosis Múltiple/fisiopatología , Esclerosis Múltiple/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , PsicometríaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate safety (infusion-related reactions [IRRs]) and patient satisfaction (patient-reported outcomes [PROs]) for at-home ocrelizumab administration for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: This open-label study included adult patients with an MS diagnosis who had completed a ≥ 600-mg ocrelizumab dose, had a patient-determined disease steps score of 0 to 6 and had completed PROs. Eligible patients received a 600-mg ocrelizumab home-based infusion over 2 h, followed by 24-h and 2-week post-infusion follow-up calls. IRRs and adverse events (AEs) were documented during infusions and follow-up calls. PROs were completed before and 2 weeks post infusion. RESULTS: Overall, 99 of 100 expected patients were included (mean [SD] age, 42.3 [7.7] years; 72.7% female; 91.9% White). The mean (SD) infusion time was 2.5 (0.6) hours, and 75.8% of patients completed their ocrelizumab infusion between 2 to 2.5 h. The IRR incidence rate was 25.3% (95% CI: 16.7%, 33.8%)-similar to other shorter ocrelizumab infusion studies-and all AEs were mild/moderate. In total, 66.7% of patients experienced AEs, including itch, fatigue, and grogginess. Patients reported significantly increased satisfaction with the at-home infusion process and confidence in the care provided. Patients also reported a significant preference for at-home infusion compared with prior infusion center experiences. INTERPRETATION: IRRs and AEs occurred at acceptable rates during in-home infusions of ocrelizumab over a shorter infusion time. Patients reported increased confidence and comfort with the home infusion process. Findings from this study provide evidence of the safety and feasibility of home-based ocrelizumab infusion over a shorter infusion period.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Infusiones Intravenosas , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple/etiología , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ocrelizumab and rituximab are frequently used treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS). Data on switching from rituximab to ocrelizumab is limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency, severity, and factors of infusion related reactions (IRRs) in patients with MS who switch from rituximab to ocrelizumab, compared to those who stay on rituximab. METHODS: Prospective study on MS patients aged 18-65, on rituximab for at least 2 cycles, who either switched to ocrelizumab (switch group) or stayed on rituximab (comparator group) (n = 100 each). Participants were followed for IRRs, safety, and tolerability over 12 months. RESULTS: The proportion of IRRs in patients who continue on rituximab (14%) were similar to those who switched to ocrelizumab on Day 1 (14%; p = 1.000) and Week 24 (12%; p = 0.647) but higher than at Day 15 (4%; 0.005). The risk of IRRs for the switch group was associated with the presence of B cells (CD19 and/or CD20 counts ≥1%) increasing by 5.01 (1.49, 16.82) times on Day 1 (p = 0.007). Antidrug antibodies to ocrelizumab were not associated with IRRs. No other safety concerns were identified in switching to ocrelizumab. CONCLUSION: IRRs are similar between both groups, which suggests that it is safe to switch from rituximab to ocrelizumab.
RESUMEN
Objective: To evaluate plasma neurofilament light (NfL) levels in autoimmune neurologic disorders (AINDs) and autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Background: Each particular neural autoantibody syndrome has a different clinical phenotype, making one unifying clinical outcome measure difficult to assess. While this is a heterogeneous group of disorders, the final common pathway is likely CNS damage and inflammation. Defining a biomarker of CNS injury that is easily obtainable through a blood sample and reflects a positive treatment response would be highly advantageous in future therapeutic trials. Measurement of blood concentration of neurofilament light (NfL) chain, however, may provide a biomarker of central nervous system (CNS) injury in AE and other AINDs. Here we provide an initial evaluation of plasma NfL levels in AE as well as other AINDs during active and chronic phases of disease and demonstrate its potential utility as a minimally-invasive biomarker for AE and AINDs. Design/Methods: Patients were retrospectively identified who were enrolled in the biorepository at the Rocky Mountain MS Center at the University of Colorado, or were prospectively enrolled after initial presentation. Patients had a well-defined AIND and were followed between 2014 and 2021. NfL was tested using the Single Molecule Array (SIMOA) technology. Patients with headaches but without other significant neurologic disease were included as controls. Results: Twenty-six plasma and 14 CSF samples of patients with AINDs, and 20 plasma control samples stored in the biorepository were evaluated. A positive correlation was found between plasma and CSF NfL levels for patients with an AIND (R 2 = 0.83, p < 0.001). Elevated plasma levels of NfL were seen in patients with active AE compared to controls [geometric mean (GM) 51.4 vs. 6.4 pg/ml, p = 0.002]. Patients with chronic symptoms (>6 months since new or worsening symptoms) of AE or cerebellar ataxia (CA) showed a trend toward lower plasma NfL levels (GM 15.1 pg/ml) compared to active AE or CA. Six patients with longitudinal, prospective sampling available demonstrated a trend in decreased plasma NfL levels over time. Conclusions: Our findings support the use of plasma NfL as a potential minimally-invasive biomarker of CNS injury.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Interleukins 12 and 23 (IL-12/23) have been implicated in multiple sclerosis (MS) pathogenesis. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of ABT-874, a monoclonal anti-IL-12/23 antibody, in active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS). METHODS: In this 24-week study, patients with RRMS or SPMS received ABT-874 200 mg every other week (EOW), ABT-874 200 mg every week (EW), or placebo. The cumulative number of gadolinium-enhanced lesions, relapse rate, disability progression, and adverse events were measured. RESULTS: 215 patients were randomized (ABT-874 200 mg EOW, N = 76; ABT-874 200 mg EW, N = 70; placebo, N = 69). At week 24, gadolinium-enhanced lesions were statistically significantly reduced with ABT-874 200 mg EOW vs. placebo (mean number [SD]: 5.4 [8.1] vs. 7.6 [14.4], p = 0.003), but not with ABT-874 200 mg EW (6.8 [11.3], p = 0.134). Mean relapse rate (relapses/y) was significantly lower for ABT-874 200 mg EW vs. placebo (0.1 [95% CI -0.0, 0.3] vs. 0.5 [0.2, 0.8], p = 0.007). Changes from baseline in disability scores and incidences of adverse events were not significantly different across treatment groups, although a numerically greater percentage of serious adverse events was reported for ABT-874 treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although rates of adverse events were not significantly different between ABT-874 treatment groups and placebo, the magnitude of ABT-874 efficacy was less than that observed with other agents currently in development for MS treatment. Anti-IL-12/23 monotherapy does not appear to warrant further testing as monotherapy treatment for MS.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Interleucina-12/inmunología , Interleucina-23/inmunología , Esclerosis Múltiple Crónica Progresiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Canadá , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple Crónica Progresiva/diagnóstico , Esclerosis Múltiple Crónica Progresiva/inmunología , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/diagnóstico , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/inmunología , Efecto Placebo , Recurrencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The expression of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by neurons, microglia, and astrocytes suggests possibly diverse mechanisms by which natural nicotinic cholinergic signaling and exposure to nicotine could modulate immune responses within the CNS. In this study, we show that nicotine exposure significantly delays and attenuates inflammatory and autoimmune responses to myelin Ags in the mouse experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model. In the periphery, nicotine exposure inhibits the proliferation of autoreactive T cells and alters the cytokine profile of helper T cells. In the CNS, nicotine exposure selectively reduces numbers of CD11c(+) dendritic and CD11b(+) infiltrating monocytes and resident microglial cells and down-regulates the expression of MHC class II, CD80, and CD86 molecules on these cells. The results underscore roles of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and nicotinic cholinergic signaling in inflammatory and immune responses and suggest novel therapeutic options for the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders, including those that affect the CNS.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inmunología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/prevención & control , Encefalomielitis Aguda Diseminada/inmunología , Encefalomielitis Aguda Diseminada/prevención & control , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Nicotina/uso terapéutico , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Animales , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/patología , Diferenciación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Diferenciación Celular/inmunología , Células Cultivadas , Encefalomielitis Aguda Diseminada/patología , Femenino , Glicoproteínas/toxicidad , Activación de Linfocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Activación de Linfocitos/inmunología , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Proteína Proteolipídica de la Mielina/toxicidad , Glicoproteína Mielina-Oligodendrócito , Fragmentos de Péptidos/toxicidad , Linfocitos T/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: : In previous studies we and others have demonstrated an association with apolipoprotein (APOE) ε4 genotype and the presence of cognitive deficits in multiple sclerosis (MS). In this follow-up study, we have assessed whether APOE ε4 status exacerbates progression of cognitive deficits in MS. METHODS: : A total of 197 patients with MS were assessed for APOE genotype, and baseline cognitive performance was measured using a standardized battery of tests. One hundred seventy patients (86.3%) were clinically followed up for 1 year and were assessed for progression of cognitive deficits. RESULTS: : The APOE ε4 allele was present in 24.7% of patients. During 1-year follow-up, significant progression of cognitive deficits was found in APOE ε4 carriers (P=0.001) after logistic regression analysis controlling for sex, ethnicity, age, education, disease duration, severity, and subtype. CONCLUSIONS: : APOE ε4 carriers with MS have worsening progression of cognitive deficits than noncarriers. APOE ε4 carrier status predicts cognitive decline in verbal learning and memory.
Asunto(s)
Apolipoproteína E4/genética , Trastornos del Conocimiento/genética , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Esclerosis Múltiple/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Trastornos del Conocimiento/complicaciones , Trastornos del Conocimiento/psicología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Genotipo , Heterocigoto , Humanos , Masculino , Memoria , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/psicología , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Polimorfismo Genético , Aprendizaje VerbalRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review presents the hypothesis that loss of neurologic reserve explains onset of progressive multiple sclerosis (PrMS). RECENT FINDINGS: Evidence supporting the separate classification of PrMS and relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) is limited and does not explain PrMS or the response of these patients to therapy. SUMMARY: We argue that multiple sclerosis (MS) progresses along a continuum from RMS to PrMS, with differing levels of neurologic reserve accounting for phenotypic differences. In early MS, inflammation causes brain atrophy with symptoms buffered by neurologic reserve. As brain loss from normal aging and MS continues, reserve is depleted and effects of subclinical MS disease activity and aging are unmasked, manifesting as PrMS. Most therapies show limited benefit in PrMS; patients are older, have fewer inflammatory events, and the effects of aging cause continued loss of neurologic function, even if inflammation is terminated. Loss of neurologic reserve means patients with PrMS cannot recover function, unlike patients with RMS.
RESUMEN
Biomarkers are needed to guide therapeutic decision making in autoimmune and paraneoplastic neurologic disorders. Here, we describe a case of paraneoplastic collapsing response-mediator protein-5 (CRMP5)-associated transverse myelitis (TM) where plasma neurofilament light (NfL) chain and glial fibrillary protein (GFAP) levels were observed over a 14-month clinical course, correlating with radiographical and clinical outcome measures in response to treatment. Blood and CSF samples obtained at diagnosis as well as 7 and 14 months into treatment. At the time of initial diagnosis, both plasma NfL (782.62 pg/ml) and GFAP (283.26 pg/ml) were significantly elevated. Initial treatment was with IV steroids and plasma exchange (PLEX) followed by neuroendocrine tumor removal, chemotherapy, and radiation. After initial improvement with chemotherapy, the patient experienced clinical worsening and transient elevation of plasma NfL (103.27 pg/ml and GFAP (211.58 pg/ml) levels. Whole body positron emission tomography PET scan did not demonstrate recurrence of malignancy. Repeat PLEX and rituximab induction resulted in improvements in patient function, neurologic exam, and plasma biomarker levels. To our knowledge, this is the first described longitudinal, prospective analysis of neuronal injury biomarkers and association of clinical treatment outcomes in CRMP5 myelitis. Our findings suggest that clinical improvement correlates with NfL and GFAP concentrations.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinically stable multiple sclerosis (MS) patients often have negligible inflammatory MRI changes. Brain atrophy may provide insight into subclinical disease progression. The objective was to compare brain atrophy rates in stable patients on long term natalizumab treatment vs. age and gender matched healthy non-MS controls (HC) prospectively over two-years examining brain volume, cognition, and patient reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: MS patients treated with natalizumab for a minimum of 2 years, age 18-60 were recruited and compared with age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HC). Both groups were followed prospectively to obtain two years of consecutive magnetic resonance imaging, clinical and PRO data. Baseline normalized brain volume (NBV), yearly T2 lesion volume (T2LV), and percent brain volume change (PBVC) were measured using SIENAX, JIM 6.0, and SIENA respectively. Neuropsychological tests from the MACFIMS battery were selected to optimize assessments for impairments in the domains of information processing speed and memory. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) for domains of physical, mental and social quality of life were evaluated using the NeuroQol short forms. RESULTS: Forty-eight natalizumab and 62 HC completed all study visits. At baseline, unadjusted mean NBV (natalizumab=1508.80cm (Popescu et al., 2013) vs. HC=1539.23cm (Popescu et al., 2013); p=0.033) and median baseline T2LV (natalizumab=1724.62mm (Popescu et al., 2013) vs. HC=44.20mm (Popescu et al., 2013); p=<0.0001) were different. The mean PBVC at year 2, adjusted for gender and baseline age was -0.57% (CI: 0.7620, -0.3716) for natalizumab and -0.50% (-0.7208, -0.2831) for HC, but the difference between groups was not statistically significant (0.073%; p=0.62). Over the 2-year period, HC demonstrated mild improvements in some cognitive tests vs. natalizumab subjects. However, PROs were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Stable MS patients on natalizumab have similar brain volume loss as people who do not have MS, suggesting normalization of brain atrophy.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Adolescente , Adulto , Atrofia/patología , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/patología , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico por imagen , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple/patología , Natalizumab/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported treatment satisfaction is associated with medication adherence and persistence, making it increasingly important in the multiple sclerosis (MS) population, where disease modifying treatments (DMTs) can be vital in preventing accumulation of disability. Therefore, the valid assessment of treatment satisfaction is critical in MS care. The current study aimed to examine the validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - General Treatment Satisfaction (FACIT-TS-G) in an MS population. METHODS: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) data were collected from 555 MS patients (mean age 47.99±11.57; 76.4% female; 78.7% White/Caucasian) as part of routine clinical care. The FACIT-TS-G reliability, validity, and factor structure were examined. FACIT-TS-G scores were compared between DMT administration type (oral, injection, infusion) and examined as a possible predictor of switching DMT type at 1-to-2-year follow-up. RESULTS: The FACIT-TS-G showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.836), convergent validity, and known-group validity. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a single factor. DMT infusion administration was associated with slightly greater FACIT-TS-G scores than injection (p = 0.013, 95% CI: 0.269, 2.273) and oral administration (p = 0.030, 95% CI: 0.087, 1.717). FACIT-TS-G scores did not predict the likelihood of switching DMT type at follow-up (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings support the use of the FACIT-TS-G as a PRO measure of treatment satisfaction in MS. Moreover, results suggest DMT administration via infusion is associated with greater treatment satisfaction. Future research is needed to examine treatment satisfaction in the context of other outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Satisfacción Personal , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ocrelizumab is an approved MS treatment administered as two 300-mg intravenous infusions 2 weeks apart (Dose 1), each lasting approximately 2.5 hours, followed by single 600-mg infusions every 6 months lasting approximately 3.5 hours. Our objective was to evaluate shorter-duration ocrelizumab infusions in the Phase IIIb open-label SaROD study (NCT03606460). METHODS: Eligible patients received ocrelizumab 600-mg Dose 2 or 3 infused over approximately 2 hours (Cohort 1) or ocrelizumab 300-mg Dose 1, Infusion 2 over approximately 1.5 hours (Cohort 2). The primary endpoint was the number and proportion of patients experiencing Grade 3-4 infusion-related reactions (IRRs) in Cohort 1. Secondary endpoints included Grade 1-4 IRRs in both cohorts and Grade 3-4 IRRs in Cohort 2. RESULTS: Mean infusion times decreased by approximately 1.09 and 0.79 hours in Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively, compared with US prescribing information. IRRs, reported by 36% of 141 patients, were mild-to-moderate, with no observed Grade 3-4 IRRs. No IRR-related discontinuations occurred. No serious AEs, deaths, or new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: The IRR rate with ocrelizumab shorter-duration infusions was similar to that observed in the pivotal Phase III trials. Ocrelizumab can be infused over a shorter time without sacrificing patient safety.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
Background: Clinically stable multiple sclerosis (MS) patients on long-term therapy often have negligible acute inflammation on MRI. Brain atrophy may provide insight into subclinical disease progression in such populations. Objective: This study aims to compare brain atrophy for age- and gender-matched MS patients treated for >2 years with fingolimod (FTY) or glatiramer acetate (GA), examining brain volume, cognition, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods: Stable relapsing-MS patients, age 18-60, on FTY or GA for >2 years were followed up for 2 years. MRI brain and lesion volumes, cognitive measures, and PROs were collected at baseline and annually. Results: Forty-four FTY and forty-three GA patients completed baseline and year 2 visits. No differences in age, gender, or education were observed. Median EDSS was 2.0GA and 2.5FTY (p = 0.22). Treatment duration was longer for GA, 6.50GA vs. 3.73FTY years (p < 0.001). Baseline geometric mean T2LV were different, GA = 1,009.29 cm3 vs. FTY = 2,404.67 cm3 (p = 0.0071). Baseline brain volumes were similar, GA = 1,508 cm3 vs. FTY = 1,489 cm3 (p = 0.2381). Annualized atrophy rates, adjusted for baseline and at mean baseline value, were GA = -0.2775% vs. FTY = -0.2967% (p = 0.7979). No differences in cognitive measures or PROs were observed. Conclusions: Stable MS patients on long-term treatment with FTY and GA have similar brain volume loss rates. Differences in baseline disease severity may suggest patients with more aggressive disease treated with FTY may achieve similar brain volume loss rates as patients with milder baseline disease on GA.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Brain atrophy has been correlated with objective cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis but few studies have explored self-reported subjective cognitive concerns and their relationship to brain volume changes. This study explores the relationship between subjective cognitive concerns in multiple sclerosis and reduced brain volume in regions of interest implicated in cognitive dysfunction. METHODS: A total of 158 patients with multiple sclerosis completed the Quality of Life in Neurologic Disorders Measures (Neuro-QoL) short forms to assess subjective cognitive concerns and underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging. Regional brain volumes from regions of interest implicated in cognitive dysfunction were measured using NeuroQuant automated volumetric quantitation. Linear regression was used to analyze the relationship between subjective cognitive concerns and brain volume. RESULTS: Controlling for age, disease duration, gender, depression and fatigue, increased subjective cognitive concerns were associated with reduced thalamic volume (standardized ß = 0.223, t150 =2.406, P = 0.017) and reduced cortical gray matter volume (standardized ß = 0.240, t150 = 2.777, P = 0.006). Increased subjective cognitive concerns were not associated with any other regions of interest that were analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective cognitive concern in MS is associated with reduced thalamic and cortical gray matter volumes, areas of the brain that have been implicated in objective cognitive impairment. These findings may lend neuroanatomical significance to subjective cognitive concerns and patient-reported outcomes as measured by Neuro-QoL.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether rituximab induction followed by glatiramer acetate (GA) monotherapy is more effective than GA alone for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis with active disease. METHODS: This was a single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Fifty-five participants were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to either rituximab (R-GA) or placebo (P-GA) induction, followed by GA therapy initiated in all participants. Participants were followed up to 3 years. The primary endpoint was the number of participants with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA): those without relapse, new MRI lesions, and sustained change in disability. RESULTS: Twenty-eight and 27 participants received rituximab and placebo induction, respectively, with one participant in each arm withdrawing before 6-month MRI. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. At end of study, 44.44% of R-GA participants demonstrated NEDA vs 19.23% of P-GA participants (p = 0.049). Treatment failed for a smaller proportion of R-GA participants (37.04% R-GA vs 69.23% P-GA, p = 0.019), and time to treatment failure was longer (23.32 months R-GA vs 11.29 months P-GA, p = 0.027). Fewer participants in the R-GA arm had new lesions (25.93% R-GA vs 61.54% P-GA, p = 0.009), and there were fewer new T2 lesions (0.48 R-GA vs 1.96 P-GA, p = 0.027). Probability of demonstrating NEDA in the R-GA arm returned to baseline within the study period. There were no differences in adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Induction therapy with rituximab followed by GA may provide superior efficacy in the short term than GA alone in relapsing multiple sclerosis, but this benefit appears to wane within the study period. Larger studies are needed to assess sustainability of results. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01569451.
Asunto(s)
Acetato de Glatiramer/uso terapéutico , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Desmielinizantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Desmielinizantes/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Growing evidence indicates that B cells play a key role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). B cells occupy distinct central nervous system (CNS) compartments in MS, including the cerebrospinal fluid and white matter lesions. Also, it is now known that, in addition to entering the CNS, B cells can circulate into the periphery via a functional lymphatic system. Data suggest that the role of B cells in MS mainly involves their in situ activation in demyelinating lesions, leading to altered pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion, and a highly effective antigen-presenting cell function, resulting in activation of memory or naïve T cells. Clinically, B cell-depleting agents show significant efficacy in MS. In addition, many disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) traditionally understood to target T cells are now known to influence B cell number and function. One of the earliest DMTs to be developed, glatiramer acetate (GA), has been shown to reduce the total frequency of B cells, plasmablasts, and memory B cells. It also appears to promote a shift toward reduced inflammation by increasing anti-inflammatory cytokine release and/or reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine release by B cells. In the authors' opinion, this may be mediated by cross-reactivity of B cell receptors for GA with antigen (possibly myelin basic protein) expressed in the MS lesion. More research is required to further characterize the role of B cells and their bidirectional trafficking in the pathogenesis of MS. This may uncover novel targets for MS treatments and facilitate the development of B cell biomarkers of drug response.
Asunto(s)
Linfocitos B/efectos de los fármacos , Acetato de Glatiramer/farmacología , Acetato de Glatiramer/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Linfocitos B/metabolismo , Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos de los fármacos , Sistema Nervioso Central/metabolismo , Citocinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Inflamación/metabolismo , Esclerosis Múltiple/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laquinimod 0.6 mg is a once-daily, oral, disease-modifying therapy in development for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) that was investigated in two double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials: ALLEGRO and BRAVO. METHODS: Data from these studies were pooled to assess the safety profile of laquinimod versus placebo. Adverse events (AEs), laboratory value changes, and potential risks identified in preclinical studies were evaluated in participants in ALLEGRO and BRAVO treated with at least one dose of laquinimod or matching placebo (1:1 random assignment). RESULTS: In total, 1988 patients received at least one dose of study drug (laquinimod: n = 983 [mean ± SD duration, 639 ± 190 days]; placebo: n = 1005 [mean ± SD duration, 627 ± 198 days]). Early terminations due to AEs were infrequent (laquinimod: 6.4%; placebo: 4.7%). Death was reported in four patients (laquinimod: n = 1; placebo: n = 3). Rates of serious AEs (including malignancies, infections, and cardiovascular AEs) were similar between groups. The most common AEs identified with laquinimod use were back and neck pain and appendicitis. Laquinimod was also associated with asymptomatic changes in liver enzyme levels, fibrinogen levels, and hematologic parameters that followed a consistent temporal pattern: mild, nonprogressive, and occurring within 90 days of treatment initiation, then stabilizing or reverting to baseline levels during continued treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Data from these pivotal laquinimod studies demonstrate a safety profile comprising benign or manageable AEs and asymptomatic laboratory findings with a clear temporal pattern. Potential risks noted in preclinical studies were not observed.